Abstract
Purpose
Due to a rapidly changing climate, voluntary carbon markets are gaining momentum and should be leveraged to improve and expand tropical sustainable forest management plans, limiting carbon emissions and enhancing critical carbon sinks. By sequestering more carbon than any other terrestrial ecosystem — ~1 Pg C yr−1 — tropical forests provide crucial natural climate solutions and opportunities in the evolving voluntary carbon market.
Methods
Here, we argue that some issues with the current sustainable management of tropical forests can be addressed using carbon-focused sustainable forest management (SFM + C) to leverage financial resources for tropical forest carbon storage and sequestration. We suggest an extended harvest cycle in SFM + C and calculate an associated potential increase in aboveground carbon stocks of commercial timber of 1.26 Mg C ha−1 after each cycle in the Brazilian Amazon.
Results
The additional carbon storage due to a longer harvest cycle can generate carbon credits worth 152.6 (SD 9.2) US dollars per hectare in 40 years. Considering an average cost of 180 BRL per m3 of commercial timber delivered to the sawmill, an SFM + C plan with a 40-year cycle could generate 28.7% (SD 2.5) more profit than 35-year cycles by combining timber and carbon revenues.
Conclusion
A robust carbon price could incentivize the further extension of harvest cycles, providing a monetary return that offsets the opportunity cost intrinsic to harvesting under longer cycles. Finally, we highlight research needs to support tropical SFM + C, which can be part of a global collective effort to limit global warming to below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amissah L, Mohren GMJ, Kyereh B et al (2018) Rainfall seasonality and drought performance shape the distribution of tropical tree species in Ghana. Ecol Evol 8:8582–8597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4384
Barros HS, Fearnside PM (2016) Soil carbon stock changes due to edge effects in Central Amazon forest fragments. For Ecol Manag 379:30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.002
Berenguer E, Ferreira J, Gardner TA et al (2014) A large-scale field assessment of carbon stocks in human-modified tropical forests. Glob Change Biol 20:3713–3726. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12627
Bomfim B, Silva LCR, Pereira RS, et al (2020) Litter and soil biogeochemical parameters as indicators of sustainable logging in Central Amazonia. Sci Total Environ 136780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136780
Brancalion PHS, de Almeida DRA, Vidal E et al (2018) Fake legal logging in the Brazilian Amazon. 4:Sci Adv, eaat1192. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat1192
BRAZIL (2020) Intended Nationally Determined Contribution towards Achieving the Objective of The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available via https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Brazil%20First/BRAZIL%20iNDC%20english%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2021
Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA (2006) The use of tree rings in tropical forest management: projecting timber yields of four Bolivian tree species. For Ecol Manag 226:256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.038
Brodribb TJ, Powers J, Cochard H, Choat B (2020) Hanging by a thread? Forests and drought. Science 368:261. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7631
Chiti T, Perugini L, Vespertino D, Valentini R (2016) Effect of selective logging on soil organic carbon dynamics in tropical forests in central and western Africa. Plant Soil 399:283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2697-9
Cook-Patton SC, Leavitt SM, Gibbs D et al (2020) Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585:545–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x
Dalagnol R, Phillips OL, Gloor E et al (2019) Quantifying canopy tree loss and gap recovery in tropical forests under low-intensity logging using VHR satellite imagery and airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070817
David HC, Carvalho JOP, Pires IP et al (2019) A 20-year tree liberation experiment in the Amazon: highlights for diameter growth rates and species-specific management. For Ecol Manag 453:117584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117584
de Miranda DLC, Higuchi N, Trumbore SE et al (2018) Using radiocarbon-calibrated dendrochronology to improve tree-cutting cycle estimates for timber management in southern Amazon forests. Trees 32:587–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1658-3
De Ridder M, Van den Bulcke J, Van Acker J, Beeckman H (2013) Tree-ring analysis of an African long-lived pioneer species as a tool for sustainable forest management. For Ecol Manag 304:417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.007
de Toledo PM, Dalla-Nora E, Vieira ICG et al (2017) Development paradigms contributing to the transformation of the Brazilian Amazon: do people matter? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26–27:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.009
Ellis PW, Gopalakrishna T, Goodman RC et al (2019) Reduced-impact logging for climate change mitigation (RIL-C) can halve selective logging emissions from tropical forests. For Ecol Manag 438:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.004
Emmerling J, Drouet L, van der Wijst K-I et al (2019) The role of the discount rate for emission pathways and negative emissions. Environ Res Lett 14:104008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3cc9
FAO (2007) Manual on Deforestation, Degradation, and Fragmentation using Remote Sensing and GIS. United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Available via https://www.fao.org/forestry/18222-045c26b711a976bb9d0d17386ee8f0e37.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2021
FAO (2020) Global Forest resources assessment 2020. United Nation’s food and agriculture organization, Rome. Available via http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca9825en. Accessed 29 Oct 2021
Ferreira TMC, de Carvalho JOP, Emmert F et al (2020) How long does the Amazon rainforest take to grow commercially sized trees? An estimation methodology for Manilkara elata (Allemão ex Miq.) Monach. For Ecol Manag 473:118333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118333
Fontes CG, Fine PVA, Wittmann F et al (2020) Convergent evolution of tree hydraulic traits in Amazonian habitats: implications for community assemblage and vulnerability to drought. New Phytol 228:106–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16675
Gomes LC, Faria RM, de Souza E et al (2019) Modelling and mapping soil organic carbon stocks in Brazil. Geoderma 340:337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.007
Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M et al (2017) Google earth engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ 202:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
Griscom BW, Adams J, Ellis PW et al (2017) Natural climate solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:11645–11650
Griscom BW, Busch J, Cook-Patton SC et al (2020) National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics. Phil Trans R Soc B 375:20190126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0126
Groenendijk P, Sass-Klaassen U, Bongers F, Zuidema PA (2014) Potential of tree-ring analysis in a wet tropical forest: a case study on 22 commercial tree species in Central Africa. For Ecol Manag 323:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.03.037
Hethcoat MG, Edwards DP, Carreiras JMB et al (2019) A machine learning approach to map tropical selective logging. Remote Sens Environ 221:569–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.044
Hethcoat MG, Carreiras JMB, Edwards D et al (2020) Mapping pervasive selective logging in the south-west Brazilian Amazon 2000–2019. Environ Res Lett 15:094057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba3a4
Indrajaya Y, van der Werf E, Weikard H-P et al (2016) The potential of REDD+ for carbon sequestration in tropical forests: supply curves for carbon storage for Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Policy Econ 71:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.032
Johns JS, Barreto P, Uhl C (1996) Logging damage during planned and unplanned logging operations in the eastern Amazon. For Ecol Manag 89:59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03869-8
Kleinschmit D, Ferraz Ziegert R, Walther L (2021) Framing illegal logging and its governance responses in Brazil – a structured review of diagnosis and prognosis. Front Forests Glob Change 4:59. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.624072
Koh LP, Zeng Y, Sarira TV, Siman K (2021) Carbon prospecting in tropical forests for climate change mitigation. Nat Commun 12:1271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21560-2
Kozlowski TT (2002) Physiological ecology of natural regeneration of harvested and disturbed forest stands: implications for forest management. For Ecol Manag 158:195–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00712-X
Kraxner F, Schepaschenko D, Fuss S et al (2017) Mapping certified forests for sustainable management - a global tool for information improvement through participatory and collaborative mapping. Forest Policy Econ 83:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.014
Kreibich N, Hermwille L (2021) Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020. null 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384
Kruid S, Macedo MN, Gorelik SR et al (2021) Beyond deforestation: carbon emissions from land grabbing and Forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. Front Forests Glob Change 4:105. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.645282
Leoni JM, da Fonseca SF, Schöngart J (2011) Growth and population structure of the tree species Malouetia tamaquarina (Aubl.) (Apocynaceae) in the central Amazonian floodplain forests and their implication for management. For Ecol Manag 261:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.025
Locks CJ, Ferreira ME, Alves Júnior LR, Chaves JH (2017) Estimating wood volume in sawmill yards of Brazilian Amazon by remotely piloted aircraft systems. In: ANAIS DO SIMPóSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO. Campinas
Longo M, Keller M (2019) Not the same old(−growth) forests. New Phytol 221:1672–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15636
MacDicken K, Reams G, de Freitas J (2015) Introduction to the changes in global Forest resources from 1990 to 2015. For Ecol Manag 352:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.018
Malhi Y, Wood D, Baker TR et al (2006) The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old-growth Amazonian forests: BIOMASS IN AMAZONIAN FORESTS. Glob Chang Biol 12:1107–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01120.x
Matricardi EAT, Skole DL, Costa OB et al (2020) Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 369:1378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3021
McDowell N, Allen CD, Anderson-Teixeira K et al (2018) Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests. New Phytol 219:851–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15027
Merry F, Soares-Filho B, Nepstad D et al (2009) Balancing conservation and economic sustainability: the future of the Amazon timber industry. Environ Manag 44:395–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9337-1
Mitchard ETA (2018) The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559:527–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0300-2
MMA (2006) Instrução Normativa no 4, de 11 de Dezembro de 2006 Publicado no DOU no. de 13/12/2006
MMA (2009) Resolução CONAMA no 406 de 02/02/2009. http://conama.mma.gov.br/?option=com_sisconama&task=arquivo.download&id=578. Accessed 7 Jul 2021
MMA (2018) Brazil’s submission of a Forest Reference Emission Level (FREL) for reducing emissions from deforestation in the Amazonia biome for REDD+ results-based payments under the UNFCCC from 2016 to 2020. Brazil’s Ministry of the Environment, Brasilia
NOAA (2020) Global Monitoring Laboratory. Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/. Accessed 11 Nov 2021
Numazawa CTD, Numazawa S, Pacca S, John VM (2017) Logging residues and CO 2 of Brazilian Amazon timber: two case studies of forest harvesting. Resour Conserv Recycl 122:280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.016
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J et al (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the World’s forests. Science 333:988–993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609
Peña-Claros M, Fredericksen TS, Alarcón A et al (2008) Beyond reduced-impact logging: Silvicultural treatments to increase growth rates of tropical trees. For Ecol Manag 256:1458–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.013
Phillips OL, Sullivan MJP, Baker TR et al (2019) Species matter: Wood density influences tropical Forest Biomass at multiple scales. Surv Geophys 40:913–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09540-0
Pinard MA, Putz FE (1996) Retaining Forest Biomass by reducing logging damage. Biotropica 28:278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389193
Piponiot C, Rödig E, Putz FE et al (2019) Can timber provision from Amazonian production forests be sustainable? Environ Res Lett 14:064014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab195e
Putz FE, Pinard MA (1993) Reduced-impact logging as a carbon-offset method. Conserv Biol 7:755–757
Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Synnott T et al (2012) Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: the attained and the attainable: sustaining tropical forests with forestry. Conserv Lett 5:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00242.x
Qin Y, Xiao X, Wigneron J-P et al (2021) Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat Clim Chang 11:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01026-5
Rogelj J, Shindell D, Jiang K (2018) Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty
Romero FM, Jacovine LA, Ribeiro SC et al (2020a) Stocks of carbon in logs and timber Products from Forest Management in the Southwestern Amazon. Forests 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101113
Romero FMB, Jacovine LAG, Ribeiro SC et al (2020b) Allometric equations for volume, Biomass, and carbon in commercial stems harvested in a managed Forest in the southwestern Amazon: a case study. Forests 11:874. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080874
Roopsind A, Wortel V, Hanoeman W, Putz FE (2017) Quantifying uncertainty about forest recovery 32-years after selective logging in Suriname. For Ecol Manag 391:246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.026
Rosa SA, Barbosa ACMC, Junk WJ et al (2017) Growth models based on tree-ring data for the Neotropical tree species Calophyllum brasiliense across different Brazilian wetlands: implications for conservation and management. Trees 31:729–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1503-5
Roşca S, Suomalainen J, Bartholomeus H, Herold M (2018) Comparing terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle structure from motion to assess top of canopy structure in tropical forests. Interface Focus 8:20170038. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0038
Rutishauser E, Hérault B, Baraloto C et al (2015) Rapid tree carbon stock recovery in managed Amazonian forests. Curr Biol 25:R787–R788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.034
Sakschewski B, von Bloh W, Boit A et al (2016) Resilience of Amazon forests emerges from plant trait diversity. Nat Clim Chang 6:1032–1036. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3109
Santos de Lima L, Merry F, Soares-Filho B et al (2018) Illegal logging as a disincentive to the establishment of a sustainable forest sector in the Amazon. PLoS One 13:e0207855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207855
Sasaki N, Chheng K, Ty S (2012) Managing production forests for timber production and carbon emission reductions under the REDD+ scheme. Environ Sci Pol 23:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.009
Sist P, Piponiot C, Kanashiro M et al (2021) Sustainability of Brazilian forest concessions. For Ecol Manag 496:119440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119440
Sools R, Stortelder S, Boer E (2021) The voluntary carbon market as an opportunity for the sustainable Forest management sector. Form International B.V, Hattem
Soong JL, Janssens IA, Grau O et al (2020) Soil properties explain tree growth and mortality, but not biomass, across phosphorus-depleted tropical forests. Sci Rep 10:2302. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58913-8
The Nature Conservancy, TerraCarbon LLC (2016) Methodology for improved forest management through reducted impact logging (RIL-C) v1.0
Therrell MD, Stahle DW, Mukelabai MM, Shugart HH (2007) Age, and radial growth dynamics of Pterocarpus angolensis in southern Africa. For Ecol Manag 244:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.023
Turner BL, Brenes-Arguedas T, Condit R (2018) Pervasive phosphorus limitation of tree species but not communities in tropical forests. Nature 555:367–370. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25789
UNFCCC (2021) REDD+: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries. Forest Reference Emissions Levels. https://redd.unfccc.int/fact-sheets/forest-reference-emission-levels.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2021
Vidal E, West TAP, Putz FE (2016) Recovery of biomass and merchantable timber volumes twenty years after conventional and reduced-impact logging in Amazonian Brazil. For Ecol Manag 376:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.003
West TAP, Vidal E, Putz FE (2014) Forest biomass recovery after conventional and reduced-impact logging in Amazonian Brazil. For Ecol Manag 314:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.022
West TAP, Börner J, Sills EO, Kontoleon A (2020) Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:24188. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004334117
Zalman J, Ellis P, Crabbe S, Roopsind A (2019) Opportunities for carbon emissions reduction from selective logging in Suriname. For Ecol Manag 439:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.026
Funding
B.B. and L.M.K. were supported as part of the Next Generation Ecosystem Experiments-Tropics, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (DE-AC02-05CH11231). F.E. was supported by the Laboratório de mensuracao e manejo dos recursos florestais (Labfor/ICA/UFRA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Lucas Silva.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bomfim, B., Pinagé, E.R., Emmert, F. et al. Improving sustainable tropical forest management with voluntary carbon markets. Plant Soil 479, 53–60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05249-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05249-5