The effect of partial conversion and fiber delay lines in an OBS switch with a large number of wavelengths
- 47 Downloads
In this paper, we analyze an optical burst switching (OBS) switch endowed with both wavelength converters (WCs) and fiber delay lines (FDLs) to resolve contention. We consider the case where the number of wavelengths is large by introducing a mean field model that provides exact results when the number of wavelengths tends to infinity. We have confirmed through simulations that the mean field model provides accurate approximations for switches with a large but finite number of wavelengths, which are of interest in view of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM). Furthermore, our model allows a very general behavior for the arrival process and the packet size distribution, as well as two different wavelength allocation policies: minimum horizon and minimum gap. Our results include a detailed analysis of the effect that these parameters have on the burst loss rate, and on the minimum number of WCs required to attain a zero loss rate as the number of wavelengths becomes large. We have found that at high loads there is little value in adding FDLs and, if included, shorter granularities result in fewer WCs required to achieve a zero loss rate. The inclusion of FDLs becomes more significant under mid loads and bursty traffic, where the addition of several FDLs may reduce the conversion requirements. Also, increasing the number of WCs under the minimum horizon policy may worsen the loss rate, while this is never the case for the minimum gap policy.
KeywordsOptical switch Partial wavelength conversion Mean field
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 8.Latouche G., Ramaswami V.: Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modeling. ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.Le Boudec, J., McDonald, D., Mundinger, J.: A generic mean field convergence result for systems of interacting objects. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of SysTems (QEST 2007), pp. 3–15. Edinburgh, UK (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Michiel, H., Laevens, K.: Teletraffic engineering in a broad-band era. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 85, pp. 2007–2033 (1997)Google Scholar
- 13.Pérez, J.F., Van Houdt, B.: Dimensioning an OBS switch with partial wavelength conversion and fiber delay lines via a mean field model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom 2009, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 2651–2655 (2009)Google Scholar
- 16.Qiao J., Yoo M.: Optical burst switching: A new paradigm for an optical Internet. J. High-Speed Netw. 8, 69–84 (1999)Google Scholar
- 17.Robertazzi T.: Computer Networks and Systems. Springer, Berlin (2000)Google Scholar
- 18.Turner J.: Terabit burst switching. J. High-Speed Netw. 8, 3–16 (1999)Google Scholar
- 19.Van Houdt, B., Laevens, K., Lambert, J., Blondia, C., Bruneel, H.: Channel utilization and loss rate in a single-wavelength Fibre Delay Line (FDL) buffer. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1900–1906 (2004)Google Scholar
- 20.Xu, L., Perros, H., Rouskas, G.N.: A queueing network model of an edge optical burst switching node. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom 2003, pp. 2019–2029 (2003)Google Scholar