Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 379, Issue 1–2, pp 193–204 | Cite as

Seasonal variation in nitrogen fixation and effects of climate change in a subarctic heath

  • Signe Lett
  • Anders Michelsen
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Nitrogen fixation associated with cryptogams is potentially very important in arctic and subarctic terrestrial ecosystems, as it is a source of new nitrogen (N) into these highly N limited systems. Moss-, lichen- and legume-associated N2 fixation was studied with high frequency (every second week) during spring, summer, autumn and early winter to uncover the seasonal variation in input of atmospheric N2 to a subarctic heath with an altered climate.

Methods

We estimated N2 fixation from ethylene production by acetylene reduction assay in situ in a field experiment with the treatments: long- vs. short-term summer warming using plastic tents and litter addition (simulating expansion of the birch forest).

Results

N2 fixation activity was measured from late April to mid November and 33 % of all N2 was fixed outside the vascular plant growing season (Jun–Aug). This substantial amount underlines the importance of N2 fixation in the cold period. Warming increased N2 fixation two- to fivefold during late spring. However, long-term summer warming tended to decrease N2 fixation outside the treatment (tents present) period. Litter alone did not alter N2 fixation but in combination with warming N2 fixation increased, probably because N2 fixation became phosphorus limited under higher temperatures, which was alleviated by the P supply from the litter.

Conclusion

In subarctic heath, the current N2 fixation period extends far beyond the vascular plant growing season. Climate warming and indirect effects such as vegetation changes affect the process of N2 fixation in different directions and thereby complicate predictions of future N cycling.

Keywords

Bryophytes Global change Lichens Litter addition Long- vs. short-term warming Nitrogen and phosphorus Plant cover 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Gosha Sylvester for laboratory assistance with chemical analyses at the University of Copenhagen, ANS for providing facilities for laboratory analyses and fieldwork, and Ida Vedel-Petersen for carrying out ARA in June and July 2011. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from “Docent, Dr. Scient. Lauritz W. Olsons rejsefond”, the Danish Council for Independent Research, and from the Danish National Research Foundation (CENPERM DNRF100). Also, we thank the anonymous reviewers and the subject editor for their highly valuable comments and suggestions.

Supplementary material

11104_2014_2031_Fig4_ESM.jpg (295 kb)
ESM 1

Mean water content (Vol. %) in treatment plots on each measurement day; C, control; W, long-term warming; L, litter; WL; combined warming and litter; Wshort, short-term warming. Shading marks presence of tents. Water saturated soil gives a value of 0.56. Bars are data means +SE, n = 6. Comparison of short- vs. long-term warming using C, W and Wshort were done with one-way ANOVA (Treatment as factor): Treat: NS, Time P < 0.0001, Moss cover P < 0.05, Treat*Time P < 0.0001. Comparison of effects of litter addition and long-term warming using C, L, W and WL were done with two-way ANOVA (Litter and Warming as factors): Warming: NS, Litter: P < 0.05, Time P < 0.0001, Moss cover P < 0.05, Litter*Time P < 0.0001. Dates with no data (ND) were due to frozen soil (JPEG 295 kb)

11104_2014_2031_MOESM1_ESM.eps (1.1 mb)
High Resolution Image (EPS 1094 kb)

References

  1. ACIA (2005) Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander V, Schell DM (1973) Seasonal and spatial variation of nitrogen fixation in the Barrow, Alaska, tundra. Arct Alp Res 5:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndal MF, Illeris L, Michelsen A et al (2009) Seasonal variation in gross ecosystem production, plant biomass, and carbon and nitrogen pools in five high arctic vegetation types. Arct Antarct Alp Res 41:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belnap J (2001) Factors influencing nitrogen fixation and nitrogen release in biological soil crusts. Ecol Stud 150:241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckeridge KM, Grogan P (2010) Deepened snow increases late thaw biogeochemical pulses in mesic low arctic tundra. Biogeochemistry 101:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campioli M, Samson R, Michelsen A et al (2009) Nonvascular contribution to ecosystem NPP in a subarctic heath during early and late growing season. Plant Ecol 202:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, et al. (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Clim. Change 2007 Phys. Sci. Basis Contrib. Work. Group Fourth Assess. Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change Univ. Press Camb. Chapter 11.Google Scholar
  8. Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, Alatalo JM et al (2001) Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? J Ecol 89:984–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00625.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornelissen JHC, Lang SI, Soudzilovskaia NA, During HJ (2007) Comparative cryptogam ecology: A review of bryophyte and lichen traits that drive biogeochemistry. Ann Bot 99:987–1001. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm030 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coxson DS, Kershaw KA (1983) Nitrogenase activity during chinook snowmelt sequences by Nostoc commune in Stipa–Bouteloa grassland. Can J Microbiol 29:938–944. doi: 10.1139/m83-150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Gundale MJ, Nilsson M-C (2008) Ecosystem feedbacks and nitrogen fixation in boreal forests. Science 320:1181–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.1154836 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC, Sellstedt A (2002) Quantifying nitrogen-fixation in feather moss carpets of boreal forests. Nature 419:917–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmendorf SC, Henry GHR, Hollister RD et al (2012) Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: Heterogeneity over space and time. Ecol Lett 15:164–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gavazov K, Soudzilovskaia N, van Logtestijn R et al (2010) Isotopic analysis of cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation associated with subarctic lichen and bryophyte species. Plant Soil 333:507–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gentili F, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O et al (2005) Physiological and molecular diversity of feather moss associative N2-fixing cyanobacteria. J Exp Bot 56:3121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graglia E, Jonasson S, Michelsen A et al (2001) Effects of environmental perturbations on abundance of subarctic plants after three, seven and ten years of treatments. Ecography 24:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grogan P, Jonasson S (2006) Ecosystem CO2 production during winter in a Swedish subarctic region: the relative importance of climate and vegetation type. Glob Change Biol 12:1479–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gundale MJ, Gustafsson H, Nilsson MC (2009) The sensitivity of nitrogen fixation by a feathermoss-cyanobacteria association to litter and moisture variability in young and old boreal forests. Can J For Res 39:2542–2549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gundale MJ, Nilsson M, Bansal S, Jäderlund A (2012a) The interactive effects of temperature and light on biological nitrogen fixation in boreal forests. New Phytol 194:453–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gundale MJ, Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C (2012) The effect of altered macroclimate on N-fixation by boreal feather mosses. Biol. Lett.Google Scholar
  21. Gundale MJ, Wardle DA, Nilsson MC (2010) Vascular plant removal effects on biological N fixation vary across a boreal forest island gradient. Ecology 91:1704–1714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardy RWF, Burns RC, Holsten RD (1973) Applications of the acetylene-ethylene assay for measurement of nitrogen fixation. Soil Biol Biochem 5:47–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonasson S (1988) Evaluation of the point intercept method for the estimation of plant biomass. Oikos 52:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonasson S, Castro J, Michelsen A (2004) Litter, warming and plants affect respiration and allocation of soil microbial and plant C, N and P in arctic mesocosms. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1129–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonasson S, Michelsen A, Schmidt IK (1999) Coupling of nutrient cycling and carbon dynamics in the Arctic, integration of soil microbial and plant processes. Appl Soil Ecol 11:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karlsson GP, Karlsson PE, Kronnäs V, Hellsten S (2011) Krondroppsnätets övervakning av luftföroreningar i norra Sverige–mätningar och modellering. Svenska Miljöinstitut IVL rapport B.Google Scholar
  27. Lagerström A, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O, Wardle DA (2007) Ecosystem input of nitrogen through biological fixation in feather mosses during ecosystem retrogression. Funct Ecol 21:1027–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larsen KS, Ibrom A, Jonasson S et al (2007) Significance of cold-season respiration and photosynthesis in a subarctic heath ecosystem in Northern Sweden. Glob Change Biol 13:1498–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leppänen SM, Salemaa M, Smolander A et al (2013) Nitrogen fixation and methanotrophy in forest mosses along a N deposition gradient. Environ Exp Bot 90:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liengen T (1999) Conversion factor between acetylene reduction and nitrogen fixation in free-living cyanobacteria from high arctic habitats. Can J Microbiol 45:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liengen T, Olsen RA (1997) Nitrogen fixation by free-living cyanobacteria from different coastal sites in a high arctic tundra. Spitsbergen Arct Alp Res 470–477Google Scholar
  32. Lindo Z, Nilsson M-C, Gundale MJ (2013) Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change. Glob Change Biol. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12175 Google Scholar
  33. Longton RE (1997) The role of bryophytes and lichens in polar ecosystems. Ecol. Arct. Environ. 13th Spec. Symp. Br. Ecol. Soc. Cambridge University Press, pp 69–96.Google Scholar
  34. Nohrstedt HÖ (1983) Conversion factor between acetylene reduction and nitrogen fixation in soil: effect of water content and nitrogenase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 15:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rinnan R, Michelsen A, Jonasson S (2008) Effects of litter addition and warming on soil carbon, nutrient pools and microbial communities in a subarctic heath ecosystem. Appl Soil Ecol 39:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt IK, Jonasson S, Shaver G et al (2002) Mineralization and distribution of nutrients in plants and microbes in four arctic ecosystems: responses to warming. Plant Soil 242:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Solheim B, Endal A, Vigstad H (1996) Nitrogen fixation in Arctic vegetation and soils from Svalbard, Norway. Polar Biol 16:35–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02388733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sorensen PL, Jonasson S, Michelsen A (2006) Nitrogen fixation, denitrification, and ecosystem nitrogen pools in relation to vegetation development in the Subarctic. Arct Antarct Alp Res 38:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sorensen PL, Lett S, Michelsen A (2012) Moss-specific changes in nitrogen fixation following two decades of warming, shading, and fertilizer addition. Plant Ecol 213:695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sorensen PL, Michelsen A (2011) Long-term warming and litter addition affects nitrogen fixation in a subarctic heath. Glob Change Biol 17Google Scholar
  41. Sorensen PL, Michelsen A, Jonasson S (2008) Nitrogen uptake during one year in subarctic plant functional groups and in microbes after long-term warming and fertilization. Ecosystems 11:1223–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stewart KJ, Coxson D, Grogan P (2011a) Nitrogen inputs by associative cyanobacteria across a low arctic tundra landscape. Arct Antarct Alp Res 43:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stewart KJ, Lamb EG, Coxson DS, Siciliano SD (2011b) Bryophyte-cyanobacterial associations as a key factor in N2-fixation across the Canadian Arctic. Plant Soil 344:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sveinbjørnsson B, Oechel WC (1992) Controls on growth and productivity of bryophytes: environmental limitations under current and anticipated conditions, In: Bryophyt. Chang. Environ. Clarendon Press, pp 77–102Google Scholar
  45. Zackrisson O, DeLuca TH, Gentili F et al (2009) Nitrogen fixation in mixed Hylocomium splendens moss communities. Oecologia 160:309–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zackrisson O, DeLuca TH, Nilsson MC et al (2004) Nitrogen fixation increases with successional age in boreal forests. Ecology 85:3327–3334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zielke M, Ekker AS, Olsen RA et al (2002) The Influence of Abiotic Factors on Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Different Types of Vegetation in the High Arctic, Svalbard. Arct Antarct Alp Res 43:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zielke M, Solheim B, Spjelkavik S, Olsen RA (2005) Nitrogen fixation in the high arctic: Role of vegetation and environmental conditions. Arct Antarct Alp Res 37:372–378. doi: 10.1657/1523-0430(2005)037[0372:NFITHA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology SectionUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Climate Impacts Research Centre, Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityAbiskoSweden
  3. 3.Center for Permafrost (CENPERM)University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations