Skip to main content

Biocrust morphology is linked to marked differences in microbial community composition

Abstract

Background and aims

Biocrust morphology is often used to infer ecological function, but morphologies vary widely in pigmentation and thickness. Little is known about the links between biocrust morphology and the composition of constituent microbial community. This study aimed to examine these links using dryland crusts varying in stage and morphology.

Methods

We compared the microbial composition of three biocrust developmental stages (Early, Mid, Late) with bare soil (Bare) using high Miseq Illumina sequencing. We used standard diversity measures and network analysis to explore how microbe-microbe associations changed with biocrust stage.

Results

Biocrust richness and diversity increased with increasing stage, and there were marked differences in the microbial signatures among stages. Bare and Late stages were dominated by Alphaproteobacteria, but Cyanobacteria was the dominant phylum in Early and Mid stages. The greatest differences in microbial taxa were between Bare and Late stages. Network analysis indicated highly-connected hubs indicative of small networks.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that readily discernible biocrust features may be good indicators of microbial composition and structure. These findings are important for land managers seeking to use biocrusts as indicators of ecosystem health and function. Treating biocrusts as a single unit without considering crust stage is likely to provide misleading information on their functional roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Abed RMM, Ramette A, Hübner V et al (2012) Microbial diversity of eolian dust sources from saline lake sediments and biological soil crusts in arid Southern Australia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80:294–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Martiny JBH (2008) Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:11512–11519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

  • Assenov Y, Ramírez F, Schelhorn SES-E et al (2008) Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics 24:282–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baran R, Brodie EL, Mayberry-Lewis J et al (2015) Exometabolite niche partitioning among sympatric soil bacteria. Nat Commun 6:8298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J, Phillips SL, Witwicki DL, Miller ME (2008) Visually assessing the level of development and soil surface stability of cyanobacterially dominated biological soil crusts. J Arid Environ 72:1257–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg G, Smalla K (2009) Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:1–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer TM, Lawson CS, Hedlund K et al (2006) Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant-soil feedback responses in two grasslands. J Ecol 94:893–904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bissett A, Brown MV, Siciliano SD, Thrall PH (2013) Microbial community responses to anthropogenically induced environmental change: Towards a systems approach. Ecol Lett 16:128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker MA, Eldridge DJ, Val J, Soliveres S (2013) Hydrology in a patterned landscape is co-engineered by soil-disturbing animals and biological crusts. Soil Biol Biochem 61:14–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Eldridge DJ et al (2014) Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) as a model system in community, landscape and ecosystem ecology. Biodivers Conserv 23:1619–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budel B, Darienko T, Deutschewitz K et al (2009) Southern African biological soil crusts are ubiquitous and highly diverse in drylands, being restricted by rainfall frequency. Microb Ecol 57:229–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Büdel B, Colesie C, Green TGA et al (2014) Improved appreciation of the functioning and importance of biological soil crusts in Europe: the Soil Crust International Project (SCIN). Biodivers Conserv 23:1639–1658

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Monroy AP, Bowker MA, Maestre FT et al (2011) Relationships between biological soil crusts, bacterial diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning: Insights from a semi-arid Mediterranean environment. J Veg Sci 22:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couradeau E, Karaoz U, Lim HC et al (2016) Bacteria increase arid-land soil surface temperature through the production of sunscreens. Nat Commun 7:10373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90:3566–3574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Eldridge DJ, Singh BK (2016) Microsite differentiation drives the abundance of soil ammonia oxidizing bacteria along aridity gradients. Front Microbiol 7:505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N et al (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5069–5072

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dini-Andreote F, De Cássia Pereira E, Silva M, Triadó-Margarit X et al (2014) Dynamics of bacterial community succession in a salt marsh chronosequence: Evidences for temporal niche partitioning. The ISME Journal 8:1989–2001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC et al (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ (1998a) Soil crust lichens and mosses on calcrete-dominant soils at Maralinga. J Adelaide Bot Gard 18:9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ (1998b) Dynamics of moss- and lichen-dominated soil crusts in a patterned Callitris glaucophylla woodland in eastern Australia. Acta-Oecologica 20:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ (2001) Biological soil crusts and water relations in of Australian deserts. In: Belnap J, Lange O (eds) Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Management and Function. Ecological Studies, vol 150. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 315–326

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge D, Rosentreter R (1999) Morphological groups: a framework for monitoring microphytic crusts in arid landscapes. J Arid Environ 41:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ, Tozer ME (1997) Environmental factors relating to the distribution of terricolous bryophytes and lichens in semi-arid eastern Australia. Bryologist 100:28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ, Woodhouse JN, Curlevski NJ et al (2015) Soil-foraging animals alter the composition and co-occurrence of microbial communities in a desert shrubland. The ISME Journal 9:2671–2681

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott DR, Thomas AD, Hoon SR, Sen R (2014) Niche partitioning of bacterial communities in biological crusts and soils under grasses, shrubs and trees in the Kalahari. Biodivers Conserv 23:1709–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Alm EJ (2012) Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman JA (2009) Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459:193–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman JA, Steele JA (2008) Community structure of marine bacterioplankton: Patterns, networks, and relationships to function. Aquat Microb Ecol 53:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Pichel F, Wojciechowski MF (2009) The evolution of a capacity to build supra-cellular ropes enabled filamentous cyanobacteria to colonize highly erodible substrates. PLoS One 4:e7801

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Pichel F, Johnson LS, Youngkin D, Belnap J (2003) Small-scale vertical distribution of bacterial biomass and diversity in biological soil crusts from arid lands in the Colorado Plateau. Microb Ecol 46:312–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2013) EcoSimR 1.00. http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.html

  • Hagemann M, Henneberg M, Felde VJ et al (2015) cyanobacterial diversity in biological soil crusts along a precipitation gradient, northwest Negev Desert, Israel. Microb Ecol 70:219–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron GJ, Li XR, Jia RL et al (2015) Assessment of carbon gains from biocrusts inhabiting a dunefield in the Negev Desert. Geoderma 253–254:102–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozich J, Westcott SL, Baxter NT et al (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the Miseq illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuske CR, Yeager CM, Johnson S et al (2012) Response and resilience of soil biocrust bacterial communities to chronic physical disturbance in arid shrublands. ISME J 6:886–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb EG, Kennedy N, Siciliano SD (2011) Effects of plant species richness and evenness on soil microbial community diversity and function. Plant Soil 338:483–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Rao B, Wang G et al (2014) Spatial heterogeneity of cyanobacteria-inoculated sand dunes significantly influences artificial biological soil crusts in the Hopq Desert (China). Environ Earth Sci 71:245–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mallen-Cooper M, Eldridge DJ (2016) Laboratory-based techniques for assessing the functional traits of biocrusts. Plant Soil 406:131–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller RC, Belnap J, Kuske CR (2015) Soil bacterial and fungal community responses to nitrogen addition are constrained by microhabitat in an arid shrubland. Frontiers. Microbiology 10:e0117026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neher D, Lewins S, Weicht T, Darby B (2009) Microarthropod communities associated with biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Deserts. J Arid Environ 73:672–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen S, Needham B, Leach ST et al (2016) Disrupted progression of the intestinal microbiota with age in children with cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep 6:24857

  • Nunes da Rocha U, Cadillo-Quiroz H, Karaoz U et al (2015) Isolation of a significant fraction of non-phototroph diversity from a desert biological soil crust. Front Microbiol 6:277

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pócs T (2009) Cyanobacterial crust types, as strategies for survival in extreme habitats. Acta Bot Hungar 51:147–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Read CF, Duncan DH, Vesk PA, Elith J (2014) Biocrust morphogroups provide an effective and rapid assessment tool for drylands. J Appl Ecol 51:1740–1749

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi F, De Philippis R (2015) Role of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides in phototrophic biofilms and in complex microbial mats. Life 5:1218–1238

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Moreno D, Pascual M, Riolo R (2006) Exploring network space with genetic algorithms: modularity, resilience and reactivity. In: Pascual M, Dunne JA (eds) Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics In Food Webs. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 187–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloss PD, Westcott SL (2011) Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3219–3226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T et al (2009) Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD et al (2012) Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front Microbiol 3:417

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Starkenburg SR, Reitenga KG, Freitas T et al (2011) Genome of the cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus FGP-2, a photosynthetic ecosystem engineer of arid land soil biocrusts worldwide. J Bacteriol 193:4569–4570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steven B, Gallegos-Graves LV, Belnap J, Kuske CR (2013) Dryland soil microbial communities display spatial biogeographic patterns associated with soil depth and soil parent material. FEMS Microbiological. Ecology 86:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas AD, Dougill AJ (2007) Spatial and temporal distribution of cyanobacterial soil crusts in the Kalahari: Implications for soil surface properties. Geomorphology 85:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Budel B, Belnap J (2016) Biological Soil Crusts: An Organising Principle in Drylands Ecological Studies 226. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams WJ, Eldridge DJ (2011) Deposition of sand over a cyanobacterial soil crust increases nitrogen bioavailability in a semi-arid woodland. Appl Soil Ecol 49:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager CM, Kornosky JL, Housman DC et al (2004) Diazotrophic community structure and function in two successional stages of biological soil crusts from the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Desert. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:973–983

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaady E, Ben-David EA, Sher Y et al (2010) Inferring biological soil crust successional stage using combined PLFA, DGGE, physical and biophysiological analyses. Soil Biol Biochem 42:842–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2005) The microstructure and formation of biological soil crusts in their early developmental stage. Chin Sci Bull 50:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Hu Y, Chen Y (2016) The seasonal and successional variations of carbon release from biological soil crust-covered soil. J Arid Environ 127:148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Angela E. Chilton for assistance with sample collection, Jason Woodhouse for assistance with the network analysis and Samantha Travers for comments on the manuscript. Angela M. Chilton was supported by an Australian Post-Graduate Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Eldridge.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Sasha Reed

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 280 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 730 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 373 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 21.5 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chilton, A.M., Neilan, B.A. & Eldridge, D.J. Biocrust morphology is linked to marked differences in microbial community composition. Plant Soil 429, 65–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3442-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3442-3

Keywords

  • Cyanobacteria
  • Network analysis
  • Biological soil crust
  • Semi-arid, microbial ecology
  • Drylands
  • Soil function