Phosphorus availability in chicken manure is lower with increased stockpiling period, despite a larger orthophosphate content
- 571 Downloads
Background and aims
The relative proportions of phosphorus (P) forms present in manure will determine the overall availability of manure P to plants; however, the link between the forms of P in manures and manure P availability is unclear. This study compares the bioavailability and P speciation of three manures of different stockpiling duration: less than 1 month, 6 months and 12 months; manures were collected concurrently from a single poultry farm.
Bioavailability to wheat in a glasshouse trial was measured using an isotopic dilution method with manure added at an application rate equivalent to 20 kg P ha−1. Phosphorus speciation was measured by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic analysis of NaOH-EDTA extracts of the manures.
The addition of all manures significantly increased shoot biomass and P concentration, with the fresh manure having the greatest effect. Addition of the fresh manure resulted in the largest labile P pool, highest manure P uptake and manure P recovery, while the manure stockpiled for 12 months resulted in the lowest manure P uptake and manure P recovery. NMR analysis indicated that there was more monoester organic P, especially phytate, in manure stockpiled for shorter periods, while the proportion of manure P that was orthophosphate increased with stockpiling time.
Together, these results imply that although the proportion of total P in the manures detected as orthophosphate was higher with longer stockpiling, only a fraction of this orthophosphate was plant-available. This suggests the availability of P from orthophosphate in manures decreases with longer stockpiling time in much the same way that P from orthophosphate in mineral fertilizer becomes less available in soil over time.
KeywordsChicken manure Stockpiling Phosphorus availability Isotopic technique NMR spectroscopy
Ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid
Inductively coupled plasma—atomic emission spectroscopy
Methylene diphosphonic acid
Nuclear magnetic resonance
P derived from manure
Thanks to Caroline Johnston, Colin Rivers and Steve Szarvas for analyses and technical assistance. C Peirce thanks the Grains Research and Development Corporation for the Undergraduate Honours Scholarship.
- Cornish PS (2010) A postscript to “Peak P”- an agronomist’s response to diminishing P reserves. In: Dove H (ed) “Food Security from Sustainable Agriculture” Proceedings of 15th Agronomy Conference 2010. Australian Society of Agronomy: Lincoln, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Hedley M, McLaughlin M (2005) Reaction of phosphate fertilizers and by-products in soils. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 181–252Google Scholar
- Isbell RF (1997) The Australian soil classification. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Klute A (1986) Water retention: Laboratory methods. American Society of Agronomy Inc./ Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
- Leytem AB, Thacker PA (2008) Fecal phosphorus excretion and characterization from swine fed diets containing a variety of cereal grains. J Anim Vet Adv 7:113–120Google Scholar
- Mortvedt JJ, Murphy LS, Follett RH (1999) Fertilizer technology and application. Meister Publishing Co, Willoughby, p 37Google Scholar
- Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (eds) (1997) Plant analysis - an interpretation manual. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Sikora LJ, Enkiri NK (2003) Availability of poultry litter compost P to fescue compared with triple super phosphate. Soil Sci 168:192–199Google Scholar
- Turner BL, Mahieu N, Condron LM (2003) Quantification of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate in alkaline soil extracts by solution 31P NMR spectroscopy and spectral deconvolution. Soil Sci 168:469–478Google Scholar
- USDA (1982) Particle size analysis. In: Procedures for collecting soil samples and methods of analysis for soil survey. Ed. S Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar