Skip to main content
Log in

Soil-litter mixing promotes decomposition and soil aggregate formation on contrasting geomorphic surfaces in a shrub-invaded Sonoran Desert grassland

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Shrub encroachment into grasslands alters organic carbon pools and patterns of decomposition. Here, we quantify the influence of plant life-form patches occuring on contrasting geomorphic substrates on (1) soil-litter mixing (SLM) and litter decomposition and 2) the development of soil aggregates and soil-microbial films on litter.

Methods

A factorial experiment in a shrub-invaded arid grassland tested the hypotheses that SLM would promote decomposition, and that development of soil films and aggregates would be inversely related to grass cover and positively related to soil surface clay content. Litterbags containing shrub (Prosopis velutina) leaf litter were deployed on a sandy Holocene-age soil and on a clayey Pleistocene-age soil under and away from shrubs on areas with low and high grass cover.

Results

SLM accelerated decomposition, with highest rates on sandy soils in inter-shrub areas with low grass cover. Decomposition on clayey soils was slower, despite more rapid development of soil films. Soil-microbial film formation in bare ground placements exceeded that in shrub or grass placements and was greater on sandy Holocene-age soils compared to clayey Pleistocene-age soils.

Conclusions

Vegetation structure and geomorphology should be considered when modeling decomposition dynamics in systems with low plant cover and high rates of aeolian and fluvial soil movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Adair EC, Parton WJ, Del Grosso SJ, Silver WL, Harmon ME, Hall SA, Burke IC, Hart SC (2008) Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates. Glob Chang Biol 14:2636–2660

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair EC, Hobbie SE, Hobbie RK (2010) Single-pool exponential decomposition models: potential pitfalls in their use in ecological studies. Ecology 91:1225–1236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R, van Logtestijn R, Karlsson P (2006) Nitrogen supply differentially affects litter decomposition rates and nitrogen dynamics of sub-arctic bog species. Oecologia 146:652–658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • An S, Mentler A, Mayer H, Blum WEH (2010) Soil aggregation, aggregate stability, organic carbon and nitrogen in different soil aggregate fractions under forest and shrub vegetation on the loess plateau, China. Catena 81:226–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archer SR, Andersen EM, Predick KI, Schwinning S, Steidl RJ, Woods SR (2017) Woody plant encroachment: causes and consequences. In: Briske DD (ed) Rangeland systems: processes. Springer, Management and Challenges, pp 25–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Barger NN, Archer SR, Campbell JL, Huang C-y, Morton JA, Knapp AK (2012) Woody plant proliferation in North American drylands: A synthesis of impacts on ecosystem carbon balance. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 116:G00K07

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Throop HL, Hewins DB, Abbene ML, Archer SR (2012) Soil coverage reduces photodegradation and promotes the development of soil-microbial films on dryland leaf litter. Ecosystems 15:311–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9511-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Throop HL, Archer SR, Breshears DD, McCulley RL, Tobler MA (2015) Sunlight and soil-litter mixing: drivers of litter decomposition in drylands. Progress in Botany 76:273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08807-5_11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batchily AK, Post DF, Bryant RB, Breckenfeld DJ (2003) Spectral reflectance and soil morphology characteristics of Santa Rita experimental range soils. In: McClaran MP, Ffolliott PF, Edminster CB (eds) Santa Rita experimental range: one hundred years (1903–2003) of accomplishments and contributions; conference proceedings, October 30–November 1, 2003, Tucson. AZ. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg B (2014) Decomposition patterns for foliar litter – a theory for influencing factors. Soil Biol Biochem 78:222–232

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Laskowski R, Bjorn B, Ryszard L (2005) Introduction. In: litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 1-17

  • Bird SB, Herrick JE, Wander MM, Wright SF (2002) Spatial heterogeneity of aggregate stability and soil carbon in semi-arid rangeland. Environ Pollut 116:445–455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boutton T, Liao JW, Filley TR, Archer SR (2009) Belowground carbon storage and dynamics accompanying woody plant encroachment in a subtropical savanna. In: Lal R, Follett RF (eds) Soil carbon sequestration and the greenhouse effect. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckenfeld DJ, Robinett D (2003) Soil and ecological sites of the Santa Rita experimental range. In: McClaran MP, Ffolliott PF, Edminster CB (eds) Santa Rita experimental range: one hundred years (1903–2003) of accomplishments and contributions; conference proceedings, October 30–November 1, 2003, Tucson. AZ. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning D, Archer S, Asner G, McClaran M, Wessman C (2008) Woody plants in grasslands: post-encroachment stand dynamics. Ecol Appl 18:928–944

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantón Y, Solé-Benet A, Asensio C, Chamizo S, Puigdefábregas J (2009) Aggregate stability in range sandy loam soils: relationships with runoff and erosion. Catena 77:192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Csavina J, Field J, Félix O, Corral-Avitia AY, Sáez AE, Betterton EA (2014) Effect of wind speed and relative humidity on atmospheric dust concentrations in semi-arid climates. Sci Total Environ 487:82–90

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Roger E, Reynolds JF, Whitford WG (2011) Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: towards a global synthesis. Ecol Lett 14:709–722

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • English NB, Weltzin JF, Fravolini A, Thomas L, Williams DG (2005) The influence of soil texture and vegetation on soil moisture under rainout shelters in a semi-desert grassland. J Arid Environ 63:324–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Field JP, Breshears DD, Whicker JJ, Zou CB (2011) Interactive effects of grazing and burning on wind- and water-driven sediment fluxes: rangeland management implications. Ecol Appl 21:22–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field JP, Breshears DD, Whicker JJ, Zou CB (2012) Sediment capture by vegetation patches: implications for desertification and increased resource redistribution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 117:G01033

    Google Scholar 

  • Fravolini A, Hultine KR, Koepke DF, Williams DG (2003) Role of soil texture on mesquite water relations and response to summer precipitation. In: McClaran, M.P., Folliet, P.F., Edminster, C.B. (Eds.), Santa Rita experimental range: 100 years (1903-2003) of accomplishments and contributions. RMRS-P-30. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp. 125-129

  • Fravolini A, Hultine KR, Brugnoli E, Gazal R, English NB, Williams DG (2005) Precipitation pulse use by an invasive woody legume: the role of soil texture and pulse size. Oecologia 144:618–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo A, Merino J (1993) Leaf decomposition in two Mediterranean ecosystems of Southwest Spain: influence of substrate quality. Ecology 74:152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbeva P, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD (2004) Microbial diversity in soil: selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:243–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick JE, van Zee JW, Havstad KM, Burkett LM, Whitford WG (2005) Monitoring manual for grassland, Shrubland and savanna ecosystems. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewins DB, Archer SR, Okin GS, McCulley RL, Throop HL (2013) Soil-litter mixing accelerates decomposition in a Chihuahuan desert grassland. Ecosystems 16:183–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewins DB, Sinsabaugh RL, Archer SR, Throop HL (2017) Soil–litter mixing and microbial activity mediate decomposition and soil aggregate formation in a sandy shrub-invaded Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Plant Ecol 218:459–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE, Schimel JP, Trumbore SE, Randerson JR (2000) Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high-latitude soils. Glob Chang Biol 6:196–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Imeson AC, Vis M (1984) Assessing soil aggregate stability by water drop impact and ultrasonic dispersion. Geoderma 34:185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly F-X, Kurupas KL, Throop HL (2017) Pulse frequency and soil-litter mixing alter the control of cumulative precipitation over litter decomposition. Ecology 98:2255–2260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Boldgiv B, Singh D, Chun J, Lkhagva A, Adams JM (2013) Structure of soil bacterial communities in relation to environmental variables in a semi-arid region of Mongolia. J Arid Environ 89:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • King JY, Brandt LA, Adair EC (2012) Shedding light on plant litter decomposition: advances, implications and new directions in understanding the role of photodegradation. Biogeochemistry 111:57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems. Environ Manag 33:528–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauber CL, Strickland MS, Bradford MA, Fierer N (2008) The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2407–2415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Rahn T, Throop HL (2012) An accounting of C-based trace gas release during abiotic plant litter degradation. Glob Chang Biol 18:1185–1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Fitzgerald J, Hewins DB, McCulley RL, Archer SR, Rahn T, Throop HL (2014) Soil moisture and soil-litter mixing effects on surface litter decomposition: a controlled environment assessment. Soil Biol Biochem 72:123–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Okin G, Alvarez L, Epstein H (2007) Quantitative effects of vegetation cover on wind erosion and soil nutrient loss in a desert grassland of southern New Mexico, USA. Biogeochemistry 85:317–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhalanyane TP, Valverde A, Gunnigle E, Frossard A, Ramond JB, Cowan DA (2015) Microbial ecology of hot desert edaphic systems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:203–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Schimel JP, Porporato A (2012) Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta-analysis. Ecology 93:930–938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Yrízar A, Núñez S, Búrquez A (2007) Leaf litter decomposition in a southern Sonoran Desert ecosystem, northwestern Mexico: effects of habitat and litter quality. Acta Oecologia 32:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe JR (1994) Landscape evolution, soil formation, and ecological patterns and processes in Sonoran Desert bajadas. Ecol Monogr 64:111–148

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe JR (1995) Landscape evolution, soil formation and Arizona’s desert grasslands. In: McClaran MP, Van Devender TR (eds) The desert grassland. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp 100–129

    Google Scholar 

  • McClaran MP (2003) A century of vegetation change on the Santa Rita experimental range. In: McClaran, M.P., Folliet, P.F., Edminster, C.B. (Eds.), Santa Rita experimental range: 100 years (1903-2003) of accomplishments and contributions. RMRS-P-30. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp. 16-33

  • McClaran M, McMurtry C, Archer S (2013) A tool for estimating impacts of woody encroachment in arid grasslands: allometric equations for biomass, carbon and nitrogen content in Prosopis velutina. J Arid Environ 88:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina AL (1996) The Santa Rita experimental range: history and annotated bibliography (1903-988). Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-276, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA

  • Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 5:195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin GS (2005) Dependence of wind erosion and dust emission on surface heterogeneity: stochastic modeling. J Geophys Res 110

  • Okin GS (2008) A new model of wind erosion in the presence of vegetation. J Geophys Res 113:G01021

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin GS, Gillette DA (2001) Distribution of vegetation in wind-dominated landscapes: implications for wind erosion modeling and landscape processes. Journal of Geographic Research 106:9673–9684

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin GS, Parsons AJ, Wainaright J, Herrick JE, Bestelmeyer BT, Peters DC, Fredrickson EL (2009) Do changes in connectivity explain desertification? Bioscience 59:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Parwada C, Van Tol J (2018) Effects of litter source on the dynamics of particulate organic matter fractions and rates of macroaggregate turnover in different soil horizons. Eur J Soil Sci 69:1126–1136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parwada C, Van Tol J (2019) Effects of litter quality on macroaggregate reformation and soil stability in different soil horizons. Environ Dev Sustain 21:1321–1339

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier JD (2008) Quantitative modeling of earth surface processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn WT, Schlesinger WH (1991) Factors controlling denitrification in a Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1694–1701

    Google Scholar 

  • Pointing SB, Belnap J (2012) Microbial colonization and controls in dryland systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:551–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prăvălie R (2016) Drylands extent and environmental issues: a global approach. Earth Sci Rev 161:259–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Predick KI, Archer SR, Aguillon SM, Keller DA, Throop HL, Barnes PW (2018) UV-B radiation and shrub canopy effects on surface litter decomposition in a shrub-invaded grassland. J Arid Environ 157:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott CE (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101:133–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org

  • Schimel JP (2018) Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 49:409–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Pilmanis AM (1998) Plant-soil interactions in deserts. Biogeochemistry 42:169–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Elliot ET, Paustian K (2000) Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biol Biochem 32:2099–2103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resource Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436

  • Song X, Peng C, Jiang H, Zhu Q, Wang W (2013) Direct and indirect effects of UV-B exposure on litter decomposition: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 8:e68858

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stavi I, Ungar ED, Lavee H, Sarah P (2010) Variability of soil aggregation in a hilly semi-arid rangeland. J Arid Environ 74:946–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Archer SR (2007) Interrelationships among shrub encroachment, land management and leaf litter decomposition in a semi-desert grassland. Ecol Appl 17:1809–1823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Archer SR (2008) Shrub (Prosopis velutina) encroachment in a semidesert grassland: spatial-temporal changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools. Glob Chang Biol 14:2420–2431

    Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Belnap J (2019) Connectivity dynamics in dryland litter cycles: moving decomposition beyond spatial stasis. Bioscience 69:602–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Abu Salem M, Whitford WG (2017) Fire enhances litter decomposition and reduces vegetation cover influences on decomposition in a dry woodland. Plant Ecol 218:799–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 33:141–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittig LD, Allardice WR (1986) X-ray diffraction techniques. In: Kute, A. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, second ed.: SSSA book, Ser. 5. SSSA Inc, Madison, WI

  • Wynn-Williams DD, Edwards HG (2002) Environmental UV radiation: biological strategies for protection and avoidance. In: Horneck G, Baumstark-Khan C (eds) Astrobiology. The quest for the conditions of life. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, pp 245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Hirata E (2005) Decomposition patterns of leaf litter of seven common canopy species in a subtropical forest: N and P dynamics. Plant Soil 273:279–289

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by NSF Ecosystems grants DEB 0816162 and DEB 0815808 and by Arizona Agricultural Experimentation Project ARZT-1360540-H12-199. M. Levi and K. Predick provided assistance with statistical analyses. M. Levi and A. Duerr provided valuable field assistance. S. Hernandez at the University of Arizona University Spectroscopy and Imaging Facilities provided SEM access and expertise. M. Meding and the Center for Environmental Physics and Mineralogy (UA ENVS Dept.) provided laboratory equipment and expertise for XRD analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E.M. Levi.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zucong Cai.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levi, E., Archer, S., Throop, H. et al. Soil-litter mixing promotes decomposition and soil aggregate formation on contrasting geomorphic surfaces in a shrub-invaded Sonoran Desert grassland. Plant Soil 450, 397–415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04508-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04508-1

Keywords

Navigation