Plant and Soil

, Volume 374, Issue 1–2, pp 941–948 | Cite as

Improved scaling of minirhizotron data using an empirically-derived depth of field and correcting for the underestimation of root diameters

  • Benton N. TaylorEmail author
  • Katilyn V. Beidler
  • Allan E. Strand
  • Seth G. Pritchard
Regular Article


Background and aims

Accurate data on the standing crop, production, and turnover of fine roots is essential to our understanding of major terrestrial ecological processes. Minirhizotrons offer a unique opportunity to study the dynamic processes of root systems, but are susceptible to several measurement biases.


We use roots extracted from minirhizotron tube surfaces to calculate the depth of field of a minirhizotron image and present a model to correct for the underestimation of root diameters obscured by soil in minirhizotron images.


Non-linear regression analysis resulted in an estimated depth of field of 0.78 mm for minirhizotron images. Unadjusted minirhizotron data underestimated root net primary production and fine root standing crop by 61 % when compared to adjusted data using our depth of field and root diameter corrections. Changes in depth of field accounted for >99 % of standing crop adjustments with root diameter corrections accounting for <1 %.


Our results represent the first effort to empirically derive depth of field for minirhizotron images. This work may explain the commonly reported underestimation of fine roots using minirhizotrons, and stands to improve the ability of researchers to accurately scale minirhizotron data to large soil volumes.


Depth of field Fine root Minirhizotron Root diameter Root method Root net primary production Standing crop 



The NC and SC experimental sites used in this work were maintained from the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, Grant No. DE-FG02-95ER62083 and Mead Westvaco, respectively. Funding for this research came from the National Science Foundation, award number DE-FC02-06ER64156.

Supplementary material

11104_2013_1930_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplemental Figure 1 The number of publications using minirhizotrons published in each year for the period 1988–2011. Publication numbers are the result of a search of the term “minirhizotron” on Web of Science. (DOCX 26 kb)


  1. Arthur M, Fahey T (1992) Biomass and nutrients in an engelmann spruce—sub-alpine fir forest in north central Colorado—pools, annual production, and internal cycling. Can J For Res 22:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernier PY, Robitaille G (2004) A plane intersect method for estimating fine root productivity of trees from minirhizotron images. Plant Soil 265:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehm W (1974) Mini-Rhizotrons for root observations under field conditions. Z Acker Pflanzenbau 140:282–287Google Scholar
  4. Bragg P, Govi G, Cannell R (1983) A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in oat crop. Plant Soil 73:435–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown ALP, Day FP, Stover DB (2009) Fine root biomass estimates from minirhizotron imagery in a shrub ecosystem exposed to elevated CO2. Plant Soil 317:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox T, Harris W, Ausmus B, Edwards N (1978) The role of roots in biogeochemical cycles in an eastern deciduous forest. Pedobiologia 18:264–271Google Scholar
  7. Day FP, Schroeder RE, Stover DB, Brown ALP, Butnor JR, Dilustro J, Hungate BA, Dijkstra P, Duval BD, Seiler TJ et al (2013) The effects of 11 yr of CO2 enrichment on roots in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem. New Phytol. doi: 10.1111/nhp.12246 Google Scholar
  8. Hendricks JJ, Hendrick RL, Wilson CA, Mitchell RJ, Pecot SD, Guo D (2006) Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. J Ecol 94:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iversen CM, Murphy MT, Allen MF, Childs J, Eissenstat DM, Lilleskov EA, Sarjala TM, Sloan VL, Sullivan PF (2011) Advancing the use of minirhizotrons in wetlands. Plant Soil 352:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson R, Mooney H, Schulze E (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:7362–7366PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson RB, Cook CW, Pippen JS, Palmer SM (2009) Increased belowground biomass and soil CO2 fluxes after a decade of carbon dioxide enrichment in a warm-temperate forest. Ecology 90:3352–3366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Majdi H (1996) Root sampling methods-applications and limitations of the minirhizotron technique. Plant Soil 185:255–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCarthy HR, Oren R, Johnsen KH, Gallet-Budynek A, Pritchard SG, Cook CW, Ladeau SL, Jackson RB, Finzi AC (2010) Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol 185:514–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McMichael B, Taylor H (1987) Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons. In: Taylor H (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: Methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  16. Milchunas DG (2012) Biases and errors associated with different root production methods and their effects on field estimates of belowground net primary production. In: Mancuso S (ed) Measuring roots. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 303–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Connell KEB, Gower ST, Norman JM (2003) Comparison of net primary production and light-use dynamics of two boreal black spruce forest communities. Ecosystems 6:236–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parker C, Carr M, Jarvis N, Puplampu B, Lee V (1991) An evaluation of the minirhizotron technique for estimating root distribution in potatoes. J Agric Sci 116:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pritchard SG, Strand AE, McCormack ML, Davis MA, Finzi AC, Jackson RB, Matamala R, Rogers HH, Oren R (2008) Fine root dynamics in a loblolly pine forest are influenced by free-air-CO2-enrichment: a six-year-minirhizotron study. Global Change Biol 14:588–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pritchard SG, Maier CA, Johnsen KH, Grabman AJ, Chalmers AP, Burke MK (2010) Soil incorporation of logging residue affects fine-root and mycorrhizal root-tip dynamics of young loblolly pine clones. Tree Physiol 30:1299–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  22. Rewald B, Ephrath J (2013) Minirhizotron technique. In: Eshel A, Beeckman T (eds) Plant roots: The hidden half. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Rytter R, Rytter L (2012) Quantitative estimates of root densities at minirhizotrons differ from those in the bulk soil. Plant Soil 350:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Samson BK, Sinclair TR (1994) Soil core and minirhizotron comparison for the determination of root length density. Plant Soil 161:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanders JL, Brown DA (1978) A new fiber optic technique for measuring root growth of soybean under field conditions. Agron J 70:1073–1076Google Scholar
  26. Taylor HM, Huck MG, Klepper B, Lund ZF (1970) Measurement of soil-grown roots in a rhizotron. Agron J 62:807–809Google Scholar
  27. Taylor BN, Beidler KV, Cooper ER, Strand AE, Pritchard SG (2013) Sampling volume in root studies: the pitfalls of under-sampling exposed using accumulation curves. Ecol Lett 16:862–869Google Scholar
  28. Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Johnson MG, Rygiewicz PT, Beedlow PA, Hogsett WE (2005) Estimates of Douglas-fir fine root production and mortality from minirhizotrons. For Ecol Manag 204:359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Upchurch D, Ritchie J (1983) Root observations using a video recording system in minirhizotrons. Agron J 75:1009–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vamerali T, Bandiera M, Mosca G (2012) Minirhizotrons in modern root studies. In: Mancuso S (ed) Measuring roots. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 341–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waddington J (1971) Observation of plant roots in situ. Can J Bot 49:1850–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yuan ZY, Chen HYH (2012) Indirect methods produce higher estimates of fine root production and turnover rates than direct methods. PLoS ONE 7:e48989PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benton N. Taylor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katilyn V. Beidler
    • 1
  • Allan E. Strand
    • 1
  • Seth G. Pritchard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations