Skip to main content
Log in

On the Nature of Tolerance: Dichotomous or Continuous?*

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

The purpose of this article is to reconsider the claim made recently by Mondak and Sanders that political tolerance ought to be thought to be a dichotomous rather than continuous variable. Using data from both Russia and the United States, I demonstrate that those Mondak and Sanders regard as uniquely tolerant are most likely no more than people who were given insufficient opportunity to express their intolerance. Even if such a phenomenon of “absolute tolerance” exists (all ideas expressed in all ways are to be tolerated), it is sufficiently rare that few practical implications are indicated for those doing empirical work on political tolerance and intolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gibson L. James (1992) ArticleTitleAlternative measures of political tolerance: Must tolerance be ‘least-liked’? American Journal of Political Science 36 IssueID2, May 560–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L. James (1996) ArticleTitle‘A mile wide but an inch deep’ (?): The structure of Democratic commitments in the former USSR American Journal of Political Science 40 IssueID2, May 396–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L. James Bingham D. Richard (1985) Civil Liberties and Nazis: The Skokie Free-Speech Controversy Praeger New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L. James Caldeira A. Gregory (1998) ArticleTitleChanges in the legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A post-Maastricht analysis British Journal of Political Science 28 IssueID1, January 63–91 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0007123498000106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L. James Gouws Amanda (2003) Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings M. Kent Deth W. Jan Particlevan (1989) Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies Walter de Gruyter Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish Leslie (1965) Survey Sampling John Wiley and Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak J. Jeffrey Sanders S. Mitchell (2003) ArticleTitleTolerance and intolerance, 1976–1998 American Journal of Political Science 47 IssueID3, July 492–502 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1540-5907.00035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie H. Norman Juan Jane Stehlik-Barry Kenneth (1996) Education and Democratic Citizenship in America University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer C. Samuel (1955) Communism Conformity and Civil Liberties Doubleday New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan L. John Piereson E. James Marcus E. George (1982) Political Tolerance and American Democracy The University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

* I appreciate the valuable comments of Jeffcry Mondak on an earlier version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, J.L. On the Nature of Tolerance: Dichotomous or Continuous?*. Polit Behav 27, 313–323 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3764-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3764-3

Keywords

Navigation