Skip to main content

Fungi participate in driving home-field advantage of litter decomposition in a subtropical forest

Plant and Soil volume 434, pages 467–480 (2019)Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 16 August 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background and aims

Home-field advantage (HFA) hypothesis predicts that plant litter decomposes faster beneath the plant species from which it was derived than beneath other plant species. However, it remains unclear, which groups of soil organisms drive HFA effects across a wide range of litter quality and forest types.

Methods

We set up a reciprocal transplant decomposition experiment to quantify the HFA effects of broadleaf, coniferous and bamboo litters. Litterbags of different mesh sizes and high-throughput pyrosequencing of microbial rRNA gene were used to test the contribution of different decomposer groups to HFA effect.

Results

The recalcitrant broadleaf litter and the labile bamboo litter exhibited HFA. Presence of meso-and macrofauna did not substantially change the HFA effects. Bacterial and fungal community composition on litters were significantly influenced by litter type. Bacterial community composition remained unchanged when the same litter was decomposed in different forest types, whereas fungal community composition on broadleaf and bamboo litters were significantly influenced by incubation site.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate specific association between fungal community composition and faster litter decomposition in the home site, suggesting that fungi probably participate in driving the HFA effect of broadleaf and bamboo litters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Change history

  • 16 August 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The labels of y-axes in Fig. 2 should presented unitless. Fig. 2. has now been corrected.

References

  • Allison SD, Martiny JBH (2008) Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:11512–11519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT, Vivanco L, Gonzalez-Arzac A et al (2014) There's no place like home? An exploration of the mechanisms behind plant litter- decomposer affinity in terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 204:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres E, Steltzer H, Simmons BL, Simpson RT et al (2009a) Home-field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests. Soil Biol Biochem 41:606–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres E, Steltzer H, Berg S et al (2009b) Soil biota accelerate decomposition in high-elevation forests by specializing in the breakdown of litter produced by the plant species above them. J Ecol 97:901–912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD (2005) The biology of soil: a community and ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Whittaker JB, Frankland JC (1993) The diet and food preferences of Onychiurus procampatus (Collembola) from upland grassland soils. Biol Fertil Soils 16:296–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg BR, McClaugherty C (2014) Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MA, Tordoff GM, Eggers T et al (2002) Microbiota, fauna, and mesh size interactions in litter decomposition. Oikos 99:317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebrian J (1999) Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities. Am Nat 154:449–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomel M, Guittonny-Larcheveque M, DesRochers A et al (2015) Home field advantage of litter decomposition in pure and mixed plantations under boreal climate. Ecosystems 18:1014–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomel M, Guittonny-Larcheveque M, Fernandez C et al (2016) Plant secondary metabolites: a key driver of litter decomposition and soil nutrient cycling. J Ecol 104:1527–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coq S, Souquet JM, Meudec E et al (2010) Interspecific variation in leaf litter tannins drives decomposition in a tropical rain forest of French Guiana. Ecology 91:2080–2091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther TW, Boddy L, Jones TH (2012) Functional and ecological consequences of saprotrophic fungus-grazer interactions. ISME J 6:1992–2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaff MA, Classen AT, Castro HF et al (2010) Labile soil carbon inputs mediate the soil microbial community composition and plant residue decomposition rates. New Phytol 188:1055–1064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Baquerizo M, Giaramida L, Reich PB et al (2016) Lack of functional redundancy in the relationship between microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning. J Ecol 104:936–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durall DM, Todd AW, Trappe JM (1994) Decomposition of C-14-labeled substrates by ectomycorrhizal fungi in association with Douglas-fir. New Phytol 127:725–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fanin N, Fromin N, Bertrand I (2016) Functional breadth and home-field advantage generate functional differences among soil microbial decomposers. Ecology 97:1023–1037

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii S, Makita N, Mori AS et al (2016) Plant species control and soil faunal involvement in the processes of above- and below-ground litter decomposition. Oikos 125:883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Palacios P, Maestre FT, Kattge J et al (2013) Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. Ecol Lett 16:1045–1053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK et al (2010) Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol 25:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gholz HL, Wedin DA, Smitherman SM et al (2000) Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition. Glob Chang Biol 6:751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesselmann UC, Martins KG, Brandle M et al (2011) Lack of home-field advantage in the decomposition of leaf litter in the Atlantic rainforest of Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol 49:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez G, Seastedt TR (2001) Soil fauna and plant litter decomposition in tropical and subalpine forests. Ecology 82:955–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graça MAS, Bärlocher F, Gessner MO (2005) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. In: Springer. Dordrecht, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson CA, Allison SD, Bradford MA et al (2008) Fungal taxa target different carbon sources in forest soil. Ecosystems 11:1157–1167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hättenschwiler S, Vitousek PM (2000) The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 15:238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt HW, Coleman DC, Ingham ER et al (1987) The detrital food web in a shortgrass prairie. Biol Fertil Soils 3:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JB (2001) Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser AD, Keiser DA, Strickland MS et al (2014) Disentangling the mechanisms underlying functional differences among decomposer communities. J Ecol 102:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser AD, Strickland MS, Fierer N et al (2011) The effect of resource history on the functioning of soil microbial communities is maintained across time. Biogeosciences 8:1477–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin DM, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Lai JS et al (2016) Traits of dominant tree species predict local scale variation in forest aboveground and topsoil carbon stocks. Plant Soil 409:435–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magoc T, Salzberg SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Makkar HPS (2003) Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage: a laboratory manual. In: Kluwer academic publishers. Dordrecht, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire KL, Bent E, Borneman J et al (2010) Functional diversity in resource use by fungi. Ecology 91:2324–2332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire KL, Payne SG, Palmer MI et al (2013) Digging the New York city skyline: soil fungal communities in green roofs and city parks. PLoS One 8:e58020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer V (1978) Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59:465–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milcu A, Manning P (2011) All size classes of soil fauna and litter quality control the acceleration of litter decay in its home environment. Oikos 120:1366–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore TR, Trofymow JA, Taylor B et al (1999) Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests. Glob Chang Biol 5:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell K (1984) Interaction between two decomposer basidiomycetes and a collembolan under Sitka spruce: grazing and its potential effects on fungal distribution and litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 16:235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M et al (2016) Vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version 2:4–1 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson E, Osler G, Dawson LA et al (2008) Labile and recalcitrant plant fractions are utilised by distinct microbial communities in soil: independent of the presence of roots and mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1103–1113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez G, Aubert M, Decaens T et al (2013) Home-field advantage: a matter of interaction between litter biochemistry and decomposer biota. Soil Biol Biochem 67:245–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rousk J, Baath E, Brookes PC et al (2010) Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4:1340–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousk J, Frey SD (2015) Revisiting the hypothesis that fungal-to-bacterial dominance characterizes turnover of soil organic matter and nutrients. Ecol Monogr 85:457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2010) SAS for Windows, version 9.3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. USA

  • Strickland MS, Lauber C, Fierer N et al (2009) Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition. Ecology 90:441–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St John MG, Orwin KH, Dickie IA (2011) No 'home' versus 'away' effects of decomposition found in a grassland-forest reciprocal litter transplant study. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1482–1489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen GF, Sundqvist MK, Wardle DA (2015) Environmental factors and traits that drive plant litter decomposition do not determine home-field advantage effects. Funct Ecol 29:981–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco L, Austin AT (2008) Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long-term plant and soil interactions in Patagonia, Argentina. J Ecol 96:727–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voriskova J, Baldrian P (2013) Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. ISME J 7:477–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wall DH, Bradford MA, St John MG et al (2008) Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent. Glob Chang Biol 14:2661–2677

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DQ, Hui DF, Luo YQ et al (2008) Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol 1:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JZ, Deng Y, Shen LN et al (2016) Temperature mediates continental-scale diversity of microbes in forest soils. Nat Commun 7:12083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Pei Wang and Yan Liu for their help in perparing litterbags, and Zhenxi Lai, Pengpeng Dou and Fang Wang for their help in the field and laboratory. We would also like to thank Alison Beamish at the University of British Columbia for her assistance with English language and grammatical editing of the manuscript, and anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 31500356], Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology [No. cstc2016jcyjA0004], Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [No. 2018CDXYCH0014] and the 111 Project [No. B13041].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region’s Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, 174th, Shapingba Zhengjie Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400045, China

    Dunmei Lin, Mei Pang, Shenhua Qian, Liang Zhao & Yongchuan Yang

  2. Interaction Soil Plant Atmosphere (ISPA), UMR 1391, INRA - Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 71 avenue Edouard Bourlaux, 33882, Villenave-d′Ornon cedex, France

    Nicolas Fanin

  3. Biotechnology Research Center, Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing, 401329, China

    Hongjuan Wang

  4. National Centre for International Research of Low-carbon and Green Buildings, Ministry of Science & Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China

    Shenhua Qian, Liang Zhao & Yongchuan Yang

  5. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China

    Xiangcheng Mi & Keping Ma

Authors
  1. Dunmei Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mei Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicolas Fanin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongjuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shenhua Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yongchuan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiangcheng Mi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Keping Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dunmei Lin.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: François Teste.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 12 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 64 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, D., Pang, M., Fanin, N. et al. Fungi participate in driving home-field advantage of litter decomposition in a subtropical forest. Plant Soil 434, 467–480 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3865-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3865-5

Keywords

  • Home-field advantage
  • Litter-decomposer interactions
  • Litter traits
  • Local adaptation
  • Functional redundancy