Political Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 71–97 | Cite as

Issue Convergence in Presidential Campaigns

Article

Abstract

This effort seeks to expand our understanding of the supply-side of the campaign process by investigating how candidate competition for agenda control affects occurrences of issue convergence (the discussion of the same issues by competing candidates) in campaigns for the presidency. More specifically, I integrate hypotheses suggested by extant literature into a framework that captures the factors that motivate presidential candidates’ selection of issues and the factors that affect their decisions to address issues also discussed by their opponents. These hypotheses are tested with duration analysis and data gathered from all available campaign advertisements produced by candidates competing in the 1976 through 1996 presidential elections. The results indicate that occurrences of issue convergences are quite frequent in presidential campaigns and that candidates’ decisions to address the same issues are affected by an issue’s saliency and partisan ownership, as well by changes in the campaign environment.

Keywords

presidential campaigns agenda setting candidate strategy campaign communication campaign issues 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, John A., John, D. Griffin 2003

    The presidency and the campaign: creating voter priorities in the 2000 election.

    Nelson, Michael eds. The Presidency and the Political System7Congressional Quarterly PressWashington DC239256
    Google Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shanto, Iyengar 1995Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate.Free PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto 1994Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues.Public Opinion Quarterly58335357Google Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D. 1993Agendas and Instability in American PoliticsUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Christopher, Zorn 2002Duration models for repeated events.The Journal of Politics6410691094Google Scholar
  6. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Christopher, Zorn 2001Duration models and proportional hazards in political science.American Journal of Political Science4597288Google Scholar
  7. Budge, Ian 1993

    Issues, dimensions, and agenda change in postwar democracies: longterm trends in party election programs and newspaper reports in twenty-three democracies.

    Riker, William eds. Agenda FormationUniversity of Michigan PressAnn Arbor4180
    Google Scholar
  8. Burstein, Paul 2003The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda.Political Research Quarterly562940Google Scholar
  9. Chong, Dennis 1996

    Creating common frames of reference on political issues

    Mutz, Diana C.Sniderman, Paul M.Brody, Richard A. eds. Political Persuasion and Attitude Change.University of Michigan PressAnn Arbor195224
    Google Scholar
  10. Damore, David F. 2004The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns.Political Research Quarterly57391397Google Scholar
  11. Damore, David F. 2003Using campaign advertisements to assess campaign processes.Journal of Political Marketing33959Google Scholar
  12. Damore, David F. 2002Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative.Political Research Quarterly55669685Google Scholar
  13. Downs, Anthony 1957An Economic Theory of Democracy.HarperNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Edelman, Murray 1964The Symbolic Uses of Politics.University of Illinois PressUrbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  15. Franklin, Charles H. 1991Eschewing obfuscation: campaigns and perception of U.S. senate incumbents.American Political Science Review8511931214Google Scholar
  16. Geer, John G. 1998

    Campaigns, party competition, and political advertising

    Geer, John G. eds. Politicians and Party Politics.Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimore186217
    Google Scholar
  17. Goldman, Peter, Thomas M. DeFrank, Mark, Miller, Andrew, Murr, , Tom, Mathews 1992Quest for the Presidency.Texas A & M University PressCollege Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  18. Holbrook, Thomas M. (1996). Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder (1987). News That Matters. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobs, Lawrence, Shapiro, Robert Y. 1994Issues, candidate image, and priming: the use of private polls in kennedy’s 1960 presidential campaign.American Political Science Review88527540Google Scholar
  20. Jacobson, Gary C. 1990The Electoral Origins of Divided Government.Westview PressBoulderGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, Bryan D. 1994Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics.University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahn, Kim Fridkin, Kenney, Patrick J. 1999The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns.Princeton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kingdon, John 1984Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.Little, Brown, and CompanyBostonGoogle Scholar
  24. Lau, Richard R., Lee, Sigelman, Caroline, Heldman, Paul, Babbitt 1999The effects of negative political advertisements: a meta-analytic assessment.American Political Science Review93851876Google Scholar
  25. Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. 1998The Democratic Dilemma.Cambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. 1981Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches.William C. BrownDubuque, IAGoogle Scholar
  27. Petrocik, John R. 1996Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study.American Journal of Political Science4082550Google Scholar
  28. Petrocik, John R., William L. Benoit, and Glenn J. Hansen (2003–2004). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly 118: 599–626.Google Scholar
  29. Pfau, Michael, Kenski, H. C. 1990Attack Politics: Strategy and Defense.PragerNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Prentice, R. L., Williams, B. J., Peterson, A. V. 1981On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data.Biometrika6837370Google Scholar
  31. Riker, William H. 1993

    Introduction

    Riker, William eds. Agenda FormationUniversity of Michigan PressAnn Arbor112
    Google Scholar
  32. Sears, David O. 1993

    Symbolic politics: a socio-psychological theory

    Iyengar, ShantoMcGuire, William eds. Explorations in Political PsychologyDuke University PressDurham NC113149
    Google Scholar
  33. Shaw, Daron R. 1999aThe effect of tv ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988–96.American Political Science Review93345362Google Scholar
  34. Shaw, Daron R. 1999bThe methods behind the madness: presidential electoral college strategies, 1988–1996.Journal of Politics61893913Google Scholar
  35. Shepsle, Kenneth A.Weingast, Barry R. eds. 1995Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions.University of Michigan PressAnn ArborGoogle Scholar
  36. Simon, Adam F. 2002The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy.Cambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Skaperdas, Stergios, Grofman, Bernard 1995Modeling negative campaigning.American Political Science Review894961Google Scholar
  38. Smith, Tom W. 1985The polls: america’s most important problems, part I: national and international.Public Opinion Quarterly49264274Google Scholar
  39. Spiliotes, Constantine J., Lynn, Vavreck 2002Campaign advertising: partisan convergence and divergence?Journal of Politics64249261Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of NevadaLas Vegas

Personalised recommendations