Surface-based GPR underestimates below-stump root biomass
- 272 Downloads
While lateral root mass is readily detectable with ground penetrating radar (GPR), the roots beneath a tree (below-stump) and overlapping lateral roots near large trees are problematic for surface-based antennas operated in reflection mode. We sought to determine if tree size (DBH) effects GPR root detection proximal to longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill) and if corrections for could be applied to stand-level estimates of root mass.
GPR (1500 MHz) was used to estimate coarse root mass proximal to 33 longleaf pine trees and compared to the amount of biomass excavated from pits proportional in area to tree basal diameter. Lateral roots were excavated to a depth of 1 m and taproots were excavated in their entirety.
GPR underestimated longleaf pine below-stump mass and the magnitude of the underestimation increased with tree DBH. Non-linear regressions between GPR estimated root mass/excavated root mass and tree diameter at breast height (DBH) were highly significant for both below-stump (lateral + taproot) root mass (p < 0.0001, R2 0.77) and lateral coarse root mass (p < 0.0001, R2 0.65).
GPR underestimates root mass proximal to trees, and this needs to be accounted for to accurately estimate stand-level belowground biomass.
KeywordsGPR Root mass, taproot Lateral root Below-stump Pinus palustris Longleaf pine
Diameter at breast height (cm) measured 1.4 m above ground level
Ground penetrating radar
- Augusto L, Achat DL, Bakker MR, Bernier F, Bert D, Danjon F, Khlifa R, Meredieu C, Trichet P (2015) Biomass and nutrients in tree root systems-sustainable harvesting of an intensively managed Pinus pinaster (Ait.) planted forest. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 7:231–243. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Butnor JR, Johnsen KH, Wikstrom P, Lundmark T, Linder S (2006) Imaging tree roots with borehole radar. 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Columbus OhioGoogle Scholar
- Butnor JR, Barton CVM, Day FP, Johnsen KH, Mucciardi AN, Schroeder RE, Stover DB (2012) Using ground-penetrating radar to detect tree roots and estimate biomass. In: Mancuso S (ed) Measuring roots: an updated approach. Springer, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Conyers LB, Goodman D (1997) Ground-penetrating radar: an introduction for archaeologists. AltaMira Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
- Cox KD, Scherm H, Serman N (2005) Ground-penetrating radar to detect and quantify residual root fragments following peach orchard clearing. HortTechnology 15:600–607Google Scholar
- Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Gezan SA, Albaugh TJ, Allen HL, Burkhart HE, Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Maier CA, Martin TA, Rubilar RA, Samuelson LJ (2014) Local and general above-stump biomass functions for loblolly pine and slash pine trees. For Ecol Manag 334:254–276. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hodgkins EJ, Nichols NG (1977) Extent of main lateral roots in natural longleaf pine as related to position and age of trees. For Sci 23:161–166Google Scholar
- Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–35Google Scholar
- Law B, Arkebauer T, Campbell JL, Chen J, Sun O, Shwartz M, van Ingen C, Verma S (2008) Terrestrial carbon observations: protocols for vegetation sampling and data submission. Terrestrial Carbon Observations (TCO) Panel of the Global Terrestrial Observing System (GTOS). FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW (1975) Digital signal processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Zenone T, Morelli G, Teobaldelli M, Fischanger F, Matteucci M, Sordini M, Armani A, Ferre C, Chiti T, Seufert G (2008) Preliminary use of ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography to study tree roots in pine forests and poplar plantations. Funct Plant Biol 35:1047–1058. doi:10.1071/fp08062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar