In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections
- 364 Downloads
This study uses an experimental design to simulate the ballot counting process during a hand-recount after a disputed election. Applying psychological theories of motivated reasoning to the political process, we find that ballot counters’ party identification conditionally influences their ballot counting decisions. Party identification’s effect on motivated reasoning is greater when ballot counters are given ambiguous, versus specific, instructions for determining voter intent. This study’s findings have major implications for ballot counting procedures throughout the United States and for the use of motivated reasoning in the political science literature.
KeywordsMotivated reasoning Partisanship Disputed elections Ballot counting
The authors would like to thank the following individuals for helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript: Lawrence Baum, Christopher Elmendorf, Edward Foley, Richard Hasen, Kathleen McGraw, Thomas Nelson, and Craig Volden. Additionally, the authors extend a special thank you to Mark Kopko for his assistance in constructing computerized ballot conditions. Earlier versions of this manuscript were presented at the 2009 meetings of the International Society of Political Psychology and the American Political Science Association.
- Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. A. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1997). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Dyck, J. J., & Seabrook, N. R. (2009). The problem with vote-by-mail. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Election Administration Research Center and Verified Voting Foundation. (2008). Poll workers. http://earc.berkeley.edu/poll.php. May 24, 2010.
- Erikson, R. S., & Tedin, K. L. (2007). American public opinion (7th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
- Foley, E. B. (2008). The original Bush v. Gore: An historical perspective on disputed elections. University Distinguished Lecture delivered at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
- Foley, E. B. (2009). Gubernatorial contests. Lecture delivered at the past, present, and future of disputed elections, sponsored by The University of Miami Law Review, University of Miami, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
- Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis-Beck, M., Norpoth, H., Jacoby, W., Converse, P., & Weisberg, H. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Minnesota Secretary of State. (2008a). Election reporting. http://electionresults.sos.state.mn.us/20081104/SenateRecount.asp. Accessed July 12, 2010.
- Minnesota Secretary of State. (2008b). Serve as an election judge. http://www.sos.state.mn.us/home/index.asp?page=585. Accessed July 12, 2010.
- Redlawsk, D. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64, 1021–1044.Google Scholar
- US Election Assistance Commission. (2008). 2008 election administration and voting survey. http://www.eac.gov/assets/1/Documents/2008%20Election%20Administration%20and%20Voting%20Survey%20EAVS%20Report.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2010.
- US Election Assistance Commission. (2009). EAC will award grants to recruit the next generation of poll workers. 2 June, 2009. http://archives.eac.gov/News/eac-will-award-grants-to-recruit-the-next-generation-of-poll-workers/. Accessed July 12, 2010.