Plant and Soil

, Volume 427, Issue 1–2, pp 291–304 | Cite as

Root responses to domestication, precipitation and silicification: weeping meadow grass simplifies and alters toughness

  • James M. W. RyallsEmail author
  • Ben D. Moore
  • Scott N. Johnson
  • Myles Connor
  • Ivan Hiltpold
Regular Article


Background and aims

Plant breeding usually focuses on conspicuous above-ground plant traits, yet roots fundamentally underpin plant fitness. Roots show phenotypic plasticity in response to soil conditions but it is unclear whether domesticated plants respond like their ancestors. We aimed to determine how root traits differed between ancestral and domesticated types of a meadow grass (Microlaena stipoides) under altered regimes of precipitation and soil silicon availability.


We subjected the two grass types to three simulated precipitation regimes (ambient, +50%/deluge and −50%/drought) in soil with (Si+) and without (Si−) silicon supplementation and then characterised root biomass, architectural complexity and toughness in addition to shoot traits.


Domestication increased root tissue density, decreased specific root length (SRL) and decreased root architectural complexity. Domestication also increased root strength under Si− conditions but not Si+ conditions. Fine roots, SRL, architectural complexity and the force required to tear the roots all decreased under deluge. The ancestral and domesticated grasses responded similarly to precipitation, except that the latter had weaker roots (decreased fracture strain) under drought.


Domestication and increased precipitation caused changes in M. stipoides root traits that could be beneficial against some stresses (e.g. soil compaction, herbivory) but not others (e.g. drought).


Deluge Drought Fracture strain Root architectural complexity Root trait selection Tensile strength 



root tissue density


specific root length


specific root area













This research was funded by a Discovery Project grant from the Australian Research Council (ARC DP140100636) awarded to SNJ and BDM and an internship from the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment awarded to MC. We would like to thank Dr. I. Chivers (Native Seeds Pty Ltd., Australia) for providing the seeds.

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3650_MOESM1_ESM.docx (536 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 536 kb)


  1. Børja I, De Wit HA, Steffenrem A, Majdi H (2008) Stand age and fine root biomass, distribution and morphology in a Norway spruce chronosequence in Southeast Norway. Tree Physiol 28:773–784. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouma TJ, Nielsen KL, Koutstaal B (2000) Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerised analysis of root length and diameter. Plant Soil 218:185–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casler MD, van Santen E (2010) Breeding objectives in forages. In: Boller B, Posselt UK, Veronesi F (eds) Handbook of plant breeding: fodder crops and amenity grasses, vol 5. Springer. New York, USA, pp 129–150Google Scholar
  4. Chen YH, Bernal CC (2011) Arthropod diversity and community composition on wild and cultivated rice. Agric For Entomol 13:181–189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen YH, Romena A (2008) Rice domestication decreases tolerance to the yellow stemborer, Scirpophaga incertulas. International Rice Research Notes 32:21–27Google Scholar
  6. Chen YH, Gols R, Benrey B (2015) Crop domestication and its impact on naturally selected trophic interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 60:35–58. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiew FHS, Young WJ, Cai W, Teng J (2011) Current drought and future hydroclimate projections in Southeast Australia and implications for water resources management. Stoch Env Res Risk A 25:601–612. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman DC (1976) A review of root production processes and their influence on biota in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Anderson JM, MacFadyen A (eds) The role of terrestrial and aquatic organisms in decomposition processes. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 417–434Google Scholar
  9. Comas LH, Becker SR, Cruz VM, Byrne PF, Dierig DA (2013) Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Front Plant Sci 4:442. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke J, Leishman MR (2011) Is plant ecology more siliceous than we realise? Trends Plant Sci 16:61–68. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. de Vries FT, Brown C, Stevens CJ (2016) Grassland species root response to drought: consequences for soil carbon and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 409:297–312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE (2017) Silicon’s role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 55:4.1–4.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Demarta L, Hibbard BE, Bohn MO, Hiltpold I (2014) The role of root architecture in foraging behavior of entomopathogenic nematodes. J Invertebr Pathol 122:32–39. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Deshmukh R, Bélanger RR (2016) Molecular evolution of aquaporins and silicon influx in plants. Funct Ecol 30:1277–1285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ennos AR (1991) The mechanics of anchorage in wheat Triticum aestivum L.: I. THE ANCHORAGE OF WHEAT SEEDLINGS. J Exp Bot 42:1601–1606. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erb M, Robert CAM, Marti G, Lu J, Doyen G, Villard N, Barrière Y, French BW, Wolfender JL, Turlings T, Gershenzon J (2015) A physiological and behavioral mechanism for leaf herbivore-induced systemic root resistance. Plant Physiol 169:2884–2894. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans LT (1996) Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Fita A, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Boscaiu M, Prohens J, Vicente O (2015) Breeding and domesticating crops adapted to drought and salinity: a new paradigm for increasing food production. Front Plant Sci 6:978. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleck AT, Schulze S, Hinrichs M, Specht A, Waßmann F, Schreiber L, Schenk MK (2015) Silicon promotes exodermal casparian band formation in Si-accumulating and Si-excluding species by forming phenol complexes. PLoS One 10:e0138555. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Frew A, Powell JR, Sallam N, Allsopp PG, Johnson SN (2016) Trade-offs between silicon and phenolic defenses may explain enhanced performance of root herbivores on phenolic-rich plants. J Chem Ecol 42:768–771. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Glémin S, Bataillon T (2009) A comparative view of the evolution of grasses under domestication. New Phytol 183:273–290. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gregory PJ (2006) Plant roots: growth, activity and interaction with soils, 1st edn. Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hales TC, Miniat CF (2017) Soil moisture causes dynamic adjustments to root reinforcement that reduce slope stability. Earth Surf Process Landf 42:803–813. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen DJ, Dayanandan P, Kaufman PB, Brotherson JD (1976) Ecological adaptations of salt marsh grass, Distichlis spicata (Gramineae), and environmental factors affecting its growth and distribution. Am J Bot 63:635–650. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harlan JR, de Wet JMJ, Price EG (1973) Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution 27:311–325. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartley SE, DeGabriel JL (2016) The ecology of herbivore-induced silicon defences in grasses. Funct Ecol 30:1311–1322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hattori T, Inanaga S, Tanimoto E, Lux A, Luxova M, Sugimoto Y (2003) Silicon-induced changes in viscoelastic properties of sorghum root cell walls. Plant Cell Physiol 44:743–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hillman G, Hedges R, Moore A, Colledge S, Pettitt P (2001) New evidence of Lateglacial cereal cultivation at Abu Hureyra on the Euphrates. The Holocene 11:383–393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hiltpold I, Demarta L, Johnson SN, Moore BD, Power SA, Mitchell C (2016) Silicon and other essential element composition in roots using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy: a high throughput approach. In: Johnson SN (ed) Invertebrate ecology of Australasian grasslands. Western Sydney University, HawkesburyGoogle Scholar
  30. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Huyghe C, Brummer EC (2013) Forage and grasslands in a sustainable agriculture: new challenges for breeding. In: Sokolović D, Huyghe C, Radović J (eds) Quantitative traits breeding for multifunctional grasslands and turf. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson SN, Nielsen UN (2012) Foraging in the dark – chemically mediated host plant location by belowground insect herbivores. J Chem Ecol 38:604–614. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson SN, Hallett PD, Gillespie TL, Halpin C (2010) Below-ground herbivory and root toughness: a potential model system using lignin-modified tobacco. Physiol Entomol 35:186–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kiba T, Krapp A (2016) Plant nitrogen acquisition under low availability: regulation of uptake and root architecture. Plant Cell Physiol 57:707–714. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Lux A, Luxová M, Abe J, Tanimoto E, Hattori T, Inanaga S (2003) The dynamics of silicon deposition in the sorghum root endodermis. New Phytol 158:437–441. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malory S (2014) Accelerated domestication of Australian native grass species using molecular tools. Southern Cross UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Malory S, Shapter FM, Elphinstone MS, Chivers IH, Henry RJ (2011) Characterizing homologues of crop domestication genes in poorly described wild relatives by high-throughput sequencing of whole genomes. Plant Biotechnol J 9:1131–1140. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mariotti Lippi M, Foggi B, Aranguren B, Ronchitelli A, Revedin A (2015) Multistep food plant processing at Grotta Paglicci (Southern Italy) around 32,600 cal B.P. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:12075–12080. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall AH, Collins RP, Humphreys MW, Scullion J (2016) A new emphasis on root traits for perennial grass and legume varieties with environmental and ecological benefits. Food Energy Secur 5:26–39. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Massei G, Hartley SE (2000) Disarmed by domestication? Induced responses to browsing in wild and cultivated olive. Oecologia 122:225–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazzacavallo MG, Kulmatiski A (2015) Modelling water uptake provides a new perspective on grass and tree coexistence. PLoS One 10:e0144300. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell M (2013) Ecology of Microlaena stipoides in grazing systems. Charles Sturt UniversityGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitchell M, Stodart B, Virgona J (2014) Genetic diversity within a population of Microlaena stipoides, as revealed by AFLP markers. Aust J Bot 62:580–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore BD, Johnson SN (2016) Get tough, get toxic or get a bodyguard: identifying candidate traits conferring belowground resistance to herbivores in grasses. Front Plant Sci 7:1925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Oksanen J et al (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4–2Google Scholar
  47. Ostonen I, Püttsepp Ü, Biel C, Alberton O, Bakker MR, Lõhmus K, Majdi H, Metcalfe D, Olsthoorn AFM, Pronk A, Vanguelova E, Weih M, Brunner I (2007) Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosyst 141:426–442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paez-Garcia A, Motes CM, Scheible W-R, Chen R, Blancaflor EB, Monteros MJ (2015) Root traits and phenotyping strategies for plant improvement. Plants 4:334–355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, de Vos AC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, ter Steege H, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2017) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–131 URL:
  51. Piwowarczyk B, Tokarz K, Makowski W, Łukasiewicz A (2017) Different acclimatization mechanisms of two grass pea cultivars to osmotic stress in in vitro culture. Acta Physiol Plant 39:96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Power SA, Barnett KL, Ochoa-Hueso R, Facey SL, Gibson-Forty EVJ, Hartley SE, Nielsen UN, Tissue DT, Johnson SN (2016) Dri-grass: a new experimental platform for addressing grassland ecosystem responses to future precipitation scenarios in south-East Australia. Front Plant Sci 7.
  53. Qin X, Niklas KJ, Qi L, Xiong Y, Li F (2012) The effects of domestication on the scaling of below- vs. aboveground biomass in four selected wheat (Triticum; Poaceae) genotypes. Am J Bot 99:1112–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  55. Richmond KE, Sussman M (2003) Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:268–272. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenthal JP, Welter SC (1995) Tolerance to herbivory by a stemboring caterpillar in architecturally distinct maizes and wild relatives. Oecologia 102:146–155. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryalls JM, Hartley SE, Johnson SN (2017) Impacts of silicon-based grass defences across trophic levels under both current and future atmospheric CO2 scenarios. Biol Lett 13:1–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Salminen J-P, Karonen M (2011) Chemical ecology of tannins and other phenolics: we need a change in approach. Funct Ecol 25:325–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shapter FM, Cross M, Ablett G, Malory S, Chivers IH, King GJ, Henry RJ (2013) High-throughput sequencing and mutagenesis to accelerate the domestication of Microlaena stipoides as a new food crop. PloS one 8:e82641CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Simpson KJ, Wade RN, Rees M, Osborne CP, Hartley SE (2017) Still armed after domestication? Impacts of domestication and agronomic selection on silicon defences in cereals. Funct Ecol 31:2108–2117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smartt J, Simmonds NW (1995) Evolution of crop plants. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Sokolović D, Huyghe C, Radović J (2014) Quantitative traits breeding for multifunctional grasslands and turf. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soukup M, Martinka M, Bosnić D, Čaplovičová M, Elbaum R, Lux A (2017) Formation of silica aggregates in sorghum root endodermis is predetermined by cell wall architecture and development Ann Bot
  64. Striker GG, Insausti P, Grimoldi AA, León RJC (2006) Root strength and trampling tolerance in the grass Paspalum dilatatum and the dicot Lotus glaber in flooded soil. Funct Ecol 20:4–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tron S, Bodner G, Laio F, Ridolfi L, Leitner D (2015) Can diversity in root architecture explain plant water use efficiency? A modeling study. Ecol Model 312:200–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Turcotte MM, Turley NE, Johnson MT (2014) The impact of domestication on resistance to two generalist herbivores across 29 independent domestication events. New Phytol 204:671–681. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. War AR, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T, Buhroo AA, Hussain B, Ignacimuthu S, Sharma HC (2012) Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav 7:1306–1320. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitehead SR, Turcotte MM, Poveda K (2017) Domestication impacts on plant-herbivore interactions: a meta-analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 372:20160034. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang Y, Chen L, Li N, Zhang Q (2016) Effect of root moisture content and diameter on root tensile properties. PloS One 11:e0151791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. W. Ryalls
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ben D. Moore
    • 1
  • Scott N. Johnson
    • 1
  • Myles Connor
    • 1
  • Ivan Hiltpold
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Hawkesbury Institute for the EnvironmentWestern Sydney UniversityRichmondAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  3. 3.Department of Entomology and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations