Over twenty years farmland reforestation decreases fungal diversity of soils, but stimulates the return of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities
Background and Aims
Although soil-inhabiting fungi can affect tree health and biomass production in managed and pristine forests, little is known about the sensitivity of the plant-fungal associations to long-term changes in land use. We aimed to investigate how reforestation of farmlands change soil characteristics and affected the recovery of soil fungal functional guilds.
We examined edaphic conditions and fungal communities (Illumina Sequencing) in three land-use types: primary forests (PF), secondary forests (SF, established over two decades ago) and active farmlands during May, July and September in Wuying, China.
Edaphic conditions and general fungal communities varied with land-use. Interestingly, overall fungal diversity was higher in soils at the farmland than at the forested sites, possibly as a result of recurring disturbances (tilling) allowing competitive release as described by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Although ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and richness were marginally higher in PF than in SF, the latter still hosted surprisingly diverse and abundant ectomycorrhizal fungal communities.
Reforestation largely restored fungal communities that were still in transition, as their composition in SF was distinct from that in PF. Our results highlight the ability of fungi grown in previously strongly managed agricultural land to rapidly respond to reforestation and thus provide support for forest trees.
KeywordsFungal community development Reforestation Fungal functional guild Atrazine Ectomycorrhizal fungal community
We are grateful to Mr. Quanyou Zhang and Mr. Minghao Zhang for their help with field sampling. Prof. Changlin Hui provided information on land-use history in Wuying. Mr. Lars Paulin provided advice and services in DNA sequencing. We would also thank the section editor and the two reviewers for providing detailed comments that helped us improve this work immeasurably. The study was supported by Tekes (project number 2975/31/2015).
- Emurotu M, Anyanwu C (2016) Effect of atrazine and butachlor on soil microflora in agricultural farm in Anyigba, Nigeria. Eur J Exp Biol 6:16–20Google Scholar
- Higgins KL, Arnold AE, Miadlikowska J, Sarvate SD, Lutzoni F (2007) Phylogenetic relationships, host affinity, and geographic structure of boreal and arctic endophytes from three major plant lineages. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:543–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.07.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Molina R, Horton TR (2015) Mycorrhiza Specificity: Its Role in the Development and Function of Common Mycelial Networks. In: Horton TR (ed) Mycorrhizal Networks. Springer Netherlands, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Oria-de-Rueda JA, Hernández-Rodríguez M, Martín-Pinto P, Pando V, Olaizola J (2010) Could artificial reforestations provide as much production and diversity of fungal species as natural forest stands in marginal Mediterranean areas? For Ecol Manag 260:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Santalahti M, Sun H, Jumpponen A, Pennanen T, Heinonsalo J (2016) Vertical and seasonal dynamics of fungal communities in boreal Scots pine forest soil. FEMS Microb Ecol 92: fiw170Google Scholar
- Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tedersoo L, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Jairus T, Sadam A, Saar I, Bahram M, Bechem E, Chuyong G, Kõljalg U (2010) 454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. New Phytol 188:291–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verbruggen E, Röling WF, Gamper HA, Kowalchuk GA, Verhoef HA, van der Heijden MG (2010) Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils. New Phytol 186: 968–979Google Scholar