Improved scaling of minirhizotron data using an empirically-derived depth of field and correcting for the underestimation of root diameters
- 628 Downloads
Background and aims
Accurate data on the standing crop, production, and turnover of fine roots is essential to our understanding of major terrestrial ecological processes. Minirhizotrons offer a unique opportunity to study the dynamic processes of root systems, but are susceptible to several measurement biases.
We use roots extracted from minirhizotron tube surfaces to calculate the depth of field of a minirhizotron image and present a model to correct for the underestimation of root diameters obscured by soil in minirhizotron images.
Non-linear regression analysis resulted in an estimated depth of field of 0.78 mm for minirhizotron images. Unadjusted minirhizotron data underestimated root net primary production and fine root standing crop by 61 % when compared to adjusted data using our depth of field and root diameter corrections. Changes in depth of field accounted for >99 % of standing crop adjustments with root diameter corrections accounting for <1 %.
Our results represent the first effort to empirically derive depth of field for minirhizotron images. This work may explain the commonly reported underestimation of fine roots using minirhizotrons, and stands to improve the ability of researchers to accurately scale minirhizotron data to large soil volumes.
KeywordsDepth of field Fine root Minirhizotron Root diameter Root method Root net primary production Standing crop
The NC and SC experimental sites used in this work were maintained from the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, Grant No. DE-FG02-95ER62083 and Mead Westvaco, respectively. Funding for this research came from the National Science Foundation, award number DE-FC02-06ER64156.
- Boehm W (1974) Mini-Rhizotrons for root observations under field conditions. Z Acker Pflanzenbau 140:282–287Google Scholar
- Cox T, Harris W, Ausmus B, Edwards N (1978) The role of roots in biogeochemical cycles in an eastern deciduous forest. Pedobiologia 18:264–271Google Scholar
- McCarthy HR, Oren R, Johnsen KH, Gallet-Budynek A, Pritchard SG, Cook CW, Ladeau SL, Jackson RB, Finzi AC (2010) Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol 185:514–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McMichael B, Taylor H (1987) Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons. In: Taylor H (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: Methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1–13Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Rewald B, Ephrath J (2013) Minirhizotron technique. In: Eshel A, Beeckman T (eds) Plant roots: The hidden half. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sanders JL, Brown DA (1978) A new fiber optic technique for measuring root growth of soybean under field conditions. Agron J 70:1073–1076Google Scholar
- Taylor HM, Huck MG, Klepper B, Lund ZF (1970) Measurement of soil-grown roots in a rhizotron. Agron J 62:807–809Google Scholar
- Taylor BN, Beidler KV, Cooper ER, Strand AE, Pritchard SG (2013) Sampling volume in root studies: the pitfalls of under-sampling exposed using accumulation curves. Ecol Lett 16:862–869Google Scholar