Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 421, Issue 1–2, pp 147–155 | Cite as

Effect of microtopography on soil respiration in an alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau

  • Guoyong Li
  • Junpeng Mu
  • Yinzhan Liu
  • Nicholas G. Smith
  • Shucun Sun
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Soil respiration is an important component of terrestrial carbon cycling and is sensitive to environmental change. Most previous studies focus on the effect of soil temperature and moisture on soil respiration, whereas the impact of spatial heterogeneity (e.g., microtopography) is seldom studied.

Methods

To test the impact of microtopography on soil respiration, we performed a field investigation to examine soil respiration, soil temperature, soil water content, soil total porosity, soil organic content, and plant biomass at a hummock site (composed of grass hummocks and inter-hummock areas) and an adjacent flat meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau.

Results

Similar seasonal dynamics of soil respiration in the grass hummocks, inter-hummock areas, and flat meadow were found in the alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. However, soil respiration of the grass hummocks was 79.3% and 413.9% higher than that of the flat meadow during the growing (April, June, August) and non-growing seasons (October, December, February), respectively. Although there was no difference in soil respiration between the inter-hummock areas and the flat meadow during the non-growing season, soil respiration was 42.5% higher at the inter-hummock areas than the flat meadow during growing season. Larger soil porosity, greater surface area, and more substrate supply, but not more root growth, likely contributed to the higher soil respiration of grass hummocks.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the impact of spatial heterogeneity on soil respiration should be taken into consideration to facilitate the accurate estimation of soil carbon fluxes at ecosystem and regional scales.

Keywords

Soil carbon flux Hummock Soil porosity Temperature Grassland 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Xinwei Wu and Fengjuan Liu for field assistance. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270564, 31000232).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belyea LR, Malmer N (2004) Carbon sequestration in peatland: Patterns and mechanisms of response to climate change. Glob Chang Biol 10:1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billings WD, Luken JO, Mortensen DA (1982) Arctic tundra: A source or sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide in a changing environment? Oecologia 53:7–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A (2010) Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 464:579–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouwman AF, Germon JC (1998) Special issue: Soils and climate change: introduction. Biol Fertil Soils 27:219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bubier JL, Crill PM, Moore TR, Savage K, Varner RK (1998) Seasonal patterns and controls on net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a boreal peatland complex. Global Biogeochem Cy 12:703–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bubier JL, Bhatia G, Moore TR, Roulet NT, Lafleur PM (2003) Spatial and temporal variability in growing-season net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange at a large peatland in Ontario, Canada. Ecosystems 6:353–367Google Scholar
  7. Cao GM, Tang YH, Mo WH, Wang YS, Li YN, Zhao XQ (2004) Grazing intensity alters soil respiration in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan plateau. Soil Biol Biochem 36:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen J, Zhou XH, Wang JF, Hruska T, Shi WY, Cao JJ, Zhang BC, GX X, Chen YZ, Luo YQ (2016) Grazing exclusion reduced soil respiration but increased its temperature sensitivity in a Meadow Grassland on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecol Evol 6:675–687CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2006) User’s guide to SMATR: Standardized Major Axis Tests & Routines Version 2.0, Copyright 2006 Homepage: http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/. Accessed 13 Nov 2006
  10. Flanagan LB, Sharp EJ, Letts MG (2013) Response of plant biomass and soil respiration to experimental warming and precipitation manipulation in a Northern Great Plains grassland. Agric For Meteorol 173:40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman C, Ostle N, Kang H (2001) An enzymatic ‘latch’ on a global carbon store. Nature 409:149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Geng Y, Wang YH, Yang K, Wang SP, Zeng H, Baumann F, Kuehn P, Scholten T, He JS (2012) Soil respiration in Tibetan alpine grasslands: belowground biomass and soil moisture, but not soil temperature, best explain the large-scale patterns. PLoS One 7:e34968CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez-Polo M, Austin AT (2009) Spatial heterogeneity provides organic matter refuges for soil microbial activity in the Patagonian steppe, Argentina. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1348–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grab S (1997) Thermal regime for a thufa apex and its adjoining depression, Mashai Valley, Lesotho. Permafrost Periglac 8:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grab S (2005) Aspects of the geomorphology, genesis and environmental significance of earth hummocks (thúfur, pounus): Miniature cryogenic mounds. Prog Phys Geogr 29:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) Bulk density and linear extensibility. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. SSSA Book Ser, vol 5. SSSA, Madison, pp 201–225Google Scholar
  17. Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48:115–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang J, Zong N, Song MH, Shi PL, Ma WL, Fu G, Shen ZX, Zhang XZ, Ouyang H (2013) Responses of ecosystem respiration and its components to fertilization in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Eur J Soil Biol 56:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim J, Verma SB (1992) Soil surface CO2 flux in a Minnesota peatland. Biogeochemistry 18:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lafleur PM, Moore TR, Roulet NT, Frolking S (2005) Ecosystem respiration in a cool temperate bog depends on peat temperature but not water table. Ecosystems 8:619–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laine A, Sottocornola M, Kiely G, Byrne KA, Wilson D, Tuittila E-S (2006) Estimating net ecosystem exchange in a patterned ecosystem: Example from blanket bog. Agric For Meteorol 138:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li G, Sun S (2011) Plant clipping may cause overestimation of soil respiration in a Tibetan alpine meadow, southwest China. Ecol Res 26(3):497–504Google Scholar
  23. Lin XW, Zhang ZH, Wang SP, YG H, GP X, Luo CY, Chang XF, Duan JC, Lin QY, Xu B, Wang YF, Zhao XQ, Xie ZB (2011) Response of ecosystem respiration to warming and grazing during the growing seasons in the alpine meadow on the Tibetan plateau. Agric For Meteorol 151:792–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu LL, Wang X, Lajeunesse MJ, Miao GF, Piao SL, Wan SQ, YX W, Wang ZH, Yang S, Li P, Deng MF (2015) A cross-biome synthesis of soil respiration and its determinants under simulated precipitation changes. Glob Chang Biol 22:1394–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mark AF (1994) Patterned ground activity in a Southern New Zealand high-alpine cushionfield. Arct Alp Res 26:270–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nielsen UN, Ball BA (2015) Impacts of altered precipitation regimes on soil communities and biogeochemistry in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 21:1407–1421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nieveen JP, Campbell DI, Schipper LA, Blair IJ (2005) Carbon exchange of grazed pasture on a drained peat soil. Glob Chang Biol 11:607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng SS, Piao SL, Wang T, Sun JY, Shen ZH (2009) Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in different ecosystems in China. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1008–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peterson KM, Billings WD, Reynolds DN (1984) Influence of water table and atmospheric CO2 concentration on the carbon balance of arctic tundra. Arct Alp Res 16:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B 44:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scanlon D, Moore T (2000) Carbon dioxide production from peatland soil profiles: the influence of temperature, oxic/anoxic conditions and substrate. Soil Sci 165:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaver GR, Chapin F III, Gartner BL (1986) Factors limiting seasonal growth and peak biomass accumulation in Eriophorum Vaginatum in Alaskan tussock tundra. J Ecol 74:257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaver GR, Johnson LC, Cades DH, Murray G, Laundre JA, Rastetter EB, Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE (1998) Biomass and CO2 flux in wet sedge tundras: Responses to nutrients, temperature, and light. Ecol Monogr 68:75–97Google Scholar
  34. Shen ZX, Li YL, Fu G (2015) Response of soil respiration to short-term experimental warming and precipitation pulses over the growing season in an alpine meadow on the Northern Tibet. Appl Soil Ecol 90:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shipitalo MJ, Dick WA, Edwards WM (2000) Conservation tillage and macropore factors that affect water movement and the fate of chemicals. Soil Tillage Res 53:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sonnentag O, van der Kamp G, Barr AG, Chen JM (2010) On the relationship between water table depth and water vapor and carbon dioxide fluxes in a minerotrophic fen. Glob Chang Biol 16:1762–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strack M, Waddington JM, Rochefort L, Tuittila E-S (2006) Response of vegetation and net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange at different peatland microforms following water table drawdown. J Geophys Res.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000145
  38. Sullivan PF, Arens SJT, Chimner RA, Welker JM (2008) Temperature and microtopography interact to control carbon cycling in a high arctic fen. Ecosystems 11:61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suseela V, Conant RT, Wallenstein MD, Dukes JS (2012) Effects of soil moisture on the temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration vary seasonally in an old-field climate change experiment. Glob Chang Biol 18:336–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tang JW, Baldocchi DD (2005) Spatial-temporal variation in soil respiration in an oak-grass savanna ecosystem in California and its partitioning into autotrophic and heterotrophic components. Biogeochemistry 73:183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tang JW, Misson L, Gershenson A, Cheng WX, Goldstein AH (2005) Continuous measurements of soil respiration with and without roots in a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Agric For Meteorol 132:212–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tarnocai C, Zoltai SC (1978) Earth hummocks of the Canadian arctic and subarctic. Arct Alp Res 10:581–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Updegraff K, Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Weishampel P, Harth C (2001) Response of CO2 and CH4 emissions from peatlands to warming and water table manipulation. Ecol Appl 11:311–326Google Scholar
  44. Waddington JM, Griffis TJ, Rouse WR (1998) Northern Canadian wetlands: Net ecosystem CO2 exchange and climatic change. Clim Chang 40:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang SZ, Wang SS, Wei M (1997) On features and hydrodynamic mechanism of forming of micro-landform on peat mires. Journal of Northeast Normal University 2:83–89 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  46. Wang YH, Liu HY, Chung H, Yu LF, Mi ZR, Geng Y, Jing X, Wang SP, Zeng H, Cao GM, Zhao XQ, He JS (2014) Non-growing-season soil respiration is controlled by freezing and thawing processes in the summer monsoon-dominated Tibetan alpine grassland. Global Biogeochem Cy 28:1081–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu ZT, Dijkstra P, Koch GW, Peñuelas J, Hungate BA (2011) Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: A meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Glob Chang Biol 17:927–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang ZY (1990) Characteristics and formation of micro-geomorphology. In: Chai X (ed) Peatland. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, pp 79–89 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guoyong Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Junpeng Mu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yinzhan Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nicholas G. Smith
    • 4
  • Shucun Sun
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Ecolab, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.International Joint Research Laboratory for Global Change Ecology, College of Life SciencesHenan UniversityKaifengChina
  3. 3.Ecological Security and Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan ProvinceMianyang Normal UniversityMianyangChina
  4. 4.Purdue University Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesWest LafayetteUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiologyNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations