Plant and Soil

, Volume 392, Issue 1–2, pp 345–356 | Cite as

Exploring the impact of regional climate and local hydrology on Pinus sylvestris L. growth variability – A comparison between pine populations growing on peat soils and mineral soils in Lithuania

  • Johannes Edvardsson
  • Egidijus Rimkus
  • Christophe Corona
  • Rasa Šimanauskienė
  • Justas Kažys
  • Markus Stoffel
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

To compare growth variability of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) on different soil types, and to assess the potential of peat-soil pines for climatological and hydrological studies.

Methods

We used extensive dendrochronological analyses to investigate temporal and spatial responses of pines growing on peat soils and mineral soils in three regions of Lithuania.

Results

Significant correlations were observed between tree populations growing on similar soil types in different geographical regions, whereas synchronicity was absent between neighbouring stands growing on different soil types. At mineral soils, tree growth was significantly correlated with winter and early summer temperatures, whereas a more complex response was detected in peat-soil trees, presumably reflecting a multi-annual synthesis of moisture variability and changing hydrology. Synchronous long-term peat soil tree-growth variations observed over large parts of the Baltics point to a possible regional hydrological forcing. Our results may therefore improve hydrological reconstructions using living and subfossil peat-soil trees, and could be of prime importance given the major influence peatland water-table fluctuations have on a range of environmental processes.

Conclusion

Results reveal that peat-soil pines are unsuitable for high-frequency climate reconstruction, but demonstrate their potential for the reconstruction of multi-annual to decadal hydrological fluctuations. Mineral-soil pines, by contrast, should be used for temperature reconstructions.

Keywords

Dendrochronology Meteorological data Hydrology Climate change Regional climate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study has been funded by the Lithuanian-Swiss cooperation program to reduce economic and social disparities within the enlarged European Union under the name CLIMPEAT (Climate change in peatlands: Holocene record, recent trends and related impacts on biodiversity and sequestered carbon) project agreement No CH-3-ŠMM-01/05. Kazimieras Dilys, Marija Tamkevičiutė and Sigita Butkutė are thanked for their help during the fieldworks and the anonymous referees for their suggestions for improvements.

References

  1. Almendinger JC, Almendinger JE, Glaser PH (1986) Topographic fluctuations across a spring fen and raised bog in the Lost River Peatland, Northern Minnesota. J Ecol 74:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BACC Author Team (2008) Assessment of climate change for the Baltic Sea basin. Springer, Berlin, p 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boggie R (1972) Effect of water-table height on root development of Pinus contorta on deep peat in Scotland. Oikos 23:304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bräker OU (2002) Measuring and data processing in tree-ring research—a methodological introduction. Dendrochronologia 20:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlisle A, Brown AHF (1968) Pinus sylvestris L. J Ecol 56:269–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cedro A (2001) Dependence of radial growth of Pinus sylvestris L. from Western Pomerania on the rainfall and temperature conditions. Geochronometria 20:69–74Google Scholar
  7. Cedro A, Lamentowicz M (2011) Contrasting responses to environmental changes by pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growing on peat and mineral soil: an example from a Polish Baltic bog. Dendrochronologia 29:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charman DJ, Brown AD, Hendon D, Karofeld D (2004) Testing the relationship between Holocene peatland palaeoclimate reconstructions and instrumental data at two European sites. Quat Sci Rev 23:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook ER (1985) A time series analysis approach to tree-ring standardization. Dissertation, University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook ER, Holmes RL (1984) Program ARSTAN user manual: laboratory of tree ring research. University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (1990) Methods of dendrochronology, applications in the environmental sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook ER, Krusic PJ (2006) ARSTAN_41: a tree-ring standardization program based on detrending and autoregressive time series modeling, with interactive graphics. Tree-Ring Laboratory, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Dauškane I, Brūmelis G, Elferts D (2011) Effect of climate on extreme radial growth of Scots pine growing on bogs in Latvia. Estonian J Ecol 60:236–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Development Core Team R (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  15. Eckstein J, Leuschner HH, Bauerochse A, Sass-Klaassen U (2009) Subfossil bog-pine horizons document climate and ecosystem changes during the Mid-Holocene. Dendrochronologia 27:129–146. doi:10.1016/j.dendro.2009.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edvardsson J, Linderson H, Rundgren M, Hammarlund D (2012) Holocene peatland development and hydrological variability inferred from bog-pine dendrochronology and peat stratigraphy – a case study from southern Sweden. J Quat Sci 27:553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edvardsson J, Edwards TWD, Linderson H, Hammarlund D (2014) Climate forcing of growth depression in subfossil South Swedish bog pines inferred from stable isotopes. Dendrochronologia 32:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edvardsson J, Šimanauskienė R, Taminskas J, Baužienė I, Stoffel M (2015) Increased tree establishment in Lithuanian peat bogs - Insights from field and remotely sensed approaches. Sci Total Environ 505:113–120. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.078 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Elferts D (2007) Scots pine pointer-years in northwestern Latvia and their relationship with climatic factors. Acta Univ Latv 723:163–170Google Scholar
  20. Freléchoux F, Buttler A, Schweingruber FH, Gobat JM (2000) Stand structure, invasion, and growth dynamics of bog pine (Pinus unicinata var. rotundata) in relation to peat cutting and drainage in the Jura Mountains, Switzerland. Can J For Res 30:1114–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman JH (1984) A variable span smoother, department of statistics technical report LCS 5. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Fritts HC (1976) Tree rings and climate. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaigalas A, Vaikutienė G, Vainorius J, Kazlauskas M (2008) Development of Lake Rėkyva and its environment in Late Pleistocene and Holocene. Geologija 1:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gailiušis B, Jablonskis J, Kovalenkovienė M (2001) Lietuvos upės: hidrografija ir nuotėkis [Lithuanian Rivers: Hydrography and Runoff]. Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, p 792Google Scholar
  25. Galvonaitė A, Misiūnienė M, Valiukas D, Buitkuvienė MS (2007) Lietuvos klimatas [Lithuanian Climate]. Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service, Vilnius, p 208Google Scholar
  26. Guiot J (1991) The bootstrapped response function. Tree-Ring Res 51:39–41Google Scholar
  27. Gunnarson BE (1999) A 200-year tree-ring chronology of pine from a raised bog in Sweden: implication for climate change? Geogr Ann A 81:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Havranek WM, Tranquillini W (1995) Physiological processes during winter dormancy and their ecological significance. In: Smith WK, Hinckley TM (eds) Ecophysiology of coniferous forests. Academic, San Diego, pp 95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hökkä H, Salminen H, Ahti E (2012) Effect of temperature and precipitation on the annual diameter growth of Scots pine on drained peatlands and adjacent mineral soil sites in Finland. Dendrochronologia 30:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hordo M, Metslaid S, Kiviste A (2009) Response of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) radial growth to climate factors in Estonia. Baltic For 15:195–205Google Scholar
  31. Ingram HAP (1983) Hydrology. In: Gore AJP (ed) Mires, Swamp, Bog, Fen, and Moor, General Studies, Vol. 4A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 67–158Google Scholar
  32. Kabailienė M (2006) Gamtinės aplinkos raida Lietuvoje per 14000 metų [Development of Natural Environment in Lithuania During 14 000 Years]. Vilnius University, Vilnius, p 471Google Scholar
  33. Karpavičius J (2005) Compoling of long-term tree ring chronology of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Growing in aukštoji plynia peat bog during the subatlantic period. LUA Res Papers 68:12–19Google Scholar
  34. Kilian MR, Van der Plicht J, Van Geel B (1995) Dating raised bogs. New aspects of AMS 14C wiggle matching, a reservoir effect and climatic change. Quat Sci Rev 14:959–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krakau U-K, Liesebach M, Aronen T, Lelu-Walter M-A, Schneck V (2013) Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). In: Pâques LE (ed) Forest tree breeding in Europe, vol 25. Managing forest ecosystems. Springer, Netherlands, pp 267–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Linderholm HW (1999) Climatic and anthropogenic influences on radial growth of Scots pine at Hanvedsmossen, a raised peat bog, in south central Sweden. Geogr Ann A 81:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Linderholm HW (2001) Climate influence on Scots pine growth on dry and wet soils in the central Scandinavian mountains, interpreted from tree-ring widths. Silva Fenn 35:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Linderholm HW, Leine M (2004) Assessing twentieth century tree-cover changes on a southern Swedish peatland combining dendrochronolgical and remote sensing methods. Wetlands 24:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Linderholm HW, Moberg A, Grudd H (2002) Peatland pines as climate indicators? A regional comparison of the climatic influence on Scots pine growth in Sweden. Can J For Res 32:1400–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Linkevičienė R, Taminskas J, Mažeikis A (2008) Simple method of modelling of bog lake’s water level fluctuation: case study of Rėkyva lake. Anthropogenic Nat Transform Lakes 2:95–98Google Scholar
  41. MacDonald GM, Beilman DW, Kremenetski KV, Sheng Y, Smith LC, Velichko AA (2006) Rapid early development of circumarctic peatlands and atmospheric CH4 and CO2 variations. Science 314:285–288. doi:10.1126/science.1131722 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mažeika J, Guobytė R, Kibirkštis G, Petrošius R, Skuratovič Ž, Taminskas J (2009) The use of carbon-14 and tritium for peat and water dynamics characterizations: case of Čepkeliai peatland, Southeastern Lithuania. Geochronometria 34:41–48Google Scholar
  43. Mérian P (2012) POINTER and DENDRO - Two applications under R software for analyzing tree response to climate using dendroecological approach. Revue For Fr 64:789–798Google Scholar
  44. Pärn H (2009) Temporal history of relationships between Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth and mean monthly temperatures. Baltic For 15:48–57Google Scholar
  45. Pikšrytė R (1996) Dendrochronological study on palaeowoodland dynamics in a Western Lithuanian peat bog. Geochronometria 13:203–214Google Scholar
  46. Povilaitis A, Taminskas J, Gulbinas Z, Linkevičienė R, Pileckas M (2011) Lietuvos šlapynės ir jų vandensauginė reikšmė [Lithuanian wetlands and their water protective importance], 978-9955-609-55-1GPS, Vilnius, LithuaniaGoogle Scholar
  47. Poyatos R, Martínez-Vilalta J, Cermák JR, Ceulemans R, Granier A, Irvine J, Köstner B, Lagergren F, Meiresonne L, Nadezhdina N, Zimmermann R, Llorens P, Mencuccini M (2007) Plasticity in hydraulic architecture of Scots pine across Eurasia. Oecologia 153:245–259. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0740-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Price JS, Schlotzhauer SM (1999) Importance of shrinkage and compression in determining water storage changes in peat: the case of a mined peatland. Hydrol Process 13:2591–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pukienė R (2001) Natural changes in bog vegetation reconstructed by sub-fossil tree remnant analysis. Biologija 2:111–113Google Scholar
  50. Rinn F (2003) TSAP-Win user reference manual. Rinntech, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  51. Smiljanić M, Seo J-W, Läänelaid A, van der Maaten-Theunissen M, Stajić B, Wilmking M (2014) Peatland pines as a proxy for water table fluctuations: disentangling tree growth, hydrology and possible human influence. Sci Total Environ 500–501:52–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Taminskas J, Linkevičienė R, Mažeika J, Kibirkštis G (2008) The impact of global climate change for hydrometeorological conditions of čepkeliai peatland: the elements of vertical water cycle. Ann Geophys 40:50–60Google Scholar
  53. Vitas A (2004) Dendroclimatological research if Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Baltic coastal zone of Lithuania. Baltic For 10:65–71Google Scholar
  54. Vitas A, Erlickytė R (2007) Influence of droughts to the radial growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) at different site conditions. Baltic For 13:10–16Google Scholar
  55. Waddington JM, Morris PJ, Kettridge N, Granath G, Thompson DK, Moore PA (2014) Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands. Ecohydrology. doi:10.1002/eco.1493 Google Scholar
  56. Wigley TML, Briffa KR, Jones PD (1984) On the average value of correlated time-series, with applications in dendroclimatology and hydrometeorology. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Edvardsson
    • 1
  • Egidijus Rimkus
    • 2
  • Christophe Corona
    • 3
  • Rasa Šimanauskienė
    • 4
  • Justas Kažys
    • 2
  • Markus Stoffel
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Dendrolab.ch, Institute of Geological SciencesUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Hydrology and Climatology, Faculty of Natural SciencesVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
  3. 3.GEOLAB, UMR6042 CNRS and Blaise Pascal UniversityClermont-Ferrand Cedex 2France
  4. 4.Department of Geography and Land Management, Faculty of Natural SciencesVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
  5. 5.Climatic Change and Climate Impacts, Institute for Environmental SciencesUniversity of GenevaCarouge-GenevaSwitzerland
  6. 6.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations