Abstract
This article presents capacity planning rules for the control plane of all-optical networks featuring GMPLS and RSVP-TE as a connection setup protocol. As per RSVP standard, a refresh message mechanism is incorporated to RSVP such that the state is periodically refreshed on a link per link basis. We provide analytical expressions for the bandwidth and buffer sizes to be provided such that no flows are torn down due to lack of refresh messages. Our findings show that small buffers (several KBytes) suffice to sustain the signaling load for as much as 400 RSVP flows per link, with the simplest RSVP refresh mechanism (neither using link bundling nor acknowledgments). On the other hand, we also find the packet drop probability per link for a given network topology for the case that the flow survival probability is larger than a given threshold. We provide numerical examples based on the COST 239 european network topology and real RSVP traffic traces from early-commercial switching equipment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee A., Drake J., Lang J., Turner B., Awduche D., Berger L., Kompella K. and Rekhter Y. (2001). Generalized multiprotocol label switching: an overview of signaling enhancements and recovery techniques. IEEE Commun. Mag. 39(7): 144–151
Zhang L., Deering S., Estrin D., Shenker S. and Zappala D. (1993). RSVP: a new resource reservation protocol. IEEE Netw. 7(5): 8–18
Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V., Swallow, G.: RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP tunnels. RFC 3209 (2001)
Berger, L.: Generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) signaling functional description. RFC 3471 (2003)
Berger, L.: Generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) signaling resource reservation protocol-traffic engineering (RSVP-TE) extensions. RFC 3473 (2003)
Ji, P., Ge, Z., Kurose, J., Towsley, D.: A comparison of hard-state and soft-state signaling protocols. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, pp 251–262. Karlsruhe, Germany, ACM Press (2003)
Komolafe, O., Sventek, J.: An evaluation of RSVP control message delivery mechanisms. In: Proceedings of Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR’04), pp. 43–47. Phoenix, USA (2004)
Komolafe, O., Sventek, J.: RSVP performance evaluation using multi-objective evolutionary optimisation. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 3, pp. 2447–2457. Miami, USA (2005)
Karsten, M., Schmitt, J., Steinmetz, R.: Implementation and evaluation of the KOM RSVP engine. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 3, pp. 22–26 Anchorage, USA (2001)
Neogi A., Chiueh T.-C. and Stirpe P. (1999). Performance analysis of an RSVP-capable router. IEEE Netw. 13(5): 56–63
Wang, H., Karri, R., Veeraraghavan, M., Li, T.: A hardware-accelerated implementation of the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 3, pp. 1609–1614. France (2004)
Berger, L., Gan, D., Swallow, G., Pan, P., Tommasi, F., Molendini, S.: RSVP refresh overhead reduction extensions. RFC 2961 (2001)
Braden R. (Ed.) Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., Jamin, S.: Resource reservation protocol (RSVP)—version 1 functional specification. RFC 2205 (1997)
Gross, D., Harris, C.M.: Fundamentals of Queueing Theory John Wiley and Sons, 2nd edn. (1985)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morató, D., Aracil, J., Fernández-Palacios, J.P. et al. On capacity planning for the GMPLS network control plane. Photon Netw Commun 15, 159–169 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-007-0107-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-007-0107-9