Political Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 69–88 | Cite as

The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates

  • Kathleen Dolan
Original Paper


In 2009, women are still dramatically underrepresented in elected office in the United States. Though the reasons for this are complex, public attitudes toward this situation are no doubt of importance. While a number of scholars have demonstrated that women candidates do not suffer at the ballot box because of their sex, we should not assume that this means that voter attitudes about gender are irrelevant to politics. Indeed, individual attitudes towards women’s representation in government and a desire for greater descriptive representation of women may shape attitudes and behaviors in situations when people are faced with a woman candidate. This project provides a more complete understanding of the determinants of the public’s desire (or lack thereof) to see more women in elective office and support them in different circumstances. The primary mechanism proposed to explain these attitudes is gender stereotypes. Gender stereotypes about the abilities and traits of political women and men are clear and well documented and could easily serve to shape an individual’s evaluations about the appropriate level and place for women in office. Drawing on an original survey of 1039 U.S. adults, and evaluating both issue and trait stereotypes, I demonstrate the ways in which sex stereotypes do and do not influence public willingness to support women in various electoral situations.


Women candidates Gender stereotypes Descriptive representation 



The author wishes to thank Jennifer Lawless, Tom Holbrook, and the reviewers for their comments and suggestions.


  1. Alexander, D., & Andersen, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 527–545.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R., & Del Boca, F. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5, 219–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00287932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not All cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 65, 1040–1061. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brians, C. (2005). Women for women: Gender and party bias in voting for female candidates. American Politics Research, 33, 357–375. doi: 10.1177/1532673X04269415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrell, B. (1994). A woman’s place is in the house: Campaigning for congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burrell, B. (2008). Political parties, fund-raising, and sex. In B. Reingold (Ed.), Legislative women: Getting elected, getting ahead. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  7. Center for American Women, Politics. (2009). Women in elective office 2009. Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  8. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolan, K. (2004). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fox, R., & Smith, E. (1998). The role of candidate sex in voter decision making. Political Psychology, 19, 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fulton, S., Maestas, C., Maisel, L. S., & Stone, W. (2006). The sense of a woman: Gender, ambition, and the decision to run for congress. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen, S. (1997). Talking about politics: Gender and contextual effects on political proselytizing. Journal of Politics, 59, 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993a). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993b). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 503–525.Google Scholar
  15. Kahn, K. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. King, D., & Matland, R. (2003). Sex and the grand old party: An experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a Republican candidate. American Politics Research, 31, 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koch, J. (1997). Candidate gender and women’s psychological engagement in politics. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koch, J. (1999). Candidate gender and assessments of senate candidates. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 84–96.Google Scholar
  19. Koch, J. (2002). Gender stereotypes and citizens’ impression of house candidates ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawless, J. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 479–490.Google Scholar
  21. Lawless, J., & Fox, R. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lawless, J., & Pearson, K. (2008). The primary reason for women’s underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. Journal of Politics, 70, 67–82.Google Scholar
  23. Leeper, M. (1991). The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2006). Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenthal, C. S. (1995). The role of gender in descriptive representation. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 599–611.Google Scholar
  26. Rossenwasser, S., & Seale, J. (1988). Attitudes toward a hypothetical male or female presidential candidate—a research note. Political Psychology, 9, 591–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanbonmatsu, K. (2006). Where women run: Gender and party in the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sanbonmatsu, K. & Dolan, K. (2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party? Political Research Quarterly, 62.Google Scholar
  30. Sapiro, V. (1981/1982). If U.S. Senator Baker were a woman: An experimental study of candidate images. Political Psychology, 7, 61–83.Google Scholar
  31. Shapiro, R., & Mahajan, H. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simmons, W. (2001, January). A majority of Americans say more women in political office would be positive for the country. The Gallup Poll Monthly, 6–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Wisconsin MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations