Quantification of the contrasting root systems of Pinus thunbergii in soils with different groundwater levels in a coastal forest in Japan

  • Yasuhiro Hirano
  • Chikage Todo
  • Keitaro Yamase
  • Toko Tanikawa
  • Masako Dannoura
  • Mizue Ohashi
  • Ryuusei Doi
  • Ryusei Wada
  • Hidetoshi Ikeno
Regular Article
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

The different root systems of Pinus thunbergii observed after the tsunami in 2011 were possibly influenced by different groundwater levels before the tsunami. The aims of this study were to quantify the tap and horizontal root structure and evaluate their relationship with the above-ground parts under different groundwater levels in a coastal P. thunbergii forest.

Methods

Two plots, sea- and land-side, with different groundwater levels, in a P. thunbergii stand, were established, and the entire root-systems of three select trees each were harvested to evaluate the biomass, lengths, and cross-sectional areas of the tap and horizontal roots.

Results

In the sea-side plot, which had a shallower groundwater level, plate root systems with thicker and longer horizontal roots, but fewer tap roots were observed, whereas tap root systems were well developed in the land-side plots, where the groundwater level was deeper. The root-to- shoot ratio was significantly higher in the sea-side plot than in the land-side plot.

Conclusion

We confirmed that quantitative contrasting root systems of P. thunbergii develop under different groundwater levels and higher biomass allocation to horizontal roots occur under shallower groundwater depths, emphasizing the need for management practices that promote the development of tap root systems to enhance resistance to tsunamis.

Keywords

Biomass allocation Horizontal root Root-to-shoot ratio Plasticity Tap root Tsunami 

Abbreviations

DBH

Stem diameter at breast height

EC

Electrical conductivity

H

Stem height

HLB

Stem height of lowest living branch

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Noguchi (Tohoku Research Center, FFPRI) for improving the manuscript, and K. Kujihashi, K. Okuda (University of Hyogo), J. An, R. Nakahata (Kyoto University), and S. Ohashi (Manbokuen), M. Harano (Aichi branch, Japan Tree Doctors Association) for their invaluable field and laboratory assistance, and A. Yoshikawa (Kyoto University) for the help with the photo analysis of root systems. We also thank A. Miyamoto, K. Hattori (Aichi Prefecture Fisheries Center), N. Yamashita, A. Ishida, A. Nakashima (Aichi Forestry Prefectural Center), the Aichi Prefecture Fisheries Center and Aichi Prefectural Government for permission to use the field site.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brunner I, Herzog C, Dawes MA, Arend M, Sperisen C (2015) How tree roots respond to drought. Front Plant Sci 6:547.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00547 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Coutts MP (1982) The tolerance of tree roots to waterlogging. V. Growth of woody root of Sitka spruce and lodgepole pine in waterlogged soil. New Phytol 90:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coutts MP, Philipson JJ (1978) Tolerance of tree roots to waterlogging. New Phytol 80:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cucchi V, Meredieu C, Stokes A, Berthier S, Bert D, Najar M, Denis A, Lastennet R (2004) Root anchorage of inner and edge trees in stands of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) growing in different podzolic soil conditions. Trees 18:460–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Iorio A, Lasserre B, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2005) Root system architecture of Quercus pubescens trees growing on different sloping conditions. Ann Bot 95:351–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005) A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant Soil 278:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahey T, Heinz AK, Battles JJ, Fisk MC, Driscoll CT, Blum JD, Johnson CE (2016) Fine root biomass declined in response to restoration of soil calcium in a northern hardwood forest. Can J For Res 46:738–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO-UNESCO (1990) Soil map of the world. Revised legend. Reprinted with corrections. World soil resources report 60. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. Forestry Agency of Japan (2012) Annual Report on Forest and Forestry in Japan for FY2013. http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/kikaku/hakusyo/23hakusyo/pdf/honbun1-3.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2017
  11. Glenz C, Schlaepfer R, Iorgulescu I, Kienast F (2006) Flooding tolerance of Central Europe tree and shrub species. For Ecol Manag 235:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godbold DL, Fritz HW, Jentschke G, Meesenburg H, Rademacher P (2003) Root turnover and root necromass accumulation of Norway spruce (Picea abies) are affected by soil acidity. Tree Physiol 23:915–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirano Y, Dannoura M, Aono K, Igarashi T, Ishii M, Yamase K, Makita N, Kanazawa Y (2009) Limiting factor in the detection of tree roots using ground-penetrating radar. Plant Soil 319:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirano Y, Yamamoto R, Dannoura M, Aono K, Igarashi T, Ishi M, Yamase K, Makita N, Kanazawa Y (2012) Detection frequency of Pinus thunbergii roots by ground-penetrating radar is related to root biomass. Plant Soil 360:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirano Y, Tanikawa T, Makita N (2017) Biomass and morphology of fine roots in eight Cryptomeria japonica stands in soils with different acid-buffering capacities. For Ecol Manag 384:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf_files/GPG_LULUCF_FULL.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2017
  17. Japan Meteorological Agency (2017) http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  18. Karizumi N (2010) The latest illustrations of tree roots (general remarks). Seibundoshinko-sya, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. King JS, Giardina CP, Pregitzer KS, Friend AL (2007) Biomass partitioning in red pine (Pinus resinosa) along a chronosequence in the upper peninsula of Michigan. Can J For Res 37:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (2002) Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. The Bot Rev 68:270–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masaka K, Torita H, Sato H, Kon H, Sato H, Fukuchi M (2010) Decline of Pinus thunbergii Parlat. stands due to excess soil moisture caused by a buried andosol layer at a coastal sand site in Hokkaido, northern Japan. J For Res 15:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meier I, Kunzen F, Eder LM, Muller-Haubold H, Goebel MO, Bachmann J, Hertel D, Leuschner C (2017) The deep root system of Fagus sylvatica on sandy soil: structure and variation across a precipitation gradient. Ecosystems 21:280–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0148-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ministry of Environment Japan (2017) National green gas inventory report of Japan (2017). http://www-gio.nies.go.jp/aboutghg/nir/2017/NIR-JPN-2017-v3.1_web.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2017
  24. Miyata K, Kitahara H, Ono H (2013) Tree-pulling experiments of Pinus thunbergii forest along the seashore of Cape Irago, Aichi. Chubu. For Res 61:1–4 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  25. Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS (2006) Critical analysis of root: shoot rations in terrestrial biomes. Glob Chang Biol 12:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadelhoffer KJ (2000) The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine root production in forest ecosystems. New Phytol 137:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicoll BC, Ray D (1996) Adaptive growth of tree root systems in response to wind action and site conditions. Tree Physiol 16:891–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicoll BC, Gardiner BA, Rayner B, Pearce AJ (2006) Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Can J For Res 36:1871–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noguchi H, Suzuki S, Nanko K, Takeuchi Y, Kaneko T, Nitta K, Watanabe K, Sakamoto T (2014) Evaluation of lodging resistance characteristics of broad-leaved tree and Pinus thunbergii planted in coastal sand dunes using tree-pulling experiments. J Jpn Soc Coast For 13:59–66 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  30. Oda T (2001) Study on the reaction of planted tree root systems to water-logging and its application to developing forests in damp lowlands of coastal sand dunes. Spec Bull Chiba Pref For Res Center 3:1–78 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  31. Ohno R (2012) Report of field investigation. In: Research Institute of Forest Conservation and Management (ed) Report on research investigation of coastal forests and tsunami. Research Institute of Forest Conservation and Management. pp 71–92. http://www.hozen-ken.jp/menu/2012-01siryou5.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2017 (in Japanese)
  32. Polomski J, Kuhn N (1998) Wurzelsysteme. Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien, HauptGoogle Scholar
  33. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  34. Ray D, Nicoll BC (1998) The effects of soil water-table depth on root-soil plate development and stability of Sitka spruce. Forestry 71:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reubens B, Poesen J, Danjon F, Geudens G, Muys B (2007) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees 21:385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakamoto T (2012) Regeneration of coastal forests affected by tsunami. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  37. Sakamoto T, Noguchi H, Gotoh Y, Suzuki S, Shimada K (2013) Management of Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii) seedlings caused by natural regeneration. J Jpn Soc Coast For 12:29–34 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  38. Tahara City (2015) Damage investigation for Nankai megathrust earthquake in Tahara city. 26 p. http://www.city.tahara.aichi.jp/_res/projects/default_project/_page_/001/001/437/mayor/newsconference/pdf/1506/1506_1-1nankaitorafu-higaisoutei.pdf. Accessed 27 Sep 2017
  39. Tanaka N, Yagisawa J, Yasuda S (2013) Breaking pattern and critical breaking conditions of Japanese pine trees on coastal sand dunes in huge tsunami caused by great East Japan earthquake. Nat Hazards 65:423–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tanaka J, Nakazawa H, Sato T (2017) Report on harvest of roots systems in Pinus thunbergii and the surrounding ground water level in Nishinohama coastal forest in Tahara, Aichi. J Jpn Soc Reveget Tech 43:298–301 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tobin B, Cermak J, Chiatante D, Danjon F, Di Iorio A, Dupuy J, Eshel A, Jourdan C, Kalliokoski T, Laiho R, Nadezhdina N, Nicoll B, Pages L, Silva J, Spanos I (2007) Towards developmental modelling of tree root systems. Plant Biosyst 141:481–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu YJ, Rohring E, Folster H (1997) Reaction of root systems of grand fir (Abies grandis Lindl.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) to seasonal waterlogging. For Ecol Manag 93:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Hyogo Prefectural Technology Center for Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesShisoJapan
  3. 3.Kansai Research CenterForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteKyotoJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Global Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  5. 5.Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  6. 6.School of Human Science and EnvironmentUniversity of HyogoHimejiJapan

Personalised recommendations