Wheat colonization by an Azospirillum brasilense ammonium-excreting strain reveals upregulation of nitrogenase and superior plant growth promotion
- 599 Downloads
In this work, an ammonium-excreting strain (HM053) of A. brasilense was further characterized genetically and biochemically, and its abilities to colonize and promote wheat growth were determined.
Immunoblot, reverse transcription-qPCR, and DNA sequencing were used for HM053 characterization. To analyze wheat-A. brasilense interaction nifH::gusA fusions in the wild-type FP2 (FP2-7) and HM053 (HM053-36) backgrounds were employed.
HM053 glutamine synthetase (GS) was not adenylylated in response to an ammonium shock or under any condition tested. Sequencing of the glnA gene revealed a substitution of a proline residue by a leucine at position 347 of the GS. Under axenic growth condition, HM053 was capable of colonizing the surface of wheat roots and increased by 30 and 49% the shoot and root dry weight, respectively, when compared with uninoculated plants, and by 30 and 31% when compared with the parental strain FP2. Although HM053-36 and FP2-7 showed GUS activity located mainly at lateral root emergence points, HM053-36 consistently showed stronger signals and expressed the nifH gene at a level 278 fold higher than strain FP2 in planta, according to qPCR data.
HM053, a spontaneous mutant in GS, increased wheat root and shoot dry weight when compared to the wild-type FP2. HM053 ability to excrete ammonium and fix nitrogen constitutively, even in the presence of high NH4 + concentration, could explain why this mutant has a higher potential to promote plant growth than FP2 and suggests HM053 as a potential nitrogen biofertilizer. However, HM053 should be tested under field conditions to evaluate its abilities to compete with indigenous microflora.
KeywordsAzospirillum brasilense Ammonium-excreting mutant Biofertilizer Glutamine synthetase glnA gene
Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR)
Biological nitrogen fixation
Colony forming units
Days after inoculation
This work was supported by the National Institute of Science and Technology on Biological Nitrogen Fixation (INCT/CNPq). We thank Roseli Prado, Valter A. Baura, and Marilza Doroty Lamour for the technical assistance.
- de Oliveira Pinheiro R, Boddey LH, James EK et al (2002) Adsorption and anchoring of Azospirillum strains to roots of wheat seedlings. Plant Soil 246:151–166Google Scholar
- Döbereiner J (1992) History and new perspectives of diazotrophs in association with non leguminous plants. Symbiosis 13:1–13Google Scholar
- García de Salamone IE, Salvo LP, Escobar Ortega JS et al (2010) Field response of rice paddy crop to Azospirillum inoculation: physiology of rhizosphere bacterial communities and the genetic diversity of endophytic bacteria in different parts of the plants. Plant Soil 336:351–362. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0487-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric. Exp. Stn. Berkeley CA 347:1–32Google Scholar
- Karnovsky M (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137A–138AGoogle Scholar
- Okon Y, Vanderleyden J (1997) Root associatied Azospirillum species can stimulate plants. ASM News 63:364–370Google Scholar
- Schloter M, Hartmann A (1998) Endophytic and surface colonization of wheat roots (Triticum aestivum) by different Azospirillum brasilense strains studied with strain-specific monoclonal antibodies. Symbiosis 25:159–179Google Scholar
- Srivastava A, Tripathi AK (2006) Adenosine diphosphate ribosylation of dinitrogenase reductase and adenylylation of glutamine synthetase control ammonia excretion in ethylenediamine-resistant mutants of Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Curr Microbiol 53:317–323. doi: 10.1007/s00284-006-0058-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tien TM, Gaskins MH, Hubbell DH (1979) Plant growth substances produced by Azospirillum brasilense and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) Appl. Environ Microbiol 37:1016–1024Google Scholar