Plant and Soil

, Volume 421, Issue 1–2, pp 1–5 | Cite as

One giant leap for mankind: can ecopoiesis avert mine tailings disasters?

  • Adam T. CrossEmail author
  • Jason C. Stevens
  • Kingsley W. Dixon



Mine tailings are among the most ecologically hostile byproducts of mining operations, with production generating alien substrates with significant cascading environmental and human welfare legacies. The rate of tailings production continues to increase globally, and this increase has occurred asynchronously with our capacity to ameliorate ecological hostility and implement successful restoration programs on tailings landforms.


There is currently a lack of sufficient technology to deliver timely and cost-effective restoration outcomes to tailings landscapes. The decadal to millennial time scale of soil formation driven by natural pedogenic processes is at odds with the short mine closure timeframes (≤5 years) and aspirations of newly formulated international standards for the practice of ecological restoration. This lack of restoration capability places biodiversity at risk, and not only jeopardises the economic viability of the mining industry but also impacts upon its social and environmental license to mine.


Delivery of successful ecosystem restoration on tailings requires a new paradigm of collaborative science-driven innovation. Could this be guided by the fundamental theory behind establishing life on other planets?


Ecopoiesis Microbial inoculation Pedogenesis Planetary science Restoration ecology Terraformation 



This research was funded by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Mine Site Restoration (project number ICI150100041), and by the Australian Research Council Linkage Project LP160100598.


  1. Alexandrov SD (2016) Algal research in space: history, current status and future prospects. Innovare J Life Sci 1:1–4Google Scholar
  2. Azam S, Li Q (2010) Tailings dam failures: a review of the last one hundred years. Geotech News 28:50–54Google Scholar
  3. Banin A, Mancinelli RL (1995) Life on Mars? I The chemical environment. Adv in Space Res 15:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battisti C, Poeta G, Fanelli G (2016) Role and effects of disturbances in natural systems. In: An introduction to disturbance ecology. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooke JA, Johnson MS (2002) Ecological restoration of land with particular reference to the mining of metals and industrial minerals: a review of theory and practice. Env Rev 10:41–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cross AT, Lambers H (2017) Young calcareous soil chronosequences as a model for ecological restoration on alkaline mine tailings. Sci Total Env 607–608:168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demidov NE, Basilevskii AT, Kuz’min RO (2015) Martian soils: varieties, structure, composition, physical properties, drillabilty, and risks for landers. Sol Syst Res 49:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimpka C, Weinand T, Asch F (2009) Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Env 32:1682–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EPA (2009a) Karara Iron Ore Project. Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority, Report 1321. Government of Western Australia, Perth, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  10. EPA (2009b) Koolanooka/Blue Hills Direct Shipping Ore Mining Project Shires of Morawa and Perenjori. Report of the Environmental Protection Authority, Report 1328. Government of Western Australia, Perth, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  11. Fahad S, Hussain S, Bano A, Saud S, Hassan S, Shan D, Khan FA, Khan F, Chen Y, Wu C, Tabassum MA, Chun MX, Afzal M, Jan A, Jan MT, Huang J (2015) Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: consequences for changing environment. Env Sci Pollut Res 22:4907–4921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fogg MJ (1993) Dynamics of a terraformed Martian biosphere. J Br Interplanet Soc 46:293–304Google Scholar
  13. Garcia LC, Ribeiro DB, Oliveira Roque F, Ochoa-Quintero JM, Laurance WF (2016) Brazil's Worst mining disaster: corporations must be compelled to pay the actual environmental costs. Ecol Appl.
  14. Ginocchio R, León-Lobos P, Arellano EC, Anic V, Ovalle JF, Baker AJM (2017) Soil physicochemical factors as environmental filters for spontaneous plant colonization of abandoned tailing dumps. Env Sci Pollut Res 24:13484–13496Google Scholar
  15. Harris J (2009) Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers? Science 325:573–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haynes RH, McKay CP (1992) The implantation of life on Mars: feasibility and motivation. Adv Space Res 12:133–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopper SD, Silveira FA, Fiedler PL (2016) Biodiversity hotspots and Ocbil theory. Plant Soil 403:167–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horwath WR (2017) The role of the soil microbial biomass in cycling nutrients. In: Tate KR (Ed) Microbial biomass: a paradigm shift in terrestrial biogeochemistry. World Scientific, New Jersey, pp 41–66Google Scholar
  19. Huang L, Baumgartl T, Mulligan D (2012) Is rhizosphere remediation sufficient for sustainable revegetation of mine tailings? Ann Bot 110:223–238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang L, Baumgartl T, Zhou L, Mulligan DR (2014) The new paradigm for phytostabilising mine wastes–ecologically engineered pedogenesis and functional root zones. In life-of-mine 2014, AUSIMM, pp 663–674Google Scholar
  21. Huang L, Li X, Nguyen TA (2015) Extremely high phosphate sorption capacity in cu-Pb-Zn mine tailings. PLoS One 10:e0135364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kothe E, Reinicke M (2017) Microbial communities in metal-contaminated environments. In: Das S, Dash HR (Eds) Handbook of metal-microbe interactions and bioremediation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 233–243Google Scholar
  23. Kumaresan D, Cross AT, Moreira-Grez B, Kariman K, Nevill P, Stevens J, Richard J, Allcock N, O'donnell AG, Dixon KW, Whiteley AS (2017) Microbial Functional Capacity Is Preserved Within Engineered Soil Formulations Used In Mine Site Restoration. Sci Rep 7:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lau JA, Lennon JT (2011) Evolutionary ecology of plant–microbe interactions: soil microbial structure alters selection on plant traits. New Phytol 192:215–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Huang L (2015) Toward a new paradigm for tailings phytostabilization - nature of the substrates, amendment options, and anthropogenic pedogenesis. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45:813–839Google Scholar
  26. Li X, Bond PL, Van Nostrand JD, Zhou J, Huang L (2015) From lithotroph- to organotroph-dominant: directional shift of microbial community in sulphidic tailings during phytostabilisation. Sci Rep 5:12978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. McDonald T, Gann G, Jonson J, Dixon KW (2016) International standards for the practice of ecological restoration – including principles and key concepts. First edition. Washington DC, Society for Ecological RestorationGoogle Scholar
  28. Murukesan G, Leino H, Mäenpää P, Ståhle K, Raksajit W, Lehto HJ, Allahverdiyeva-Rinne Y, Lehto K (2016) Pressurized Martian-like pure CO2 atmosphere supports strong growth of cyanobacteria, and causes significant changes in their metabolism. Orig Life Evol Biosph 46:119–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Poulet L, Fontaine JP, Dussap CG (2016) Plant’s Response to space environment: a comprehensive review including mechanistic modelling for future space gardeners. Bot Lett 163:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rico M, Benito G, Salgueiro AR, Díez-Herrero A, Pereira HG (2008) Reported tailings dam failures: a review of the European incidents in the worldwide context. J Hazard Mater 152:846–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Robbins EI, Kourtidou-Papadeli C, Iberall AS, Nord GL Jr, Sato M (2016) From Precambrian iron-formation to terraforming Mars: the JIMES expedition to Santorini. Geomicrobiol J 33:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Santini TC, Banning NC (2016) Alkaline tailings as novel soil forming substrates: reframing perspectives on mining and refining wastes. Hydrometallurgy 164:38–47Google Scholar
  33. Teste FP, Kardol P, Turner BL, Wardle DA, Zemunik G, Renton M, Laliberté E (2017) Plant-soil feedback and the maintenance of diversity in Mediterranean-climate shrublands. Science 355:173–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomas DJ, Boling J, Boston PJ, Campbell KA, McSpadden T, McWilliams L, Todd P (2006) Extremophiles for ecopoiesis: desirable traits for and survivability of pioneer Martian organisms. Gravit Space Biol 19:91–104Google Scholar
  35. Van Niekerk HJ, Viljoen MJ (2005) Causes and consequences of the Merriespruit and other tailings-dam failures. Land Degrad Dev 16:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verseux C, Baqué M, Lehto K, de Vera JPP, Rothschild LJ, Billi D (2016) Sustainable life support on Mars–the potential roles of cyanobacteria. Int J Astrobiol 15:65–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weir A (2014) The Martian. Crown Publishing, United States, p 221Google Scholar
  38. Ye S, Zeng G, Wu H, Zhang C, Dai J, Liang J, Yu J, Ren X, Yi H, Cheng M, Zhang C (2017) Biological technologies for the remediation of co-contaminated soil. Crit Rev Biotechol

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam T. Cross
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Jason C. Stevens
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kingsley W. Dixon
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Mine Site Restoration, Department of Environment and AgricultureCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Kings Park and Botanic GardenPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations