Impact of species identity and phylogenetic relatedness on biologically-mediated plant-soil feedbacks in a low and a high intensity agroecosystem
Plant species-specific effects on soil biota and their impacts on subsequent plant growth, i.e. plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs, henceforth), are major drivers in natural systems but little is known about their role in agroecosystems. We investigated the presence and magnitude of PSFs in two contrasting agricultural settings and tested the importance of species identity and phylogenetic relationships in determining PSFs.
We compared PSFs that developed from an intensified agricultural site and a nearby non-cultivated pasture. Four weed and seven crop species were grown in soil inoculated with either biologically active or sterilized soils from each system. Four crop response species were grown to estimate PSFs.
PSFs were species-specific. The identity of currently- and previously-planted species and their interactions explained over 80 % of the variation in feedbacks. Biota from the intensified agricultural site produced negative feedbacks in three of the four response species. Phylogenetic relationships partially explained PSFs.
PSFs can alter crop growth and may be altered by agricultural practices. The species-specific effect to soil biota should be taken into account when assessing the extent to which crop and weed species could influence subsequent plant growth.
KeywordsBiologically mediated feedbacks Weed and crop growth Phylogeny Agroecology Crop field Pasture
- Development Core Team R (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- de Vries F, Thebault E, Liiri M, Birkhofer K, Tsiafouli M, Bjornlund L, Jorgensen H, Brady M, Christensen S, de Ruiter P, d’Hertefeldt T, Frouz J, Hedlund K, Hemerik L, Hol W, Hotes S, Mortimer S, Setala H, Sgardelis S, Uteseny K, van der Putten W, Wolters V, Bardgett R (2013) Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:14296–14301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1305198110 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ehrenfeld JG, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005) Feedback in the plant-soil system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
- Furhrer J, Grimm A, Tschannenn W, Shariatmadari H (1992) The response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to ozone at higher elevations. 2. Changes in yield, yield components and grain quality in response to ozone flux. New Phytol 121:211–219. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01106.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hol W, de Boer W, ten Hooven F, van der Putten W (2013) Competition Increases Sensitivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Biotic Plant-Soil Feedback. Plos One 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066085
- Smith R, Ryan M, Menalled F (2011) Direct and indirect impacts of weed management practices on soil quality, chap 18. In: Hatfield J, Sauer J (eds) Soil management: building a stable base for agriculture. American Soc Agron and Soil Sci Soc of America, WI, p 275–286Google Scholar
- Stevens P (2014) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Available on line: http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/APweb/. Accessed 24 April 2014
- van der Putten W, Bardgett R, Bever J, Bezemer T, Casper B, Fukami T, Kardol P, Klironomos J, Kulmatiski A, Schweitzer J, Suding K, Van de Voorde T, Wardle D (2013) Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. J Ecol 101:265–276. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar