Important interaction of chemicals, microbial biomass and dissolved substrates in the diel hysteresis loop of soil heterotrophic respiration
- 204 Downloads
Background and aims
Increasing the emission of carbon dioxide by heterotrophic respiration (Rh) might lead to global warming. However, issues remain on how Rh responds to changing temperatures, especially with respect to the hysteresis loop in the relationship between Rh and temperature at the daily scale, along with elucidating the underlying mechanisms.
We investigated hysteresis loop by measuring Rh in subtropical forest soil at the daily scale (12 h for warm-up (6–30 °C) and cool-down processes (30–6 °C), respectively) using continuous temperature variation and high resolution of measurements over a 56-day incubation period. The ratios of R20 and Q10 between warm-up and cool-down were calculated as the characteristics of diel hysteresis. We measured chemical (pH, conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential), microbial biomass and dissolved substrate (carbon and nitrogen) parameters to explain variation of diel hysteresis.
Rh was strongly dependent on temperature, with a clockwise hysteresis loop of Rh between the warm-up and cool-down daily processes. The average value of R20 [at a reference temperature of 20 °C] during the whole incubation period under the warm-up process was significantly higher (46.05 ± 0.96 μgC g−1 d−1) than that under the cool-down process (14.74 ± 0.03 μgC g−1 d−1). In comparison, the average value of Q10 under the cool-down process (5.27 ± 0.2) was significantly higher than that under the warm-up process (1.66 ± 0.02). Redundancy analysis showed that the interaction effects of soil chemical, microbial biomass, and dissolved substrate parameters explain most variation of diel hysteresis: 98% variation in R20 and 93.5% variation in Q10. Compared with the weak effect of chemistry parameters on the diel hysteresis, the sole and interactive effects of microbial biomass and substrate were more important, especially their interaction.
Interactions of chemical, microbial biomass, and dissolved substrate parameters dominated the variation in diel hysteresis of Rh with temperature, especially the interaction of microbial biomass and dissolved substrate. Of note, Q10 during the warm-up process might be overestimated when using the highly fitted temperature-dependent function of cool-down period. Furthermore, using a constant value of Q10 (Q10 = 2) in carbon cycle models might be an important source of uncertainty.
KeywordsWarm-up Cool-down Substrate Microbial biomass Heterotrophic respiration
This work was partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0500102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770655, 41571130043). Nianpeng He contributes the conception and design; Qing Wang conducted the experiment and analyzes the data. All authors contributed to the final version. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. We thank the reviewers to improve the manuscript.
- Cheng L, Zhang NF, Yuan MT, Xiao J, Qin YJ, Deng Y, Tu QC, Xue K, Van Nostrand JD, Wu LY, He ZL, Zhou XH, Leigh MB, Konstantinidis KT, Schuur EAG, Luo YQ, Tiedje JM, Zhou JZ (2017) Warming enhances old organic carbon decomposition through altering functional microbial communities. ISME J 11:1825–1835CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lefevre R, Barre P, Moyano FE, Christensen BT, Bardoux G, Eglin T, Girardin C, Houot S, Katterer T, van Oort F, Chenu C (2014) Higher temperature sensitivity for stable than for labile soil organic carbon-Evidence from incubations of long- term bare fallow soils. Glob Chang Biol 20:633–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liski J, Ilvesniemi H, Mäkelä A, Westman CJ (1999) CO2 emissions from soil in response to climatic warming are overestimated-The decomposition of old soil organic matter istolerant of temperature. Ambio 28:171–174Google Scholar
- Riveros-Iregui DA, Emanuel RE, Muth DJ, McGlynn BL, Epstein HE, Welsch DL, Pacific VJ, Wraith JM (2007) Diurnal hysteresis between soil CO2 and soil temperature is controlled by soil water content. Geophys Res Lett:34Google Scholar
- Rousk J, Baath E (2011) Growth of saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in soil. Fems Microbiol Ecol 78:17–30Google Scholar
- Rovira P, Jorba M, Romanya J (2010) Active and passive organic matter fractions in Mediterranean forest soils. Biol Fert Soils 46:355-369.Rousk J, Bååth E (2011) Growth of saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:17–30Google Scholar
- ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2012) Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Ithaca USA: Microcomputer Power, 2012Google Scholar