Influence of Temperature of Accumulative Roll Bonding on the Mechanical Properties of AA5083–1% Al2O3 Composite

THEORY AND TECHNOLOGY OF FORMING PROCESS
  • 6 Downloads

The influence of rolling temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AA5083–1% Al2O3 composites has been analyzed in this study. The alloy was deformed with the method of warm accumulative roll bonding in various temperature conditions, i.e., at ambient temperature, 200°C, and 300°C up to 5 cycles (𝜀 = 4). The structure has been studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and mechanical properties of the deformed material have been measured by tensile test as well as Vickers microhardness test. It was established that the rolling temperature had a significant effect on the mechanical properties and microstructure of the manufactured MMCs. High strength, low elongation, and high average Vickers microhardness were obtained for the material processed at lower temperatures, i.e., at ambient temperature. Whereas, by increasing the rolling temperature to 300°C, the toughness and elongation ranges were greater than for the MMCs manufactured at lower temperatures.

Keywords

aluminum metallic matrix composites heat treatment rolling 

References

  1. 1.
    C. W. Schmidt, C. Knieke, V. Maier, et al., “Accelerated grain refinement during accumulative roll bonding by nanoparticle reinforcement,” Scr. Mater., 64, No. 3, 245–248 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Vaidyanath, M. Nicholas, and D. Milner, “Pressure welding by rolling,” Br. Weld. J., 6, 13–28 (1959).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. V. Prasad and R. Asthana, “Aluminum metal–matrix composites for automotive applications: Tribological considerations,” Tribol. Lett., 17, No. 3, 445–453 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Saito, H. Utsunomiya, N. Tsuji, and T. Sakai, “Novel ultrahigh straining process for bulk materials—development of the accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process,” Acta Mater., 47, No. 2, 579–583 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Korbel, M. Richert, and J. Richert, “The effects of very high cumulative deformation on structure and mechanical properties of aluminum,” in: Proc. 2nd RISO Int. Symp. Metallurgy and Material Science, Roskilde (1981), pp. 14–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Yin, J. Lu, H. Ma, and P. Zhang, “Nanostructural formation of fine grained aluminum alloy by severe plastic deformation at cryogenic temperature,” J. Mater. Sci., 39, No. 8, 2851–2854 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Kok, “Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminum alloy composites,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 161, 381–387 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Y. Liu, R. Jing, Q. Wang, et al., “Effect of W particles on the properties of accumulatively roll-bonded Al/W composites,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 547, 120–124 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Alizadeh and M. Talebian, “Fabrication of Al/Cu composite by accumulative roll bonding process and investigation of mechanical properties,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 558, 331–337 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Lu, K. Tieu, and D. Wexler, “Significant enhancement of bond strength in the accumulative roll bonding process using nanosized SiO2 particles,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 209, No. 10, 4830–4834 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. K. Lindroos and M. J. Talvitie, “Recent advance in metal matrix composites,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 53, 273–284 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Liu, Q. Wang, Y. Jia, et al., “Evaluation of mechanical properties of 1060-Al reinforced with WC particles via warm accumulative roll bonding process,” Mater. Des., 43, 367–372 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Ipek, “Adhesive wear behavior of B4C and SiC reinforced 4147 Al matrix composites (Al/B4C–Al/SiC),” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 162–163, 71–75 (2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Bogucka, “Influence of temperature of accumulative roll bonding on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AA5251 aluminum alloy,” Arch. Metall. Mater., 59, No. 1, 16–20 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM E8/E8M, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Annu. B. ASTM Stand. 4, 1–27 (2010).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. R. Rezaei, M. R. Toroghinejad, and F. Ashrafizadeh, “Production of nanograined structure in 6061 aluminum alloy strip by accumulative roll bonding,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 529, 442–446 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Alizadeh, M. H. Paydar, and F. Sharifian Jazi, “Structural evaluation and mechanical properties of nanostructured Al/B4C composite fabricated by ARB process,” Compos. Part B. Eng., 44, No. 1, 339–343 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Rezayat, A. Akbarzadeh, and A. Owhadi, “Production of high strength Al–Al2O3 composite by accumulative roll bonding,” Compos. Part A, Appl. Sci. Manuf., 43, No. 2, 261–267 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Jamaati and M. R. Toroghinejad, “Manufacturing of high-strength aluminum/alumina composite by accumulative roll bonding,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 527, Nos. 16–17, 4146–4151 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Rezayat, A. Akbarzadeh, and A. Owhadi, “Fabrication of high-strength Al/SiCp nanocomposite sheets by accumulative roll bonding,” Met. Mater. Soc. ASM Int., 43A, 2085–2093 (2012).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Sedighi, P. Farhadipour, and M. Heydari Vini, “Mechanical properties and microstructural evolution of bimetal 1050/Al2O3/5083 composites fabricated by warm accumulative roll bonding,” JOM, 68, No. 12, 3193–3200 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mobarakeh BranchIslamic Azad UniversityIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations