Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 259–283 | Cite as

Nonparticipation as Self-Censorship: Publicly Observable Political Activity in a Polarized Opinion Climate

  • Andrew F. HayesEmail author
  • Dietram A. Scheufele
  • Michael E. Huge
Original Paper

Abstract

In a polarized opinion climate, people may refrain from participating in publicly observable political activities that make them vulnerable to scrutiny and criticism by others who hold opinions that differ from their own. We took a dispositional approach to testing this claim by determining whether people who are relatively more influenced by the climate of opinion when choosing whether or not to voice an opinion, measured with the Willingness to Self-Censor scale [Hayes et al. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (2005) 298], are also relatively less likely to engage in public political activities. In a poll of residents of the United States, we found that even after controlling for interest in politics, political ideology, ideological extremity, political efficacy, attention to political news, dispositional shyness, frequency of political discussion, and demographics, dispositional self-censors reported having engaged in relatively fewer public political activities over the prior 2 years compared to those less willing to censor their own opinion expression. These results are consistent with our interpretation of political participation as a social process that is governed in part by the social psychological implications of participation to the person. At a larger theoretical level, our findings connect the literature on opinion perceptions and opinion expression with research on political participation.

Keywords

Political participation Disagreement Self-censorship Public opinion Opinion expression 

References

  1. Abrams, J. (2004, June 26). Civility noticeably absent in Congress. Columbus Dispatch, p. A3.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, V. L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed)., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 133–175.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, Leadership, and Men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.Google Scholar
  5. Associated Press (2005, December 6). Mericki treated at hospital after beating. Associated Press Wire Service.Google Scholar
  6. Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carmines, E. G. (1991). Psychological antecedents of adolescent political involvement: Personal competence and political behavior. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 3, 79–98.Google Scholar
  8. Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 330–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, A., Vigoda, E., & Samorty, A. (2001). Analysis of the mediating effect of personal–psychological variables on the relationship between socioeconomic status and political participation: A structural equations framework. Political Psychology, 22, 727–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deustch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of individual and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Froming, W. J., & Carver, C. S. (1981). Divergent influences of private and public self-consciousness in a compliance paradigm. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analysis of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert, C. (2004, October 28). An uncivil season: Volunteers fend off epithets, rocks and worse during intense campaign season. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, p. A1.Google Scholar
  15. Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the spiral of silence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 452–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison, T. (1940). What is public opinion? The Political Quarterly, 11, 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., Shanahan, J., & Uldall, B. (2003, May). Individual differences in willingness to self-censor. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005a). Willingness to self-censor: A construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 298–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005b). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, M. (2004). Public opinion and social context. In G. G. John (Ed.), Public opinion and polling around the world (pp. 339–345). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lennox, R., & Wolfe, R. (1984). Revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. S. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. American Statistician, 54, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maslach, C., Stapp, J., & Santee, R. T. (1985). Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 729–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McLeod, J. M., Daily, C., Eveland, W. P., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, S. (1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23, 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morris, W. N., & Miller, R. S. (1975). The effects of consensus-breaking and consensus preempting partners on reduction of conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moy, P., Domke, D. S., & Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 7–25.Google Scholar
  32. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2005). Mplus v3 [computer program]. Los Angeles, CA: Authors.Google Scholar
  33. Mutz, D. C. (1997). Mechanisms of momentum: Does thinking make it so? Journal of Politics, 59, 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nie, N. H., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17, 422–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nisbet, M. C. (2004). The polls-trends—Public opinion about stem cell research and human cloning. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—our social skin (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pew Research Center for People and the Press (2003, November 5). The 2004 political landscape: Evenly divided and increasingly polarized. Washington, DC: Author. (Downloadable from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=196).Google Scholar
  42. Raum, T. (2003, September 7). Politics in U.S. becoming less civil. Columbus Dispatch, p. A5.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenberg, M. (1954–1955). Some determinants of political apathy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18, 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Santee, R. T., & Maslach, C. (1982). To agree or not to agree: Personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 690–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 727–743.Google Scholar
  48. Scheufele, D. A., & Eveland, W. P. (2001). Perceptions of ‘public opinion’ and ‘public’ opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., & Brossard, D. (2003). Pathways to political participation? Religion, communication contexts, and mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 300–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlet. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scheufele, D. A., & Ostman, R. E. (2003). Communication and civic participation: A proposed research agenda. In: J. Harper, & T. Yantek (Eds), Media, profit, and politics: Competing priorities in an open society (pp. 77–90). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schlozman, K. L., Nancy B., & Sidney V. (1994). Gender and the pathways to participation: The role of resources. Journal of Politics, 56, 963–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shanahan, J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lee, E. (2001). The polls-trends—Attitudes about agricultural biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaw, G. M. (2003). The polls-trends—Abortion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shaw, G. M., Shapiro, R. Y., Lock, S., & Jacobs, L. R. (1998). The polls-trends: Crime, the police, and civil liberties. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  59. Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Willnat, L., Lee, W., & Detenber, B. H. (2002). Individual-level predictors of public outspokenness: A test of the spiral of silence theory in Singapore. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., Levinsohn, H., & Al-Haj, M. (1996). The dimensions of expression inhibition: Perceptions of obstacles to free speech in three cultures. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 229–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew F. Hayes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dietram A. Scheufele
    • 2
  • Michael E. Huge
    • 1
  1. 1.School of CommunicationThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.School of Journalism and Mass CommunicationUniversity of Wisconsin—MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations