Competition with winter crops induces deeper rooting of walnut trees in a Mediterranean alley cropping agroforestry system
- 949 Downloads
Background and aims
Characterising the spatial distribution of tree fine roots (diameter ≤ 2 mm) is fundamental for a better understanding of belowground functioning when tree are grown with associated crops in agroforestry systems. Our aim was to compare fine root distributions and orientations in trees grown in an alley cropping agroforestry stand with those in a tree monoculture.
Fieldwork was conducted in two adjacent 17 year old hybrid walnut (Juglans regia × nigra L.) stands in southern France: the agroforestry stand was intercropped with durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) whereas the tree monoculture had a natural understorey. Root intercepts were mapped to a depth of 150 cm on trench walls in both stands, and to a depth of 400 cm in the agroforestry stand in order to characterise tree root distribution below the crop’s maximum rooting depth. Soil cubes were then extracted to assess three dimensional root orientation and to establish a predictive model of root length densities (RLD) derived from root intersection densities (RID).
In the tree monoculture, root mapping demonstrated a very high tree RID in the top 50 cm and a slight decrease in RID with increasing soil depth. However, in the agroforestry stand, RID was significantly lower at 50 cm, tree roots colonized deeper soil layers and were more vertically oriented. In the agroforestry stand, RID and RLD were greater within the tree row than in the inter-row.
Fine roots of intercropped walnut trees grew significantly deeper, indicating a strong plasticity in root distribution. This plasticity reduced direct root competition from the crop, enabling trees to access deeper water tables not available to crop roots.
KeywordsDeep roots Intercropping Fine roots Juglans sp Root anisotropy Root intersection density Root length density Root mapping Specific root length
This study was financed by the French ANR funded project ECOSFIX (Ecosystem Services of Roots - Hydraulic Redistribution, Carbon Sequestration and Soil Fixation, ANR-2010-STRA-003-01), and by the ADEME funded project AGRIPSOL. We thank the farmer Mr Breton, for his authorization to sample roots and open pits. We are very grateful to our French colleagues for their help with field and laboratory work and logistics, including Jean-François Bourdoncle (INRA), Lydie Dufour (INRA), Clément Enard (INRA), Alain Sellier (INRA), and the students (Jordan Chauliaguet, Hugo Fontenille, James Metayer, Floriane Schmith, Aurélien Schüller).
- Cadisch G, Rowe E, van Noordwijk M (1997) Nutrient harvesting - the tree-root safety net. Agrofor Forum 8:31–33Google Scholar
- Cardinael R, Chevallier T, Barthès BG, Saby NPA, Parent T, Dupraz C, Bernoux M, Chenu C (submitted) Impact of agroforestry on stocks, forms and spatial distribution of soil organic carbonGoogle Scholar
- Chopart J-L, Siband P (1999) Development and validation of a model to describe root length density of maize from root counts on soil profiles. Plant Soil 214:61–74Google Scholar
- Christina M, Laclau J-P, Gonçalves JLM, Jourdan C, Nouvellon Y, Bouillet J-P (2011) Almost symmetrical vertical growth rates above and below ground in one of the world’s most productive forests. Ecosphere 2:art27Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
- Dupraz C, Liagre F (2008) Agroforesterie: des arbres et des cultures. France Agr:413Google Scholar
- Dupraz C, Fournier C, Balvay Y, Dauzat M, Pesteur S, Simorte V (1999) Influence de quatre années de culture intercalaire de blé et de colza sur la croissance de noyers hybrides en agroforesterie. Bois Forêts Des Agric:95–114Google Scholar
- Gamma Design Software (2004) Geostatistics for the environmental sciencesGoogle Scholar
- Gregory P (2006) Plant roots: growth, Activity and Interactions with soils. 318pGoogle Scholar
- IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World reference base for soil resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Laclau J-P, da Silva EA, Rodrigues Lambais G, Bernoux M, le Maire G, Stape JL, Bouillet J-P, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Jourdan C, Nouvellon Y (2013) Dynamics of soil exploration by fine roots down to a depth of 10 m throughout the entire rotation in Eucalyptus grandis plantations. Front Plant Sci 4:243Google Scholar
- Maurice J, Laclau J-P, Re DS, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Nouvellon Y, Bouillet J-P, Stape JL, Ranger J, Behling M, Chopart J-L (2010) Fine root isotopy in Eucalyptus grandis plantations. Towards the prediction of root length densities from root counts on trench walls. Plant Soil 334:261–275Google Scholar
- Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron:237–307Google Scholar
- Prieto I, Roumet C, Cardinael R, Dupraz C, Jourdan C, Kim JH, Maeght JL, Mao Z, Pierret A, Portillo N, Roupsard O, Thammahacksa C, Stokes A (2014) Root community traits along a land use gradient: evidence of a community-level economics spectrum. J EcolGoogle Scholar
- Qian SS (2009) Environmental and ecological statistics with R. 440pGoogle Scholar
- Sinclair FL (1995) Agroforestry: science, policy and practice. 287pGoogle Scholar
- Torquebiau EF (2000) A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. Life Sci 323:1009–1017Google Scholar
- Van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumaré A, Groot JJR, Hairiah K (1996) Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementary. Tree-crops interact. A physiol. Approach. CAB-International, Wallingford, pp 319–364Google Scholar
- Van Noordwijk M, Brouwer G, Meijboom F, Oliveira MRG, Bengough AG (2000) Trench profile techniques and core break methods. In: Smit AL, Bengough AG, Engels C, Van Noordwijk M, Pellerin S, Van Geijn SC (eds) Root methods. Springer, Nerlin, pp 212–233Google Scholar
- Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists:1–332Google Scholar
- Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M (2005) Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. 63pGoogle Scholar