Sex and Race: Are Black Candidates More Likely to be Disadvantaged by Sex Scandals?
A growing body of work suggests that exposure to subtle racial cues prompts white voters to penalize black candidates, and that the effects of these cues may influence outcomes indirectly via perceptions of candidate ideology. We test hypotheses related to these ideas using two experiments based on national samples. In one experiment, we manipulated the race of a candidate (Barack Obama vs. John Edwards) accused of sexual impropriety. We found that while both candidates suffered from the accusation, the scandal led respondents to view Obama as more liberal than Edwards, especially among resentful and engaged whites. Second, overall evaluations of Obama declined more sharply than for Edwards. In the other experiment, we manipulated the explicitness of the scandal, and found that implicit cues were more damaging for Obama than explicit ones.
KeywordsRace Voting behavior Stereotypes
We thank Oleg Bespalov and John Lovett for valuable research assistance and Spencer Piston for helpful comments. Berinsky thanks the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences for research support.
- Abrajano, M., Nagler, J., & Alvarez, R. M. (2005). A natural experiment of race-based and issue voting: The 2001 city of Los Angeles elections. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 203–218.Google Scholar
- CNN/ORC. (2007). CNN/ORC poll # 2007–012: Economy/Iran/Iraq/2008 presidential election. Storrs: The Roper Center, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
- Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gadarian, S. (2008). The politics of threat: Terrorism, media, and foreign policy opinion. Ph.D. Dissertation. Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/33/32/3332408.html.
- Giddings, P. (1984). Gender and support for reagan: A comprehensive model of presidential approval. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 19–49.Google Scholar
- Hutchings, V. L. & Valentino, N. A. (2003). Driving the wedge: The structure and function of racial group cues in contemporary American politics. Presented at the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Keeter, S. & Samaranayake, N. (2007). Can you trust what polls say about Obama’s electoral prospects. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/408/can-you-trust-what-polls-say-about-obamas-electoral-prospects.
- Kinder, D. R. (1983). Diversity and complexity in American public opinion. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline. Washington: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
- Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Ladd, J. M. (2005). Attitudes toward the news media and voting behavior. Presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
- Lewis-Beck, M. S., Tien, C., & Nadeau, R. (2010). Obama’s missed landslide: A racial cost? PS: Political Science and Politics, 43, 69–76.Google Scholar
- McConnaughy, C. M. & White, I. K. (2009). Threatening stereotypes: Race, gender, and election 2008. Paper presented at Princeton Election 2008 Workshop, May 8–9, 2009.Google Scholar
- McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 895–918.Google Scholar
- Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Mendelberg, T. (2008a). Racial priming revived. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 109–123.Google Scholar
- Mendelberg, T. (2008b). Racial priming: Issues in research design and interpretation. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 135–140.Google Scholar
- Obama, B. (2004). Dreams from my father: A story of race and inheritance. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
- Pew (2007). Clinton pressed in Iowa, but holds solid leads elsewhere. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/report/374/democratic-primary-preview-iowa-new-hampshire-south-carolina.
- Reeves, K. (1997). Voting hopes or fears? White voters, black candidates and racial politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. Vol. 37, pp. 95–150). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Sears, D. O., Sidanius, J., & Bobo, L. (2000). Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Stout, C. & Kline, R. (2008). Ashamed not to vote for an African-American; ashamed to vote for a woman: An analysis of the Bradley effect from 1982–2006. Paper presented at APSA Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
- Tesler, M. & Sears, D. O. (2009). Barack Obama and the two sides of symbolic racism: Explaining the effects of racial resentment in the primaries and beyond. Paper presented at Princeton Election 2008 Workshop, May 8–9, 2009.Google Scholar
- Valentino, N. A. (2001). Review of the race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. By Tali Mendelberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Public Opinion Quarterly 65, 607–610.Google Scholar
- Williams, Representative John Bell (MS). (1956). In Congressional Record 102a, H5691–5694. Google Scholar