Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 285–301 | Cite as

Does Economic Inequality Depress Electoral Participation? Testing the Schattschneider Hypothesis

  • Frederick SoltEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Nearly a half-century ago, E.E. Schattschneider wrote that the high abstention and large differences between the rates of electoral participation of richer and poorer citizens found in the United States were caused by high levels of economic inequality. Despite increasing inequality and stagnant or declining voting rates since then, Schattschneider’s hypothesis remains largely untested. This article takes advantage of the variation in inequality across states and over time to remedy this oversight. Using a multilevel analysis that combines aspects of state context with individual survey responses in 144 gubernatorial elections, it finds that citizens of states with greater income inequality are less likely to vote and that income inequality increases income bias in the electorate, lending empirical support to Schattschneider’s argument.

Keywords

Electoral participation Economic inequality Income bias Gubernatorial elections 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Stephen Bloom, Gina Branton, Tobin Grant, Evelyne Huber, Patrick Kenney, Melissa Marschall, Scott McClurg, Celeste Montoya, Peter Nardulli, Marco Steenbergen, and the editors and reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this work.

References

  1. Achen, C. H., & Shively, W. P. (1995). Cross-level inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters, 80, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APSA Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy. (2004). American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 651–670.Google Scholar
  4. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1970). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1975). Power and its two faces revisited: A reply to Geoffrey Debnam. American Political Science Review, 69(3), 900–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartels, L. M. (2006). Is the water rising? Reflections on inequality and American democracy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(1), 39–42.Google Scholar
  7. Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, W. D., Rubin, J. H., & Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 248–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brady, H. E. (2004). An analytical perspective on participatory inequality and income inequality. In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 667–702). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham, W. D. (1965). The changing shape of the American political universe. American Political Science Review, 59(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darmofal, D. (1999). Socioeconomic bias in turnout decline: Do the voters remain the same? Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  13. Debnam, G. (1975). Nondecisions and power: The two faces of Bachrach and Baratz. American Political Science Review, 69(3), 889–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, R. B. (2004). What, me vote? In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 703–728). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Frey, F. W. (1971). Comment: On issues and nonissues in the study of power. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 1081–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hacker, J. S. (2006). Inequality, American democracy, and American political science: The need for cumulative research. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(1), 47–49.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, K. Q., & Klarner, C. (2002). The many faces of elite power in the ‘System of 1896’. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1115–1136.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, K. Q., & Leighley, J. E. (1992). The policy consequences of class bias in state electorates. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill, K. Q., & Leighley, J. E. (1999). Racial diversity, voter turnout, and mobilizing institutions in the United States. American Politics Quarterly, 27(3), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirsch, B. T., Macpherson, D. A., & Vroman, W. G. (2001). Estimates of union density by state. Monthly Labor Review, 124(7), 51–55.Google Scholar
  25. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1993). Citizens, context, and politics. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 281–303). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobs, L. R., & Page, B. I. (2005). Who influences US foreign policy? American Political Science Review, 99(1), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langer, L. (1999). Measuring income distribution across space and time in the American States. Social Science Quarterly, 80(1), 55–67.Google Scholar
  30. Leighley, J. E., & Nagler, J. (1992). Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964–1988: The voters remain the same. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leighley, J. E., & Nagler, J. (2007). Unions, voter turnout, and class bias in the U.S. electorate, 1964–2004. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 430–441.Google Scholar
  32. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Patterson, S. C., & Caldeira, G. A. (1983). Getting out the vote: Participation in gubernatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 77(3), 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1988). Why Americans don’t vote. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  35. Polsby, N. W. (1963). Community power and political theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenstone, S. J., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1978). The effect of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 72(1), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  39. Schlozman, K., Lehman, B. I., Page, S., & Verba, M. F. (2004). Inequalities of political voice. Washington, DC: Task force on inequality and American democracy, American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  40. Shields, T. G., & Goidel, R. K. (1997). Participation rates, socioeconomic class biases, and congressional elections: A crossvalidation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 683–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Silver, B. D., Anderson, B. A., & Abramson, P. R. (1986). Who overreports voting? American Political Science Review, 80(2), 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60.Google Scholar
  43. Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. S. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tolbert, C. J., & Smith, D. A. (2005). The educative effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout. American Politics Research, 33(2), 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wolfinger, R. E. (1971). Nondecisions and the study of local politics. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 1063–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. (1980). Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations