Successive straw biochar application as a strategy to sequester carbon and improve fertility: A pot experiment with two rice/wheat rotations in paddy soil
- 2k Downloads
A pot study spanning four consecutive crop seasons was conducted to compare the effects of successive rice straw biochar/rice straw amendments on C sequestration and soil fertility in rice/wheat rotated paddy soil.
We adopted 4.5 t ha−1, 9.0 t ha−1 biochar and 3.75 t ha−1 straw for each crop season with an identical dose of NPK fertilizers.
We found no major losses of biochar-C over the 2-year experimental period. Obvious reductions in CH4 emission were observed from rice seasons under the biochar application, despite the fact that the biochar brought more C into the soil than the straw. N2O emissions with biochar were similar to the controls without additives over the 2-year experimental period. Biochar application had positive effects on crop growth, along with positive effects on nutrient (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) uptake by crop plants and the availability of soil P, K, Ca and Mg. High levels of biochar application over the course of the crop rotation suppressed NH3 volatilization in the rice season, but stimulated it in the wheat season.
Converting straw to biochar followed by successive application to soil is viable for soil C sequestration, CH4 mitigation, improvements of soil and crop productivity. Biochar soil amendment influences NH3 volatilization differently in the flooded rice and upland wheat seasons, respectively.
KeywordsAvailable nutrients Biochar Crop grain and straw yield Greenhouse gas emission NH3 volatilization Soil organic C
- Christensen TR, Ekberg A, Ström L, Mastepanov M, Panikov N, Öquist M, Svensson Bo H, Nykänen H, Martikainen Pertti J, Oskarsson H (2003) Factors controlling large scale variations in methane emissions from wetlands. Geophys Res Lett 30. doi:10.1029/2002GL016848.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M (eds), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdomand New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Lu RK (2000) Soil agro-chemical analyses (In Chinese.). Agricultural Technical Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
- Nigussie A, Kissi E, Misganaw M, Ambaw G (2012) Effect of biochar application on soil properties and nutrient uptake of lettuces (lactuca sativa) grown in chromium polluted soils. Amer-Eurasian J Agri Environ Sci 12:369–376Google Scholar
- Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of Soil Analyses: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society Agronomy, USA, pp 403–430Google Scholar
- Patrick WHJr, Reddy CN (1978) Chemical changes in rice soils. In: International Rice Research Institute (es) Soils and rice. IRRI, Los Bafios.Google Scholar
- Wang SQ, Zhao X, Xing GX, Yang LZ (2013a) Large-scale biochar production from crop Residue: a new idea and the biogas-energy pyrolysis system. BioResources 8:8–11Google Scholar
- Wang Y, Hu YT, Zhao X, Wang SQ, Xing GX (2013b) Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues at different temperatures and residence times. Energy Fuels. doi:10.1021/ef400972z.
- Yadvinder-Singh, Bijay-Singh, Ladha JK, Khind CS, Gupta RK, Meelu OP, Pasuquin E (2004) Long-Term Effects of Organic Inputs on Yield and Soil Fertility in the Rice–Wheat Rotation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:845–853Google Scholar
- Zhang AF, Bian RJ, Pan GX, Cui LQ, Hussain Q, Li LQ, Zheng JW, Zheng JF, Zhang XH, Han XJ, Yu XY (2012) Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crops Res 127:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar