Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 387, Issue 1–2, pp 21–35 | Cite as

Plasticity of tree root system structure in contrasting soil materials and environmental conditions

  • Caroline ZanettiEmail author
  • Michel Vennetier
  • Patrice Mériaux
  • Mireille Provansal
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Tree root system structure and development are difficult to assess and poorly understood in natural conditions because of soil heterogeneity and the difficulty in extracting mature tree root systems without damaging them. The purpose of this study was to understand root system development plasticity according to biological and physical parameters: species, tree age and size, soil material, water availability, slope angle, and climate.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-three mature trees from 12 species were uprooted from homogeneous French dikes fills. Root system structure (root number and size, root system span, depth and volume) was compared between two contrasting soil materials: fine and coarse.

Results

Tree species had little influence on root system structure: all root system types and root size could be found for most of the species according to site conditions. Heart root systems were limited to fine material while mixed and tap root systems were found on coarse material. In coarse materials, trees developed few but rather large roots (>5 cm in diameter and >4 m in length). In fine materials, root systems had three times more roots but they were 40 % smaller and shorter. Roots were 20 % more numerous and 65 % larger on the downslope side due to water availability at dike or riverbank toe.

Conclusion

Root system structure was mainly influenced by soil material and water availability and far less by tree species. Tree root systems are opportunistic in developing in the direction where water and nutrients are plentiful: whatever the species, predicting its dimensions and structure requires a thorough investigation of soil and other environmental conditions. This study gives a new insight in root development: it will help predict tree root growth in various environments and particularly on dikes.

Keywords

Tree root system structure Root number Root size Root distribution Trees on dikes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by IRSTEA, Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur region, French National Research Agency (ANR-ERINOH project), by European Union (Interreg IV A France-Suisse 2007–2013) and by dike managers (EDF, CNR, AD Isère-Drac-Romanche, DDT Nièvre, SMAVD, Chambery Métropole, Conseil Général de l’Isère) who hired the technical staff and material to log trees, extract root systems and remediate damages to studied sites. The authors are indebted to many colleagues, technicians and students who contributed in data collection during sometimes difficult field campaigns, and particularly to Willy Martin, Roland Estève, Olivier Chandioux, Gaylord Doirat, Pierre Jean Moundy and David Fiorese. They thank several anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions, as well as Maureen K. Corcoran and Pete Fulé for their comments, corrections and their help in language editing.

References

  1. Akinnifesi FK, Smucker AJM, Kang BT (1999) Below-ground dynamics in agroforestry systems. Ann Arid Zone 38(3–4):239–273Google Scholar
  2. Armengaud P, Zambaux K, Hills A, Sulpice R, Pattison RJ, Blatt MR, Amtmann A (2009) EZ-Rhizo: integrated software for the fast and accurate measurement of root system architecture. Plant J 57(5):945–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atger C (1991) L’architecture racinaire est-elle influencée par le milieu? L’arbre, biologie et developpement, n° hs, p. 71–84.Google Scholar
  4. Atger C, Edelin C (1994) Premières données sur l’architecture comparée des systèmes racinaires et caulinaires. Can J Bot 72:963–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canadell J, Jackson RB, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108(4):583–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corcoran M (2009) In: US-ARMY (ed) The effects of woody vegetation on levee performance. USSD Workshop on Levees, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  7. Danjon F, Fourcaud T (2009) L’arbre et son enracinement. Innov Agron 6:17–37Google Scholar
  8. Danjon F, Reubens B (2008) Assessing and analyzing 3D architecture of woody root systems, a review of methods and applications in tree and soil stability, resource acquisition and allocation. Plant Soil 303(1–2):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danjon F, Fourcaud T, Bert R (2005a) Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytol 168:387–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danjon F, Fourcaud T, Bert D (2005b) Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytol 168(2):387–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desnos T (2008) Root branching responses to phosphate and nitrate. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11(1):82–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devine WD, Harrington CA (2005) Root system morphology of Oregon white oak on a glacial outwash soil. Northwest Sci 79(2–3):179–188Google Scholar
  13. Di Iorio A, Lasserre B, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2005) Root system architecture of Quercus pubescens trees growing on different sloping conditions. Ann Bot 95(2):351–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eis S (1974) Root system morphology of western hemlock, western Red cedar, and Douglas-Fir. Can J For Res 4:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitter AH (1994) Architecture and biomass allocation as components of the plastic response of root system to soil heterogeneity. In: Exploiting of environnemental heterogeneity by plants, (ed Caldwell M.M.a.P.R.W.), Academic Press, San Diego New York Boston London Sydney Tokyo Toronto, p. 305–323.Google Scholar
  16. Fitter A, Stickland T (1991) Architectural analysis of plant root systems 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytol 118:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forde BG (2009) Is it good noise? The role of developmental instability in the shaping of a root system. J Exp Bot 60(14):3989–4002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forde B, Lorenzo H (2001) The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil 232(1–2):51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foussadier R (2003) Les systèmes racinaires des arbres de la ripisylve : effets des contraintes physiquues et exemples. In: Les forêts riveraines des cours d’eau, écologie, fonctions et gestion, (ed IDF), Paris, p. 124–133.Google Scholar
  20. George E, Seith B, Schaeffer C, Marschner H (1997) Responses of Picea, Pinus and Pseudotsuga roots to heterogeneous nutrient distribution in soil. Tree Physiol 17(1):39–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haselsteiner R (2010) Woody Vegetation on Small Embankment Dams. In: Proc. 8th ICOLD European Club Symposium on dam safety, Innsbruck, Austria, September 22–23, 2010, p. 381–386.Google Scholar
  22. Hipondoka MHT, Versfeld WD (2006) Root system of terminalia sericea shrubs across rainfall gradient in a semi-arid environment of etosha national park, Namibia. Ecol Indic 6(3):516–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodge A (2004) The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162(1):9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Imada S, Yamanaka N, Tamai S (2008) Water table depth affects Populus alba fine root growth and whole plant biomass. Funct Ecol 22(6):1018–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson RB, Moore LA, Hoffmann WA, Pockman WT, Linder CR (1999) Ecosystem rooting depth determined with caves and DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(20):11387–11392PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jourdan C, Rey H (1997) Architecture and development of the oil-palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) root system. Plant Soil 189(1):33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamimura K, Kitagawa K, Saito S, Mizunaga H (2012) Root anchorage of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtuse (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Endl.) under the combined loading of wind and rapidly supplied water on soil: analyses based on tree-pulling experiments. Eur J Forest Res 131(1):219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Köstler JN, Brueckner E, Bibelriether H (1968) Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume. Untersuchung zur Morphologie der Waldbäume in Mitteleuropa., Paul Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  29. Moreno G, Obrador JJ, Cubera E, Dupraz C (2005) Fine root distribution in Dehesas of Central-Western Spain. Plant Soil 277(1–2):153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nemenyi PB (1963) Distribution-free multiple comparisons. Princeton University, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicoll BC, Berthier S, Achim A, Gouskou K, Danjon F, Van Beek LPH (2006a) The architecture of Picea sitchensis structural root systems on horizontal and sloping terrain. Trees-Struct Funct 20(6):701–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicoll BC, Gardiner BA, Rayner B, Peace AJ (2006b) Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Can J For Res 36(7):1871–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nieuwenhuis M, Wills J, Gardiner J, Sundstrom E, Keane M (2003) The effect of soil cultivation methods on rooting depth of young Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) trees on wet mineral soils in Ireland. Forestry 76(4):465–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Plourde A, Krause C, Lord D (2009) Spatial distribution, architecture, and development of the root system of Pinus banksiana Lamb. in natural and planted stands. For Ecol Manag 258(9):2143–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ray D, Nicoll BC (1998) The effect of soil water-table depth on root-plate development and stability of Sitka spruce. Forest 71(2):169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reubens B, Poesen J, Danjon F, Geudens G, Muys B (2007) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees-Struct Funct 21(4):385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rood S, Bigelow S, Hall A (2011) Root architecture of riparian trees: river cut-banks provide natural hydraulic excavation, revealing that cottonwoods are facultative phreatophytes. Trees - Struct funct 25(5):907–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002) The global biogeography of roots. Ecol Monogr 72(3):311–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schenk H, Jackson R (2005) Mapping the global distribution of deep roots in relation to climate and soil characteristics. Geoderma 126:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwarz M, Lehmann P (2010) Quantifying lateral root reinforcement in steep slopes - from a bundle of roots to tree stands. Earth Surf Proc Land 35(3):354–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shields FD, Gray DH (1992) Effects of woody vegetation on the structural integrity of sandy levees. Water Resour Bull 28:917–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soar CJ, Loveys BR (2007) The effect of changing patterns in soil-moisture availability on grapevine root distribution, and viticultural implications for converting full-cover irrigation into a point-source irrigation system. Aust J Grape Wine Res 13(1):2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sokalska DI, Haman DZ, Szewczuk A, Sobota J, Deren D (2009) Spatial root distribution of mature apple trees under drip irrigation system. Agric Water Manag 96(6):917–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stone EL, Kalisz PJ (1991) On the maximum extent of tree roots. For Ecol Manag 46:59–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sutton RF, Tinus RW (1983) Root and root system terminology. Soc American Forest, Bethesda (USA), 137 pGoogle Scholar
  46. Tamasi E, Stokes A, Lasserre B, Danjon F, Berthier S, Fourcaud T, Chiatante D (2005) Influence of wind loading on root system development and architecture in oak (Quercus robur L.) seedlings. Trees-Struct Funct 19(4):374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tatarinov F, Urban J, Cermak J (2008) Application of “clump technique” for root system studies of Quercus robur and Fraxinus excelsior. For Ecol Manag 255(3–4):495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tobin B, Cermak J, Chiatante D, Danjon F, Di Iorio A, Dupuy L, Eshel A, Jourdan C, Kalliokoski T, Laiho R, Nadezhdina N, Nicoll B, Pages L, Silva J, Spanos I (2007) Towards developmental modelling of tree root systems. Plant Biosyst 141(3):481–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Unger PW, Kaspar TC (1994) Soil compaction and root growth: a review. Agro J 86:759–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vannoordwijk M, Spek LY, Dewilligen P (1994) Proximal root diameter as predictor of total root size for fractal branching models. 1. Theory, Plant Soil 164(1):107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vennetier M, Zanetti C, Mériaux P, Danjon F.; Mary B (2014) Tree root architecture : new insights from a comprehensive study on dikes. Plant Soil (in press)Google Scholar
  52. Vercambre G, Pages L, Doussan C, Habib R (2003) Architectural analysis and synthesis of the plum tree root system in an orchard using a quantitative modelling approach. Plant Soil 251(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vyskot M (1976) Tree Story Biomass in Lowland Forests in South Moravia. Rozpravy CSAV, Academia, Praha., vol. 86, n° 10.Google Scholar
  54. Wagner B, Gärtner H, Santini S, Ingensand H (2011) Cross-sectional interpolation of annual rings within a 3D root model. Dendrochronologia 29(4):201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zanetti C (2010) Characterization of tree root systems in earth dikes, PHD Dissertation, Cemagref, Provence University, p.197Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Zanetti
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Michel Vennetier
    • 2
    • 4
  • Patrice Mériaux
    • 1
    • 4
  • Mireille Provansal
    • 5
  1. 1.Irstea, UR OHAX Ouvrages hydrauliques et hydrologieLe Tholonet Aix-en-ProvenceFrance
  2. 2.Irstea, UR EMAX Ecosystèmes méditerranéens et risquesLe Tholonet Aix-en-ProvenceFrance
  3. 3.ARBEAUSOLutions, 100 impasse des HouillèresMeyreuilFrance
  4. 4.ECCOREV FR 3098, Université Aix-MarseilleMeyreuilFrance
  5. 5.CEREGE, Europôle de l’Arbois, BP 80Aix-en-Provence cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations