Achen, C. H. (2005). Two-step hierarchical estimation: Beyond regression analysis. Political Analysis,
Adams, J. (2001). Party competition and responsible party government: A theory of spatial competition based upon insights from behavioral research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Adams, J., & Merrill, S., III. (2005). Candidates’ policy platforms and election outcomes: The three faces of policy representation. European Journal of Political Research,
Adams, J. F., Merrill, S., III., & Grofman, B. (2005). A unified theory of party competition. A cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (2004). Party system compactness: Measurement and consequences. Political Analysis,
Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science,
Bellucci, P. (2006). Tracing the cognitive and affective roots of ‘party competence’: Italy and Britain, 2001. Electoral Studies,
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Curtice, J. (2002). The state of election studies: Mid-life crisis or new youth? Electoral Studies,
Dalton, R. J. (2008). The quantity and the quality of party systems. Comparative Political Studies,
Dalton, R. J. (2010, forthcoming). Left–right orientations, context, and voting choices. In R. J. Dalton & C. J. Anderson (Eds.), Citizens, context and choice: How context shapes citizens’ electoral choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, R. J., & Anderson, C. J. (Eds.). (2010, forthcoming). Citizens, context and choice: How context shapes citizens’ electoral choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Ensley, M. J. (2007). Candidate divergence, ideology, and vote choice in U.S. Senate Elections. American Politics Research,
Erikson, R. S., & Romero, D. W. (1990). Candidate equilibrium and the behavioral model of the vote. American Political Science Review,
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,
Green, J. (2007). When voters and parties agree: Valence issues and party competition. Political Studies,
Hellwig, T. (2010, forthcoming). Context, political information, and performance voting. In J. D. Russell & J. A. Christopher (Eds.), Citizens, context and choice: How context shapes citizens’ electoral choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knutsen, O., & Kumlin, S. (2005). Value orientations and party choice. In J. Thomassen (Ed.), The European voter. A comparative study of modern democracies (pp. 125–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research,
Kriesi, H., Lachat, R., Selb, P., Bornschier, S., & Helbling, M. (Eds.). (2005). Der Aufstieg der SVP. Acht Kantone im Vergleich. Zürich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
Kriesi, H., & Trechsel, A. H. (2008). The politics of Switzerland: Continuity and change in a consensus democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kroh, M. (2009). The ease of ideological voting: Voter sophistication and party system complexity. In H. -D. Klingemann (Ed.), The comparative study of electoral systems (pp. 220–236). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). ‘Effective’ number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies,
Lachat, R. (2008a). The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies,
Lachat, R. (2008b). Switzerland: Another case of transformation driven by an established party. In H. Kriesi, et al. (Eds.), West European politics in the age of globalization (pp. 130–153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lachat, R., & Sciarini, P. (2002). When do election campaigns matter, and to whom? Results from the 1999 Swiss election panel study. In D. M. Farrell & R. Schmitt-Beck (Eds.), Do campaigns matter? Campaign effects in elections and referendums (pp. 41–57). London: Routledge.
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, J. B., & Linzer, D. A. (2005). Estimating regression models in which the dependent variable is based on estimates. Political Analysis,
Lijphart, A. (1997). The difficult science of electoral systems: A commentary on the critique by Alberto Penadés. Electoral Studies,
Lodge, M., & Hamill, R. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review,
Lutz, G., & Selb, P. (2007). The national elections in Switzerland. In U. Klöti, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Swiss politics (pp. 405–433). Zürich: NZZ Verlag.
Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Norris, P. (2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science,
Powell, G. B., Jr. (2004). Political representation in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science,
Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science,
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, M., & Herman, V. M. (1971). Party systems and government stability. American Political Science Review,
Thomassen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The European voter: A comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomassen, J., & Schmitt, H. (1997). Policy representation. European Journal of Political Research,
Tillie, J. (1995). Party utility and voting behavior. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
Van der Eijk, C., Schmitt, H., & Binder, T. (2005). Left–right orientations and party choice. In J. Thomassen (Ed.), The European voter. A comparative study of modern democracies (pp. 167–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van der Eijk, C., van der Brug, W., Kroh, M., & Franklin, M. (2006). Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies,
Westlye, M. C. (1991). Senate elections and campaign intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.