Is annual or perennial harvesting more efficient in Ni phytoextraction?
The use of perennial metal hyperaccumulators in phytoextraction provides an excellent gateway toward the removal of heavy metals from polluted sites, and the opportunity for the phytomining of valuable metals. In order to further advance our understanding of the effect of cropping systems on metal phytoextraction, it is important to investigate the effect of harvesting time. This study focuses on the variation in biomass production, Ni concentration and Ni mass across the different phenological stages, populations and organs of Alyssum lesbiacum, in order to evaluate when Ni phytoextraction is at a maximum.
We sampled 60 single-phenological stage plots in three A. lesbiacum populations and we determined biomass production and Ni concentration at the plant organ level.
Based on spontaneous A. lesbiacum vegetation, we were able to record remarkably high values of Ni phytoextraction. Biomass production and Ni concentration were found to be maximal on the third and fourth year of the A. lesbiacum life cycle respectively, while maximum phytoextraction capacity was reached in the third year.
Our results: (1) demonstrate the significant variation in Ni phytoextraction across different phenological stages, populations and organs of A. lesbiacum, (2) imply that its phytoextraction potential is mostly influenced by biomass production and (3) suggest that perennial harvests could be an interesting alternative to consider in the future.
KeywordsAlyssum lesbiacum Intra-specific variation Nickel hyperaccumulation Phenology Phytomining Phytoremediation
- Adamidis GC, Kazakou E, Aloupi M, Dimitrakopoulos PG (2016) Is it worth hyperaccumulating Ni on non-serpentine soils? Decomposition dynamics of mixed-species litters containing hyperaccumulated Ni across serpentine and non-serpentine environments. Ann Bot 117(7):1241–1248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Berti WWR, Cunningham SD (2000) Phytostabilization of metals. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals – using plants to clean up the environment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, pp 71–88Google Scholar
- Brooks RR, Chambers MF, Nicks LJ, Robinson BH (1998) Phytomining Trends Plant Sci 1: 359–362Google Scholar
- Chaney RL (1983) Plant uptake of inorganic waste constituents. In: Parr JFEA (ed) Land treatment of hazardous wastes. Noyes Data Corp, Park Ridge, pp 50–76Google Scholar
- Cluis C (2004) Junk-greedy greens: phytoremediation as a new option for soil decontamination. Bio Teach J 2:61–67Google Scholar
- Greipsson S (2011) Phytoremediation Nat Educ Knowl 3(10), 7Google Scholar
- Milic D, Lukovic J, Ninkov J, Zeremski-Skoric T, Zoric L, Vasin J, Milic S (2012) Heavy metal content in halophytic plants from inland and maritime saline areas. Cent Eur J Biol 7:307–317Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Rafati M, Khorasani N, Moattar F, Shirvany A, Moraghebi F, Hosseinzadeh S (2011) Phytoremediation potential of Populus alba and Morus alba for cadmium, chromuim and nickel absorption from polluted soil. Int J Environ Res 5:961–970Google Scholar
- Reeves RD, Baker AJM, Kelepertsis A (1997) The distribution and biogeochemistry of some serpentine plants of Greece. In: Jaffre T, Reeves RD, Becquer T (eds) Ecologie des milieux sur roches ultramafiques et sur sols metalliferes. ORSTOM, Noumea, pp 205–207Google Scholar
- Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2000) Metal-accumulating plants. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxicmetals. Wiley, New York, pp 193–229Google Scholar
- Strid A, Tan K (2002) Flora Hellenica, vol 2. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG, RuggellGoogle Scholar
- Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (1964-1980) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- US Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Method 3051A, microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, Sludges, soils, and oils, revision 1. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, USEPA Washington DCGoogle Scholar