Advertisement

Do corn-soybean rotations enhance decomposition of soil organic matter?

  • Steven J. HallEmail author
  • Ann E. Russell
  • A’lece R. Moore
Regular Article
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

Corn and soybean crops are often grown in rotation, requiring lower nitrogen (N) inputs than continuous corn. However, soil organic carbon (C) may be declining in corn-soybean systems despite sustained residue inputs. We asked whether corn-soybean rotations increase decomposition of litter and soil C as compared with continuous corn.

Methods

We incubated soils from a long-term field experiment including continuous corn and both phases of the corn-soybean rotation. Soils were amended with corn litter, soybean litter, or no litter. We measured natural abundance C stable isotopes (δ13C values) in respiration and microbial biomass to partition C sources.

Results

Addition of soybean litter increased microbial biomass while corn did not. However, corn litter addition consistently increased (i.e., primed) soil C decomposition while soybean litter did not. Soils most recently planted to corn following soybeans had the greatest soil C decomposition and N mineralization irrespective of litter addition, and they decomposed corn litter faster and had a faster priming response than the other treatments.

Conclusions

Our data support the hypothesis that alternating inputs of N-rich soybean litter and relatively N-poor corn litter could enhance litter and SOC decomposition by driving microbial growth following the soybean phase and stimulating priming following the corn phase. Increased decomposition and N mineralization from litter and SOC in corn-soybean rotations may contribute to the soybean N credit but could also contribute to longer-term soil C and N declines, consistent with field data.

Keywords

Carbon-use efficiency Carbon stable isotopes Microbial biomass Nitrogen mineralization Priming Soybean nitrogen credit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided in part by the Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research at the University of Iowa. We thank Matt Liebman for thoughtful comments and for facilitating access to the field site, Carlos Tenesaca for assistance in the lab, the McNair Scholars program for providing research support for ARM, and two anonymous reviewers who provided thoughtful and useful comments.

Author’s contributions

AER, ARM, and SJH conceived the research and designed and performed the experiment. SJH analyzed data and wrote the paper, with contributions from AER.

Supplementary material

11104_2019_4292_MOESM1_ESM.csv (24 kb)
ESM 1 (CSV 23 kb)
11104_2019_4292_MOESM2_ESM.csv (2 kb)
ESM 2 (CSV 2 kb)
11104_2019_4292_MOESM3_ESM.csv (2 kb)
ESM 3 (CSV 1 kb)

References

  1. Bowling DR, Pataki DE, Randerson JT (2008) Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes. New Phytol 178:24–40.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x
  2. Brown KH, Bach EM, Drijber RA, et al (2014) A long-term nitrogen fertilizer gradient has little effect on soil organic matter in a high-intensity maize production system. Glob Change Biol 20:1339–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12519
  3. Bundy LG, Andraski TW, Wolkowski RP (1993) Nitrogen credits in soybean-corn crop sequences on three soils. Agron J 85:1061.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500050020x
  4. Chambers A, Lal R, Paustian K (2016) Soil carbon sequestration potential of US croplands and grasslands: implementing the 4 per thousand initiative. J Soil Water Conserv 71:68A–74A.  https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.68A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins HP, Elliott ET, Paustian K et al (2000) Soil carbon pools and fluxes in long-term corn belt agroecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 32:157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00136-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Córdova SC, Olk DC, Dietzel RN, Mueller KE, Archontouilis SV, Castellano MJ (2018) Plant litter quality affects the accumulation rate, composition, and stability of mineral-associated soil organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 125:115–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein MD, Boot CM, et al (2013) The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Change Biol 19:988–995.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12113
  8. David MB, McIsaac GF, Darmody RG, Omonode RA (2009) Long-term changes in Mollisol organic carbon and nitrogen. J Environ Qual 38:200.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David MB, Drinkwater LE, McIsaac GF (2010) Sources of nitrate yields in the Mississippi River basin. J Environ Qual 39:1657.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehleringer JR, Buchmann N, Flanagan LB (2000) Carbon isotope ratios in belowground carbon cycle processes. Ecol Appl 10:412–422.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0412:CIRIBC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu SL, Cheng WX (2002) Rhizosphere priming effects on the decomposition of soil organic matter in C-4 and C-3 grassland soils. Plant Soil 238:289–294.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014488128054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gentry LE, Below FE, David MB, Bergerou JA (2001) Source of the soybean N credit in maize production. Plant Soil 236:175–184.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012707617126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gentry LE, David MB, Below FE, Royer TV, McIsaac GF (2009) Nitrogen mass balance of a tile-drained agricultural watershed in east-Central Illinois. J Environ Qual 38:1841.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentry LF, Ruffo ML, Below FE (2013) Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty. Agron J 105:295–303.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goidts E, van Wesemael B, Crucifix M (2009) Magnitude and sources of uncertainties in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock assessments at various scales. Eur J Soil Sci 60:723–739.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01157.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green CJ, Blackmer AM (1995) Residue decomposition effects on nitrogen availability to corn following corn or soybean. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1065.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040016x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall SJ, Huang W, Hammel KE (2017) An optical method for carbon dioxide isotopes and mole fractions in small gas samples: tracing microbial respiration from soil, litter, and lignin. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 31:1938–1946.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helal HM, Sauerbeck DR (1984) Influence of plant roots on C and P metabolism in soil. Plant Soil 76:175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huggins DR, Buyanovsky GA, Wagner GH, Brown JR, Darmody RG, Peck TR, Lesoing GW, Vanotti MB, Bundy LG (1998) Soil organic C in the tallgrass prairie-derived region of the Corn Belt: effects of long-term crop management. Soil Till Res 47:219–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00108-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huggins DR, Allmaras RR, Clapp CE et al (2007) Corn-soybean sequence and tillage effects on soil carbon dynamics and storage. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Janssens IA, Dieleman W, Luyssaert S, et al (2010) Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nat Geosci 3:315–322.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo844
  22. Jarchow ME, Liebman M, Dhungel S, Dietzel R, Sundberg D, Anex RP, Thompson ML, Chua T (2015) Trade-offs among agronomic, energetic, and environmental performance characteristics of corn and prairie bioenergy cropping systems. GCB Bioenergy 7:57–71.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaynes DB, Karlen DL (2008) Sustaining soil resources while managing nutrients. In: Final report: gulf hypoxia and local water quality concerns workshop. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, pp 149–158Google Scholar
  24. Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biol Biochem 8:167–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8
  25. Kumar A, Kuzyakov Y, Pausch J (2016) Maize rhizosphere priming: field estimates using 13C natural abundance. Plant Soil 409:87–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2958-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuzyakov Y (2002) Review: Factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:382–396.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<382::AID-JPLN382>3.0.CO;2-#
  27. Kuzyakov Y (2010) Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1363–1371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liebig MA, Varvel GE, Doran JW, Wienhold BJ (2002) Crop sequence and nitrogen fertilization effects on soil properties in the western corn belt. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:596–601.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.5960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liebman M, Helmers MJ, Schulte LA, Chase CA (2013) Using biodiversity to link agricultural productivity with environmental quality: results from three field experiments in Iowa. Renewable Agric Food Syst 28:115–128.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahal NK, Osterholz WR, Miguez FE, Poffenbarger HJ, Sawyer JE, Olk DC, Archontoulis SV, Castellano MJ (2019) Nitrogen fertilizer suppresses mineralization of soil organic matter in maize agroecosystems. Front Ecol Evol 7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00059
  31. Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, et al (2012) Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol 79–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x
  32. Martinez-Feria RA, Castellano MJ, Dietzel RN, Helmers MJ, Liebman M, Huber I, Archontoulis SV (2018) Linking crop- and soil-based approaches to evaluate system nitrogen-use efficiency and tradeoffs. Agric Ecosyst Environ 256:131–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazzilli SR, Kemanian AR, Ernst OR, Jackson RB, Piñeiro G (2014) Priming of soil organic carbon decomposition induced by corn compared to soybean crops. Soil Biol Biochem 75:273–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDaniel MD, Tiemann LK, Grandy AS (2014) Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 24:560–570.  https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0616.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, et al (2007) Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315:361–364.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134853
  36. Poffenbarger HJ, Barker DW, Helmers MJ, Miguez FE, Olk DC, Sawyer JE, Six J, Castellano MJ (2017) Maximum soil organic carbon storage in Midwest U.S. cropping systems when crops are optimally nitrogen-fertilized. PLoS One 12:e0172293.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prince SD, Haskett J, Steininger M, Strand H, Wright R (2001) Net primary production of U.S. Midwest croplands from agricultural harvest yield data. Ecol Appl 11:1194–1205.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3061021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reichstein M, Bednorz F, Broll G, Kätterer T (2000) Temperature dependence of carbon mineralisation: conclusions from a long-term incubation of subalpine soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem 32:947–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell AE, Laird DA, Parkin TB, Mallarino AP (2005) Impact of nitrogen fertilization and cropping system on carbon sequestration in Midwestern Mollisols. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Russell AE, Cambardella CA, Laird DA, Jaynes DB, Meek DW (2009) Nitrogen fertilizer effects on soil carbon balances in Midwestern US agricultural systems. Ecol Appl 19:1102–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tiemann LK, Grandy AS, Atkinson EE, Marin-Spiotta E, McDaniel MD (2015) Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem. Ecol Lett 18:761–771.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tomer MD, James DE, Schipper LA, Wills SA (2017) Use of the USDA National Cooperative Soil Survey soil characterization data to detect soil change: a cautionary tale. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81:1463–1474.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.06.0198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yu Z, Lu C, Cao P, Tian H (2018) Long-term terrestrial carbon dynamics in the Midwestern United States during 1850–2015: roles of land use and cover change and agricultural management. Glob Chang Biol 24:2673–2690.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources Ecology and ManagementIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Biology ProgramIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations