Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 408, Issue 1–2, pp 31–41 | Cite as

Soil under nurse plants is always better than outside: a survey on soil amelioration by a complete guild of nurse plants across a long environmental gradient

  • M. A. K. Mihoč
  • L. Giménez-Benavides
  • D. S. Pescador
  • A. M. Sánchez
  • L. A. Cavieres
  • A. Escudero
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

Soil under nurse plants is more fertile than in the harsh surroundings. This is a primary mechanism involved in plant to plant facilitation and it is critical in structuring plant communities under stressful conditions. However we do not know how this soil enrichment process varies along complex environmental gradients and among coexisting nurse plants.

Methods

Soil properties related to structure, resource stocks and microbial activity, were compared among up to ten nurse plant species and adjacent barren soil areas, along a 1600 m elevation gradient above the treeline in central Chilean Andes. Shifts in Relative Interaction Index (RII) sensu Armas (Ecology 85: 2682–2686, 2004) and in coefficient of variation on soil properties were also modelled.

Results

Soil under nurse plants was always richer than on barren areas irrespective of altitude, except in the case of texture with more small particles in the intermediate altitude. β-glucosidase activity was higher under cushion plants than under nurse plants with other growth habit. Besides β-glucosidase and phosphatase activities were more variable at higher altitudes. Nitrogen was more variable under nurse plants than in barren areas and its RII values were lower at intermediate altitudes.

Conclusions

Soil amelioration by nurse plants occurred all along the studied environmental gradient promoting islands of fertility and a general increase on soil niches heterogeneity.

Keywords

Central Andes Fertility islands High mountain ecosystems Soil amelioration by nurse plants Soil enzymatic activity Soil nutrient content 

Abbreviations

RII

Relative Interaction Index

PSD

Particle Size Distribution

EC

Electric Conductivity

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the projects REMEDINAL-3CM (S2013/MAE-2719), ROOTS (CGL2015-66809-P), and we also thank F.T. Maestre for his support through the BIOCON06 ⁄ 105 project.

Supplementary material

11104_2016_2908_MOESM1_ESM.docx (325 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 92 kb)
11104_2016_2908_MOESM2_ESM.docx (52 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 125 kb)

References

  1. Aguiar MR, Sala OE (1999) Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:273–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthelme F, Dangles O (2012) Plant–plant interactions in tropical alpine environments. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 14:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthelme F, Buendia B, Mazoyer C, Dangles O (2012) Unexpected mechanisms sustain the stress gradient hypothesis in a tropical alpine environment. J Veg Sci 23:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonsson H, Björk RG, Molau U (2009) Nurse plant effect of the cushion plant Silene acaulis (L.) Jacq. in an alpine environment in the subarctic Scandes, Sweden. Plant Ecol Divers 2:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI (2004) Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85:2682–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arroyo MTK, Cavieres LA, Peñaloza A, Arroyo-Kalin M (2003) Positive association between the cushion plant Azorella monantha (Apiaceae) and alpine plant species in the Chilean Patagonian Andes. Plant Ecol 161:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badano EI, Cavieres LA (2006) Impacts of ecosystem engineers on community attributes: effects of cushion plants at different elevations of the Chilean Andes. Divers Distrib 12:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Badano EI, Marquetb PA, Cavieres LA (2010) Predicting effects of ecosystem engineering on species richness along primary productivity gradients. Acta Oecol 36(1):46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  10. Bertness MD, Hacker SS (1994) Physical stress and positive association among marsh plants. Am Nat 144(3):363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonanomi G, Incerti G, Mazzoleni S (2011) Assessing occurrence, specificity, and mechanisms of plant facilitation in terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Ecol 212:1777–1790Google Scholar
  12. Bremner JM (1965) Inorganic forms of nitrogen. In Black CA et al. (eds.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy Monograph. 9. ASA, Madison pp 1179–1237Google Scholar
  13. Callaway RM, Howard TG (2007). Competitive networks, indirect interactions, and allelopathy: a microbial viewpoint on plant communities. In Progress in Botany. Springer, Berlin, pp 317–335Google Scholar
  14. Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Casanova-Katny MA, Torres-Mellado GA, Palfner G, Cavieres LA (2011) The best for the guest: high Andean nurse cushions of Azorella madreporica enhance arbuscular mycorrhizal status in associated plant species. Mycorrhiza 21:613–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavieres LA, Badano EI (2009) Do facilitative interactions increase species richness at the entire community level? J Ecol 97:1181–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavieres LA, Peñaloza A, Arroyo MTK (2000) Altitudinal vegetation belts in the high-Andes of central Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 73:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cavieres LA, Mary TK, Peñaloza AA, Molina-Montenegro MA (2002) Nurse effect of Bolax gummifera cushion plants in the alpine vegetation of the Chilean Patagonian Andes. J Veg Sci 13(4):547–554Google Scholar
  19. Cavieres LA, Badano EI, Sierra-Almeida A, Gómez-González A, Molina-Montenegro MA (2006) Positive interactions between alpine plant species and the nurse cushion plant Laretia acaulis do not increase with elevation in the Andes of central Chile. New Phytol 169:59–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cavieres LA, Badano EI, Sierra-Almeida A, Molina-Montenegro MA (2007) Microclimatic modifications of cushion plants and their consequences for seedling survival of native and non-native herbaceous species in the high Andes of central Chile. Arct Antarct Alp Res 39:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cavieres LA, Quiroz CL, Molina-Montenegro MA (2008) Facilitation of the non-native Taraxacum officinale by native nurse cushion species in the high Andes of central Chile: are there differences between nurses? Funct Ecol 22:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cavieres LA, Brooker RW, Butterfield BJ, Cook BJ, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Schöb C, Xiao S, Anthelme F, Björk RG, Dickinson KJM, Cranston BH, Gavilán R, Gutiérrez-Girón A, Kanka R, Maalouf J-P, Mark AF, Noroozi J, Parajuli R, Phoenix GK, Reid AM, Ridenour WM, Rixen C, Wipf S, Zhao L, Escudero A, Zaitchik BF, Lingua E, Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM (2014) Facilitative plant interactions and climate simultaneously drive alpine plant diversity. Ecol Lett 17:193–202Google Scholar
  23. Charley JL, West NE (1975) Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J Ecol 63:945–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen J, Yang Y, Stöcklin J, Cavieres L, Peng D, Lif Z, Sun H (2014) Soil nutrient availability determines the facilitative effects of cushion plants on other plant species at high elevations in the south-eastern Himalayas. Plant Ecol Divers 8:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crain CM, Bertness MD (2005) Community impacts of a tussock sedge: is ecosystem engineering important in benign habitats? Ecology 86:2695–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crain CM, Bertness MD (2006) Ecosystem engineering across environmental gradients: implications for conservation and management. Bioscience 56:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Escudero A, Giménez-Benavides L, Iriondo JM, Rubio A (2004) Patch dynamics and islands of fertility in a high mountain Mediterranean community. Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:518–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Escudero A, Palacio S, Maestre FT, Luzuriaga AL (2015) Plant life on gypsum: a review of its multiple facets. Biol Rev 90:1–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Flores J, Jurado E (2003) Are nurse-protege interactions more common among plants from arid environments? J Veg Sci 14:911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eskelinen A, Stark S, Mannisto M (2009) Links between plant community composition, soil organic matter quality and microbial communities in contrasting tundra habitats. Oecologia 161(1):113–123Google Scholar
  31. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd edn http://z.umn.edu/carbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Ghazoul J (2006) Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. J Ecol 94:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Giménez-Benavides L, Escudero A, Iriondo JM (2007) Reproductive limits of a late-flowering high mountain Mediterranean plant along an elevational climate gradient. New Phytol 173:367–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gómez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Gómez JM (2005) Regeneration status of the endangered Acer opalus subsp. granatense throughout its geographical distribution in the Iberian peninsula. Biol Conserv 121:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmgren M, Scheffer M, Huston MA (1997) The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant community. Ecology 78:1966–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Springer, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2014). lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0–20. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
  38. Michalet R, Xiao S, Touzard B, Smith DS, Cavieres LA, Callaway RM, Whitham O (2011) Phenotypic variation in nurse traits and community feedbacks define an alpine community. Ecol Lett 14(5):433–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Moora M, Zobel M (2010) Arbuscular mycorrhizae and plant-plant interactions. In: Pugnaire FI (ed) Positive Plant Interactions and Community Dynamics. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, FL, USA, pp. 79–98Google Scholar
  40. Nuñez CI, Aizen MA, Ezcurra C (1999) Species associations and nurse plant effects in patches of high-Andean vegetation. J Veg Sci 10(3):357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  42. Rebollo S, Milchunas DG, Noy-Meir I, Chapman PL (2002) The role of a spiny plant refuge in structuring grazed shortgrass steppe plant communities. Oikos 98:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reid AM, Lamarque LJ, Lortie CJ (2010) A systematic review of the recent ecological literature on cushion plants: champions of plant facilitation. Web Ecol 10:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reynolds JF, Stafford-Smith MD, Lambin EF, Turner BLII, Mortimore M, Batterbury J, et al. (2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rietkerk M, Dekker M, Ruiter K, van de Koppel J (2004) Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305:1926–1932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Roy J, Albert CH, Ibanez S, et al. (2013) Microbes on the cliff: alpine cushion plants structure bacterial and fungal communities. Front Microbiol 4:64PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlesinger WH, Pilmanis AM (1998) Plant-soil interactions in deserts. Biogeochemistry 42:168–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schlesinger WH, Reynolds JF, Cunningham GL, Huenneke LF, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA, Whitford WG (1990) Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247:1043–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Seastedt TR, Vaccaro L (2001) Plant species richness, productivity, and nitrogen and phosphorous limitations across a snowpack gradient in alpine tundra, Colorado, USA. Arct Antarct Alp Res 33(1):100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomical Monograph No. 9. 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science of America, Madison, pp 501–538Google Scholar
  51. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate in assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30(5):377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang Y, Niu Y, Cavieres LA, Sun H (2010) Positive associations between the cushion plant Arenaria polytrichoides (Caryophyllaceae) and other alpine plant species increase with altitude in the Sino-Himalayas. J Veg Sci 21:1048–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yeaton RI (1978) A cyclical relationship between Larrea tridentata and Opuntia leptocaulis in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. J Ecol 66:651–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zinger L, Lejon DPH, Baptist F, et al. (2011) Contrasting diversity patterns of crenarchaeal, bacterial and fungal soil communities in an alpine landscape. PLoS One 6:e19950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019950 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. K. Mihoč
    • 1
  • L. Giménez-Benavides
    • 2
  • D. S. Pescador
    • 2
  • A. M. Sánchez
    • 2
  • L. A. Cavieres
    • 1
    • 3
  • A. Escudero
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB)SantiagoChile
  2. 2.Área de Biodiversidad y ConservaciónUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMóstolesEspaña
  3. 3.Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y OceanográficasUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile

Personalised recommendations