Plant and Soil

, Volume 415, Issue 1–2, pp 99–116 | Cite as

A new model for root growth in soil with macropores

  • Magdalena Landl
  • Katrin Huber
  • Andrea Schnepf
  • Jan Vanderborght
  • Mathieu Javaux
  • A. Glyn Bengough
  • Harry Vereecken
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

The use of standard dynamic root architecture models to simulate root growth in soil containing macropores failed to reproduce experimentally observed root growth patterns. We thus developed a new, more mechanistic model approach for the simulation of root growth in structured soil.

Methods

In our alternative modelling approach, we distinguish between, firstly, the driving force for root growth, which is determined by the orientation of the previous root segment and the influence of gravitropism and, secondly, soil mechanical resistance to root growth. The latter is expressed by its inverse, soil mechanical conductance, and treated similarly to hydraulic conductivity in Darcy’s law. At the presence of macropores, soil mechanical conductance is anisotropic, which leads to a difference between the direction of the driving force and the direction of the root tip movement.

Results

The model was tested using data from the literature, at pot scale, at macropore scale, and in a series of simulations where sensitivity to gravity and macropore orientation was evaluated.

Conclusions

Qualitative and quantitative comparisons between simulated and experimentally observed root systems showed good agreement, suggesting that the drawn analogy between soil water flow and root growth is a useful one.

Keywords

Macropores Root architecture model Root growth direction R-SWMS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding by German Research Foundation within the Research Unit DFG PAK 888 is gratefully acknowledged. The James Hutton Institute receives funding from the Scottish Government. We also thank Richard Stirzaker and John Passioura (CSIRO) for helpful correspondence concerning experimental methods.

References

  1. Athmann M, Kautz T, Pude R, Köpke U (2013) Root growth in biopores—evaluation with in situ endoscopy. Plant Soil 371:179–190. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1673-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Athmann M, Huang N, Kautz T, Köpke U (2014) Biopore characterization with in situ endoscopy: Influence of earthworms on carbon and nitrogen contents. In: RGA U (ed) 4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao Y, Aggarwal P, Robbins NE, Sturrock CJ, Thompson MC, Tan HQ, Tham C, Duan L, Rodriguez PL, Vernoux T (2014) Plant roots use a patterning mechanism to position lateral root branches toward available water. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:9319–9324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Barej JAM, Pätzold S, Perkons U, Amelung W (2014) Phosphorus fractions in bulk subsoil and its biopore system. Eur J Soil Sci 65:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bear J (2013) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Courier CorporationGoogle Scholar
  6. Bengough A, McKenzie B, Hallett P, Valentine T (2011) Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. J Exp Bot 62:59–68. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq350 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clausnitzer V, Hopmans J (1994) Simultaneous modeling of transient three-dimensional root growth and soil water flow. Plant Soil 164:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dal Ferro N, Sartori L, Simonetti G, Berti A, Morari F (2014) Soil macro-and microstructure as affected by different tillage systems and their effects on maize root growth. Soil Tillage Res 140:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dexter A (1986) Model experiments on the behaviour of roots at the interface between a tilled seed-bed and a compacted subsoil. Plant and Soil 95:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dexter A, Hewitt J (1978) The deflection of plant roots. J Agric Eng Res 23:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doussan C, Vercambre G, Pagès L (1998) Modelling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: an integrated approach to water absorption - distribution of axial and radial conductances in maize. Ann Bot 81:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehlers W, Köpke U, Hesse E, Böhm W (1983) Penetration resistance and root growth of oats in tilles and untilled loess soil. Soil Tillage Res 3:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaiser T, Perkons U, Küpper PM, Kautz T, Uteau-Puschmann D, Ewert F, Enders A, Krauss G (2013) Modeling biopore effects on root growth and biomass production on soils with pronounced sub-soil clay accumulation. Ecol Model 256:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao W, Hodgkinson L, Jin K, Watts CW, Ashton RW, Shen J, Ren T, Dodd IC, Binley A, Phillips AL (2016a) Deep roots and soil structure. Plant Cell Environ. doi:10.1111/pce.12684
  15. Gao W, Whalley WR, Tian Z, Liu J, Ren T (2016b) A simple model to predict soil penetrometer resistance as a function of density, drying and depth in the field. Soil Tillage Res 155:190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory PJ (2008) Plant roots: growth, activity and interactions with the soil. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Gruwel ML (2014) In situ magnetic resonance imaging of plant roots. Vadose Zone J 13Google Scholar
  18. Hatano R, Iwanaga K, Okajima H, Sakuma T (1988) Relationship between the distribution of soil macropores and root elongation. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 34:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirth J, McKenzie B, Tisdall J (2005) Ability of seedling roots of Lolium perenne L. to penetrate soil from artificial biopores is modified by soil bulk density, biopore angle and biopore relief. Plant Soil 272:327–336. doi:10.1007/s11104-004-5764-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jakobsen B, Dexter A (1988) Influence of biopores on root-growth, water-uptake and grain-yield of wheat (triticum-aestivum) based on predictions from a computer-model. Biol Fertil Soils 6:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Javaux M, Schröder T, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2008) Use of a three-dimensional detailed modeling approach for predicting root water uptake. Vadose Zone J 7:1079–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiménez JJ, Cepeda A, Decaëns T, Oberson A, Friesen DK (2003) Phosphorus fractions and dynamics in surface earthworm casts under native and improved grasslands in a Colombian savanna Oxisol. Soil Biol Biochem 35:715–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kautz T, Köpke U (2009) Assessing the root-soil contact in biopores. International Symposium 'Root Research and Applications', Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  24. Kautz T, Amelung W, Ewert F, Gaiser T, Horn R, Jahn R, Javaux M, Kemna A, Kuzyakov Y, Munch J, Patzold S, Peth S, Scherer H, Schloter M, Schneider H, Vanderborght J, Vetterlein D, Walter A, Wiesenberg G, Kopke U (2013a) Nutrient acquisition from arable subsoils in temperate climates: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 57:1003–1022. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kautz T, Perkons U, Athmann M, Pude R, Köpke U (2013b) Barley roots are not constrained to large-sized biopores in the subsoil of a deep haplic Luvisol. Biol Fertil Soils 49:959–963. doi:10.1007/s00374-013-0783-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirkegaard J, Lilley J, Howe G, Graham J (2007) Impact of subsoil water use on wheta yield. Aust J Agric Res 58:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolb E, Hartmann C, Genet P (2012) Radial force development during root growth measured by phytoplasticity. Plant Soil 360:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuchenbuch R, Ingram K (2002) Image analysis for non-destructive and non-invasive quantification of root growth and soilw ater content in rhizotrons. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuhlmann H, Baumgärtel G (1991) Potential importance of the subsoil for the P and Mg nutrition of wheat. Plant Soil 137:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laloy E, Weynants M, Bielders C, Vanclooster M, Javaux M (2010) How efficient are one-dimensional models to reproduce the hydrodynamic behavior of structured soils subjected to multi-step outflow experiments? J Hydrol 393:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leitner D, Klepsch S, Bodner G, Schnepf A (2010) A dynamic root system growth model based on L-systems. Plant Soil 332:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leitner D, Felderer B, Vontobel P, Schnepf A (2014) Recovering root system traits using image analysis exemplified by two-dimensional neutron radiography images of lupine. Plant Physiol 164(1):24–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leue M, Gerke HH (2016) Roughness of biopores and cracks in Bt-horizons assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. doi:10.1002/jpln.201600016
  34. Lust M (2001) Quaternionen- mathematischer Hintergrund und ihre Interpretation als Rotationen. In: Koblenz-Landau U (ed)Google Scholar
  35. Materechera S, Dexter A, Alston A (1991) Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 135:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McKenzie B, Bengough A, Hallett P, Thomas W, Forster B, McNicol J (2009) Deep rooting and drought screening of cereal crops: a novel field-based method and its application. Field Crop Res 112:165–171. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nagel K, Putz A, Gilmer F, Heinz K, Fischbach A, Pfeifer J, Faget M, Bloßfeld S, Ernst M, Dimaki C, Kastenholz B, Kleinert A, Galinski A, Scharr H, Fiorani F, Schurr U (2012) GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enablign simultaneous measruements of root and shoot growth for pkants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Funct Plant Biol 39:891–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pagès L, Vercambre G, Drouet J-L, Lecompte F, Collet C, Le Bot J (2004) Root Typ: a generic model to depict and analyse the root system architecture. Plant Soil 258:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rab M, Haling R, Aarons S, Hannah M, Young I, Gibson D (2014) Evaluation of X-ray computed tomography for quantifying macroporosity of loamy pasture soils. Geoderma 213:460–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richards L (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous medium. Physics 1:318–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rose D (1983) The description of teh growth of root systems. Plant Soil 75:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sammartino S, Lissy A-S, Bogner C, Van Den Bogaert R, Capowiez Y, Ruy S, Cornu S (2015) Identifying the functional macropore network related to preferential flow in structured soils. Vadose Zone J 14Google Scholar
  43. Shkolnik D, Krieger G, Nuriel R, Fromm H (2016) Hydrotropism: root bending does not require auxin redistribution. Mol Plant 9:757–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stewart J, Moran C, Wood J (1999) Macropore sheath: quantification of plant root and soil macroproe association. Plant Soil 211:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stingaciu L, Schulz H, Pohlmeier A, Behnke S, Zilken H, Javaux M, Vereecken H (2013) In situ root system architecture extraction from magnetic resonance imaging for water uptake modeling. Vadose Zone J 12Google Scholar
  46. Stirzaker R, Passioura J, Wilms Y (1996) Soil structure and plant growth: impact of bulk density and biopores. Plant Soil 185:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Toyota M, Gilroy S (2013) Gravitropism and mechanical signaling in plants. Am J Bot 100:111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tracy S (2013) The response of root system architecture to soil compaction. Philosophy. NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  49. Tracy SR, Roberts JA, Black CR, McNeill A, Davidson R, Mooney SJ (2010) The X-factor: visualizing undisturbed root architecture in soils using X-ray computed tomography. J Exp Bot 61:311–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsutsumi D, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T (2003) Root-system development and water-extraction model considering hydrotropism. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valentine T, Hallet P, Binnie K, Young M, Squire G, Bengough G (2012) Soil strength and macropore volume limit root elongation rates in many UK agricultural soils. Ann Bot 110:259–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Vereecken H, Schnepf A, Hopmans JW, Javaux M, Or D, Roose T, Vanderborght J, Young M, Amelung W, Aitkenhead M, Allison SD, Assouline S, Baveye P, Berli M, Brüggemann N, Finke P, Flury M, Gaiser T, Govers G, Ghezzehei T, Hallett PD, Hendricks, Franssen HJ, Heppel J, Horn R, Huisman J, Jacques D, Jonard F, Kollet S, Lafolie F, Lamorski K, Leitner D, Mc Bratney A, Minasny B, Montzka C, Nowak W, Pachepsky Y, Padarian J, Romano N, Roth K, Rothfuss Y, Rowe E, Schwen A, Simunek J, Tiktak A, Van Dam J, van der Zee S, Vogel H, Vrugt J, Wöhling T, Young I (2016) Modeling soil processes: review, key challenges, and new perspectives. Vadose Zone J 15Google Scholar
  53. Watt M, Silk W, Passioura J (2006) Rates of root and organism growth, soil conditions, and temporal and spatial developement of the rhizosphere. Ann Bot 97:839–855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Whalley W, To J, Kay B, Whitmore A (2007) Prediction of the penetrometer resistance of soils with models with few parameters. Geoderma 137:370–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. White R, Kirkegaard J (2010) The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil - implications for water uptake. Plant Cell Environ 33:133–148. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02059.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3)JuelichGermany
  2. 2.The James Hutton InstituteDundeeUK
  3. 3.Earth and Life Institute / Environmental SciencesUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  4. 4.School of Science and EngineeringUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations