Plant and Soil

, Volume 374, Issue 1–2, pp 843–855 | Cite as

Efficacy of zinc oxides as fertilisers

  • T. M. McBeathEmail author
  • M. J. McLaughlin
Regular Article


Background and aims

Human zinc (Zn) deficiency is prevalent in developing countries and Zn biofortification of grains is used to increase the Zn content of food staples. Agronomic interventions to biofortify grain involve fertiliser selection and management. The usefulness of a zinc compound as a fertiliser will depend on its solubility, bioavailability and the effect of its distribution in the soil profile.


Various sources of Zn oxide and Zn sulfate fertiliser were characterised for nutrient content, morphology, solubility, and fertiliser recovery when applied to the surface, banded near the seed or uniformly mixed.


Compared with Zn sulfates, Zn oxide fertilisers had very low water solubility and slow dissolution rates, because of a higher dissolution pH. This did not translate to a diminished ability to supply Zn to plants when both sources of Zn were mixed through the soil, but there was significantly less fertiliser recovery from Zn oxides than from Zn sulfates when the fertiliser was banded near the seed.


All sources will be equally effective if uniformly mixed through the profile. In no-till systems where fertiliser is banded near seed, Zn sulfate is superior to Zn oxide.


Fertiliser efficiency Isotopically exchangeable zinc Fertiliser dissolution Fertiliser solubility 



Funding for this work was from the International Zinc Association. Thanks to Maria Manjarrez and Caroline Johnston for technical support and to the Department of Environment and Heritage for permission to undertake sampling for scientific purpose in the Ngarkat Group of Conservation Parks. Thanks to Fien Degryse, Rodrigo Coqui da Silva and Merv Probert for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.


  1. Amrani M, Westfall DG (1999) Influence of water solubility of granular zinc fertilizers on plant uptake and growth. J Plant Nutr 22:1815–1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bickel A, Killorn R (2001) Spatial response of corn to banded zinc sulfate fertilizer in Iowa. In: Thirty-first north central extension-industry soil fertility conference. Potash and Phosphate Institute, Des Moins, pp 144–155Google Scholar
  3. Boawn LC, Viets FG Jr, Crawford LC (1957) Plant utilization of zinc from various types of zinc compounds and fertilizer materials. Soil Sci 83:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan RF, Bolland MDA (2006) Zinc sulfate is more effective at producing wheat shoots than zinc oxide in an alkaline soil but both sources are equally effective in an acid soil. Aust J Soil Res 46:1615–1620Google Scholar
  5. Brown LC, Krantz BA (1966) Source and placement of zinc and phosphorus for corn (Zea mays L.). Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 30:86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown KH, Rivera JA, Bhutta Z, Gibson RS, King JC, Lönnerdal B, Ruel MT, Sandtröm B, Wasantwisut E, Hotz C (2004) Chapter 2- Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations. Food Nutr Bull 25:S130–S162Google Scholar
  7. Brümmer G, Tiller KG, Herms U, Clayton PM (1983) Adsorption-desorption and/or precipitation-dissolution processes of zinc in soils. Geoderma 31:337–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cakmak I (2008) Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil 302:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards HM, Baker DH (1999) Bioavailability of zinc in several sources of zinc oxide, zinc sulfate and zinc metal. J Anim Sci 77:2730–2735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gangloff WJ, Westfall DG, Peterson GA, Mortvedt JJ (2002) Relative ability coefficients of organic and inorganic Zn fertilizers. J Plant Nutr 25:259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giordano PM, Mortvedt JJ (1973) Zinc sources and methods of application for rice. Agron J 65:51–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goos RJ, Johnson BE, Thiollet M (2000) A comparison of the availability of three zinc sources to maize (Zea mays L.) under greenhouse conditions. Biol Fert Soil 31:343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham RD, Davies WJ, Sparrow DHB, Ascher JS (1983) Tolerance of barley and other cereals to manganese-deficient calcareous soils of South Australia. In ‘Genetic aspects of plant nutrition. developments in plant and soil sciences’ pp. 339–345. (Springer)Google Scholar
  14. Graham RD, Davies WJ, Ascher JS (1985) The critical concentration of manganese in field-grown wheat. Aust J Agric Res 36:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamon RE, Wundke J, McLaughlin MJ, Naidu R (1997) Availability of zinc and cadmium to different plant species. Aust J Soil Res 35:1267–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashem Stietiya M, Wang JJ, Roy A (2011) Macroscopic and extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopic investigation of ligand effect on zinc adsorption to kaolinite as a function of pH. Soil Sci 176:464–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hettiarachchi GM, Lombi E, McLaughlin MJ, Chittleborough DJ, Johnston C (2010) Chemical behaviour of fluid and granular Mn and Zn fertilisers in alkaline soils. Aust J Soil Res 48:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holloway RE, Bertrand I, Frischke AJ, Brace DM, McLaughlin MJ, Shepperd W (2001) Improving fertiliser efficiency on calcareous and alkaline soils with fluid sources of P, N and Zn. Plant Soil 236:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hossner LR, Blanchar RW (1969) The utilization of applied zinc as affected by pH and pyrophosphate content of ammonium phosphates. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 33:618–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Isbell RF (1997) The Australian soil classification. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  21. IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World reference base for soil resources 2006, first 498 update 2007. World soil resources reports No. 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. Klute A (1986) Water retention: laboratory methods. American Society of Agronomy Inc./Soil Science Society of America, Inc., MadisonGoogle Scholar
  23. Legget ME (1972) Chemical and physical properties of zinc fertilizer that affect their avilability in neutral or calcareous soils. In twenty-third annual fertilizer conference of the Pacific Northwest. pp 155–163, Boise, IdahoGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahmud S, Abdullah MJ, Putrus FA, Chong J, Karim Mohamad A (2006) Nanostructure of ZnO fabricated via French process and its correlation to electrical properties of semiconducting varistors. Syn React Inorg Met 36:155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martens DC, Westermann DT (1991) Fertilizer applications for correcting micronutrient deficiencies. In: Mortvedt JJ (ed) ‘Micronutrients in agriculture’. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 549–592Google Scholar
  27. Matejovic I (1997) Determination of carbon and nitrogen in samples of various soils by the dry combustion method. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 28:1499–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenzie NJ, Coughlan KJ, Cresswell HP (2002) Soil physical measurements and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  29. Milani N, McLaughlin MJ, Stacey SP, Kirby J, Hettiarachchi GM, Beak DG, Cornelis G (2012) Dissolution kinetics of macronutrient fertilizers coated with manufactured zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Agr Food Chem 60:3991–3998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mortvedt JJ (1968) Crop response to applied zinc in ammoniated phosphate fertilizers. J Agr Food Chem 16:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mortvedt JJ, Cunningham HG (1971) Production, marketing and use of other secondary and micornutrient fertilizers. In: Olson RA (ed) Fertilizer technology and use. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  32. Mortvedt JJ, Gilkes RJ (1993) Zinc fertilisers. In: Robson AD (ed) Zinc in soils and plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mortvedt JJ, Giordano PM (1969) Extractability of zinc granulated with macronutrient fertilizers in relation to its agronomic effectiveness. J Agr Food Chem 17:1272–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peck AW, McDonald GK (2010) Adequate zinc nutrition alleviates the adverse effects of heat stress in bread wheat. Plant Soil 337:355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peterson GA, Kolberg RL (2002) Inorganic carbon analysis by modified pressure-calcimeter method. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peverill KI, Sparrow LA, Reuter DJ (eds) (1999) Methods of soil analysis-an interpretation manual. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  37. Pumphrey FV, Koehler FE, Allmaras RR, Roberts S (1963) Method and rate of applying zinc sulfate for corn on zinc-deficient soil in Western Nebraska. Agron J 55:235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  39. Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (eds) (1997) Plant analysis—an interpretation manual, 2nd edn. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  40. Sadiq M (1991) Solubility and speciation of zinc in calcareous soils. Water Air Soil Poll 57–58:411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soper RJ, Morden GW, Hedayat MW (1989) The effect of zinc rate and placement on yield and zinc utilization by blackbean (Phaseolus vulgaris var. Black Turtle). Can J Soil Sci 69:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tiller KG, Hodgson JF (1962) The specific sorption of cobalt and zinc by layer silicates. Clay Clay Miner 9:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wright AL, Hons FM, Lemon RG, McFarland ML, Nichols RL (2007) Stratification of nutrients in soil for different tillage regimes and cotton rotations. Soil Till Res 96:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zarcinas BA, McLaughlin MJ, Smart MK (1996) The effect of acid digestion technique on the performance of nebulization systems used in inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Commun Soil Plant Anal 27:1331–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Agriculture, Food and WineWaite Research Institute, The University of AdelaideGlen OsmondAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Sustainable Agriculture Flagship, CSIRO Land and WaterGlen OsmondAustralia
  3. 3.CSIRO Sustainable Agriculture Flagship, CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesGlen OsmondAustralia

Personalised recommendations