Barker, D. C. (2002). Rushed to judgment: Talk radio, persuasion, and American political behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bartels, L. M. (2006). Three virtues of panel data for the analysis of campaign effects. In H. E. Bradyand & R. Johnston (Eds.), Capturing campaign effects. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96, 91–110.
Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Baum, M. A. (2005). Talk the vote: Why presidential candidates hit the talk show circuit. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 213–234. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.t01-1-00119.x.
Baumgartner, J. C. (2006). The American vice presidency reconsidered. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Baumgartner, J. C. (2007). Humor on the next frontier: Youth, online political humor, and the ‘jib-jab’ effect. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 319–338. doi:10.1177/0894439306295395.
Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The daily show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and the American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341–367. doi:10.1177/1532673X05280074.
Baym, G. (2005). The daily show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22, 259–276. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492.
Bennett, L. W. (2007). News: The politics of illusion (7th ed.). New York: Longman.
Brewer, P. R., & Cao, X. (2006). Candidate appearances on soft news shows and public knowledge about primary campaigns. The Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50, 18–35. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5001_2.
Brinkman, D. (1968). Do editorial cartoons and editorials change opinions? Journalism Quarterly, 45, 724–726.
Cable News Network (CNN). (2004). Transcript from CNN’s Crossfire, October 15, 2004. Transcript retrieved from transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/15/cf.01.html.
Dalton, R. J., Beck, P. A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media. American Political Science Review, 92, 111–126. doi:10.2307/2585932.
Davis, R., & Owen, D. (1998). The new media and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: How editorial slant affects voters. The Journal of Politics, 67, 1030–1049. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00349.x.
Folkenflik, D. (2003). Daily dose of media crit is dead-on: Satirical Daily Show punctures self-esteem of journalism’s hordes. Baltimore Sun, December 10, 2003, p. E10.
Fox, R. L., & Van Sickel, R. W. (2001). Tabloid justice: Criminal justice in an age of media frenzy. Boulder, CO: Rienner Press.
Freedman, J. L., Sears, D. O., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1978). Social psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Garofoli, J. (2004). Young voters turning to fake anchor for insight. San Francisco Chronicle, October 21, 2004, p. A1.
Hoffman, B. (2005). Apple power—New York honchos dominate 100 most influential. The New York Post, April 11, 2005, p. 17.
Hoffman, B. (2006). Oprah still reigns as TV queen. The New York Post, February 6, 2006, p. 7.
Holbert, R. L., Lambe, J. L., Dudo, A. D., & Carlton, K. A. (2007). Primacy effects of the Daily Show and national TV news viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 20–38.
Hollander, B. A. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 402–415. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_3.
Jones, D. A. (2002). The polarizing effect of new media messages. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 158–174. doi:10.1093/ijpor/14.2.158.
Jones, J. P. (2005a). Entertaining politics: News political television and civic culture. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Jones, J. A. (2005b). The masking effects of humor on audience perception of message organization. Humor, 18, 405–417. doi:10.1515/humr.2005.18.4.405.
Kahn, K. F., & Kenny, P. J. (2002). The slant of news. American Political Science Review, 96, 381–394. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000230.
Kenski, K., & Romer, D. (2006). Analysis of panel data. In D. Romer, K. Kenski, K. Winneg, C. Adasiewicz, & K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), Capturing campaign dynamics 2000 & 2004. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kuiper, N. A., McKenzie, S. D., & Belanger, K. A. (1995). Cognitive appraisals and individual differences in sense of humor: Motivational and affective implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 359–372. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00072-E.
Kurtz, H. (2004). The campaign of a comedian: Jon Stewart’s fake journalism enjoys real political impact. The Washington Post, October 23, 2004, p. A1.
Lyttle, J. (2001). The effectiveness of humor in persuasion: The case of business ethics training. Journal of General Psychology, 128, 206–216.
Morris, J. S., & Baumgartner, J. C. (2008). The Daily Show and attitudes toward the news media. In J. C Baumgartner & J. S. Morris (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age. New York: Routledge.
Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2005). Priming effects of late-night comedy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 198–210. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh092.
National Annenberg Election Survey. (2004). Daily Show viewers knowledgeable about presidential campaigns. National Annenberg Election Survey shows, http://www.naes04.org. Accessed 21 Oct 2004.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Niven, D. (1999). Partisan bias in the media? A new test. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 847–857.
Niven, D. (2001). Bias in the news: Partisanship and negativity in media coverage of presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6, 31–46. doi:10.1177/108118001129172215.
Niven, D. (2002). Tilt? The search for media bias. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Niven, D. (2003). Objective evidence on media bias: Newspaper coverage of congressional party switchers. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 311–326.
Osterhouse, R. A., & Brock, T. C. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 344–358. doi:10.1037/h0029598.
Panagopoulos, C. (2007). Follow the bouncing ball: Assessing convention bumps, 1964–2004. In C. Panagopoulos (Ed.), Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Patterson, T. E. (1994). Out of order. New York: Vintage Books.
Pew Research Center. (2004a). Cable and internet loom large in fragmented political news universe. News Release, January 11, 2004, http://www.people-press.org.
Pew Research Center. (2004b). News audiences increasingly politicized. Research report released June 8, 2004, www.people-press.org/reports.
Pew Research Center. (2006). Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership. Biennial Media Consumption Study. Report Released July 30, 2006, www.people-press.org/reports.
Schmidt, S. R. (1994). Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 953–967. doi:10.1037/0278-73126.96.36.1993.
Sinclair, R. C., Mark, M. M., & Clore, G. L. (1994). Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Social Cognition, 12, 309–326.
Sternthall, B., & Craig, C. S. (1973). Humor in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 37, 12–18. doi:10.2307/1250353.
Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. (1966). On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 325–342. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90026-6.
West, D. M. (2001). The rise and fall of the media establishment. Boston: St. Martin’s Press.
Young, D. G. (2004a). Late-night comedy in election 2000: Its influence on candidate trait ratings and the moderating effects of political knowledge and partisanship. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48, 1–22. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4801_1.
Young, D. G. (2004b). The counterargument-disruption model of political humor (CADIMO): An experimental exploration of the effects of late-night political jokes on cognitive elaboration and the conditional effects of partisanship. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, September 2–6, 2004.
Young, D. G. (2006). Late-night comedy and the salience of the candidates’ caricatured traits in the 2000 election. Mass Media & Society, 9, 339–366.
Young, D. G. (2008). The Daily Show as new journalism: In their own words. In J. C. Baumgartner & J. S. Morris (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age. New York: Routledge.
Young, D. G., & Tisinger, R. M. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors and exposure to various late-night shows. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 113–134. doi:10.1177/1081180X05286042.