Political Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 503–523 | Cite as

The Gender Gap in Ideology

Original Paper

Abstract

Over the past few decades, a gender gap has emerged in the mass public in ideological self-placement. While most men and women moved in the conservative direction, another segment of women retained their liberal self-identifications. A gender gap also exists in how men and women define their ideology. Which issues are linked to ideological identities is conditioned by gender and time period. Finally, ideological identities are structure by nonpolitical values as well as political issues. Religiosity and religious beliefs have come to increasingly shape Americans’ ideological identities, with some differences across the two sexes.

Keywords

Gender gap Ideology Issues Group alignments 

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, G. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 718–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardes, B. A., & Oldendick, R. W. (2007). Public opinion: Measuring the American mind (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomas Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Bartels, L. M. (2006). What’s the matter with What’s the matter with Kansas? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & De Boef, S. (2001). Macropartisanship and macroideology in the sophisticated electorate. Journal of Politics, 63, 232–248.Google Scholar
  6. Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carmines, E. G., & Woods, J. (2002). The role of party activists in the evolution of the abortion issue. Political Behavior, 24, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, S. J. (1988). Women’s autonomy and the gender gap: 1980 and 1982. In C. Mueller (Ed.), The politics of the gender gap. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Carsey, T. M., & Layman, G. C. (1999). A dynamic model of political change among party activists. Political Behavior, 21, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carsey, T. M., & Layman, G. C. (2006). Changing sides or changing minds: Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connelly, M. (2004). How Americans voted: A political portrait. New York Times, November 7, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Conover, P. (1988). Feminism and the gender gap. Journal of Politics, 50, 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conover, P., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, E. A., & Wilcox, C. (1991). Feminism and the gender gap: A second look. Journal of Politics, 53, 1111–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, E. A., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Gender in the 1992 elections. In H. Weisberg (Ed.), Democracy’s feast: The 1992 elections (pp. 195–219). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  17. DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race conscious programs: Principles or prejudices? American Journal of Political Science, 49, 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiorina, M. P., with Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2006). Culture war?: The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  22. Fite, D., Genest, M., & Wilcox, C. (1990). Gender differences in foreign policy attitudes: A longitudinal analysis. American Politics Quarterly, 18, 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frank, T. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
  24. Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 957–994.Google Scholar
  25. Gilens, M. (1988). Gender and support for Reagan: A comprehensive model of presidential approval. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Green, J. C., Guth, J. L., Smidt, C. E., & Kellstedt, L. A. (1996). Religion and the culture wars: Dispatches from the front. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  27. Hamill, R. C., Lodge, M., & Blake, F. (1985). The breadth, depth, and utility of class, partisan, and ideological schemata. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 850–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howell, S. E., & Day, C. L. (2000). The complexities of the gender gap. Journal of Politics, 62, 858–874.Google Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Jacoby, W. G. (1986). Levels of conceptualization and reliance on the liberal-conservative continuum. Journal of Politics, 48, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jarvis, S. (2005). The talk of the party: Political labels, symbolic capital, and American life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Jelen, T. G., Thomas, S., & Wilcox, C. (1994). The gender gap in comparative perspective: Gender differences in abstract ideology and concrete issues in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 25, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kanthak, K., & Norrander, B. (2004). The enduring gender gap. In H. F. Weisberg & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Models of voting in Presidential Elections: The 2000 U.S. election (pp. 141–160). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kaufmann, K. M. (2002). Culture wars, secular realignment, and the gender gap in party identification. Political Behavior, 24, 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaufmann, K. M., & Petrocik, J. R. (1999). The changing politics of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 864–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Killian, M., & Wilcox, C. (2008). Do abortion attitudes lead to party switching? Forthcoming, Political Research Quarterly.Google Scholar
  39. Klein, E. (1984). Gender politics: From consciousness to mass politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Knight, K. (1985). Ideology in the 1980 election: Ideological sophistication does matter. Journal of Politics, 47, 828–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knight, K. (2006). Transformations of the concept of ideology in the Twentieth Century. American Political Science Review, 100, 619–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kohut, A., Green, J. C., Keeter, S., & Toth, R. C. (2000). The diminishing divide: Religion’s changing role in American politics. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  43. Layman, G. (2001). The great divide. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Leege, D. C., Wald, K. D., Krueger, B. S., & Mueller, P. D. (2002). The politics of cultural differences: Social change and voter mobilization strategies in the post-new deal period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Levine, J., Carmines, E. G., & Huckfeldt, R. (1997). The rise of ideology in the post-New Deal party system, 1972–1992. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Levitin, T. E., & Miller, W. E. (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections. American Political Science Review, 73, 751–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1979). The changing American voter, enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Norrander, B. (1999a). Is the gender gap growing? In H. Weisberg & J. Box-Steffensmeier (Eds.), Reelection 1996: How Americans voted (pp. 145–161). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  49. Norrander, B. (1999b). Evolution of the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 566–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sapiro, V. (2002). It’s the context, situation, and question, stupid: The gender basis of public opinion. In B. Norrander & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Understanding public opinion (2nd ed., pp. 21–42). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sapiro, V., with Conover, P. J. (1997). The variable gender basis of electoral politics: Gender and context in the 1992 U.S. election. British Journal of Political Science, 27, 497–523.Google Scholar
  53. Saunders, K. L., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2004). Ideological realignment and active partisans in the American electorate. American Politics Research, 32, 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schlesinger, M., & Heldman, C. (2001). Gender gap or gender gaps: New perspectives on support for government action and policies. Journal of Politics, 63, 59–92.Google Scholar
  55. Schlesinger, M., & Lau, R. R. (2000). The meaning and measure of policy metaphors. American Political Science Review, 94, 611–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schreckhise, W. D., & Shields, T. G. (2003). Ideological realignment in the contemporary U.S. electorate revisited. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., & Allen, H. M., Jr. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seltzer, R. A., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates & voters in U.S. elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  59. Sharp, C., & Lodge, M. (1985). Partisan and ideological belief systems: Do they differ? Political Behavior, 7, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shapiro, R., & Mahajan, H. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1970s and 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tate, K. (1994). From protest to politics: The new black voters in American elections, enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wilcox, C., & Norrander, B. 2002. Of moods and morals: The dynamics of opinion on abortion and gay rights. In Barbara Norrander & Clyde Wilcox (Eds.), Understanding public opinion (2nd ed., pp. 121–148). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wirls, D. (1986). Reinterpreting the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of GovernmentGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations