Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11: Article 7. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/amichai-hamburger.html. Accessed 24 Aug 2010.
Aroopala, C. (2011). Are group sources always credible? An experimental study of sources, stakes, and participation. Journal of Theoretical Politics,
Barth, J., Overby, L. M., & Huffmon, S. H. (2009). Community context, personal contact, and support for an anti-gay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly,
Boudreau, C. (2009). Closing the gap: When do cues eliminate differences between sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens? Journal of Politics,
Brown, R., Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology,
Calvert, R. L. (1985). Robustness of the multidimensional voting model: Candidate motivations, uncertainty, and convergence. American Journal of Political Science,
Campbell, D. E., & Monson, J. Q. (2008). The religion card: Gay marriage and the 2004 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science,
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication,
Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics,
Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review,
Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2000). Preference formation. Annual Review of Political Science,
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science,
Egan, P. J. (2010). Findings from a decade of polling on ballot measures regarding the legal status of same-sex couples. Report prepared for the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund. June 15, 2010. http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2010/06/15/campaigns-on-same-sex-marriage-ballot-measures-fail-to-move-voters.html. Accessed 28 Nov 2010.
Frey, B., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. American Economic Review,
Gellman, A., Jeffrey, L., & Justin, P. (2010). Over time, a gay marriage groundswell. NewYorkTimes.com, August 21. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/weekinreview/22gay.html?_r=1&emc=eta1. Accessed 25 Aug 2010.
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review,
Grack, C., & Richman, C. L. (1996). Reducing general and specific heterosexism through cooperative contact. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality,
Green, D. P. (2009). Regression adjustments to experimental data: Do David Freedman’s concerns apply to political science? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Sept. 3, Toronto. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1466886.
Han, H. C. (2009). Does the content of political appeals matter in motivating participation? A field experiment on self-disclosure in political appeals. Political Behavior,
Hegatry, P., Pratto, F., & Lemieux, A. F. (2004). Heterosexist ambivalence and heterocentric norms: Drinking in intergroup discomfort. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,
Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). Some of my best friends: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexual’s attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research,
Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Hopper, R. (1998). What do we know about telephone conversation? In H. Sawhney & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in communications (Vol. 15, pp. 29–44). Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Karlan, D., & List, J. A. (2007). Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural experiment. American Economic Review,
Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: A.A. Knopf.
Kim, W. (2002). Personalization: Definition, status, and challenges ahead. Journal of Object Technology,
Lemm, K. M. (2006). Among interpersonal contact, motivation, and implicit and explicit attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality,
Lupia, A. (1992). Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information. American Political Science Review,
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review,
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, N., Brewer, M. B., & Edwards, K. (1985). Cooperative interaction in desegregated settings: A laboratory analogue. Journal of Social Issues,
Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology,
Moreno, K. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2001). Intergroup affect and social judgment: Feelings as inadmissible information. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,
Nelson, T. E., Sanbonmatsu, K., & McClerking, H. K. (2007). Playing a different race card: Examining the limits of elite influence on perceptions of racism. Journal of Politics,
Overby, L. M., & Barth, J. (2002). Contact, community context, and public attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Polity,
Peterson, K. (2004). 50-state rundown on gay marriage laws. Stateline.org.
http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1&contentId=15576. Accessed 28 Nov 2010.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Prestwich, A., Kenworthy, J. B., Wilson, M., & Kwan-Tat, N. (2008). Differential relations between two types of contact and implicit and explicit racial attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology,
Saad, L. (2010). Americans’ acceptance of gay relations crosses 50% threshold. Gallup.com, May 25, 2010. http://www.gallup.com/poll/135764/Americans-Acceptance-Gay-Relations-Crosses-Threshold.aspx. Accessed 2 Dec 2010.
Scarberry, N. C., Ratcliff, C. D., Lord, C. G., Lanicek, D. L., & Desforges, D. M. (1997). Effects of individuating information on the generalization of Allport’s contact hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). Field experiments in charitable contribution: The impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods. The Economic Journal,
Sherman, S. J., Crawford, M. T., & McConnell, A. R. (2004). Looking ahead as a technique to reduce resistance to persuasive attempts. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 149–174). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
Skipworth, S. A., Garner, A., & Dettrey, B. J. (2010). Limitations of the contact hypothesis: Heterogeneity in the contact effect on attitudes toward gay rights. Politics & Policy,
Smith, D. A., DeSantis, M., & Kassel, J. (2006). Same-sex marriage ballot measures and the 2004 presidential election. State & Local Government Review,
Solomon, M. (2010). Our constitution is a living, breathing document. http://www.bilerico.com/2010/08/our_constitution_is_a_living_breathing_document.php. Accessed 4 Aug 2010.
Soule, S. A. (2004). Going to the Chapel? Same-sex marriage bans in the United States, 1973–2000. Social Problems,
Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social Issues,
Stein, R. M., Post, S. S., & Rinden, A. L. (2000). Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly,
Vives, R. (2010). Activists mark Harvey Milk Day with door-to-door campaign. Los Angeles Times, May 23, 2010. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/23/local/la-me-harvey-milk-day-20100523. Accessed 4 Dec 2010.