Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 311–330 | Cite as

From Fistfights to Firefights: Trait Aggression and Support for State Violence

  • Nathan P. Kalmoe
Original Paper

Abstract

Aggression is a fundamental component of human behavior, yet is mostly absent from scholarship on mass political behavior. This study proposes and tests a theory of state violence attitudes in which citizens develop preferences from aggressive personality traits. In an original nationally-representative survey, trait aggression strongly predicts support for violent state policies, as does its subcomponent trait anger, rivaling the power of partisanship. More provocatively, the well-documented gender gap in state violence attitudes replicated here is not attributable to sex differences in aggressive personality. This work builds on recent advances in political personality research and highlights the important role of aggression in political behavior.

Keywords

Trait aggression Trait anger State violence Gender gap 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Gerald R. Ford Fellowship and the Marsh Research Fellowship at the University of Michigan. The author thanks Don Kinder, Ted Brader, Nancy Burns, Nick Valentino, and the editors and anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback.

Supplementary material

11109_2012_9195_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Altemeyer, R. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. A., Benjamin, A. J., Wood, P. K., & Bonacci, A. M. (2006). Development and testing of the Velicer attitudes toward violence scale: Evidence for a four-factor model. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berinsky, A. (2009). In time of war. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berkowitz, L. (1993). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45(4), 494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(3), 422–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bettencourt, B. A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J., & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 751–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjorkvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3–4), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryant, F. B., & Smith, B. D. (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(2), 138–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bushman, B. J. (1995). Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 950–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 160(4), 348–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bushman, B. J., & Wells, G. L. (1998). Trait aggression and hockey penalties: Predicting hot tempers on the ice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 969–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carnagey, N. L., & Anderson, C. A. (2007). Changes in attitudes toward war and violence after September 11, 2001. Aggressive Behavior, 33(2), 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Marin, J., Craig, I. W., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297(5582), 851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the Internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 641–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coccaro, E. F., Bergeman, C. S., Kavoussi, R. J., & Seroczynski, A. D. (1997). Heritability of aggression and irritability: A twin study of the Buss–Durkee aggression scales in adult male subjects. Biological Psychiatry, 41(3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30(3), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eichenberg, R. C. (2003). Gender differences in public attitudes toward the use of force by the United States, 1990–2003. International Security, 28(1), 110–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erikson, R. S., & Stoker, L. (2011). Caught in the draft: The effects of Vietnam draft lottery status on political attitudes. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Franklin, C. H., & Jackson, J. E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review, 77(4), 957–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., & Couper, M. P. (2006). Complementing random-digit-dialing telephone surveys with other approaches to collecting sensitive data. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(5), 437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gamson, W. A., & McEvoy, J. (1970). Police violence and its public support. Annals of the American Academy, 391, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris, J. A. (1997). A further evaluation of the Aggression Questionnaire: Issues of validity and reliability. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 35(11), 1047–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2007). On the distinct effects of anxiety and anger. In W. Russell Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect (pp. 202–230). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Huesmann, L. R. (1988). An information processing model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Lefkowitz, M. M., & Walder, L. O. (1984). Stability of aggression over time and generations. Developmental Psychology, 20(6), 1120–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kinder, D. R. (1994). Reason and emotion in American political life. In R. Schank & E. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning, and decision-making. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Kinder, D. R., & Kam, C. D. (2009). Us against them. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuklinski, J. H., Sniderman, P. M., Knight, K., Piazza, T., Tetlock, P. E., Lawrence, G. R., et al. (1997). Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 402–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & Mackuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. McDermott, R., Tingley, D., Cowden, J., Frazzetto, G., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2009). Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(7), 2118–2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McIntyre, M. H., Barrett, E. S., McDermott, R., Johnson, D. D. P., Cowden, J., & Rosen, S. P. (2007). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in aggression during a simulated war game. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4), 755–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement. An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1997). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the south. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  48. Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neale, M. C., Nias, D. K., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Altruism and aggression: The heritability of individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1192–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sapiro, V., & Conover, P. J. (1993). Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1079–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shapiro, R. Y., & Mahajan, H. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(1), 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharpe, J. P., & Desai, S. (2001). The revised Neo Personality Inventory and the MMPI-2 Psychopathology Five in the prediction of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(4), 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Siever, L. J. (2008). Neurobiology of aggression and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(4), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Re-conceptualizing political ideology. Political Psychology, 32, 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, & coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tessler, M., Nachtwey, J., & Grant, A. (1999). Further tests of the women and peace hypothesis: Evidence from cross-national survey research in the Middle East. International Studies Quarterly, 43(3), 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tremblay, P. F., & Ewart, L. A. (2005). The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(2), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Valentino, N. A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. W. (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31(3), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson, E. O. (2004). On human nature (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zillmann, D. (1988). Cognition-excitation interdependencies in aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 14(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Michigan, Ann ArborAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations