Microbial expression profiles in the rhizosphere of two maize lines differing in N use efficiency
Study of the microbial expression profile in the rhizosphere of two contrasting maize lines, differing in the Nitrogen Use efficiency (NUE).
The Lo5 and T250 inbred maize characterized by high and low NUE, respectively, were grown in rhizoboxes allowing precise sampling of rhizosphere and bulk soils. We conducted metatranscriptomic of rhizosphere and bulk soil by m-RNA sequencing.
High activity of bacteria was observed compared to archaea and fungi in both rhizosphere and bulk soils of both maize lines. Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were involved in all processes, while significant shifts occurred in the expression of Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Cyanobacteria, archaea and fungi, indicating their possible role in specific processes occurring in rhizosphere of two maize lines. Maize plants with different NUE induced changes in microbial processes, especially in N cycling, with high NUE maize favouring ammonification and nitrification processes and low NUE maize inducing expression of genes encoding for denitrifying process, likely favoured by longer N residence time in the rhizosphere.
Overall our results showed that maize lines with different NUE shaped not only microbial communities but also conditioned the microbial functions and the N cycle in their rhizosphere. While the plant NUE is genetically determined and an inherent plant physiological trait, it also stimulates changes in the microbial community composition and gene expression in the rhizosphere, favouring microbial processes that mineralize and oxidize N in the high NUE maize. These results can improve our understanding on plant-microbe interaction in the rhizosphere of crop plants with potential applications for improving the management practices of the agro-ecosystems.
KeywordsMetatranscriptomic mRNA Gene expression Functional diversity Rhizosphere Nitrogen use efficiency
This research was supported by the Ministry for Education and Research project “PRIN 2009MWY5F9”. Shamina Imran Pathan was supported by the Marie Curie ITN action “TRAINBIODIVERSE”, grant no. 289949. The Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences thanks to the Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze for the financial support for the acquisition of new instruments. Moreover, we would like to thank Editor and anonymous Reviewer for their valuable suggestions.
- Aislabie J, Deslippe JR (2013) Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services. In dymond JRed. Ecosystem services in New Zealand – Condition and trend. Manaaki Whenual press, Lincon. NewZealand pp-143:161Google Scholar
- Baraniya D, Puglisi E, Ceccherini MT, Pietramellara G, Giagnoni L, Arenella MR, Nannipieri P, Renella G (2016) Protease encoding microbial communities and protease activity of therhizosphere and bulk soils of two maize lines with different N uptake efficiency. Soil Biol Biochem 96:176–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bland C, Armengaud J (2014) Proteogenomics: a new integrative approach for a better description of protein diversity found in soil microflora. In Nannipieri P, Pietramellara G, Renella G (eds) Omics in soil science. Caister Academic Press, UK, pp 139–162Google Scholar
- Brimecombe MJ, De Leij FAAM, Lynch JM (2007) Rhizodeposition and microbial populations. In: Pinton, R., Varanini, Z., Nannipieri, P. (Eds.), The Rhizosphere: Biochemistry and Organic Sub-stances at the Soil-plant Interface. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York, pp. 73–109Google Scholar
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistic software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:1–9Google Scholar
- Jonczyk R, Schmidt H, Osterrieder A, Fiesselmann A, Schullehner K, Haslbeck M, Sicker D, Hofmann D, Yalpani N, Simmons C, Frey M, Gierl A (2008) Elucidation of the final reactions of DIMBOA-glucoside biosynthesis in maize: characterization of Bx6 and Bx7. Plant Physiol 146:1053–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lynch JM (1990) Introduction: some consequences of microbial rhizosphere competence for plant and soil. In: Lynch JM (ed) The rhizosphere. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–10Google Scholar
- Meyer F, Paarmann D, D'Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, Paczian T, Rodriguez A, Stevens R, Wilke A, Wilkening J, Edwards RA (2008) The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9:386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moran AM (2009) Metatranscriptomics: eavesdropping on complex microbial communities. Microbe 4:329–335Google Scholar
- Nannipieri P (2014) Soil as biological system. In: Nannipieri P, Pietramellara G, Renella G (Eds)., omics in soil science. Caister Academic Press, U.K, pp 1–7Google Scholar
- Pathan SI, Ceccherini MT, Hansen MA, Giagnoni L, Ascher J, Arenella M, Sørensen SJ, Pietramellara G, Nannipieri P, Renella G (2015b) Maize lines with different nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) also differ for molecular diversity of bacterial β-glucosidase gene and glucosidase activity in their rhizosphere. Biol Fertil Soils 51:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.Rproject.org
- Varanini Z, Cesco S, Tomasi N, Pinton R, Guzzo F, Zamboni A, Schloter-Hai B, Schloter M, Giagnoni L, Arenella M, Nannipieri P, Renella G (2018) Nitrate induction and physiological responses of two maize lines differing in nitrogen use efficiency: effects on N availability, microbial diversity and enzyme activity in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 422:331–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Villagrasa M, Guillamón M, Navarro A, Eljarrat E, Barceló D (2008) Development of a pressurized liquid extractions solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitative determination of benzoxazolinones and their degradation products in agricultural soil. J Chromatogr A 1179:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WRB World Reference Base for Soil Resources (1998) World soil resources reports 84. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar