Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental demonstration of software-defined optical network for heterogeneous packet and optical networks

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid growth of the network traffic and the diversity of the network requirements bring network service providers new demands and challenges. In order to achieve better efficiency and resource utilization, we need to solve the problems caused by the heterogeneous network environment, such as the low resource utilization and the control and management collaboration problem of heterogeneous networks. The promotion of the software-defined network concept brings the network operators a new way of thinking to solve the problem caused by heterogeneous network environment, especially the convergence of packet and optical network. We propose a control architecture for packet and optical network convergence, including how to be compatible with the existing optical network control architecture. A series of network performance parameters have been demonstrated under various network environments on our testbed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cisco.: Cisco visual networking index: forecast and methodology, 2013–2018. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/ip-ngn-ip-next-generation-network/white_paper_c11-481360.html/ (2014)

  2. Das, S., Parulkar, G., Mckeown, N.: Unifying Packet and Circuit Switched Networks. GLOBECOM Workshops 2009, Vol. 15, pp. 1–6 (2009)

  3. Autenrieth, A., Elbers, J.P.: Benefits of integrated packet/circuit/wavelength switches in next-generation optical core networks. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition, and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (IEEE), pp. 1–3 (2011)

  4. Goth, G.: Software-defined networking could shake up more than packets. IEEE Internet Comput. 15(4), 6–9 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, H., Yu, Y.: Which is more suitable for the control over large scale optical networks, GMPLS or OpenFlow? Optical Fiber Communication Conf. and Expo. and the Nat. Fiber Optic Engineers Conf.(OFC/NFOEC), Anaheim, Mar. 2013, paper NTu3F.2 (2013)

  6. Cvijetic, N., Tanaka, A., Ji, P., Sethuraman, K., Murakami, S., Wang, T.: SDN and openflow for dynamic flex-grid optical access and aggregation networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 32(4), 864–870 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu, Z., Chen, X., Chen, C., Ma, S.: Openflow-assisted online defragmentation in single-/multi-domain software-defined elastic optical networks [invited]. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 7(1), A7–A15 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, Z., Chen, X., Chen, C., Ma, S.: Demonstration of cooperative resource allocation in an openflow-controlled multidomain and multinational sd-eon testbed. J. Lightwave Technol. 33(8), 1508–1514 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lei, L., Takehiro, T., Itsuro, M., Hongxiang, G., Jian, W.: Experimental validation and performance evaluation of openflow-based wavelength path control in transparent optical networks. Opt. Express 19(27), 26578 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azodolmolky, S., Nejabati, R., Escalona, E., Jayakumar, R., Efstathiou, N., Simeonidou, D.: Integrated OpenFlow–GMPLS control plane: an overlay model for software defined packet over optical networks. Opt. Express 19(26), B421–B428 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gudla, V., Das, S., Shastri, A., Parulkar, G., Mckeown, N., Kazovsky, L., et al.: Experimental demonstration of openflow control of packet and circuit switches. Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2011 (IEEE) 45, 1–3 (2011)

  12. Casellas, R., Martnez, R., Muoz, R., Vilalta, R., Liu, L., Tsuritani, T., et al.: Control and management of flexi-grid optical networks with an integrated stateful path computation element and openflow controller. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 5(10), A57–A65 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giorgetti, A., Cugini, F., Paolucci, F., Castoldi, P.: Openflow And Pce Architectures In: Wavelength Switched Optical Networks. Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM), 16th International Conference on, pp. 1–6 (2012)

  14. Liu, L., Casellas, R., Tsuritani, T., Morita, I., Martinez, R., Munoz, R.: Interworking between OpenFlow and PCE for dynamic wavelength path control in multi-domain WSON. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition (OFC/NFOEC), 2012 and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (IEEE), pp. 1–3 (2012)

  15. Parulkar, G.M., Rexford, J., Turner, J.S., Mckeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., et al.: Openflow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 38(2), 69–74 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yongli, Z., Ruiying, H., Haoran, C., Jie, Z., Yuefeng, J., Haomian, Z., et al.: Experimental performance evaluation of software defined networking (SDN) based data communication networks for large scale flexi-grid optical networks. Opt. Express 22(8), 9538–9547 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Das, S., Parulkar, G., Mckeown, N.: Rethinking IP core networks. Opt Commun. Netw. IEEE/OSA J. 5(12), 1431–1442 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Das, S.: Extensions to the OpenFlow protocol in support of circuit switching. Addendum to OpenFlow protocol specification (v1.0) Circuit Switch Addendum v0.3, http://www.openflow.org/wk/images/8/81/OpenFlow_Circuit_Switch_Specification_v0.3. June (2010)

  19. Gringeri, S., Bitar, N., Xia, T.J.: Extending software defined network principles to include optical transport. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51(3), 32–40 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Channegowda, M., Nejabati, R., Simeonidou, D.: Software-defined optical networks technology and infrastructure: enabling software-defined optical network operations [invited]. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 5(10), A274–A282 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, S., Zhou, Y., Yin, S., Kong, Q., Zhang, M., Zhao, Y., et al.: Fragmentation assessment based on-line routing and spectrum allocation for intra-data-center networks with centralized control. Opt. Switch. Netw. 14(8), 274281 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guo, B., Li, J., Wang, Y., Huang, S., Chen, Z., He, Y.: Collision-aware routing and spectrum assignment in GMPLS-enabled flexible-bandwidth optical network. Opt. Commun. Netw. IEEE/OSA J. 5(6), 658–666 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Das, S., Yiakoumis, Y., Parulkar, G., Mckeown, N., Singh, P., Getachew, D., et al.: Application-Aware Aggregation and Traffic Engineering in a Converged Packet-Circuit Network. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition (OFC/NFOEC), 2011 and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (IEEE), pp. 1–3 (2011)

  24. Xu, D., Li, Y., Chiang, M., Calderbank, A.: Elastic service availability: utility framework and optimal provisioning. Sel. Areas Commun. IEEE J. 26(6), 55–65 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [Online]. Available: http://www.opendaylight.org/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 61205058 and 61331008), the Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2012AA011302), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-12- 0793), the Beijing Nova Program (No. 2011065), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M 570979).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanguo Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Yin, S., Guo, B. et al. Experimental demonstration of software-defined optical network for heterogeneous packet and optical networks. Photon Netw Commun 32, 329–335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-016-0611-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-016-0611-x

Keywords

Navigation