Political Behavior

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 465–491 | Cite as

Does Political Advertising Persuade?

Original Paper


Well over $1 billion was spent on televised political advertising in the U.S. in 2004. Given the ubiquity of the 30 second spot, one might presume that ads must affect viewers’ vote choices. Somewhat surprisingly, though, scholars have yet to make much progress in confirming this claim. In this paper, we leverage a comprehensive dataset that tracks political ads in the nation’s top media markets and a survey of presidential and U.S. Senate voters in 2004. We ask whether exposure to presidential and Senate advertising influences voters’ evaluations of candidates and the choices that they make at the ballot box. In the end, we find considerable evidence that advertising persuades—and that its impact varies depending on the characteristics of the viewer.


Political advertising Elections Campaign effects Persuasion 


  1. Althaus, S. L., Nardulli, P. F., & Shaw, D. R. (2001). Campaign effects on Presidential voting, 1992–2000. Working Paper, San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going Negative: How Political Advertising Shrinks and Polarizes the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1999). Replicating experiments using aggregate and survey data: The case of negative advertising and turnout. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 901–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, C. (2001). The impact of emotion elicited by print political advertising on candidate evaluation. Media Psychology, 3(2), 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, C. (2003). Party bias in political-advertising processing: Results from an experiment involving the 1998 Taipei Mayoral Election. Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 55–67.Google Scholar
  6. Converse, P. E. (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(4), 578–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Djupe, P. A., & Peterson, D. A. M. (2002). the impact of negative campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 senatorial primaries. Political Research Quarterly, 55(4), 845–860.Google Scholar
  8. Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1189–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freedman, P., Franz, M., & Goldstein, K. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 723–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garramone, G., Atkin, C. K., Pinkleton, B. E., & Cole, R. T. (1990). Effects of negative political advertising on the political process. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 299–311. .Google Scholar
  11. Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1189–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (2000). New evidence for new arguments: Money and advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections. Journal of Politics, 62(4), 1087–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (2002a). Campaign advertising and voter turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect. Journal of Politics, 64(3), 721–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldstein, K. M., & Freedman, P. (2002b). Lessons learned: Campaign advertising in the 2000 elections. Political Communication, 19, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, D. P., & Krasno, J. S. (1988) Salvation for the spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 884–907.Google Scholar
  16. Green, D. P., & Krasno, J. S. (1990). Rebuttal to Jacobson’s ‘New Evidence for Old Arguments’. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Impact of negative advertising on evaluations of political candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(2), 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hitchon, J. C., & Chang, C. (1995). Effects of gender schematic processing on the reception of political commercials for men and women candidates. Communication Research, 22(4), 430–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holbrook, T. (1996). Do campaigns matter?. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. F. (2000). New Perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobson, G. C. (1997). The politics of congressional elections (4th ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  22. Jacobson, G. C. (1990). The effects of campaign spending in house elections: New evidence for old arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 334–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, R., Hagen, M. G., & Jamieson, K. H. (2004). The 2000 presidential election and the foundations of party politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Joslyn, M. R. (2003). The determinants and consequences of recall error about Gulf war preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahn, K. F., & Geer, J. G. (1994). Creating impressions: An experimental investigation of political advertising on television. Political Behavior, 16(1), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? American Political Science Review, 93(4), 877–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaid, L. L. (1997). Effects of the television spots on images of Dole and Clinton. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(August), 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaid, L. L., & Boydston, J. (1987). An experimental study of the effectiveness of negative political advertisements. Communication Quarterly, 35, 193–201.Google Scholar
  29. King, G., Michael, T., & Jason, W. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klapper, J. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf war on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 963–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.Google Scholar
  33. Lau, R. R., & Pomper, G. M. (2004). Negative campaigning: An analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield Press. .Google Scholar
  34. Leighley, J. E. (2004). Mass media and politics: A social science perspective. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, P. S. (2004). Inside the black box of negative campaign effects: Three reasons why negative campaigns mobilize. Political Psychology, 25(4), 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In: G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 136–314). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. .Google Scholar
  37. McGuire, W. J. (1986). The myth of a massive media impact: Savagings and salvagings. Public Communication Behavior, 1, 173–257.Google Scholar
  38. Memmott, M., & Drinkard, J. (2004). Election ad battle smashes record in 2004: Group questions the value of costly campaigns to USA. USA Today. November 24.Google Scholar
  39. Meirick, P. (2002). Cognitive responses to negative and comparative political advertising. Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
  40. Peterson, D. A. M., & Djupe, P. A. (2005). When primary campaigns go negative: The determinants of campaign negativity. Political Research Quarterly, 58(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
  41. Pfau, M., Park, D., Holbert, R. L., & Cho, J. (2001). The effects of party- and PAC-sponsored issue advertising and the potential of inoculation to combat its impact on the democratic process. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2379–2397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pfau, M., Holbert, R. L., Szabo, E. A., & Kaminski, K. (2002). Issue-advocacy versus candidate advertising: Effects on candidate preferences and democratic process. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinkleton, B. E. (1997). The effects of negative comparative political advertising on candidate evaluations and advertising evaluations: An exploration. Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 19–29.Google Scholar
  44. Pinkleton, B. E. (1998). Effects of print comparative political advertising on political decision-making and participation. Journal of Communication, 48(4), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ridout, T. N., Shah, D. V., Goldstein, K. M., & Franz, M. M. (2004). Evaluating measures of campaign advertising exposure on political learning. Political Behavior, 26(3), 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schenck-Hamlin, W., & Procter, D. (2000). The influence of negative advertising frames on political cynicism and politician accountability. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scott, D. R., & Solomon, D. (1998). What is wearout anyway? Journal of Advertising Research, 27(5), 19–28.Google Scholar
  48. Shaw, D. R. (1999). The effect of TV ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988–1996. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaw, D. R. (2006). The race to 270: The electoral college and the campaign strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Thorson, E., Christ, W. G., & Caywood, C. (1991). Effects of issue-image strategies, attack and support appeals, music, and visual content in political commercials. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35(4), 465–486.Google Scholar
  51. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & Williams, D. (2004). The impact of political advertising on knowledge, internet information seeking, and candidate preference. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wattenberg M. P., & Brians, C. (1999). Negative campaign advertising: demobilizer or mobilizer?. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 891–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. West, D. (1994). Political advertising and news coverage in the 1992 California United States Senate Campaigns. Journal of Politics, 56(4), 1053–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Zaller, J. (1996). The myth of massive media impact revisited. In: D. C. Mutz, P. M. Sniderman, & R. A. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 17–78). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Government and Legal StudiesBowdoin CollegeBrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Political ScienceWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations