Political Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 135–152 | Cite as

The Physiology of Political Participation

  • Michael W. Gruszczynski
  • Amanda Balzer
  • Carly M. Jacobs
  • Kevin B. Smith
  • John R. Hibbing
Original Paper

Abstract

Political involvement varies markedly across people. Traditional explanations for this variation tend to rely on demographic variables and self-reported, overtly political concepts. In this article, we expand the range of possible explanatory variables by hypothesizing that a correlation exists between political involvement and physiological predispositions. We measure physiology by computing the degree to which electrodermal activity changes on average when a participant sequentially views a full range of differentially valenced stimuli. Our findings indicate that individuals with higher electrodermal responsiveness are also more likely to participate actively in politics. This relationship holds even after the effects of traditional demographic variables are taken into account, suggesting that physiological responsiveness independently contributes to a fuller understanding of the underlying sources of variation in political involvement.

Keywords

Political participation Physiology Electrodermal activity Emotion 

References

  1. Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1246–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle, (2010). The politics. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, D. C., & Tinnick, J. D. (2006). Competing visions of parental roles and ideological constraint. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Blechert, J., Michael, T., Vriends, N., Margraf, J., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2007). Fear conditioning in posttraumatic stress disorder: Evidence for delayed extinction of autonomic, experiential, and behavioural responses. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2019–2033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brader, T. (2011). The political relevance of emotions: “Reassessing” revisited. Political Psychology, 32(2), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 581–599). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bradley, S. D., Angelini, J. R., & Lee, S. (2007). Psychophysiological and memory effects of negative political ads: Aversive, arousing, and well remembered. Journal of Advertising, 36, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. (2007). Psychophysiological science: Interdisciplinary approaches to classic questions about the mind. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., et al. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression: Moderation by a polymorhpism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301(5631), 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crider, A., Kremen, W. S., Xian, H., Jacobson, K. C., Waterman, B., Eisen, S. A., et al. (2004). Stability, consistency, and heritability of electrodermal response lability in middle-aged male twins. Psychophysiology, 41(4), 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1994). Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: The convergence zone framework. In C. Koch & J. L. Davis (Eds.), Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 61–74). Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dawson, M. E., Filion, D. L., & Schell, A. M. (1989). Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources? Psychophysiology, 26(5), 560–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2007). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  20. Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fowler, J. H. (2006). Altruism and turnout. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 674–683.Google Scholar
  22. Fowler, J. H., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Two genes predict voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 579–594.Google Scholar
  23. Galdi, S., Arcuri, L., & Gawronski, B. (2008). Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers. Science, 321, 1100–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gazzaniga, M. S. (2011). Who’s in charge?: Free will and the science of the brain. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  25. Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray, J. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4(3), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1788). The federalist. New York: Barnes and Noble Classics.Google Scholar
  29. Hanoch, Y. (2002). “Neither an angel nor an ant”: Emotion as an aid to bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2011). The normative implications of biological research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helzer, E. G., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22(4), 517–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. S. (2008). Reassessing the role of anxiety in vote choice. Political Psychology, 29(2), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). Effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers’ cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, H., Shackman, A. J., Jacobs, D. C., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Test-retest reliability of voluntary emotion regulation. Psychophysiology, 46(4), 874–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2003). Is political cognition like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking. Political Psychology, 24(4), 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcus, G. E. (2003). The psychology of emotion and politics. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 182–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, W. R. (2011). Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence. Political Psychology, 32(2), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., & Lees, J. L. (1990). Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 150–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDermott, R. (2004). The feeling of rationality: The meaning of neuroscientific advances for political science. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mondak, J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(01), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(01), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neblo, M. A. (2007). Philosophical psychology with political intent. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (1st ed., pp. 25–47). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1989). Applied linear regression models. Scarborough, ON: Irwin.Google Scholar
  52. Nikula, R. (1991). Psychological correlates of nonspecific skin conductance responses. Psychophysiology, 28(1), 86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. (1967). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  54. Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(01), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prior, M. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quevedo, K., Smith, T., Donzella, B., Schunk, E., & Gunnar, M. (2010). The startle response: Developmental effects and a paradigm for children and adults. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(1), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever “get it”? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rudolph, T. J., Gangl, A., & Stevens, D. (2000). The effects of efficacy and emotions on campaign involvement. Journal of Politics, 62(4), 1189–1197.Google Scholar
  60. Schell, A., Dawson, M., Nuechterline, K., Subotnik, K., & Venture, J. (2002). The temporal stability of electrodermal variables over a one-year period. Psychophysiology, 39, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). The mind body connection: Psychophysiology as an approach to studying political attitudes and behaviors. In The political animal. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011a). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e25552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011b). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Reconceptualizing political ideology. Political Psychology, 32(3), 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spezio, M. L., & Adolphs, R. (2007). Emotional processing and political judgment: Toward integrating political psychology and decision neuroscience. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (1st ed., pp. 71–96). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  65. Stanton, S. J., LaBar, K. S., Saini, E. K., Kuhn, C. M., & Beehner, J. C. (2010). Stressful politics: Voters’ cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(5), 768–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73, 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wahlke, J. C., & Lodge, M. (1972). Psychophysiological measures of political attitudes and behavior. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 505–537.Google Scholar
  71. Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael W. Gruszczynski
    • 1
  • Amanda Balzer
    • 1
  • Carly M. Jacobs
    • 1
  • Kevin B. Smith
    • 1
  • John R. Hibbing
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations