Impacts of acid deposition, ozone exposure and weather conditions on forest ecosystems in Europe: an overview
- 3.7k Downloads
In 1994, a “Pan-European Programme for Intensive and Continuous Monitoring of Forest Ecosystems” started to contribute to a better understanding of the impact of air pollution, climate change and natural stress factors on forest ecosystems. The programme today counts approximately 760 permanent observation plots including near 500 plots with data on both air quality and forest ecosystem impacts.
This paper first presents impacts of air pollution and climate on forests ecosystems as reported in the literature on the basis of laboratory and field research. Next, results from monitoring studies, both at a European wide scale and related national studies, are presented in terms of trends and geographic variations in nitrogen and sulphur deposition and ozone concentrations and the impacts of those changes in interaction with weather conditions on (i) water and element budgets and nutrient-acidity status, (ii) forest crown condition, (iii) forest growth and carbon sequestration and (iv) species diversity of the ground vegetation. The empirical, field based forest responses to the various drivers are evaluated in view of available knowledge.
Analyses of large scale monitoring data sets show significant effects of atmospheric deposition on nutrient-acidity status in terms of elevated nitrogen and sulphur or sulphate concentrations in forest foliage and soil solution and related soil acidification in terms of elevated aluminium and/or base cation leaching from the forest ecosystem. Relationships of air pollution with crown condition, however, appear to be weak and limited in time and space, while climatic factors appear to be more important drivers. Regarding forest growth, monitoring results indicate a clear fertilization effect of N deposition on European forests but the field evidence for impacts of ambient ozone exposure on tree growth is less clear.
KeywordsNitrogen deposition Climate change Ozone exposure Monitoring Element budgets Forest condition Forest growth Ground vegetation
Trends in environmental conditions in Europe
Environmental conditions are rapidly changing on a global scale since the beginning of the industrial times (Schöpp et al. 2003; IPCC 2007). The human development has not only altered the chemical composition of the atmosphere, but also of water bodies, soils, flora and fauna. Since the late 19th century until its peak in the mid-1980s, sulphur (S) emissions in Europe increased by a factor of seven, while nitrogen (N) emissions increased by a factor near five, correlated with a similar increase in acid deposition (Schöpp et al. 2003). The initial concern for negative effects of acid deposition started in Scandinavia in the seventies, in particular in south Norway, where slow weathering bedrocks and shallow soils made the ecosystems sensitive, and widespread death of trout and salmon was attributed to the enhanced leaking of aluminium (Al) which damaged gills (Baker and Schofield 1982). Low pH and increased Al levels cause chronic stress can also lead to lower body weight and smaller size and makes fish less able to compete for food and habitat (Lien et al. 1996). Shortly afterwards, in the beginning of the eighties, the health and vitality of forest ecosystems became a subject of wide public and political concern due to the extensive forest damage observed in rural areas in Central Europe, which was connected to air pollution and acid deposition (e.g Schütt et al. 1983; Lammel 1984). The extensive forest damage observed in rural areas in Central Europe in the beginning of the 1980’s (e.g. Schütt et al. 1983; Lammel 1984) was in particular the case for the Ore Mountains on the border between Germany, Poland and the Czech Republic, which were heavily exposed to sulphur dioxide (SO2).
Of more recent concern are the increasing concentrations of tropospheric ozone (O3), which is not only a greenhouse gas with the third strongest radiative forcing on climate (Forster et al. 2007), but is also the air pollutant considered to be causing the most damage to plants in Europe and the US today (Ashmore 2005; Karnosky et al. 2007a; Matyssek et al. 2007b). Tropospheric O3 pollution has shifted from a regional to a global issue because of its intercontinental transport (Derwent et al. 2004; Vingarzan 2004). In fact, tropospheric O3 has been recognized as an important factor within “global change” (IPCC 2001; Ashmore 2005), that has the capacity of reducing carbon sink strength of forest ecosystems (e.g. Karnosky et al. 2003; Sitch et al. 2007; Pretzsch et al. 2010) and modify metabolic responses under elevated atmospheric CO2 (Karnosky et al. 2007b; Matyssek et al. 2010a). Emissions associated with fossil fuel and biomass burning have acted to approximately double the global mean tropospheric O3 concentration (Gauss et al. 2006), and further increases are expected over the twenty-first century (Gauss et al. 2003; IPCC 2007). However, major uncertainties in modelled O3 response exist, mainly due to changes in methane (Wild et al. 2012). Trend analyses of O3 measurements are mainly restricted to northern and western parts of Europe. Overviews of reported trends are given in several publications, such as Monks et al. (2003) and Mol et al. (2010). The temporal trends in tropospheric O3 do not show a uniform picture, apart from sites at the western coast of Europe which are measuring background values. Most sites show a substantial downward trend in peak O3 concentrations (98 and 95 percentiles) over the past 10 to 15 years, which is due to European abatement on nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compound emissions. However, despite this downward trend in peak O3 concentrations, there has been a slight increase in the accumulated dose over a threshold of 40 ppb (AOT40; Fuhrer et al. 1997) in rural stations (Fiala et al. 2003).
Another more recent concern is the rise in CO2 concentrations by 15 % since the late 19th century. Over the 20th century, this has been accompanied by an increase in global average surface temperature by 0.6 ± 0.2 °C (IPCC 2007) and it is expected to increase by 1.4 to 5.8 °C until 2100 (IPCC 2007). While past temperature change was most pronounced in winter months, current temperature increases in Europe also include spring and summer temperatures (Rebetez and Reinhard 2008). In the European Alps, temperature has increased by more than twice the global average in the 20th century (Christensen and Christensen 2003). Most of this increase has occurred during the last 20 years (Rebetez and Reinhard 2008). For future precipitation, an increase in extreme events is predicted (Christensen and Christensen 2003; Frei et al. 2006), while more hot spells are expected in summer due to increasing variability in temperature (Schär et al. 2004).
Impacts of air quality and acid deposition on forest ecosystems
Forest condition is influenced by a multitude of stress factors, including air pollution and climatic factors. The hypotheses on air pollution, which have been subject to considerable controversy over the years (Skelly and Innes 1994), include direct, above-ground impacts of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and ozone (O3) on foliage and indirect, soil-mediated impacts of N and S deposition on roots that may cause nutrient deficiencies and aggravate natural stress, such as physiological drought and the occurrence of pests and diseases (e.g. Landmann and Bonneau 1995). The relative contribution of a given factor may vary on its spatial and temporal distribution, i.e. between regions in Europe and from year to year.
Elevated concentrations of the gases SO2 and O3, causing (i) leaf stomata disturbances and premature senescence, leading to water regulation stress and physiological drought, (ii) reduction or shift of carbon allocation leading to a weakened root system and (iii) accelerated foliar leaching affecting the nutrient status.
Eutrophication by elevated N (NO3, NH4) deposition inputs, causing (i) a shift in deficiency from N to base cation nutrients (Bc), where Bc stands for the sum of calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K), due to elevated demands induced by an initial growth increase, (ii) enhanced drought stress since an elevated N input favours growth of canopy biomass, whereas root growth is relatively unaffected and (iii) an increased sensitivity to natural stresses, such as frost and fungal diseases.
Soil acidification by S (SO4) and N deposition, including (i) the loss of Bc from the soil causing deficiency of these nutrients (notably Mg), (ii) the release of toxic Al affecting fine root growth and inhibiting Bc uptake and (iii) a decrease in pH that may increase the mobility of heavy metals.
Direct toxicity of nitrogen gases and aerosols may result in changes in physiology and reduce growth at high concentrations,
Increased availability of nitrogen may result in an increase in plant productivity, litter production and N mineralisation, and thus cause competitive exclusion of characteristic species by fast-growing nitrophilic species,
High concentrations of ammonium and ammonia in the soil solution may be toxic to sensitive plant species, especially in habitats with moderately acidic conditions
N deposition may result in soil acidification causing acid-resistant plant species to become dominant and species typical of intermediate pH to disappear.
High availability of nitrogen may increase susceptibility to secondary stress and disturbance factors, such as plant pathogens and insect pests.
At present, the concern is related to the (long-term) resilience of forest ecosystems to cope with the interacting impacts of air pollution and climate change, and the possibility to counteract these impacts by forest management. Below, we discuss effects of N and acid deposition, O3 exposure, and the impacts of climatic factors.
Aims of the large-scale forest monitoring networks in Europe
As a consequence of the concern of acid deposition effects, a large-scale monitoring of forest condition began under the umbrella of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE) and EU resulting in the International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests) network in the mid-1980s (Lorenz 1995) and a related EU Scheme on the Protection of Forests against Atmospheric Pollution. ICP-Forests is part of the UN-ECE Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) convention. From 1986 onwards, data on tree crown condition, i.e. defoliation and discoloration, were gathered annually at forested plots that were placed in a systematic fashion (in most countries on a 16 × 16 km grid), following harmonized methods and centrally stored (e.g. Fischer et al. (2010; e.g. EC-UN/ECE 2007). The major aim of this so-called Level I Monitoring Programme was to gain insight in the geographic and temporal variations in forest condition and its possible relationship with stress factors, including air pollution. As it became more and more clear that large-scale monitoring was not able to answer questions regarding the cause-effect relationships, a “Pan- European Programme for Intensive and Continuous Monitoring of Forest Ecosystems” (the so-called Level II Monitoring Programme) started in 1994 under the umbrella of the UN-ECE/ICP Forests and EU, with currently approximately 760 permanent observation plots, located in 30 participating countries, including 500 plots with data on both atmospheric deposition and forests ecosystem impacts (De Vries et al. 2003c; Lorenz and Becher 2012). In the sequel both networks are referred to as the ICP Forests Level I and Level II networks. An overview of the measurements carried out and the methods used in both monitoring networks is given in Ferretti and Fischer (2013).
The ICP Forest monitoring programmes initially focused on air pollution impacts on forest nutrition and forest health, since the results should be useful for the validation and further development of protocols on air pollution control strategies. However, over time, natural stress factors and climate change gained increasing attention, including impacts on forest growth and plant species diversity of the forest ground vegetation. This change in focus follows from the changes in environmental conditions shown in Fig. 1. In 1985, when the time that the first large-scale forest health monitoring began at so-called Level I plots, S and N emissions and related acidification effects were top priority in forest impact research. However, since then, S emissions have declined by 75 % to only 160 % of pre-industrial times, while total N emissions have only declined by 25 % and are still roughly four times as high as in the 19th century. CO2 rise had slightly increased from between 0.5 ppm per year until 1985 to 1.7 ppm per year between 1980 and 2007. Temperature has risen more dramatically with an increase of almost 0.8 °C since 1980 (double the value of the previous 100 years). Thus, during the short period of large-scale forest monitoring in Europe, environmental conditions have drastically changed, illustrating the increasing interest in the combined interacting impacts of N deposition, NOx induced O3 exposure and climate change.
Whereas the ICP Forests Level I network predominantly aims to gain insight in the geographic and temporal variations in forest condition, the aim of the ICP Forests Level II network is to clarify cause-effect relationships. The ICP Forests Level II network includes 15 different surveys, with an assessment of crown condition and damages, tree stem increment and the chemical composition of foliage and soil on all plots, whereas atmospheric deposition, meteorological parameters, soil solution chemistry, ground vegetation composition litterfall, O3 injury, ambient air quality, ground vegetation biomass, leaf area index and soil water are conducted on a number of selected permanent observation plots spread over Europe (Ferretti et al. 2013). The Level II network is now following trends in stresses and responses for approximately 760 sites spread over 40 European countries, with 15-year time series. These data allow an evaluation of the impacts due to changes in weather conditions, including extremes, O3 exposures and deposition of atmospheric S and N compounds.
Aim and contents of this paper
Nutrient status: element budgets, soil solution chemistry and foliar chemistry
Forest health in terms of crown condition and crown transparency
Forest growth and related tree carbon sequestration
Species diversity of the ground vegetation
We conclude with an evaluation of the monitoring results in view of the knowledge based on results of laboratory and field studies. Rather than giving an in-depth review of the interactions between air quality and climate on forest ecosystems, we present a broad overview of empirical, field data based, forest responses to many drivers.
Impacts as derived from laboratory and field studies
Tentative overview of key stress factors for different effects in various ecosystem compartments. A ‘+’ signifies that an impact is expected, whereas a ‘−‘ implies no impact. A ‘+/−’ signifies that the impact is likely to be small (after De Vries et al. 2003d)
Key stress factors
Ecological conditions and forest management
Site & stand characteristics
Soil and soil solution
Nitrogen and sulphur deposition impacts
Overall impacts at increasing nitrogen saturation
Atmospheric deposition has an impact on forest ecosystems through “eutrophication by nitrogen” and soil acidification. Nitrogen is an essential plant nutrient and many terrestrial ecosystems are adapted to conditions of low N availability, a situation that often leads to plant communities with high species diversity (Bobbink et al. 1998). Aber et al. (1989) launched the theory on ecosystem nitrogen saturation and the different stages that can be identified in view of: (i) impacts on soil chemical processes such as mineralization, immobilization, nitrification, affecting N leaching, (ii) plant nutrition and forest growth and (iii) plant species diversity. Until a certain physiological optimum is reached, forests will react to additional N inputs by an increased biomass production. Below the threshold level for growth, however, changes in the ecosystem are already observed. Especially the forest vegetation may gradually change towards more nitrophilic species. Changes in the plant species diversity of the forest undergrowth towards more nitrophilic species have been observed at levels where the growth of forest may still respond to additional N (Ellenberg 1985; Bobbink et al. 1998; Bobbink and Hettelingh 2011). In forested plots with a continuous elevated N input, the ecosystem may approach “N saturation” (Aber et al. 1989). In this stage, the leaching of N, mostly as nitrate (NO3) will increase. At very high NH4 deposition levels, elevated NH4 accumulation may occur in the topsoil (e.g. Roelofs et al. 1985). Elevated leaching of NO3, in combination with sulphate (SO4), is associated with elevated leaching of Al and/or base cations (BC). This cation release, either by weathering or by exchange of protons against Al and BC, implies a decrease in the acid neutralizing capacity of the soil, which is defined as soil acidification (Van Breemen et al. 1984). Soil acidification is associated with a decrease in pH and base cation saturation and an increase of the concentration of Al3+ in the soil solution, (Cronan and Grigal 1995; Marschner 1990; Mengel 1991), which in turn causes a decrease in the ratio of nutrient base cations (Bc), i.e. calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K) to Al (e.g. Sverdrup and Warfvinge 1993; Cronan and Grigal 1995). In this stage, a decrease in forest condition and even forest growth is assumed to occur (Aber et al. 1989, 1998).
Enhanced dissolution of Al by deposition of acidifying N and S compounds has been considered a probable threat to forest vitality (Ulrich 1984; Ulrich et al. 1980). Hypothesized mechanisms of Al toxicity are hampered root growth and inhibition of uptake of nutrient base cations (Bc) (Matzner and Murach 1995; Schulze 1989), which may be aggravated by a loss of mycorrhiza or root damage (e.g. Roelofs et al. 1985) or increased levels of dissolved NH4 (Boxman et al. 1988).
An excess input of N may furthermore increase the N content in foliage, which in turn may cause a nutritional imbalance, i.e. causing a shift in deficiency from N to the macro nutrients K, P, Mg and Ca. The chemical composition of the foliage of forest trees is an important indicator for tree nutrition. It provides information on deficiency or excess of nutrients, either in absolute values or relative to the content of other elements. Increased growth rate and elevated N concentrations in foliage may dilute the pool of other nutrients in absolute or relative terms. Furthermore, strong accumulation of N in foliage (e.g. as amino acids) may cause an increased sensitivity to climatic factors, such as frost and drought (Aronsson 1980; De Visser 1994) and diseases and plagues, such as attacks by fungi on (Roelofs et al. 1985; Van Dijk et al. 1992; Flückiger and Braun 1998). It may also cause water stress as a result of increased canopy size, increased shoot/root ratio, and loss of mycorrhizal infection. In this context, a critical N content of 1.8 % in needles has often been mentioned in the literature (Aronsson 1980). Apart from laboratory experiments, the hypothesis of acid deposition induced forest condition decline was based on field observations and foliage analyses, showing e.g. relations between acid deposition, deficiencies of Mg and K based on foliar analysis and yellowing of needles (Zöttl and Mies 1983). In the eighties, several authors considered soil acidification, as the main cause for forest decline (for example Ulrich and Pankrath 1983; Hutchinson et al. 1986)
As summarized by Kozlowski and Pallardy (1996), the requirements for tree growth are carbon dioxide, water and minerals for raw materials, light as energy resource, oxygen, and favourable temperature for growth processes. The capacity for photosynthetic processes (i.e. foliar biomass) and the competition for resources are constraining tree growth. The impact of the deposition of acid N and S compounds on forest growth can thus be positive, due to a fertilizing effect of N deposition, and negative due to a weakening of the forest condition by mechanisms discussed above. Since the productivity of many temperate ecosystems is N limited, adding N via deposition has the potential to increase growth, and therefore to sequester CO2 from the atmosphere. A range of studies has shown positive forest growth and C accumulation responses under low to moderate N additions (Vitousek and Howarth 1991; Aber et al. 1995; Bergh et al. 1999; Franklin et al. 2003). Observations of increased tree growth of European forests (Spiecker et al. 1996) are thus associated with the effect of increased N inputs. Results of 15N experimental studies on the fate of N, combined with C/N ratios in forest ecosystem compartments (e.g. Nadelhoffer et al. 1999) and results of long-term (8–30 year) low dose N fertilizer experiments on the C pool in biomass and soil (e.g. Högberg et al. 2006; Pregitzer et al. 2008; Hyvönen et al. 2008) showed a clear N fertilization effect varying between approximately 20–40 kg C per kg N. Several meta-analysis of impacts of N addition experiments on carbon responses, such net primary production (NPP) and net ecosystem CO2 exchange, indicated similar positive responses (e.g. LeBauer and Treseder 2008; Wamelink et al. 2009; Liu and Greaver 2009).
The nitrogen saturation hypothesis (Aber et al. 1989, 1998) predicts that the final stages of N saturation lead to tree decline and even death. Some studies indeed report decreased growth in response to high N-loads (e.g. Magill et al. 1997, 2004). Furthermore, Boxman et al. (1998) observed a growth improvement in a highly N-saturated Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand in which the N input to the forest floor was reduced from ≈ 60 kg N ha−1 yr−1 to <5 kg N ha−1 yr−1 by means of a transparent roof and application of clean, artificial throughfall water. The mechanism for a decline in growth includes the loss of the nutrient base cations Ca, Mg and K from the soil in response to acid deposition, since their (lowered) availability may limit tree growth. Field studies have shown for example that low foliar Ca concentrations, associated with low soil Ca concentrations, were related to elevated rates of dark respiration, and lower rates of net photosynthesis (McLaughlin and Wimmer 1999). Roberts et al. (1989) showed that chlorosis of older needles, associated with reduced photosynthesis and carbohydrate translocation, of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and silver fir (Abies alba) in mountainous areas of central Europe resulted directly from foliar Mg deficiency. These changes can result in lower rates of root growth and wood development. They indicated that foliar Mg deficiency resulted primarily from low rates of Mg uptake due to the low availability of Mg in some acidified soils in central Europe.
Species diversity of ground vegetation
An important aspect of forest biodiversity is the species composition of the ground vegetation (Fischer et al. 2009). In many countries a shift in species composition has been reported, usually from a cryptogam-dominated to a grass-dominated undergrowth, and an increase in species indicative for nitrogen-rich circumstances (Van Dobben et al. 1999). These changes are now mostly ascribed to deposition of nitrogen compounds originating from combustion processes and agriculture (e.g. Tyler 1987; Bobbink et al. 1998; Thimonier et al. 1992; Gilliam 2006). In response, many experimental nitrogen addition studies have been carried out to establish empirical ‘critical loads’ for nitrogen, i.e. the maximum deposition tolerated by a given ecosystem without a change in species composition (e.g. Achermann and Bobbink 2003) and models have been developed to assess critical loads by simulation (Van Dobben et al. 2006; De Vries et al. 2010). Generalisation of the impacts of N deposition on the plant species diversity of forest ecosystems across Europe is, however, difficult because the effects of air-borne N deposition depends on (i) the duration and total amount of the inputs, (ii) the form of the N input, (iii) the intrinsic sensitivity of the present (plant) species and (iv) the abiotic conditions in the ecosystem (Achermann and Bobbink 2003). A way to gain insight into N deposition impacts is to relate monitoring data of the ground vegetation with environmental factors, including N deposition, as described further.
As a strong oxidant, O3 causes several types of visible symptoms including chlorosis and necrosis. Compounds resulting from oxidation by O3 interfere with the cell’s energy production, decrease the photosynthesis, resulting in slower plant growth and they impair water use efficiency and other functions. Plants weakened by O3 may also be more susceptible to pests, disease, and drought. Ambient O3 concentrations in rural and forested areas have been shown to reach concentrations high enough to produce phytotoxic effects in native vegetation (e.g. Bussotti and Ferretti 1998; Sanz and Millán 1998; Skelly et al. 1999; Sanz et al. 2000; Innes et al. 2001; Ashmore 2005; Ferretti et al. 2007a). For example, from 2000 to 2002, a total of 65 species representing 52 genuses were observed to manifest O3 symptoms in Spain, Italy and Switzerland. Symptomatic species were found at 47 % of the common monitoring plots in 2001 and 38 % in 2002 (Ferretti et al. 2007a).
Several authors have hypothesized that ambient O3 is one of the key factors resulting in spatial and temporal changes of tree crown defoliation, interacting with acid deposition (Reich 1987; Guderian 1985; Sandermann 1996; Takemoto et al. 2001). It is assumed that their combined effects differ significantly from the sum of individual effects due to their complex synergistic or antagonistic interactions (Bytnerowicz et al. 2007). Relatively few studies have, however, investigated O3 effects on crown condition. Datasets describing O3 effects on adult trees from long-term studies are scarce, given the fact that most of the available knowledge about O3 effects on trees has been gained from juvenile trees (e.g. Baumgarten et al. 2000; Bortier et al. 2000; Kolb and Matyssek 2003; Matyssek and Sandermann 2003; Nunn et al. 2005; Schaub et al. 2005; Gerosa et al. 2009; Vapaavuori et al. 2009) or from intensive studies which focused on a better mechanistic understanding of the physiological and bio-chemical processes within the canopy of several trees (e.g. Matyssek et al. 2007a; Wieser et al. 2013).
The complex interactions between environmental conditions as they occur inside the canopy of adult trees and O3 are thus not fully clarified and the relationship between forest tree crown condition (to describe the condition of entire forest ecosystems) and O3 effects are still not well established (Manning 2005; Ollinger et al. 1997; Percy and Ferretti 2004; Paoletti 2006). Response validation under actual forest conditions with adult trees has become feasible upon recent developments of free-air O3 fumigation systems (Musselman and Hale 1997; Karnosky et al. 2007b; Werner and Fabian 2002). Also, due to the expected increase in future ambient O3 concentrations (Fowler et al. 1999; Percy et al. 2003) it is necessary to determine if exposure to ambient O3 levels actually affects crown condition in natural forests (Manning 2005).
Until approximately 2000, most O3 research focused impacts of the external O3 exposure on forest ecosystems, using either an average or peak O3 concentrations or an accumulated dose over a threshold O3 concentration of 40 ppb (AOT40). The AOT40 index was developed within the context of the UN-ECE as a metric to derive a ‘critical level’, defined as ‘the concentration in the atmosphere above which direct adverse effects on receptors such as plants and ecosystems may occur, according to present knowledge’ (Ashmore and Fuhrer 2000). The currently set AOT 40 threshold of 5 ppmh to protect forests from ozone (De Santis 1999) is frequently exceeded in many parts of Europe (Karlsson et al. 2004b). From 2000 to 2002, this critical level was exceeded at 77–100 % of the 81 monitored forest sites across France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland (Gerosa et al. 2007). However, already for more than a decade, the uncertainties associated with the metric and the currently applied critical level of 5 ppm h are clearly articulated under the LRTAP Convention and individual countries are encouraged to modify the approach for application to their local conditions (Ashmore and Fuhrer 2000). Today, there is consensus that the so-called Phytotoxic Ozone Dose (i.e. the accumulated stomatal flux of ozone above a flux threshold of Y, PODY) exposure index provides much stronger relationships with O3 effects compared to external concentration based exposure indices (Emberson et al. 2000; Simpson et al. 2003; Karlsson et al. 2003; Ashmore et al. 2004; Matyssek et al. 2007a; Mills et al. 2010; Grünhage et al. 2012). Karlsson et al. (2007), for example, has demonstrated that the O3 impact on biomass, as well as on visible injury could be better explained by the accumulated stomatal O3 uptake flux as compared to the concentration based AOT40 index, for young trees. For both, young and adult beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees, Baumgarten et al. (2000) showed an improved association between injury and cumulative O3 uptake, as compared to the exposure-based approach. Within the UN-ECE, the PODY is therefore now suggested for regional ozone risk assessment instead of AOT40 (Mills et al. 2010).
The decoupling between external O3 exposure and internal O3 flux becomes particular apparent under limited light conditions or drought (Matyssek et al. 2004; Nunn et al. 2006). Schaub et al. (2007) found a divergence between AOT40 and O3 flux indices under conditions where water vapour deficit (VPD) and soil moisture deficit may limit physiological activity, stomatal conductance and hence O3 uptake into the leaves. The advantage of O3 risk assessment by means of PODy can be demonstrated for Fennoscandia, where the potentially most important effect of a future climate change on stomatal O3 uptake would be mediated through the earlier onset of the start of the growing season, therefore leading to a substantial and increasing risk for negative impacts on vegetation in Northern Sweden (Karlsson et al. 2007). Currently, the flux-based O3 uptake approach has been applied for adult trees of beech (Matyssek et al. 2004; Baumgarten et al. 2009; Schaub et al. 2007; Braun et al. 2010; Gerosa et al. 2008), conifer species such as spruce, larch (Larix) and stone pine (Pinus pinea) (Wieser et al. 2013; Wieser et al. 2002; Nunn et al. 2006; Zapletal et al. 2012) and Mediterranean species such as quercus species (Calatayud et al. 2011; Gerosa et al. 2008; Manes et al. 2007).
Increasing O3 levels have the potential of limiting carbon sink strength of forest ecosystems (IPCC 2007; Pretzsch et al. 2010; Sitch et al. 2007; Wittig et al. 2009), due to reduced net photosynthesis, accelerated leaf senescence and increased dark respiration (Matyssek et al. 2010b).
The negative impacts of O3 on physiological functions and biomass production have been investigated in a number of experiments. Most has focused on physiological or biochemical effects of O3 exposure, in attempts to determine mechanisms of toxicity, dose response work for risk assessment, or development of diagnostic tests for O3 injury. Many of these demonstrated relationships between O3 exposure and reductions in both growth and leaf gas exchange (Matyssek et al. 1995; Sandermann et al. 1997; Novak et al. 2005). Experimental studies, however, also show high variability of different growth parameters in response to elevated O3 exposures. An example is Kranzberg Forest, Germany, where 50- to 60-year-old mixed stand of Norway spruce and European beech tree cohorts have been exposed to double ambient O3 from 2000 through 2007 (Werner and Fabian 2002). Within this stand, Pretzsch et al. (2010) found that O3 fumigation induced a shift in resource allocation into height growth at the expense of diameter growth. Norway spruce showed a non-significant loss of stem diameter and basal area increment at breast height of about 12 %. Similar reductions were reported for beech with −12 % for stem increment and −17 % for basal area. The height growth of spruce, however, significantly increased by 70 %, whereas this was not the case for beech. In terms of total volume growth, twice ambient O3 concentrations thus induced a 2.7 % growth increase for spruce and a 43.5 % growth reduction for beech (Pretzsch et al. 2010).
Many experiments have been carried out to assess how much exposure to O3 actually affects tree growth (Sandermann et al. 1997; Chappelka and Samuelson 1998; Dizengremel 2001; Samuelson and Kelly 2001; Ferretti et al. 2002; Karlsson et al. 2003; Karlsson et al. 2004a). Despite the high variability of different tree species, the overall impact of experimental results shows a clear decline in growth in response to elevated O3 exposures. With a meta-analysis, including 313 articles covering the period 1970 through 2006, Wittig et al. (2009) addressed the question as how current ambient O3 concentrations decrease productivity relative to preindustrial O3 concentrations. They found that current ambient O3 concentrations of 40 ppb on average significantly reduced total biomass (and therefore carbon storage) of young trees by 7 % compared to trees grown under preindustrial O3 levels. Elevated O3 concentrations of 64 ppb reduced total biomass by 11 % relative to trees grown under ambient O3 concentrations.
While results of experimental studies under controlled conditions, as described above, are valuable contributions for the mechanistic understanding of O3 effects on forest trees, it is difficult to upscale their findings to adult trees, grown under real field conditions (Kolb et al. 1997; Baumgarten et al. 2000; Schaub et al. 2005). For example Nunn et al. (2005) applied a correlative O3 uptake model (Emberson et al. 2000) to relate O3 flux to radial growth and showed that despite similar O3 regimes, young beech seedling grown in phytotrons were more sensitive to O3 relative to adult beech trees due to higher O3 uptake. On the other hand, Kitao et al. (2012) found that O3-induced changes in leaf-level photosynthetic parameters had the capacity of limiting the seasonal photosynthetic carbon gain in the same adult beech trees, but the reduction in leaf photosynthesis could not immediately be related to the extent of growth reduction in stems.
Much has been written about the presumed or probable effects of O3 on growth of trees in the forest (Manning 2005). In Europe, estimates of average forest yield losses around 10 % were suggested (Broadmeadow 1998), while values as high as 42 % were suggested for beech (Pretzsch et al. 2010). At the same time, in the eastern USA, growth losses of 0–10 % were predicted (Chappelka and Samuelson 1998). Growth reductions in eastern hardwood trees, ranging from 4 to 12 %, were predicted for north-eastern forests (Ollinger et al. 1997). Verifying these loss predictions is difficult, as the bases for most of them are laboratory experiments that may not be relevant for actual field conditions. In fact, much of the available information about O3 effects on trees does not apply well to actual forest conditions and large trees (Matyssek and Sandermann 2003). Due to the complex interrelationships among the parameters affecting tree growth over the life span of a tree, establishing a cause and effect relationship for ambient O3 exposure and tree growth in forests has proven to be a difficult task. Manning (2005) suggests, that smaller, better-defined studies in the forest should lead to a better understanding of factor interaction with O3 in affecting tree growth. While it is difficult to work in natural ambient conditions, studies under these conditions are essential to develop a better understanding of how O3 and environmental factors interact to affect radial growth in trees. In this context, Matyssek et al. (2010b) promotes free-air fumigation studies, which allow whole-plant assessment of adult trees to gain a better understanding of the modifying impact of biotic agents in the presence of natural mycorrhization.
Species diversity of ground vegetation
Novak et al. (2008) demonstrated that plant competition is an important factor affecting plant responses to O3 stress, but the direction and severity of these effects depend on the interacting species and micro site conditions. Therefore, competition in combination with elevated O3 exposures may alter species composition and diversity over the long run, but quantitative information on this potential impact is yet lacking.
Crown transparency, a measure of reduced foliage mass has been shown to be highly influenced by summer drought (Dobbertin and Rigling 2006; Seidling 2007; Carnicer et al. 2011). Drought may affect crown condition and mortality in many ways, i.e. by increasing needle or leaf loss during or after the drought (Christiansen 1992; Gruber 1990; Bussotti et al. 2005; Heiniger and Schmid 1986, 1989; Livsey and Barklund 1993), dying of buds and branches (Aronsson et al. 1978), root mortality and predisposition to attack by Armillaria spp. or other root pathogens (Whitney and Timmer 1983) and reduced foliar nutrient contents (Wehrmann 1961). Experimentally introduced drought stress to stands of spruce and pine have shown a considerable defoliation, measured as a reduction in foliage mass (Christiansen and Nilsen 1990), and yellowing caused by reduced foliar nutrient concentrations (Dambrine et al. 1993). In addition, a dry or hot summer reduces growth (Spiecker 1986), increases attacks by bark beetles and other insects (Worrell 1983), and induces heavy flowering (Owens and Blake 1985), partly at the expense of vegetative shoot formation (Lüscher 1989).
Spring or early summer drought have the potential to reduce current year leaf or needle size (Dobbertin et al. 2010). Extreme drought may either lead to premature leaf or needle shedding causing high crown transparency during the summer, or for conifers it may cause needle loss during autumn which will up show as reduced foliage mass in the following year (Solberg 2004). Most commonly for temperate trees with only one annual flush, however, is that late summer drought causes a decrease in primordial, which subsequently results in reduced foliage mass and shorter shoots in the following season. Water stress is therefore very important with respect to the monitored forest condition. Innes (1993) mentioned that the most alarming and frequent observations of a decrease in forest condition in Central Europe coincided with the dry years 1982 and 1983. Landmann (1995) mentioned that defoliation appears to be highest in soils poorly supplied with water and/or in stands in which trees, at some stage of development, have suffered from competition for water.
Mortality of forest and woodland plants has also been increasingly observed as a response to extreme drought and heat events (Allen and Breshears 1998; Allen et al. 2010; Hanson and Weltzin 2000; Breshears et al. 2005; Shaw et al. 2005; Berg et al. 2006; Gitlin et al. 2006; Carnicer et al. 2011). Drought and heat events, such as in 2003 in Europe, reduced net primary productivity (Ciais et al. 2005; Bréda et al. 2006) and increased mortality (Martínez-Vilalta and Piñol 2002; Lloret et al. 2005; Bigler et al. 2006; Dobbertin and Rigling 2006). A widespread increase in tree mortality in the Western United States has also recently been observed and attributed mainly to warming and consequent increases in water stress (Van Mantgem et al. 2009).
Change in water supply can severely alter above- and below-ground tree growth, as well as affect the vitality of trees (Dobbertin 2005; Waring 1987). Increasing temperature under equal or reduced precipitation will increase the evaporative pressure on plants (Rebetez and Dobbertin 2004). Plants react to drought stress with stomata closure to reduce water loss or leaf wilting (Zweifel et al. 2007). While the reduction of stomatal conductance is an adaptation to drought stress, closed stomata reduces the uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and in turn limits the carbon dioxide fertilization of photosynthesis and therefore reduces carbon uptake (Körner 2003). Reduced photosynthesis may not only result in reduced tree growth and related carbon allocation (Zweifel et al. 2006; Adams et al. 2009; McDowell et al. 2008; Zweifel et al. 2009), but it may also reduce the resistance of trees against insects and pathogens (Kolb et al. 1998). As different species are differently adapted to drought, the inter-tree competition will also be altered.
It is well known that reduced water availability results in decreased tree growth and reduced foliage mass, either by premature leaf shedding or reduced foliage production in the following year (Pallardy 2008). The extreme drought of 2003, for example, led to a reduction of forest growth in low-land forests in central Europe of up to 60 % (Dobbertin 2005; Jolly et al. 2005; Leuzinger et al. 2005). Although respiration loss was also reduced, many forests released more carbon in 2003 than they sequestrated via tree stem growth (Ciais et al. 2005) resulting in a net loss of carbon. Many tree-ring studies have successfully linked ring width reduction to reduced precipitation or increased temperature of various months during or before the current the tree growing season (Schweingruber 1996).
Impacts as derived from monitoring studies
Geographic variation and trends in acidic atmospheric deposition and ozone exposure at ICP Forests Level II plots
Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulphur
In the framework of the activities carried out on the ICP Forests Level II plots, atmospheric deposition is measured on the basis of a combination of (i) bulk deposition in the open field in the vicinity (within 1 kilometre) of the Intensive Monitoring plot and (ii) throughfall below the forest canopy within the plot. For monitoring of throughfall data, use was mostly made of funnels whereas gutters were used at a minority of the plots. The sampling frequencies for bulk deposition, throughfall and stemflow measurements were mostly weekly or fortnightly and the number of bulk deposition and throughfall samplers used mostly ranged from 2–6 and 10–15, respectively (De Vries et al. 2003c).
Trends in S and N deposition at Intensive Monitoring plots, assessed over the last 10–15 years, show a clear decline for S and a less significant decline for N. This follows from recent studies by, Fischer et al. (2010) and Lorenz and Becher (2012), who presented results of trends in S and N deposition between 1998–2007 and 2001–2010, respectively, based on 87 plots with throughfall measurements and 55 plots with bulk deposition measurements. Their results showed an overall strong decrease of annual S deposition both in bulk deposition and throughfall. For example, mean S throughfall deposition decreased from 10 kg S ha−1 yr−1 in 1998 to 5 kg S ha−1 yr−1 in 2010, implying an average annual decline of 0.42 kg S ha−1 yr−1 over 12 years. The mean S bulk deposition decreased from about 7 kg S ha−1 yr−1 in 1998 to 4 kg S ha−1 yr−1 in 2010, implying an average annual decline of 0.25 kg S ha−1 yr−1. The mean throughfall deposition of inorganic N on plots with continuous measurements from 1998 to 2010 decreased from approximately 11 to 9 kg N ha−1 yr−1, i.e. circa 0.16 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Trends were clearer for NO3 than for NH4. At 83 % of the intensive monitoring plots, no significant decrease in atmospheric throughfall deposition was detected (Fischer et al. 2010), illustrating the limited reduction in ammonia (NH3) emissions since 1998.
Tropospheric ozone concentrations
In National Air Quality Networks, O3 concentrations are measured with continuous monitors that are costly and mostly concentrated in urban or suburban areas, making it very difficult to infer the O3 spatial patterns, especially in complex mountainous areas or along the sea shore (Bacci et al. 1990; Millán et al. 2000). Passive samplers are considered an alternative, or a complement to continuous monitors, e.g. when a higher density in the measuring network is required. Their use in assessing the ecological effects of tropospheric O3 has significantly increased in recent years (e.g. Manning et al. 1996; Blum et al. 1997; Krupa and Legge 2000; Sanz et al. 2001). In the framework of the activities carried out on the ICP Forests Level II plots, mainly O3 passive sampler measurements were thus carried out since 2000 to (i) gain knowledge into the spatial and temporal exposure trends of O3 concentrations and (ii) to evaluate the potential risk to forest ecosystems (Sanz and Krause 2001).
Water and element budgets and nutrient-acidity status
Water influences the availability of nutrients by affecting bio/geochemical processes and the loss of nutrients from the rooting zone by leaching. To understand the element cycles in a forest ecosystem, a quantification of the hydrological situation is indispensable. The hydrological budget is mainly determined by the input of water by rainfall and the loss of water from the forest by interception evaporation, soil evaporation, transpiration and leaching. The first and only water flux study at a European wide scale has been carried out by Van der Salm et al. (2007b), using data from hundreds of intensive forest monitoring plots for the period 1996-1998. They calculated interception evaporation on the basis of measured bulk deposition and throughfall, while soil evaporation, transpiration and leaching were calculated with a hydrological simulation model called SWATRE. Van der Salm et al. (2007b) concluded that yearly but also monthly and two weekly measured throughfall data were quite well simulated for 245 plots passing a calibration procedure and various quality checks.
Although average S leaching is close to S deposition, there is a large variation in both fluxes that can partly be attributed to errors in both the input and output assessment (Fig. 8a). At several sites the leaching of SO4 is considerably higher than the deposition indicating a strong release of SO4, which has been adsorbed during previous decades. Results of the leaching of total N and NO3 against the total N deposition showed that the leaching of N is generally negligible below a total N input of 10 kg ha−1 yr−1 (Fig. 8b). These results are in accordance with those found by e.g. Gundersen et al. (1998), Dise et al. (1998a, b, 2009), MacDonald et al. (2002) and Van der Salm et al. (2007a), who found those results, largely based on a review of literature data while using NO3 leaching and throughfall N inputs. At N inputs between 10 and 20 kg ha−1 yr−1, leaching of N is generally elevated, although lower than the input indicating N retention at the plots. At N inputs above 20 kg ha−1 yr−1, N leaching is also mostly elevated and in several cases (seven plots), it is near or even above (for two plots) the N deposition (Fig. 8b). The latter situation indicates a clear disturbance in the N cycle in response to the elevated N input. NO3 dominates N leaching and the increase in N leaching in response to elevated N loads (above 20 kg ha−1 yr−1) appears to be larger for deciduous trees than for conifers (De Vries et al. 2007).
Soil solution and foliar chemistry
Soil chemistry data at a single point in time do not give adequate information on the impacts of acid atmospheric deposition data due to natural soil acidification that may also lead to low pH values and low base saturation under natural circumstances. De Vos and Cools (2011) summarize the results of a second European Forest Soil Condition survey in which they evaluate carbon and nutrient stocks, acidification and contamination levels, as compared to the first European forest soil condition survey in the 1990s on the ICP Forests Level I network (Vanmechelen et al. 1997). About 44 % of the number of Level I plots assessed during the first forest soil condition survey were revisited during the BioSoil survey (2326 plots), but only a limited set of 127 permanent Level II plots were investigated, with about 75 % of them having historical soil data thus enabling assessment of temporal changes. Unfortunately, since methods were not always consistent, De Vos and Cools (2011) did not present any changes in soil chemistry at European scale. Unlike soil chemistry, one time monitoring data of soil solution chemistry and foliar chemistry already shows effects of atmospheric N and S deposition by elevated N and S concentrations in soil solution and forest foliage. Below the results are discussed of both one-time surveys and trends at European scale.
Soil solution chemistry
Recently, Iost et al. (2012) examined trends in two soil solution parameters, i.e. the base cation/aluminium (Bc/Al) ratio and the dissolved inorganic N concentration, in terms of exceedances of possible critical limits for these parameters mentioned in literature (Sverdrup and Warfvinge 1993). Data were evaluated for the organic layer, mineral topsoil (0–40 cm soil depth) and mineral subsoil (below 40 cm soil depth) from the early 1990s to 2006. For the time trend analysis, they selected all plots and soil depths that provided data for at least five consecutive years. Their results showed no trends in critical limit exceedance for the Bc/Al ratio in nearly all plots. For the N concentration no trends were detected in most of the plots, but in cases where a trend was detected, it was usually decreasing.
The constant Bc/Al ratio may seem strange in view of the reduced S deposition. The most likely explanation is that this reduction has led to both a reduced Al and Bc concentration because of less buffering due to the decrease in potential acid deposition. Reported monitoring data for the Lehstenbach site in Germany experienced a significant decrease in acid deposition load between 1988 and 1999 and as a consequence, a significant decrease in soil solution Al concentration. At the same time, however, soil solution Ca and Mg decreased even stronger resulting in a decline in soil solution Ca to Al ratio (Alewell et al. 2000). Leeters et al. (2007) also found a decrease of both Al, K and Mg concentration in response to a decrease in S and N deposition for 14 intensive monitoring plots In the Netherlands, in the period 1990–2001.
Foliar nutrient status
Ranges in N deposition at 109 Intensive Monitoring plots in Europe with a balanced and unbalanced ratio of P, K, Ca or Mg to N
N deposition kg. ha−1.yr−1
Nr of plots
Nr of plots
Regarding foliar chemistry, no trend assessments have yet been made at European scale, but results are available at country level. Leeters et al. (2007), for example, evaluated trends in foliar N and S contents in the foliage of 9 intensive monitoring plots In the Netherlands in the period 1990–2005. Their analysis included three plots for Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Pine and Oak (Quercus), respectively. Results showed that N and S contents in the foliage decreases significantly over this period 1990–2005 for the coniferous tree species (Douglas-fir and Pine) but no trends were found for Oak.
Forest crown condition
A possible method to explore relationships between air pollution and crown condition is by means of correlative studies, i.e. statistical analysis of data that have been collected within the framework of monitoring programmes, even without an ad-hoc experimental design (Ferretti et al. 2007a, b). This is the case of many studies carried out to evaluate relationships between air pollution and tree crown condition (Innes and Whittaker 1993; Mather 1994; Dobbertin et al. 1997; Klap et al. 2000; Zierl 2002; Ferretti et al. 2003; Ozolincius et al. 2005). These studies have a number of inherent limitations (Ferretti et al. 2003; Karlsson et al. 2003; Manning 2005): (i) high variability of the forests being examined (in experimental terms: non-homogeneous experimental material), (ii) unbalanced and virtually biased allocation of plots to air pollution levels (non-random allocation of treatments, absence of replication), (iii) effects of confounding factors and covariates, (iv) absence of a true control, (v) potential inadequacy of sampling numbers for proper statistical analysis and interpretation, (vi) co-linearity between multi data, (vii) constraints in data availability and (viii) nature of the available response indicators. However, while these limitations must be taken into account at the interpretation stage, in many cases correlative studies are one of the few available options to gain an insight into the possible relationships between O3 exposure and forest conditions across wide geographical areas. In this section, we report results based on monitoring studies using a correlative approach.
European scale studies
Since 1986, the crown condition variables defoliation and discolouration have been monitored by assessments on permanent plots throughout Europe, as indicators of forest health. This effort has been carried out on plots at systematically sampled locations in a grid over Europe (Level I), subjectively located intensive monitoring plots (Level II) as well as a number of additional, national sets of plots. These large data sets together with data on stress factors have been used in various research projects in order to test hypotheses on cause-effect mechanisms of forest health.
Explained variance by country, age, altitude and environmental variables (acid deposition, relative transpiration, air concentrations of SO2 and NO2 and AOT60) by different ‘best’ selected statistical models (After Klap et al. 2000)
Selected predictive model1
Country + S3(Age) + AcidDep + S2(RelTranst)
Country + S3(Age)
sessile or pedunculate oak
Country + Spec + S3(Age) + S2(RelTranst−1) + [NO2]t
Country + S3(Age) + S2(AOT60) + D(RelTranslag) + [SO2]t + [NO2]t
Country + S3(Alt) + S2(RelTranst) + [NO2]t + S2(AOT60)
However, despite this, statistical relationships have been found in a number of studies. In the above mentioned 10-year study of the Level-I plots regression analyses, significant correlations were revealed between crown condition and factors considered as natural, i.e. tree age, altitude and drought stress, while indications of effects by pathogenic fungi and insects were also found. In addition, significant relationships were also found for air pollution, most notable for O3, but also for NOx, SO2 and acid deposition, suggesting negative effects in parts of central Europe, and in particular for deciduous tree species. The relationships were weaker for conifers, in particular for spruce (Klap et al. 1997, 2000; Müller-Edzards et al. 1997).
Overview of predictor variables explaining defoliation of the four most represented tree species of the Intensive Monitoring Plots with the number of plots (N) and the percentage accounted for (R2adj) (after De Vries et al. 2003d)
N deposition (molc.ha−1.yr−1)
S deposition (molc.ha−1.yr−1)
Foliar N content (g.kg−1)
Foliar Ca content (g.kg−1)
In studies by Lorenz et al. (2003) and Fischer et al. (2003), based on about 3000 Level I plots, sulphur deposition was related to either high or increasing defoliation. However, significant relationships were found for Scots pine only. In addition, the studies indicated negative effects of insect attacks, drought and age. In a 20-year study Fischer et al. (2007) found some common, European-wide temporal variation of defoliation for most tree species, with a peak in the mid-1990s and an increase in 2003 and 2004. This might indicate that climatic conditions have a considerable influence, with particular attention to the summer droughts in the early 1990s and in 2003. Until now, O3 exposure has not been included in European scale crown condition studies due to a lack of data on the European wide scale.
From 2001 to 2005, Schaub and Sanz (2005) confirmed 108 symptomatic species at 136 EU and UN-ECE/ICP Forests Level II monitoring plots across 10 countries, including 35 tree-, 27 shrub- and 46 perennial herb species (Schaub et al. 2002). Temperate plots located in humid areas such as the Italian Po Plane and Canton Ticino in southern Switzerland had the highest number of symptomatic species but no relationship was found between O3 exposure, frequency of symptomatic sites and frequency of species with symptoms (Lorenz et al. 2005).
Ferretti et al. (2007b) evaluated whether O3 is a significant predictor of defoliation of beech by relating crown defoliation data with measured O3 concentration data, collected at a number of long-term monitoring plots in France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland within the framework of the Level II monitoring network (see also Ferretti et al. 2007a; Sanz et al. 2007; Gerosa et al. 2007). Ozone seems to have had a significant role (p = 0.008) in determining mean defoliation of beech plots. When year-by-year deviations from predicted defoliation are considered, a possible effect of O3 was obvious only at high exposure levels. Therefore, this raises the question whether one O3 critical level to protect vegetation is appropriate for all European countries (e.g. De Santis 1999). Ozone was selected as a significant predictor of defoliation (multivariate approach) and high O3 exposure was associated with deviation from predicted crown defoliation (temporal autocorrelation approach). This suggests that O3 may have some role in determining the overall defoliation status of the sites (which however is mostly controlled by site characteristics) and in determining annual deviations from predictions (which is mostly controlled by other biotic and abiotic factors) (Ferretti et al. 2007b).
National scale studies
National scale studies relating crown condition variables to environmental conditions were mostly limited to a selected set of variables, focusing on acid deposition, O3 exposure or climatic effects, as summarized below.
West-Germany was the first country to carry out a nationwide assessment of crown condition, in 1983. The results of this were interpreted as evidence for air pollution effects (Schöpfer and Hradetzky 1984). This was, however, based on weak and indirect relationships such as a slightly higher defoliation in multi-layered stands than in one-layered stands, because the former stand structure was believed to intercept more with the moving air masses and hence capture more air pollution. Later, based on 61 Level-II plots with 4 tree species in Germany, Seidling (2004) found no clear indication of acid deposition effects on crown condition, by showing that high defoliation during 1995–2000 was statistically related both to low concentrations of soil Ca as well as low concentrations of SO4 in soil solution. In a study on 1800 Level-I plots in Germany, defoliation (taken as the fraction of trees with >25 % defoliation) was positively correlated to a number of S variables (S deposition; exceedance of critical loads of S and foliar S concentration) and foliar Ca concentration, while it was negatively correlated to N deposition (Augustin et al. 2005).
Early studies from Great Britain did not indicate negative effects of acid deposition on crown condition (Innes and Whittaker 1993; Mather et al. 1995), and the highest defoliation was found on sites having the lowest Al/BC ratios in soil water (Freer-Smith and Read 1995). However, a cause-effect relationship was considered unlikely, since plots with the highest loads of acid deposition were mainly located at high elevations exposed to mechanical damage from snow and wind (not quantified in the study) (Mather et al. 1995).
In Norway, two apparently contradictory results were found concerning the effect of acid deposition on Norway spruce defoliation. Both studies worked in southern Norway, which is a very appropriate region for correlative studies, because it contains a gradient from the highest deposition loads in Norway down to almost background values. Nellemann and Frogner (1994) found a relationship between defoliation and modelled (PROFILE) exceedance of critical loads based on about 100 Level-I plots, while Solberg and Tørseth (1997), who used a stratum of about 100 old forest officers plots, found no relationships with either deposition or soil chemical variables. While Solberg and Tørseth (1997) used standard statistical analyses methods, Nellemann and Frogner (1994) used an unusual statistical approach: Their 100 observations were first aggregated to 10 decile values, and for these 10 data points they fitted an S-shaped line and presented an R2 value of 0.94. The S-shaped fit was the only way to resolve the fact that the plots with the highest exceedance had defoliation similar to the plots with the lowest exceedance; however, they did not provide a plausible explanation for this curve. Later, Solberg et al. (2002) carried out modelling of exceedance of critical loads of acidity for the same 100 forest officers’ plots, and found the exceedance variables to not correlate with crown condition variables. Their soil solution Al/Ca were mostly below the criterion of 1.0, even though critical acid loads were exceeded at many plots, as calculated by the MAGIC and PROFILE models, demonstrating that modelled exceedance does not mean that unfavourable soil solution chemistry is present today but only that it might be reached in the future. Hence, exceedance may not be an appropriate variable in correlative studies searching for acid deposition effects.
Augustaitis et al. (2007) analysed Scots pine defoliation and air pollution data from 45 monitoring plots during 1994–2004 in Lithuania. During these years, air pollution decreased considerably. For example the SO2 concentrations decreased by 80 %. At the same time defoliation decreased considerably. This co-incidence between two decreasing trends produced positive correlations between defoliation and air pollution variables, and they concluded from this that air pollution were among the key factors affecting defoliation. However, this seems questionable as the SO2 concentrations were only in the range 1.6–6 μg m−3, which is clearly below critical levels, while it is unlikely that the ecosystem could recover from an eventual soil acidification stress during only 10 years. In addition, their hypothesis testing was questionable, since they treated all data from 45 stands during 11 consecutive years as 495 independent observations, i.e. not taking temporal autocorrelation into account.
In the Netherlands defoliation has been found to correlate mainly to tree species and age, and to a much lesser extent to foliar N content and pH of the soil solution (Hendriks et al. 1994). In a later study Hendriks et al. (2000) found that a range of factors such as deposition, climatic, stand, site and biotic factors was correlated to defoliation, however, the relationships were weak.
Augustaitis and Bytnerowicz (2008) investigated the possible effect of natural and anthropogenic environmental factors on Scots pine defoliation and stem growth in Lithuania, including acid deposition and O3 exposure by applying a linear multiple regression technique. Results confirmed earlier findings that acidifying air compounds and their deposition are key factors resulting in pine defoliation changes (Augustaitis et al. 2003, 2005, 2007). They explained from 23 % to 28 % of the variance of residual defoliation of pine trees. The effect of peak O3 concentrations was less significant (19.3 %), however, they increased the explanation rate of defoliation residual variability by air concentration of acidifying compounds, their concentration in precipitation and deposition from 3 to 8 % (Augustaitis and Bytnerowicz 2008).The findings of that study revealed that the contribution of peak O3 concentrations to the integrated impact of the other environmental factors on Scots pine defoliation and basal growth increment remain statistically significant, confirming results obtained in Finland (Utriainen and Holopainen 2000) and the Carpathian forest (Muzika et al. 2004). Also, the effects of peak O3 concentrations have higher significance for spruce trees in Norway than the mean diurnal O3 concentration or the AOT40 index in southern Sweden (Karlsson et al. 2006). Therefore, it seems that peak O3 concentration is one of the key factors affecting forest ecosystems in North-eastern and Northern Europe (Augustaitis and Bytnerowicz 2008).
With emphasis on the simulation of the local water balance, and based on forest condition data for 1983–1985 from the Swiss Forests Inventory (Stierlin et al. 1994), Zierl (2002) investigated possible relationships between leaf/needle loss and O3 concentrations in Switzerland by means of statistical analysis, based on the hypothesis about the possible impact of O3 on crown defoliation. All results from the temporal and spatial statistical analysis support the hypothesis that tropospheric O3 contributes to the forest decline observed during the last decades in Switzerland. However, under different climatic conditions plants might respond differently to O3, which results in regional and yearly differences in sensitivities of forest stands. Especially drought stress during the summer months can provide an effective protection from O3 damage by enforcing stomatal narrowing or even closure. At dry forest sites the risk of ozone damage even seems to be highest in years with moderate O3 concentrations, but small drought stress.
Baumgarten et al. (2009) compared exposure and flux-based indices of O3 risk at 13 Level II monitoring sites across Bavaria, Southern Germany from 2002 to 2005. Both, the exposure-based indices AOT40 and MPOC (Maximum Permissible Ozone Concentration, Grünhage et al. 2001; Krause et al. 2005) as well as the flux-based POD indicator suggested that Bavarian forests are at risk from ozone. However, O3 visible symptoms were found only to a small extent (<3 % of total leaf area, >1–5 % of leaves) on beech trees throughout the study years, and not on all plots.
In a study dedicated on the impact of O3 on forest ecosystems in Italy, O3 was found to be a predictor of crown transparency residuals in beech sites over two consecutive years, but the variance explained amounts to less than 10 % (Bussotti and Ferretti 2009). In a more recent study, Ferretti et al. (2012a) investigated the relation between defoliation data (2007–2009) collected at ICP Forests Level I (n = 15) and Level II (n = 1) plots in Trentino, Italy and site and environmental factors including O3, using multiple regression models and Linear Mixed Models (LMM). Both approaches showed that defoliation values increased with increasing frequency of reported damage (biotic and abiotic) and with decreasing level of foliar N:K. Despite the recorded high values, O3 was never reported as a significant predictor of defoliation at the plots in Trentino. These results were further confirmed for the 2000–2009 period, taking into account AOT40 and stomatal flux, at the Level II plot.
Weather conditions, especially drought, are major drivers for year to year variations in crown condition (e.g. Lorenz et al. 1998). In Britain, Mather et al. (1995) analysed data from 294 monitoring plots together with modelled climatic and air pollution variables between 1989 and 1992, and concluded that drought was the major factor affecting the crown condition of trees. Using multivariate analyses techniques defoliation could be attributed to soil moisture deficit and potential evapotranspiration, and the cause-effect inference was supported by observations of drought stress effects on trees in the very dry 1989 summer, particularly in southern Britain. However, drought and other factors together explained only 5–10 % of the variation in defoliation. Solberg (2004) found that summer drought was followed by increases in defoliation, discolouration, more cones and mortality, working on 450 forest officers spruce plots in southeast Norway. Increased defoliation occurred the year after the drought, which was interpreted as a result of increased needle fall in the autumn after the dry summer. Seidling (2007) studied German defoliation data from 1990–2004, and found increased defoliation in pine, spruce, beech and oak after dry summers, mainly with a delay of one year. The response was particularly evident after the extremely dry summer of 2003, which is also supported by the annual German forest condition report from 2004 which showed that their 20 year time series of spruce defoliation peaked in the following year 2004 (Anon 2005). In the Swiss party of the Rhone Valley, a considerable decline of Scots pine has been recorded, where 59 % of the trees died from 1994 to 2004, most of following the drought periods 1996–1998 and 2003–2004 (Dobbertin and Rigling 2006). Their analyses indicated that the decline was caused by an interaction between drought and mistletoe (Viscum album) infection, because the mistletoes caused increased water use. In Italy, Bussotti et al. (1995) demonstrated closely related temporal variations in litterfall and defoliation in a Holm oak monitoring plot, and concluded that summer drought was a major driver for defoliation, possibly in combination with other stress factors.
Many biotic agents are likely to be responsible for discolouration and defoliation, and some well-known examples of insects include Elatobius sp. lice attacks on Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) in Britain, oak caterpillars (Tortrix spp.) in central Europe, various moths on mountain birch (Betula pubescens) in Fennoscandia, and pine sawflies (Diprion pini and Neodiprion sertifer) in Fennoscandia. An example of fungal diseases is Gremmeniella abietina, which had an epidemic in Sweden and Norway in the years 2001–2003, causing considerable browning and defoliation. The extent of the disease was well described using data from grids of plot in the national forest inventory and the national forest damage inventory, even though these grids were sparse (Wulff et al. 2006). And as mentioned above, a widespread mistletoe infection apparently contributed to a Scots pine decline in the Swiss alps by causing excessive water use and more drought stress (Dobbertin and Rigling 2006).
Other stress factors
In general, correlative studies often indicated a multitude of stress factors. For example, based on the longest available time series of beech and oak defoliation in several of the German federal states, Eichhorn et al. (2005) used logistic regression analyses which demonstrated that defoliation was related to a number of factors, i.e. age, crown spacing, stand composition, fruit bearing and insect defoliation. Tree age is often the dominating explanatory variable, as for example found in a German study: Zirlewagen et al. (2007) found that age explained 35–64 % of the variance in defoliation, which is in line with the findings of Seidling (2007). However, for cause-effect inferences, age cannot unambiguously be held responsible for defoliation, and the often identified relationship between defoliation and age may in fact represent an interaction between stress factors and age: In a study on the relationships between defoliation and age in Norway, it was demonstrated that the relationship varied from region to region, and in one region of Norway there was almost no increase in defoliation with increasing age (Solberg et al. 2009). This was the western part of Norway, where Norway spruce has been introduced, and where the soils are free from the severe root rot Heterobasidiuon annosum and where drought stress is rare due to abundant rainfall. Hence, when a large fraction of the variation in defoliation often is attributed to age, this may in fact camouflage stress affects that hit older trees harder than younger trees.
Forest growth and tree carbon sequestration
European scale studies
The influence of site and environmental factors on measured forest growth data was investigated at tree level by Laubhann et al. (2009) and at stand level by Solberg et al. (2009), using five-year growth data for the period 1994–1999 for nearly 400 intensively monitored forest plots. Evaluations focused on the influence of nitrogen and acid deposition in interaction with forest stand characteristics and weather variables. The impact of O3 exposure was not included. The study included the main tree species common beech, sessile or pedunculate oak (Quercus petraea and Q. robur), Scots pine and Norway spruce. Requirements for plot selection were different for both methods, resulting in 382 plots for the individual tree-based approach and 363 plots for the stand-growth model approach. The individual tree-based model had measured basal area increment of each individual tree as a growth response variable and tree size (diameter at breast height), tree competition (basal area of larger trees and stand density index), site factors (e.g. soil C/N ratio, temperature), and environmental factors (e.g. temperature change compared to long-term average N and S deposition) as influencing parameters. In the stand-growth model, stem volume increment was used as the growth response variable, after filtering out the expected growth. Expected growth was modelled as a function of site productivity, stand age and a stand density index. Relative volume growth was then calculated as actual growth in % of expected growth. Concerning the meteorological variables temperature, precipitation, and drought the deviations from the long-term (30 years) means were used.
Multivariate regression results at tree level indicating the relative change in basal area increment per unit change in influencing factor of the four most represented tree species at the Intensive Monitoring Plots. Values for N deposition are given in bold. The regression results indicate the relative change in stem volume growth per unit change in influencing factor. For example, a value of 0.013 for N deposition implies an increase of stem growth of 1.3 % per kg N deposition Note: - implies that the effect was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) (after Laubhann et al. 2009)
Multivariate regression results at stand level indicating the relative change in stem volume growth per unit change in influencing factor of the four most represented tree species at the Intensive Monitoring Plots. Values for N deposition are given in bold. Note: - implies that the effect was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). (after Solberg et al. 2009)
S deposition and acidic deposition both had mostly positive slopes, but these two explanatory variables were highly correlated to N deposition. Signs for the parameter estimates for temperature deviation gave significant positive parameter estimates for pine and spruce and partially for beech, while estimates were not significant for oak. Estimates for drought were generally negative for spruce pine and beech and again mostly insignificant for oak.
National scale studies
As with crown condition, national scale studies relating forest growth to environmental conditions were mostly limited to either air quality (acid deposition and/or O3 exposure) or climatic effects, as summarized below.
The possible influence of nitrogen and acid deposition on forest growth was evaluated in a study with nationwide data-sets for Norway (Solberg et al. 2004). Results indicated a 1–2 % increase in growth per kg N annual deposition for pine and spruce, but for beech and oak, the response was not significant. Augustaitis and Bytnerowicz (2008) investigated the impact of acid deposition and O3 exposure on both defoliation (see before) and stem growth of Scots pine stands in Lithuania. Results showed that the integrated impact of acidifying compounds and their deposition accounted for 18.5 % of variability in stem increment residuals, while O3 increased the degree of the explanation by 8.7 %–27.2 %.
The impact of O3 on forest ecosystems is specifically monitored and evaluated in Italy, where O3 levels are measured in 30 plots using passive samplers together with forest response parameters, including crown condition (transparency), BAI (basal area increment) and visible symptoms on spontaneous vegetation (Bussotti and Ferretti 2009). Results showed that levels of AOT40 are above the concentration-based critical level of 5 ppmh in all sites, but the evidence of impact on forest vegetation remains limited. As mentioned before, O3 was found to be a predictor of crown transparency, but the variance explained was less than 10 % and the relation between BAI reduction and O3 was even less certain (Bussotti and Ferretti 2009).
As with defoliation, Ferretti et al. (2012a) also investigated the relation between growth data, reported as relative Basal Area Increment (BAI), collected in the period 2005–2009 at ICP Forests Level I (n = 15) and Level II (n = 1) plots in Trentino, Italy and site and environmental factors, using multiple regression. Results showed that relative BAI increased with foliar N:Mg and decreased with tree diameter. As with defoliation, O3 was not a significant predictor of BAI at the sites in Trentino. These results were further confirmed for the 2000–2009 period, taking into account AOT40 and stomatal flux at the Level II plot. Large variations in exposure and flux did not result into consistent variation in growth. In a recent investigation carried out in Italy (Ferretti et al. 2012b), variables related to management, climate, tree health, and N in soil, foliage and throughfall were the most important predictors of relative growth of Level II plots.
Braun et al. (2007) applied an epidemiological analysis across 83 beech and 61 Norway spruce plots across Switzerland and associated a 7.4 % reduction in shoot length with an AOT40 level of 0–10 ppm h for beech but shoot growth of Norway spruce was not affected by O3. Karlsson et al. (2006) used relative annual basal area increment of mature Norway spruce trees in south-central Sweden during 9 years and found a decline in basal area increment of 4.6 % in 19- to 35-year old Norway spruce trees that could be correlated with differences in ambient O3 exposures between years in the range of 2–9 ppm h. At the same site, O3-specific symptoms were demonstrated by means of light electron microscopy from mature Norway spruce trees (Kivimäenpää et al. 2004).
Various national scale studies showed that soil water availability and also temperature change was correlated with forest growth. By combining tree-ring analysis with models for soil water availability, that had been locally calibrated, Lebourgeois et al. (2005) showed that soil water deficit, in particular in early summer, could well explain annual and early wood growth fluctuations for common beech on French Level II plots. For Norway spruce, early and latewood growth depended mainly on current summer soil water availability, while for silver fir early wood growth was also influenced by the water supply of the previous year’s summer and autumn (Lebourgeois 2007). Using annual stem circumference measurements at Swiss Level II plots, a tree growth reduction was found at low altitude in 2003 as compared to the wet years 2002, while high altitude forests showed no growth change or increased growth (Jolly et al. 2005). The reason, was that at low altitude soil water availability was highly reduced in 2003 and correlated well with the observed growth reductions, while water was not limiting at high altitude (Graf Pannatier et al. 2007). At high altitude, the temperature during the summer of 2003 was increased favouring increased tree growth (Graf Pannatier et al. 2007).
Species diversity of the ground vegetation
European scale studies
Relationships between species composition of the ground vegetation and environmental factors were evaluated at 366 Intensive monitoring plots, as presented in van Dobben and de Vries (2010). Included environmental factors were: (i) site characteristics, such as climate zone, altitude, tree species and soil type, (ii) climatic data, such as temperature and precipitation, (iii) chemical soil data, including element contents in the humus layer and the mineral topsoil both in soil solid and liquid phase, and (iv) bulk deposition data of NH4, NO3, SO4, Ca, Mg, K, Na and Cl. The data used in the analysis are annual mean values over the period 1995–1999, being the period in which the ground vegetation data were assessed. Bulk deposition collected in nearby open field precipitation samplers was used as an estimator for atmospheric deposition. Although throughfall may give a better estimation of the deposition to the forest floor, these data were not used because they were available for a limited number of plots only. A separate analysis was carried out for these plots to check the effect of throughfall, which showed that impacts inferred on the basis of bulk deposition data were very similar to those inferred on the basis of throughfall data.
Percentage explained variance of plant species abundances at Intensive Monitoring Plots that could be ascribed to four main groups of variables in a European and Dutch study (after Van Dobben and de Vries 2010)
Percentage explained variance
Conclusions similar to the above, based on the same one time survey of ground vegetation data, are drawn by de Vries et al. (2003a). These authors stress the bias in monitoring results caused by methodological differences between the countries, especially if biodiversity indicators like the number of species per plot are used. Such bias can be due to differences in e.g. plot size, number and distance of subplots, number of yearly visits, size of the field team and experience of fieldworkers. In general, analyses based on composite measures like mean indicator values per plot or measures derive from multivariate statistics are considered more robust than analyses based on individual species. Seidling and Fischer (2008) and Seidling et al. (2008) present an analysis of a subset of the European Intensive Monitoring plots based on Ellenberg indicator values (Ellenberg et al. 1991). Also their analysis leads to the conclusion that there is a slight but statistically significant increase of nitrophilic species (i.e., an increase in mean Ellenberg nutrient indicator) with increasing nitrogen deposition.
Explained variation of the change in vegetation at Intensive Monitoring Plots, using EMEP estimates to quantify N deposition. Change is determined as the difference last - first relevee of each species in each plot where the time lag between the first and last relevee is >6 years (after Van Dobben et al. 2010)
Percentage explained variance
Atlantic North climate
SUM if P < 0.05
National scale studies
Although many countries have forest monitoring schemes at the national level, only few of them have their results published in scientific literature, the most recent examples being from the Netherlands (Van Dobben and de Vries 2010) and Norway (Økland et al. 2004). The results of these two national evaluations appear to be very comparable to the above one on the European level. The result of the study in the Netherlands is also given in Table 8, which shows that again there is a significant but small contribution of deposition to the explained variance. In this case the components of deposition with a significant effect are SO2 and Mg. Of these, only SO2 is of anthropogenic origin, and Mg is probably just an indicator for the distance to the coast. The Norwegian study (Økland et al. 2004) also found the traditional factors (soil, climate, humidity) to be the most important determinants of the vegetation. In this study soil acidification due to atmospheric deposition is considered as one of the main drivers of vegetation changes (mainly a loss of species in areas with high deposition). However, this conclusion is only based on inference as the vegetation was not directly related to measured or simulated deposition.
All results referred to so far are based on the analysis of generalised indicators, i.e. derived from multivariate approaches (ordination axes) or indicator values. An alternative approach may be the analysis of the response of single species to environmental factors using logistic regression (e.g. De Vries et al. 2003d). However, with studies over a large geographical extent the distribution area of each species should also be taken into account. Failure to do so (like in the above studies) may lead to spurious results because outside its distribution area a species will be absent anyway, even if abiotic conditions are favourable. The results of such studies are therefore hard to interpret.
Discussion and conclusions
Explicit assessments of the impacts of different air quality variables (deposition of N and acidity and O3 exposure) and weather variables (temperature and precipitation) on forest ecosystems are difficult to derive on the basis of monitoring data because of the various interacting effects. This holds less for the impacts on forest nutrient status and soil (solution) chemistry but is specifically true for the impacts on forest health, forest growth and species diversity of the ground vegetation. Below, we discuss the strengths, weaknesses and perspectives of the European forest monitoring programme, followed by a discussion of the main results of this programme in view of those strengths and weaknesses and knowledge obtained from field and laboratory research and we end with main conclusions that can be drawn from the monitoring results.
Strengths, weaknesses and perspectives of the European forest monitoring programme
The main strength of the ICP Forests monitoring programme is the large number of variables that has been measured at each plot, the large spatial extent and the temporal coverage over the last approximately 20 years. Furthermore, compared to other monitoring programmes, ICP Forests has invested great efforts into harmonization. This has led to various manuals for the data assessment, including quality assurance and quality control procedures.
An important weakness of the forest monitoring programme is the use of non-specific response indicators, such as tree defoliation, which are affected by various interacting air quality and climate parameters. In combination with correlations between those drivers, such as those between NOx deposition and O3 exposure, this causes the problem of confounding factors in regression relations. Furthermore, despite the focus and efforts to come to harmonized approaches, there is still a lack of standardization for various assessments, specifically for crown condition and ground vegetation data, eventually causing substantial observer bias. Finally, since the programme is extremely labour intensive, there has until recently been a very strong focus on the actual field measurements all the way through to data management and data storage at the expense of actual data analyses and dissemination of results.
Integration and further data analysis: The ICP Forests Monitoring Programme in Europe has strong links to other ICPs such as ICP Modelling & Mapping, ICP Integrated Monitoring and ICP Vegetation allowing for more integrated and interdisciplinary analyses across Europe. Another source for future potential lies in a stronger collaboration with programmes such as ICOS, EMEP, LTER, etc. Until now, integrated analyses of the data are still limited while the wealth of data allows for such an analysis, especially considering the current time coverage.
Model validation: The monitoring data set also becomes more and more attractive for validation purposes of regional and global scale models. This is particularly true for physiological and environmental parameters describing the water, carbon and nutrient cycles.
Introduction of new techniques and approaches: The technical advances allow more and more parameters to be monitored at higher, i.e. hourly resolution which is another great potential for model validation purposes. Furthermore, there are ideas to include not only Level II & I but also so-called Level III (super) sites which are highly equipped long-term monitoring plots that allow integrated studies and analyses from cell to ecosystem level and validation of detailed process based models. Finally the monitoring systems can be used as a ground validation systems for remote sensing techniques, that are used to assess various forestry aspects, such as growth, crown condition and tree nutrition.
Impacts on forest ecosystems as derived from monitoring studies
Nitrogen deposition effects on forest growth and plant species diversity
The two presented European scale studies, although being different in their approaches, using a different set of plots and different methods to estimate the N induced carbon uptake in stem wood, resulted in similar results. In summary, the results of this wide European growth dataset in the period 1993–2000 indicated a clear fertilization effect of N deposition on European forests varying between approximately 20–40 kg C per kg N (see also De Vries et al. 2008) although higher growth responses to N deposition (up to 4 %) have also been observed in selected Swiss observation plots (Braun et al. 1999). The results are in line with approaches focusing on the fate of N in forest ecosystems (e.g. Nadelhoffer et al. 1999), results of N fertilizer experiments and model simulations (De Vries et al. 2009), as well meta- analysis of various N addition experiments. In the correlative study, S deposition and acidic deposition were also positively correlated with forest growth, but both variables were highly correlated to nitrogen deposition. It has to be realized that the overall positive effect of N deposition on forest growth does not preclude negative effects in extreme cases of acidification. Especially the removal of base cations from the adsorption complex of moderately acid soil may have negative effects on the long term. Lawrence et al. (2005) compared changes in soil chemistry, based on archived soil samples in 1926, 1964, and 2001, with patterns of tree growth in the same period near St. Petersburg, Russia. Results showed a depletion of exchangeable Ca and Mg in the period between 1926 and 1964 and an increase in exchangeable Al between 1964 and 2001. The onset of Al mobilization coincided with decreased diameter growth and a suppression of climate-tree growth relationships in Norway spruce, suggesting that the trees were responding to a decline in Ca and Mg availability. However, overall, the impact of acid deposition on growth does not seem to be negative at European scale.
Even though large impacts of N deposition on forest ground vegetation have been found in local N addition studies, such an effect is hard to assess in large-scale (i.e. Europe-wide or at least country-wide) monitoring studies relating variation in environmental factors, including N deposition, to variation in plant species diversity. These studies lead to the conclusion that factors that are considered to be key indicators for the vegetation in phyto-sociological literature (e.g. Braun-Blanquet 1964; Grime et al. 1988; Oberdorfer 1979; Ellenberg et al. 1991) are most important. These factors are soil chemistry, tree layer characteristics (most notably the tree species), climate and hydrology. Effects of N deposition may be significant but are always small.
A disclaimer with large-scale monitoring studies is that they may be strongly hampered by methodological inconsistencies, especially if they span more than one country. The European ICP Forest network has large differences in plot size and number of subplots between the countries and sometimes even within a country. Observers may have different levels of species knowledge (Ringvall et al. 2005), and in transversal studies their species knowledge tends to increase over time (De Vries et al. 2003a). Floristic views may differ per country or even per observer. Plots may be fenced to exclude the effect of grazing or unfenced, observation dates relative to the growing season may be different and there may be different number of visits per year. On the abiotic side analytical techniques may be different. Anyway evaluations over the complete geographical extent are only possible for variables that have been measured in all plots, and this requires a level of standardisation that is hardly attainable. Mosses and lichens, which are probably the best indicators for environmental conditions (Van Dobben et al. 1999), are not recorded by all countries within ICP Forests. These methodological problems make the large-scale monitoring rather insensitive, i.e. only environmental variables with a rather large effect are likely to be significant in such a study, despite large numbers of plots and a large geographical extent. Large-scale monitoring studies with repeated data, however, are likely to pick up relationships between N deposition and trends in plant species diversity indicators.
Acid deposition effects on soil and forest condition
Results of monitoring studies at the European scale, presented above, show that elevated S and N deposition is reflected by an increase in S and N concentration in forest foliage and elevated SO4 and NO3 concentrations in soil solution. This in turn leads to soil acidification in terms of elevated Al and/or Bc leaching from the forest ecosystem and increased dissolved Al and/or Bc concentrations. Although on average N deposition is higher than S deposition, it still leads to less cation mobilization (acidification) because SO4 generally behaves conservative, whereas N is strongly retained in the soil and/or denitrified. In combination with results from country scale monitoring, the studies also show that reductions in S and N deposition observed over the last 10–15 years are reflected in a decrease of foliar S and N concentrations and dissolved SO4, NO3, Al and Bc concentrations. Since both Al and Bc decrease with a decrease in acid deposition, the Bc/Al ratio stays mostly rather constant.
Despite the impacts on forest nutrient status and soil (solution) chemistry, acidic deposition was found to explain only about 1 % of the variation in crown condition on a European scale, whereas most monitoring results at national scale do not even show any convincing statistical relationship between crown condition and acid deposition or sulphur dioxide exposure. These results imply that there is no clear evidence that acid deposition negatively affects forest health, in terms of crown condition, on a large regional scale. This result is in line with the observation that defoliation tends to oscillate, which indicates that acute stress and recovery are drivers in forest health, rather than chronic air pollution stress (Landmann 1993; Mather et al. 1995; Kandler 1988). In the past several regional studies have concluded that air pollution effects on crown condition are clearly evident, but the provided evidence for this is generally weak and questionable. For example, the first nationwide assessments of crown condition in West Germany in 1983 was interpreted as evidence for air pollution effects based on weak and speculative relationships (Schöpfer and Hradetzky 1984), and the strong increase in defoliation observed in the next year was seen as evidence for the increasing damage by air pollutants, but this increase could well be explained by a change in the assessment methods (Kandler 1992).
The limited evidence of acidification impacts on forest condition from monitoring study results is in line with the earlier presented evidence that the linkage between Bc/Al ratios and root or shoot growth found in laboratory experiments (e.g. Sverdrup and Warfvinge 1993), is generally not found in the field situation (De Wit et al. 2001a, b, 2010). Effects are even lacking in extreme situations. For example, the Uusikaarlepyy monitoring site in Finland has a very acidic soil with extremely high concentrations of inorganic Al, while the spruce trees growing there show no defoliation (Rautjärvi et al. 2002). Also in studies from moderately polluted areas North America, indications of air pollution effects on crown condition have been ruled out in favour of other factors, such as climate, stand and site condition, and pests, with special regard to drought and insect attacks (Brooks 1994; Burton et al. 1991). Despite the large body of data gathered and a widespread research effort, the effects of long-range transported acid deposition on forest health remain indecisive (e.g. Skelly and Innes 1994; Solberg and Tørseth 1997; Thomas et al. 2002; Solberg et al. 2004; Binkley and Högberg 1997; Kandler and Innes 1995; Klap et al. 1997).
Altogether, an evaluation of correlative studies based on European crown condition assessments together with related studies in Europe and North America, indicate that negative effects from air pollution on forests in Europe are weak or cover minor parts of Europe. Widespread, negative effects from acid deposition and soil acidification are not detectable. If occurring, negative effects of air pollution on forests in Europe seems to be local (“classical smoke damage”) due to industry plumes containing high concentrations of SO2 (Lomský et al. 2002) but the extent of such damage has decreased considerably during the last 30–40 years and this SO2 damage type is today rare.
Ozone exposure effects on forest condition and forest growth
The assessment of visible O3-induced injury at monitoring sites across Europe has turned out to be a useful and inexpensive method to show spatial and temporal trends for potentially harmful O3 exposures (Sanz et al. 2007; Gerosa et al. 2007). However, species-specific differences in O3 sensitivity, differences in microclimatic conditions and species composition make it difficult to relate visible injury to O3 exposure and determine critical levels of O3 risk (Schaub and Sanz 2005). Most monitoring results both at national and European scale mostly showed a convincing statistical relationship between crown condition and O3 exposure, but generally, the effects seem to be limited. Until now, the possible impact of O3 on forest growth has hardly been evaluated in either national or European field scale monitoring studies with the exception of Augustaitis and Bytnerowicz (2008), who investigated the impact of acid deposition and O3 exposure on both defoliation and stem growth of Scots pine stands in Lithuania. Their results suggested that peak O3 concentration is one of the key factors affecting forest ecosystems in North-eastern and Northern Europe.
The limited results of correlative studies based on monitoring results do not yet confirm the hypothesis that ambient O3 is a key factor explaining spatial and temporal changes of tree crown defoliation and/or forest growth. The problem with routine forest monitoring is, however, the use on non-specific response indicators, such as tree defoliation and tree growth, which are subject to many other stressors than O3 (e.g. Percy and Ferretti 2004). Furthermore, there is generally a correlation between NOx deposition and O3 exposure, while severe drought conditions may limit O3 uptake by plants, therefore preventing the development of visible injury (Fischer et al. 2005). Consequently, field evidence of O3 effects on forests is limited and extrapolation of experimental results to the real forest condition is problematic (Ferretti et al. 2007c).
In this context, it has also to be realized that all correlative studies were made using either peak or average O3 concentrations or air quality standards such as AOT40 (Kärenlampi and Skärby 1996; Fuhrer et al. 1997). These O3 exposure metrics, however, do not account for environmental and biological variables that affect ozone uptake and plant injury (Matyssek et al. 2007a; Karlsson et al. 2007) and are thus quite inappropriate to predict ozone effects on regional scales. Until now, there are no publications relating monitored forest growth changes to changes in the phytotoxic ozone dose. This is a potential promising approach in correlative field studies. Critical levels in terms of phytotoxic ozone dose (POD) have until now been based on the results of experiments with seedlings under controlled condition (e.g. Karlsson et al. 2003) with relative reduction of biomass used as a response indicator without any results from field gradient studies or long-term monitoring studies. Such monitoring results are highly relevant since the extrapolation of results obtained from seedlings to mature trees under real forest condition has been severely challenged (Kolb and Matyssek 2003). Currently, a study is carried out in which the combined effects of climatic factors, nitrogen deposition and phytotoxic ozone dose (POD) are related to changes in basal area increment, using fifteen-year growth data for the period 1994–2009 for nearly 400 intensively monitored forest plots, as a follow up of the study by Solberg et al. (2009). Preliminary results (not yet published), however, show a large correlation between N and POD, thus obscuring the negative effects of cumulative O3 uptake.
Climate effects on forest condition and forest growth
Correlative studies of measured or modelled climatic and air pollution variables with monitored changes in crown condition at both European and national scale showed that climatic variables (especially drought) were generally the most significant predictors for the variation in crown condition. This result is in line with field studies and experimental studies, showing that drought can reduce foliage production and foliage size, increase foliage shedding, cause yellowing due to reduced foliar nutrient concentrations or cause increased attacks by pests and diseases. For example, it has been demonstrated that oak decline, which has received great attention during the last decades, is not new, but rather that it has occurred repeatedly during the past three centuries, and can be attributed to climatic extremes (winter frost, summer drought), as well as defoliating insects and pathogenic fungi, while air pollution and nutritional imbalance do not seem to be important (Thomas et al. 2002).
Both the European scale studies and various national scale studies also showed that soil water availability and drought stress are correlated with forest growth. At European scale, an increase in temperature deviation gave significant positive relationships with the growth of pine, spruce and beech, while increased drought had a significant negative impact on the growth of these tree species. The various national scale studies showed specifically a large impact of summer soil water availability on growth. The results are fully in line with the experimental observations that reduced water availability results in decreased tree growth and reduced foliage mass.
Reductions in N and S deposition observed over the last 10–15 years are reflected in a decrease of foliar N and S contents and dissolved SO4, NO3, Al and Bc concentrations. Since both Al and Bc decrease with a decrease in acid deposition, the Bc/Al ratio stays mostly rather constant.
Climatic factors and in particularly drought stress, appear to be primary drivers for forest crown condition variations, while air pollution effects appear limited in time and space.
Drought usually increases crown transparency and reduces tree growth, while temperature rise increases forest growth.
Ozone, especially peak O3 concentrations, are related to a decrease in crown condition and growth of forest ecosystems in parts of Europe.
Negative impacts of acid (N and S) deposition on crown condition and forest growth are hardly or not derived. Inversely, N deposition has significantly increased above ground tree growth in European forests.
N deposition has negatively affected the species diversity of the ground vegetation although the impact is limited compared to traditional factors such as tree species and climate.
We thankfully acknowledge Dr Richard Fischer for giving permission for the use of the Figs. 3 and 4. This review was partly funded by the strategic research program KBIV (KB-14) “Sustainable spatial development of ecosystems, landscapes, seas and regions” which is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, and carried out by Wageningen University and Research centre.
- Aber JD, McDowell W, Nadelhoffer K, Magill A, Berntsen G, Kamakea M, McNulty S, Currie W, Rustad L, Fernandez I (1998) Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems: hypothesis revisited. Bioscience 48:921–934Google Scholar
- Achermann B, Bobbink R (eds) (2003) Empirical critical loads for nitrogen: Expert workshop, Berne, 11–13 November 2002. Environmental Documentation 164. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL)Google Scholar
- Adams HD, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Barron-Gafford GA, Villegas JC, Breshears DD, Zou CB, Troch PA, Huxman TE (2009) Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:7063–7066. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901438106 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alewell C, Manderscheid B, Gerstberger P, Matzner E (2000) Effects of reduced atmospheric deposition on soil solution chemistry and elemental contents of spruce needles in NE-Bavaria, Germany. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci Zeitschrift Fur Pflanzenernahrung Und Bodenkunde 163(5):509–516Google Scholar
- Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim J-H, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2010) Drought-induced forest mortality: a global overview reveals emerging climate change risks. For Ecol Manag 259(4):660–684. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 Google Scholar
- Amoriello T, Spinazzi F, Gerosa G, Costantini A, Buffoni A, Ferretti M (2003) Ozone levels and meteorological variables at the permanent monitoring plots of the CONECOFOR programme in Italy. In: Ferretti M, Bussotti F, Fabbio G, Petriccione B (eds) Ozone and forest ecosystems in Italy. Second report of the Task Force on Integrated and Combined (I&C) evaluation of the CONECOFOR programme. Annali Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura, Special Issue, Arezzo Anno 1999 Volume 30Google Scholar
- Anon (2005) Bericht über den Zustand des Waldes 2004. Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und LantwirtshaftGoogle Scholar
- Aronsson A (1980) Frost hardiness in Scots pine. II Hardiness during winter and spring in young trees of different mineral status. Stud Suec 155:1–27Google Scholar
- Aronsson A, Elowson S, Forsberg NG (1978) Torkskador på gran i Västmanland. Drought damage on spruce in south Sweden. Sveriges Skogvårdsförbunds Tidsskrift 76(6):441–456Google Scholar
- Ashmore MR, Fuhrer J (2000) New directions. Usa and abuse of the AOT40 concept. Atmos Environ 34:1157–1159Google Scholar
- Ashmore M, Shotbolt L, Hill M, Hall J, Spurgeon D, Svendsen C, Fawehinimi J, Heywood E, Tipping E, Lofts S, Lawlor A, Jordan C (2004) Further development of an effects (critical loads) based approach for cadmium, copper, lead and zinc. Final Report, EPGGoogle Scholar
- Augustaitis A, Juknys R, Kliučius A, Augustaitienė I (2003) The changes of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) tree stem and crown increment under decreased environmental pollution. Ekologia (Bratislava) 22(1):30–36Google Scholar
- Augustaitis A, Augustaitienė I, Kliučius A, Bartkevičius E, Mozgeris G, Šopauskienė D, Eitminavičiūtė I, Arbačiauskas K, Mažeikytė R, Baužienė (2005) Forest biota under changing concentration in acidifying compounds in the air and their deposition. Balt For 11(2):84–93Google Scholar
- Baker JP, Schofield CL (1982) Aluminum toxicity to fish in acidic waters. Water Air Soil Pollut 18:289–309Google Scholar
- Baumgarten M, Werner H, Haberle KH, Emberson LD, Fabian P, Matyssek R (2000) Seasonal ozone response of mature beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) at high altitude in the Bavarian forest (Germany) in comparison with young beech grown in the field and in phytotrons. Environ Pollut 109:431–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berg EE, Henry JD, Fastie CL, De Volder AD, Matsuoka SM (2006) Spruce beetle outbreaks on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon Territory: relationship to summer temperatures and regional differences in disturbance regimes. For Ecol Manag 227(3):219–232. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.038 Google Scholar
- Bobbink R, Hettelingh J-P (2011) Review and revision of empirical critical loads and dose-response relationships. Proceedings of an expert workshop, Noordwijkerhout, 23–25 June 2010. Coordination Centre for Effects, National Institue for Public Health and the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
- Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, Bustamante M, Cinderby S, Davidson E, Dentener F, Emmett B, Erisman JW, Fenn M, Gilliam F, Nordin A, Pardo L, de Vries W (2010) Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 20(1):30–59. doi:10.1890/08-1140.1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boxman AW, van Dijk HFG, Houdijk ALFM, Roelofs JGM (1988) Critical loads for nitrogen with special emphasis on ammonium. In: Nilsson J, Grennfelt P (eds) Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. Report from a workshop held at Skokloster, Sweden, 19–24 March, 1988. Miljø rapport 1988 15. Nordic Council of Ministers, København, pp 295–322Google Scholar
- Boxman AW, van der Ven PJM, Roelofs JGM (1998) Ecosystem recovery after a decrease in nitrogen input to a Scots pine stand at Ysselsteyn, the Netherlands. For Ecol Manag 101(1–3):155–163Google Scholar
- Braun-Blanquet W (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd edn. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
- Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RB, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belnap J, Anderson JJ, Myers OB, Meyer CW (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(42):15144–15148. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505734102 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brooks RT (1994) A regional-scale survey and analysis of forest growth and mortality as affected by site and stand factors and acid deposition. For Sci 40(3):543–557Google Scholar
- Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Reed DD (1991) Leaf area and foliar biomass relationships in northern hardwood forests located along an 800 km acid deposition gradient. For Sci 37(4):1041–1059Google Scholar
- Carnicer J, Coll M, Ninyerola M, Pons X, Sanchez G, Penuelas J (2011) Widespread crown condition decline, food web disruption, and amplified tree mortality with increased climate change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:1474–1478. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010070108 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christiansen E, Nilsen P (1990) Effekter av tørke og nitrogen. Aktuelt fra Skogforsk 5:18–29Google Scholar
- Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogee J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, de Noblet N, Friend AD, Friedlingstein P, Grunwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–533. doi:10.1038/nature03972 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Leeuw F, Bogman F (2001) Air pollution by ozone in europe in summer 2001. Overview of exceedances of EC ozone threshold values during the summer season April–August 2001. EEA Topic Report 13/2001. European Environmental Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- De Visser PHB (1994) Growth and nutrition of Douglas-fir, Scots pine and pedunculate oak in relation to soil acidification. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- De Vos B, Cools N (2011) Second European Forest Soil Condition Report. Volume I: Results of the BioSoil Soil Survey. Research Institute for Nature and Forest, BrusselGoogle Scholar
- De Vries W, Reinds GJ, van Kerkvoorde MA, Hendriks CMA, Leeters EEJM, Gross CP, Voogd JCH, Vel EM (2000b) Intensive Monitoring of Forest Ecosystems in Europe. Technical Report 2000. UN/ECE, EC, Forest Intensive Monitoring Coordinating InstituteGoogle Scholar
- De Vries W, Reinds GJ, Posch M, Sanz MJ, Krause GHM, Calatayud V, Renaud JP, Dupouey JL, Sterba H, Gundersen P, Voogd JCH, Vel EM (2003a) Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe. Technical Report 2003. UN/ECE and EC, Forest Intensive Monitoring Coordinating Institute, Geneva and BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- De Vries W, Reinds GJ, Van der Salm C, van Dobben H, Erisman JW, de Zwart D, Bleeker A, Draaijers G-PJ, Gundersen P, Vel EM, Haussmann T (2003b) Results on nitrogen impacts in the EC and UN/ECE ICP Forests programme. In: Achermann B, Bobbink R (eds) Empirical critical Loads for Nitrogen. Proceedings of an Expert Workshop in Berne, Switzerland, November 11–13. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL) Environmental Documentation 164, pp 199–207Google Scholar
- De Vries W, Vel E, Reinds GJ, Deelstra H, Klap JM, Leeters EEJM, Hendriks CMA, Kerkvoorden M, Landmann G, Herkendell J, Haussmann T, Erisman JW (2003d) Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe: 1. Objectives, set-up and evaluation strategy. For Ecol Manag 174(1–3):77–95. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00029-4 Google Scholar
- De Vries W, Solberg S, Dobbertin M, Sterba H, Laubhann D, van Oijen M, Evans C, Gundersen P, Kros J, Wamelink GWW, Reinds GJ, Sutton MA (2009) The impact of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by European forests and heathlands. For Ecol Manag 258(8):1814–1823. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.034 Google Scholar
- De Vries W, Wamelink GWW, van Dobben H, Kros J, Reinds GJ, Mol-Dijkstra JP, Smart SM, Evans CD, Rowe EC, Belyazid S, Sverdrup HU, van Hinsberg A, Posch M, Hettelingh JP, Spranger T, Bobbink R (2010) Use of dynamic soil–vegetation models to assess impacts of nitrogen deposition on plant species composition: an overview. Ecol Appl 20(1):60–79. doi:10.1890/08-1019.1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Derwent RG, Stevenson DS, Collins WJ, Johnson CE (2004) Intercontinental transport and the origins of the ozone observed at surface sites in Europe. Atmos Environ 38:1891–1901Google Scholar
- Dobbertin M, Ghosh S, Innes JL (1997) National reports: Switzerland. In: Müller-Edzards C, De Vries W, Erisman JW (eds) Ten years of monitoring forest condition in Europe. EC-UN/ECE, Brussels, pp 120–124Google Scholar
- EC-UN/ECE (2007) The condition of forests in Europe. 2007 Executive Report. EC, UN/ECE, Hamburg, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Ellenberg H Jr (1985) Veränderungen der Flora Mitteleuropas unter dem Einfluss von Düngung und Immissionen. Schweiz Z Forstwes 136:19–39Google Scholar
- Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1991) Indicator values of plants in Central Europe. Erich Goltze, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
- Ferretti M, Fischer RF (eds) (2013) Methods for terrestrial investigations in Europe with an overview of North America and Asia. Developments in environmental science, vol Volume 12: Forest Monitoring, 1st Edition edn. Elsevier Publishers, ISBN: 9780080982229Google Scholar
- Ferretti M, Gerosa G, Bussotti F, Fabbio G (2003) Ozone exposure, crown transparency and basal area increment at the permanent monitoring plots of the CONECOFOR programme in Italy. In: Ferretti M, Bussotti F, Fabbio G, Petriccione B (eds) Ozone and Forest Ecosystems in Italy. Second report of the Task Force on Integrated and Combined (I&C) evaluation of the CONECOFOR programme. Annali Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura, Special Issue, Arezzo Anno 1999 Volume 30 - Supplemento 1 2003. pp 107–120Google Scholar
- Ferretti M, Fagnano M, Amoriello T, Badiani M, Ballarin-Denti A, Buffoni A, Bussotti F, Castagna A, Cieslik S, Costantini A, De Marco A, Gerosa G, Lorenzini G, Manes F, Merola G, Nali C, Paoletti E, Petriccione B, Racalbuto S, Rana G, Ranieri A, Tagliaferri A, Vialetto G, Vitale M (2007c) Measuring, modelling and testing ozone exposure, flux and effects on vegetation in southern European conditions–What does not work? A review from Italy. Environ Pollut 146(3):648–658. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.05.012 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferretti M, Bacaro G, Brunialti G, Cristofolini F, A.Cristofori, Frati L, Maccherini S, Gottardini E (2012a) Defogliazione ed accrescimento degli alberi nei siti di monitoraggio delle foreste in Trentino: relazione con fattori stazionali, nutrizionali, eteorologici ed ozono nel periodo 2005–2011. In: E. Gottardini FC, A. Cristofori, M. Confalonieri, M. Ferretti (ed) Ozono e foreste in Trentino. Risultati del progetto Ozone EFFORT 2007–2011. FEM-CRI, p 144Google Scholar
- Ferretti M, Marchetto A, Bussotti F, Calderisi M, Canullo R, Carnicelli S, Cecchini G, Fabbio G, Bertini G, Matteucci G, De Cinti B, Pompei E, Salvati L (2012b) Nitrogen deposition and Critical Load exceedance: effects on health, growth and diversity of forest vegetation in Italy. In: Book of Abstracts, Conference “Biological Reactions of Forests to Climate Change and Air Pollution”. Kaunas, Lithuania, 18–27 May, 2012. p 53Google Scholar
- Ferretti M, Beuker E, Calatayud V, Canullo R, Dobbertin M, Eichhorn J, Neumann M, Roskams P, Schaub M (2013) Data quality in field surveys: Methods and results for tree condition, phenology, growth, plant diversity and foliar injury due to ozone. In: Ferretti M, Fischer R (eds) Forest monitoring, Vol 12, developments in environmental science. Elsevier, UK, pp 397–414Google Scholar
- Fiala J, Cernikovsky L, de Leeuw F, Livorova H (2002) Air pollution by ozone in Europe in summer 2002. Overview of exceedances of EC ozone threshold values during the summer season April–August 2002. EEA Topic Report 6/2002. European Environmental Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- Fiala J, Cernikovsky L, de Leeuw F, Kurfuerst P (2003) Air pollution by ozone in Europe in summer 2003. Overview of Exceedances of EC Ozone Threshold Values During the Summer Season AprileAugust 2003 and Comparison with Previous Years. EEA Topic Report 3/2003. European Environmental Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- Fischer R, de Vries W, Beuker E, Calatayud V, Fürst A, Häberle K-H, Haussmann T, Karnosky DF, Krause GHM, Gundersen P, Lorenz M, Luyssaert S, Matyssek R, Mayer F-J, Meining S, Mues V, Neville P, Percy KE, Posch M, Preusler T, Reinds GJ, Renaud JP, Sanze MJ, Schultze ED, Vel E (2003) The condition of forests in Europe, Executive report 2003. UN/ECE and EC, Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products (BFH), Geneva and BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Fischer R, Bastrup-Birk A, Becker R, Calatayud V, Dise N, Dobbertin M, Graf-Pannatier E, Gundersen P, Haußman T, Hildingsson A, Lorenz M, Müller J, Mues V, Pavlenda P, Petriccione B, Raspe S, Sanchez-Peña G, Sanz MJ, Ulrich E, Volz R, Wijk S (2005) The Condition of Forests in Europe. 2005 Executive Report. UNECE, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Fischer R, Lorenz M, Granke O, Mues V, Iost S, van Dobben H, Reinds GJ, de Vries W (2010) Forest Condition in Europe, 2010. ICP Forests, HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, van Dorland R (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in Radiative Forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al. (eds) Climate change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, NY, USA, pp 129–234Google Scholar
- Gauss M, Myhre G, Pitari G, Prather MJ, Isaksen ISA, Berntsen TK, Brasseur GP, Dentener FJ, Derwent RG, Hauglustaine DA, Horowitz LW, Jacob DJ, Johnson M, Law KS, Mickley LJ, Müller JF, Plantevin PH, Pyle JA, Rogers HL, Stevenson DS, Sundet JK, van Weele M, Wild O (2003) Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere. J Geophys Res 108(D9):4292. doi:10.1029/2002JD002624 Google Scholar
- Gauss M, Myhre G, Isaksen ISA, Grewe V, Pitari G, Wild O, Collins WJ, Dentener FJ, Ellingsen K, Gohar LK, Hauglustaine DA, Iachetti D, Lamarque F, Mancini E, Mickley LJ, Prather MJ, Pyle JA, Sanderson MG, Shine KP, Stevenson DS, Sudo K, Szopa S, Zeng G (2006) Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone change in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere. Atmos Chem Phys 6(3):575–599. doi:10.5194/acp-6-575-2006 Google Scholar
- Gerosa G, Marzuoli R, Desotgiu R, Bussotti F, Ballarin-Denti A (2008) Visible leaf injury in young trees of Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L. in relation to ozone uptake and ozone exposure. An Open-Top Chambers experiment in South Alpine environmental conditions. Environ Pollut 152:274–284. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.045 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerosa G, Marzuoli R, Desotgiu R, Bussotti F, Ballarin-Denti A (2009) Validation of the stomatal flux approach for the assessment of ozone visible injury in young forest trees. Results from the TOP (transboundary ozone pollution) experiment at Curno, Italy. Environ Pollut 157:1497–1505PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gitlin AR, Sthultz CM, Bowker MA, Stumpf S, Paxton KL, Kennedy K, Munoz A, Bailey JK, Whitham TG (2006) Mortality gradients within and among dominant plant populations as barometers of ecosystem change during extreme drought. Conserv Biol 20(5):1477–1486. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00424.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graf Pannatier E, Dobbertin M, Schmitt M, Thimonier A, Waldner P (2007) Effects of the drought 2003 on forests in Swiss level II plots. Schriftenreihe der Forstlichen Fakultät Göttingen und der Nordwestdeutschen Forstlichen VersuchsanstaltGoogle Scholar
- Grime JP, Hodgson GJ, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology; a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gruber F (1990) Verzweigungssystem, Benadelung und Nadelfall der Fichte (Picea abies). Birkhäuser, BaselGoogle Scholar
- Guderian R (1985) Air pollution by photochemical oxidants, formation, transport, control and effects on plants. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Heiniger U, Schmid M (1986) Nadelfall der Fichte. Untersuchungen zum jahreszeitlichen Verlauf des Nadelfalls und zum Vorkommen von Schüttepilzen im Kanton Zürich. Schweiz Z Forstwes 137(2):157–162Google Scholar
- Hendriks CMA, de Vries W, van den Burg J (1994) Effects of acid deposition on 150 forest stands in the Netherlands. 2. Relationships between forest vitality characteristics and the chemical composition of foliage, humus layer, mineral soil and soil solution. Staring Centre Report. Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Soil and Water Research., Wageningen; NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks CMA, Olsthoorn AFM, Klap JM, Goedhart PW, Oude Voshaar JH, Bleeker A, de Vries F, van der Salm C, Voogd JCH, de Vries W, Wijdeven SMJ (2000) Relationships between crown condition and its determining factors in the Netherlands for the period 1984 to 1994. Alterra rapport. Alterra, Wageningen (Netherlands)Google Scholar
- Innes JL (1993) Forest health: Its assessment and status. Oxon CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
- Innes J, Whittaker RJ (1993) Relationships between the crown condition of Sitka and Norway spruce and the environment in Great Brittain: an explanatory analysis. J Appl Ecol 30(2):341–360Google Scholar
- Innes JL, Skelly JM, Schaub M (2001) Ozone and broadleaved species. Eidgenoessische Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf, Haupt Verlag, Bern, Stuttgart, WienGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2001) Climate change: the scientific basis. Contribution of WG I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Kandler O (1988) Epidemiologische Bewertung der Waldscahedenserhebungen 1983 bis 1987 in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Allgem Forst- und Jagdzeitung 159:179–194Google Scholar
- Kandler O (1992) The German forest decline situation: A complex disease or a complex of diseases? In: Manion PD, Lachance D (eds) Forest decline concepts. APS Press. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp 59–84Google Scholar
- Kärenlampi L, Skärby L (1996) Critical levels for ozone in Europe: testing and finalizing the concepts. Univ. of Kuopio, Dept. of Ecology and Environmental Science, Kuopio, FinlandGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson PE, Örlander G, Uddling J, Peterson M, Longvaal O, Greenfelt P (2003) Verifying the impact of tropospheric ozone on mature Norway spruce treesda statistical analysis of stem growth of Norway spruce in relation to clmate change and ozone exposure. In: Karlsson PE, Selldén G, Pleijel H (eds) Establishing Ozone Critical Level II. UN/ECE Workshop Report, IVL report B 1523. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden, pp 329–335.Google Scholar
- Karlsson PE, Uddling J, Braun S, Broadmeadow M, Elvira S, Gimeno BS, Le Thiec D, Oksanen E, Vandermeiren K, Wilkinson M, Emberson L (2004b) New critical levels for ozone effects on young trees based on AOT40 and simulated cumulative leaf uptake of ozone. Atmos Environ 38:2283–2294Google Scholar
- Karnosky DF, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Awmack CS, Bockheim JG, Dickson RE, Hendrey GR, Host GE, King JS, Kopper BJ, Kruger EL, Kubiske ME, Lindroth RL, Mattson WJ, Mcdonald EP, Noormets A, Oksanen E, Parsons WFJ, Percy KE, Podila GK, Riemenschneider DE, Sharma P, Thakur R, Sôber A, Sôber J, Jones WS, Anttonen S, Vapaavuori E, Mankovska B, Heilman W, Isebrands JG (2003) Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project. Funct Ecol 17(3):289–304. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00733.x Google Scholar
- Kitao M, Winkler JB, Löw M, Nunn AJ, Kuptz D, Häberle K-H, Reiter IM, Matyssek R (2012) How closely does stem growth of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica) relate to net carbon gain under experimentally enhanced ozone stress? Environ Pollut 166:108–115. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.014 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klap JM, de Vries W, Erisman JW, van Leeuwen EP (1997) Relationships between forest condition and natural and anthropogenic stress factors on the European scale; pilot study. Report. DLO Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil and Water Research, Wageningen, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Kolb TE, Matyssek R (2003) Limitations and perspectives about scaling ozone impacts in trees. In: Karnosky DF, Percy KE, Chappelka AH, Simpson C, Pikkarainen J (eds) Air pollution, global change and forests in the new millennium. Developments in Environmental Sciences. Volume 3. Elsevier, pp 141–173. doi:10.1016/S1474-8177(03)03006-7
- Kolb TE, Fredericksen TS, Steiner KC, Skelly JM (1997) Issues in scaling tree size and age responses to ozone: a review. Environ Pollut 98:195–208Google Scholar
- Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life: Functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (1996) Physiology of woody plants, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Krause G, Kollner B, Grunhage L, Jager H-J, Bender J, Weigel H-J, Ashmore M, Emberson L, Karlsson P-E, Pleijel H (2005) New Directions: Discussion of “A new generation of ozone critical levels for the protection of vegetation in Europe” by Ashmore et al. Atmos Environ 39:5213–5217Google Scholar
- Lammel R (1984) Endgültige Ergebnisse und bundesweite Kartierung der Waldschadenserhebung 1983. AFZ-Der Wald 39:340–344Google Scholar
- Landmann G (1993) Role of climate, stand dynamics and past management in forest declines: A review of ten years of field ecology in France. In: Huettl RF, Mueller-Dombois D (eds) Forest decline in the Atlantic and pacific region. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 30–39Google Scholar
- Landmann G (1995) Forest decline and air pollution effects in the French mountains: A synthesis. In: Landmann G, Bonneau M (eds) Forest decline and atmospheric deposition effects in the French mountains. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Landmann G, Bonneau M (eds) (1995) Forest decline and atmospheric deposition effects in the French mountains. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Leeters EEJM, de Vries W, Hoogland T, van Delft B, Wieggers R, Brus DJ, Olsthoorn AFM, van Dobben H, Bleeker A (2007) What happened to our forests in the last decades? Results of more than ten years of forest ecosystem monitoring in the Netherlands. Report 1528. Alterra, WageningenGoogle Scholar
- Lomský B, Materna J, Pfanz H (2002) SO2-pollution and forest decline in the Ore Mountains. Ministry of Agriculture of the Chech Republic. Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Jiloviste-StrnadyGoogle Scholar
- Lorenz M, Becher G (2012) Forest Condition in Europe, 2012 Technical Report of ICP Forests. ICP Forests, HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Lorenz M, Augustin S, Becher G, Förster M, Müller-Edzards C (1998) Forest condition in Europe. Results of the 1997 crown condition survey. 1998 technical report. UN/ECE-EC, Geneva, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Lorenz M, Mues V, Becher G, Müller-Edzards C, Luyssaert S, Raitio H, Fürst A, Langouche D (2003) Forest condition in Europe. Results of the 2002 large-scale survey. Technical Report. UNECE/EC, Geneva and BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Lorenz M, Becher G, Mues V, Fischer R, Becker R, Calatayud V, Dise N, Krause GHM, Sanz M, Ulrich E (2005) Forest Condition in Europe, Technical Report. UNECE/EC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Lüscher D (1989) Die Blütenbildung bei Bäumen und ihre auswirkung auf die Struktur der Krone: III. Die Fichte (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Schweiz Z Forstwes 140(9):813–822Google Scholar
- Magill AH, Aber JD, Currie W, Nadelhoffer K, Martin M, McDowell WH, Melillo JM, Steudler P (2004) Ecosystem response to 15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA. For Ecol Manag 196(1):7–28Google Scholar
- Marschner H (1990) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London, San Diego, New York, Boston, Sydney, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Mather RA (1994) Forest condition in Great Britain. 1989 to 1992. University of Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Mather R, Freer-Smith P, Savill P (1995) Analysis of the changes in forest condition in Britain 1989 to 1992. In: Forestry Commission Bulletin 116. HMSO, London, UKGoogle Scholar
- Matyssek R, Sandermann H Jr (2003) Impact of ozone on trees: An ecophysiological perspective. In: Esser K, Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Hellwig F (eds) Progress in botany, vol 64. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 349–404Google Scholar
- Matyssek R, Wieser G, Nunn AJ, Kozovits AR, Reiter IM, Heerdt C, Winkler JB, Baumgarten M, Haberle KH, Grams TEE, Werner H, Fabian P, Havranek WM (2004) Comparison between AOT40 and ozone uptake in forest trees of different species, age and site conditions. Atmos Environ 38:2271–2281Google Scholar
- Matyssek R, Bahnweg G, Ceulemans R, Fabian P, Grill D, Hanke DE, Kraigher H, Oβwald W, Rennenberg H, Sandermann H, Tausz M, Wieser G (2007a) Synopsis of the CASIROZ case study: carbon sink strength of Fagus sylvatica L. in a changing environment: experimental risk assessment of mitigation by chronic ozone impact. Plant Biol 9(2):163–180. doi:10.1055/s-2007-964883 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matyssek R, Karnosky DF, Wieser G, Percy K, Oksanen E, Grams TEE, Kubiske M, Hanke D, Pretzsch H (2010a) Advances in understanding ozone impact on forest trees: messages from novel phytotron and free-air fumigation studies. Environ Pollut 158(6):1990–2006. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.11.033 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matyssek R, Wieser G, Ceulemans R, Rennenberg H, Pretzsch H, Haberer K, Löw M, Nunn AJ, Werner H, Wipfler P, Oßwald W, Nikolova P, Hanke DE, Kraigher H, Tausz M, Bahnweg G, Kitao M, Dieler J, Sandermann H, Herbinger K, Grebenc T, Blumenröther M, Deckmyn G, Grams TEE, Heerdt C, Leuchner M, Fabian P, Häberle K-H (2010b) Enhanced ozone strongly reduces carbon sink strength of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica) - Resume from the free-air fumigation study at Kranzberg Forest. Environ Pollut 158(8):2527–2532. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.05.009 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178(4):719–739. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mengel K (1991) Ernährung und Stoffwechsel der Pflanze. 7th revised edition. JenaGoogle Scholar
- Millán MM, Mantilla E, Salvador R, Carratalá A, Sanz MJ, Alonso L, Gangoiti G, Navazo M (2000) Ozone cycles in the Western Mediterranean Basin: interpretation of monitoring data in complex coastal terrain. J Appl Meteorol 39:487–508Google Scholar
- Mills G, Pleijel H, Büker P, Braun S, Emberson L, Harmens H, Hayes F, Simpson D, Grünhage L, Karlsson P-E, Danielsson H, Bermejo V, Fernandez IG (2010) Chapter 3 of the LRTAP Convention Manual of Methodologies for Modelling and Mapping Effects of Air Pollution.Google Scholar
- Mol WJA, van Hooydonk PR, de LeeuwFAAM (2010) The state of the air quality in 2008 and the European exchange of monitoring information in 2009.Google Scholar
- Monks P, Richard A, Dentener F, Jonson J, Lindskog A, Roemer M, Schuepbach E, Friedli T, Solberg S (2003) Tropospheric ozone and precursors, trends budgets and policy, TROTREP synthesis and integration report.Google Scholar
- Müller-Edzards C, de Vries W, Erisman JW (1997) Ten years of monitoring forest condition in Europe - studies on temporal development, spatial distribution and impacts of natural and anthropogenic stress factors. Technical background report. EC-UN/ECE, Geneva, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Musselman RC, Hale BA (1997) Methods for controlled and field ozone exposures of forest tree species in North America. In: Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL (eds) Ecological Studies; Forest decline and ozone: A comparison of controlled chamber and field experiments.Google Scholar
- Nelleman C, Frogner T (1994) Spatial patterns of spruce defoliation seen in relation to acid deposition, critical loads and natural growth conditions in Norway. Ambio 23(4–5):255–259Google Scholar
- Nunn AJ, Kozovits AR, Reiter IM, Heerdt C, Leuchner M, Lütz C, Liu X, Löw M, Winkler JB, Grams TEE, Häberle K-H, Werner H, Fabian P, Rennenberg H, Matyssek R (2005) Comparison of ozone uptake and sensitivity between a phytotron study with young beech and a field experiment with adult beech (Fagus sylvatica). Environ Pollut 137:494–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oberdorfer E (1979) Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora. 4. Aufl. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Owens JN, Blake MD (1985) Forest tree seed production: a review of the literature and recommendations for future research. Can. For. Serv. Inf. Rep. PI-X-53. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Chalk River, Ont.Google Scholar
- Pallardy SG (2008) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USAGoogle Scholar
- Percy KE, Legge AH, Krupa SV (2003) Tropospheric ozone: A continuing threat to global forests? In: Karnosky DF, Percy KE, Chappelka AH, Simpson C, Pikkarainen J (eds) Air Pollution, Global Change and Forests in the New Millenium. doi:10.1016/S1474-8177(03)03004-3Google Scholar
- Rautjärvi H, Ukonmaanaho L, Raitio H (2002) Forest condition monitoring in Finland. National report 2001Google Scholar
- Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Health RL (1997) Forest decline and ozone: synopsis. In: Forest decline and ozone: a comparison of controlled chamber and field experiments. Ecological Studies Series 127. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 369–377Google Scholar
- Sanz MJ, Krause G (2001) State of the art of passive sampling in the Pan European Program for Forest. In: Brown RH, Hafkensheod TL, Saunders KJ, Borowiak A, de Saeger E (eds) International Conference Measuring Air Pollutants by Diffusive Sampling, Montpellier, France, 26–28 September 2001. European Commission. Joint Research Centre, pp 10–15Google Scholar
- Schaub M, Sanz MJ (2005) Ozone visible injury assessment across Europe. Int For Rev 7(5):284Google Scholar
- Schaub M, Jakob P, Bernhard L, Innes JL, Skelly JM, Kräuchi N (2002) Ozone injury database. www.ozone.wsl.ch. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.
- Schaub M, Skelly JM, Zhang JW, Ferdinand JA, Savage JE, Stevenson RE, Davis DD, Steiner KC (2005) Physiological and foliar symptom response in the crowns of Prunus serotina, Fraxinus americana and Acer rubrum canopy trees to ambient ozone under field conditions. Environ Pollut 133:553–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schweingruber FH (1996) Tree rings and environment: Dendroecology. Paul Haupt, BernGoogle Scholar
- Shaw JD, Steed BE, DeBlander LT (2005) Forest inventory and analysis (FIA) annual inventory answers the question: what is happening to pinyon-juniper woodlands? J For 103(6):280–285Google Scholar
- Solberg S, Dobbertin M, Reinds GJ, Lange H, Andreassen K, Fernandez PG, Hildingsson A, de Vries W (2009) Analyses of the impact of changes in atmospheric deposition and climate on forest growth in European monitoring plots: a stand growth approach. For Ecol Manag 258(8):1735–1750. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.057 Google Scholar
- Spiecker H (1986) Das Wachstum der Tannen und Fichten auf Plenterwald-Versuchsflächen des Schwarzwaldes in der Zeit von 1950 bis 1984. Allgem Forst- und Jagdzeitung 157:152–164Google Scholar
- Spiecker H, Mielikäinen K, Kölh M, Skovsgaard JP (eds) (1996) Growth trends in European forests. Studies from 12 Countries. Research Report 5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Staffelbach T, Neftel A, Blatter A, Gut A, Fahrni M, Stähelin J, Prévôt A, Hering A, Lehning M, Neininger B, Bäumle M, Kok GL, Dommen J, Hutterli M, Anklin M (1997a) Photochemical oxidant formation over southern Switzerland: 1. Results from summer 1994. J Geophys Res 102(D19):23345–23362. doi:10.1029/97JD00933 Google Scholar
- Stefan K, Fürst A, Hacker R, Bartels U (1997) Forest Foliar Condition in Europe. Results of large-scale foliar chemistry surveys (survey 1995 and data from previous years). EC-UN/ECE, Brussels, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Stierlin H-R, Brandli U-B, Herold A, Zinggeler J (1994) Swiss National Forest Inventory: Guide to the field surveys of the Inventory of 1993–1995.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup H, Warfvinge P (1993) The effect of soil acidification on the growth of trees, grass and herbs as expressed by the (Ca+Mg+K)/Al ratio. Reports in Ecology and Environmental Engineering 1993:. Lund University, Department of Chemical Engineering II,Google Scholar
- Tyler G (1987) Probable effects of soil acidification and nitrogen deposition on the floristic composition of oak (Quercus robur L.) forest. Flora 179:165–170Google Scholar
- Ulrich B, Pankrath J (1983) Effects of accumulation of air pollutants on forest ecosystems. D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Ulrich B, Mayer R, Khanna PK (1980) Chemical changes due to acid precipitation in a loess-derived soil in Central Europe. Soil Sci 130(4):193–199Google Scholar
- Van Dobben HF, de Vries W, Reinds GJ, Granke O (2010) In: Fischer R, Lorenz M, Granke O et al (eds) Forest Condition in Europe, 2010. Technical Report of ICP Forests. Work Report of the Institute for World Forestry 2010/1. ICP Forests, HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Vanmechelen L, Groenemans R, van Ranst E (1997) Forest soil condition in Europe. Results of a large-scale soil survey. EC-UN/ECE, Brussels, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Vapaavuori E, Holopainen JK, Holopainen T, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Kaakinen S, Kasurinen A, Kontunen-Soppela S, Kostiainen K, Oksanen E, Peltonen P, Riikonen J, Tulva I (2009) Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration partially masks the negative effects of elevated ozone in silver birch (Betula pendula Roth). Ambio 38(8):418–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vingarzan R (2004) A review of surface O3 background levels and trends. Atmos Environ 38:3431–3442Google Scholar
- Waring RH (1987) Characteristics of trees predisposed to die. Bioscience 37(8):569–574Google Scholar
- Werner H, Fabian P (2002) Free-air fumigation of mature trees - a novel system for controlled ozone enrichment in grown-up beech and spruce canopies. Environ Sci Pollut R 9:117–121Google Scholar
- Whitney RD, Timmer VR (1983) Chlorosis in planted white spruce at Limestone Lake. Inf. Rep. D-X-346. Ontario. Dep. Environ., Can. For. Serv., Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.Google Scholar
- Wild O, Fiore AM, Shindell DT, Doherty RM, Collins WJ, Dentener FJ, Schultz MG, Gong S, MacKenzie IA, Zeng G, Hess P, Duncan BN, Bergmann DJ, Szopa S, Jonson JE, Keating TJ, Zuber A (2012) Modelling future changes in surface ozone: a parameterized approach. Atmos Chem Phys 12:2037–2054. doi:10.5194/acp-12-2037-2012 Google Scholar
- Worrell R (1983) Damage by the spruce bark beetle in South Norway 1970-80: A survey, and factors affecting its occurrence. Medd Nor Inst Skogforsoeksves 38(6):1–34Google Scholar
- Zöttl HW, Mies E (1983) Nährelementversorgung und Schadstoffbelastung von Fichtenökosy-stemen im Südschwarzwald unter Immissionseinfluß. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 38:429–434Google Scholar