Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 373, Issue 1–2, pp 403–413 | Cite as

Combined effects of soil properties and Phytophthora cinnamomi infections on Quercus ilex decline

  • Tamara Corcobado
  • Alejandro Solla
  • Manuel A. Madeira
  • Gerardo MorenoEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

The importance of soil properties as determinants of tree vitality and Phytophthora cinnamomi root infections was analysed.

Methods

The study comprised 96 declining stands in western Spain, where declining and non-declining holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) trees were sampled. Soil properties (soil depth, Ah horizon thickness, texture, pH, redox potential, soil bulk density and N-NH4 + and N-NO3 concentrations) and P. cinnamomi infections were assessed.

Results

Tree mortality rates increased with low soil bulk densities, which were also associated with more P. cinnamomi-infected trees. Occurrence of infected trees was higher in fine textured soils and in thick Ah horizons. Fine textured soils favoured trees, but with the presence of P. cinnamomi their health status deteriorated. Soil under declining trees had higher N-NO3 /N-NH4 + ratio values than under non-declining trees. Additional soil properties changes associated to grazing were not related to decline and P. cinnamomi infections.

Conclusions

The implications of P. cinnamomi in holm oak decline and the influence of soil properties as contributors to pathogen activity were demonstrated. Fine soil textures and thick Ah horizons, usually favourable for vigour and vitality of trees growing in the Mediterranean climate, were shown to be disadvantageous soil properties if P. cinnamomi was present. Fine soil textures and thick Ah horizons are frequently related with higher levels of soil moisture, which increase the inoculum of the pathogen and favours root infection. Grazing does not seem to be directly linked to Q. ilex health status or P. cinnamomi root rot.

Keywords

Silvopastoral systems Soil compaction Nitrogen deposition Soil texture Root-rot disease Oak decline 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to María Vivas, Andrea Pérez, Luis Miguel Rodríguez, Rubén Sepúlveda and Elisa Moreno for their valuable assistance with some of the field measurements, to Dr. Jorge Martín-García for his help with data analysis, to Dr. Thomas Jung for encouragement and technical assistance (Olores Locos team), to Dr. Luis Sampedro (CIF Lourizán, Pontevedra) for a critical review of the manuscript, and to Jane McGrath for correcting the manuscript. Useful technical advice provided by Prof. João Santos Pereira and Prof. Nuno Cortez (Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa) was made possible through Acción Integrada hispano-lusa (funded by MEC-UE). The study was funded by Junta de Extremadura (IV-PRI regional project), the European Union and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (AGL2011-30438-C02-02) and was performed within the framework of COST Action “Established and Emerging Phytophthora: Increasing Threats to Woodland and Forest Ecosystems in Europe” (FP0801).

Supplementary material

11104_2013_1804_MOESM1_ESM.docx (92 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 92 kb)

References

  1. Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:419–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alameda D, Villar R (2009) Moderate soil compaction: implications on growth and architecture in seedlings of 17 woody plant species. Soil Tillage Res 103:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asner GP, Elmore AJ, Olander LP, Martin RE, Harris AT (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:261–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balci Y, Balci S, Eggers J, MacDonald WL, Juzwik J, Long RP, Gottschalk KW (2007) Phytophthora spp. associated with forest soils in eastern and north-central U.S. oak ecosystems. Plant Dis 91:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett RJ, James BR (1995) System for categorizing soil redox status by chemical field testing. Geoderma 68:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benson DM (1984) Influence of pine bark, matric potential, and pH on sporangium production by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology 74:1359–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger TW, Glatzel G (2001) Response of Quercus petraea seedlings to nitrogen fertilization. For Ecol Manag 149:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brasier CM (1996) Evidence for Phytophthora cinnamomi involvement in Iberian oak decline. Environmental constraints including climate change. Ann For Sci 53:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camilo-Alves CSP, Clara MIE, Ribeiro NMCA (2013) Decline of Mediterranean oak trees and its association with Phytophthora cinnamomi: a review. Eur J Forest Res 132:411–432Google Scholar
  10. Corcobado T, Cubera E, Pérez-Sierra A, Jung T, Solla A (2010) First report of Phytophthora gonapodyides involved in the decline of Quercus ilex in xeric conditions in Spain. New Dis Reports 22:33–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corcobado T, Cubera E, Moreno G, Solla A (2013) Quercus ilex forests are influenced by annual variations in water table, soil water deficit and fine root loss caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Agric Forest Meteorol 169:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa A, Pereira H, Madeira M (2010) Analysis of spatial patterns of oak decline in cork oak woodlands in Mediterranean conditions. Ann For Sci 67:204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cubera E, Moreno G (2007) Effect of single Quercus ilex trees upon spatial and seasonal changes in soil water content in dehesas of central western Spain. Ann For Sci 64:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cubera E, Moreno G, Solla A (2009) Quercus ilex root growth in response to heterogeneous conditions of soil bulk density and soil NH4-N content. Soil Tillage Res 103:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dane JH, Topp GC (2002) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4: Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America Books Series: 5. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  16. David TS, Ferreira MI, Cohen S, Pereira JS, David JS (2004) Constraints on transpiration from an evergreen oak tree in southern Portugal. Agr Forest Meteorol 122:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Del Pozo JL (2006) Prospección de la seca en Extremadura. Análisis de los resultados. In: Espejo M, Martín M, Matos C, Mesías SJ (eds) Gestión ambiental y económica del ecosistema dehesa en la península ibérica. Junta de Extremadura, Mérida, pp 131–143Google Scholar
  18. Evans R (1998) The erosional impacts of grazing animals. Prog Phys Geogr 22:251–268Google Scholar
  19. Gallardo A (2003) Effect of tree canopy on the spatial distribution of soil nutrients in a Mediterranean dehesa. Pedobiologia 47:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gisi U (1983) Biophysical aspects of the development of Phytophthora. In: Erwin DC, Bartnicki-Garcia S, Tsao PH (eds) Phytophthora: Its biology, taxonomy, ecology, and pathology. The American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, pp 109–119Google Scholar
  21. Gómez-Aparicio L, Ibáñez B, Serrano MS, De Vita P, Ávila JM, Pérez-Ramos IM, García LV, Sánchez ME, Marañón T (2012) Spatial patterns of soil pathogens in declining Meditarranean forests: implications for tree species regeneration. New Phytol 194:1014–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardham AR (1989) Lectin and antibody labelling of surface components of spores of Phytophthora cinnamomi. Aust J Plant Physiol 16:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heuscher SA, Brandt CC, Jardine PM (2005) Using soil physical and chemical properties to estimate bulk density. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:51–56Google Scholar
  24. Jönsson U, Jung T, Sonesson K, Rosengren U (2005) Relationships between health of Quercus robur, occurrence of Phytophthora species and site conditions in southern Sweden. Plant Pathol 54:502–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jung T, Blaschke H, Neumann P (1996) Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of Phytophthora species from declining oak stands. Eur J For Pathol 26:253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung T, Blaschke H, Oβwald W (2000) Involvement of soilborne Phytophthora species in Central European oak decline and the effect of site factors on the disease. Plant Pathol 49:706–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khew KL, Zentmyer GA (1973) Chemotactic response of zoospores of five species of Phytophthora. Phytopathology 63:1511–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kong P, Lea-Cox JD, Moorman GW, Hong C (2012) Survival of Phytophthora alni, P. kernoviae and P. ramorum in a simulated aquatic environment at different levels of pH. Microbiology 332:54–60Google Scholar
  29. Kozlowski TT (1999) Soil compaction and growth of woody plants. Scand J For Res 14:596–619Google Scholar
  30. Lloret F, Siscart D, Dalmases C (2004) Canopy recovery after drought dieback in holm-oak Mediterranean forests of Catalonia (NE Spain). Global Change Biol 10:2092–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malajczuk N, Sanfelieu CL, Hossen S (1983) Production and survival of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores in suppressive and conducive soils. Trans Br Mycol Soc 80:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maurel M, Robin C, Capron G, Desprez-Loustau ML (2001) Effects of root damage associated with Phytophthora cinnamomi on water relations, biomass accumulation, mineral nutrition and vulnerability to water deficit of five oak and chestnut species. For Pathol 31:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moreno G, Obrador JJ, Cubera E, Dupraz C (2005) Fine root distribution in dehesas of central-western Spain. Plant Soil 277:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moreno G, Pulido FJ (2009) The functioning, management, and persistence of dehesas. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Mosquera-Losada MR, McAdam J (eds) Agroforestry systems in Europe. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 127–160Google Scholar
  35. Moreira AC, Martins JMS (2005) Influence of site factors on the impact of Phytophthora cinnamomi in cork oak stands in Portugal. For Pathol 35:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morillas L, Gallardo A, Portillo-Estrada M, Covelo F (2012) Nutritional status of Quercus suber populations under contrasting tree dieback. Forestry. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cps035 Google Scholar
  37. Oppermann R, Beaufoy G, Jones G (2012) High nature value farming in Europe. 35 European countries—experiences and perspectives. Verlag regionalkultur, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  38. Oszako T, Delatour C (2000) Recent advances on oak health in Europe. Forest Research Institute, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  39. Pegg KG (1977) Soil application of elemental sulphur as a control of Phytophthora cinnamomi root and heart rot of pineapple. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 17:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pérez-Sierra A, López-García C, León M, García-Jiménez J, Abad-Campos P, Jung T (2013) Previously unrecorded low-temperature Phytophthora species associated with Quercus decline in a Mediterranean forest in eastern Spain. For Pathol. doi: 10.1111/efp.12037 Google Scholar
  41. Rozas V, García-González I (2012) Too wet for oaks? Inter-tree competition and recent persistent wetness predispose oaks to rainfall-induced dieback in Atlantic rainy forest. Global Planet Chang 94–95:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sánchez ME, Caetano P, Ferraz J, Trapero A (2000) El decaimiento y muerte de encinas en tres dehesas de la provincia de Huelva. Bol San Veg Plagas 26:447–464Google Scholar
  43. Sánchez ME, Caetano P, Ferraz J, Trapero A (2002) Phytophthora disease of Quercus ilex in south-western Spain. For Pathol 32:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sankaran MS, Augustine DJ (2004) Large herbivores suppress decomposer abundance in a semiarid grazing ecosystem. Ecology 41:45–58Google Scholar
  45. Santini A, Ghelardini L, De Pace C, Desprez-Loustau ML, Capretti P, Chandelier A, Cech T, Chira D, Diamandis S, Gaitniekis T, Hantula J, Holdenrieder O, Jankovsky L, Jung T, Jurc D, Kirisits T, Kunca A, Lygis V, Malecka M, Marcais B, Schmitz S, Schumacher J, Solheim H, Solla A, Szabò I, Tsopelas P, Vannini A, Vettraino AM, Webber J, Woodward S, Stenlid J (2013) Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytol 197:238–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmitthenner AF, Canaday CH (1983) Role of chemical factors in development of Phytophthora diseases. In: Erwin DC, Bartnicki-Garcia S, Tsao PH (eds) Phytophthora: Its biology, taxonomy, ecology, and pathology. The American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, pp 189–196Google Scholar
  47. Schnabel S, Gómez Gutiérrez A, Lavado Contador JF (2009) Grazing and soil erosion in dehesas of SW Spain. In: Romero Díaz A, Belmonte Serrato F, Alonso Sarria F, Francisco López Bermúdez F (eds) Advances in studies on desertification. Editum, Murcia, pp 725–728Google Scholar
  48. Sempere A, Oliver J, Ramos C (1993) Simple determination of nitrate in soils by second-derivative spectroscopy. Eur J Soil Sci 44:633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Serrano MS, De Vita P, Carbonero MD, Fernández F, Fernández-Rebollo P, Sánchez ME (2012) Susceptibility to Phytophthora cinnamomi of the commonest morphotypes of holm oak in southern Spain. For Pathol 42:345–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shearer BL, Crane CE (2011) Habitat suitability of soils from a topographic gradient across the Fitzgerald River National Park for invasion by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australas Plant Pathol 40:168–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singer FJ, Schoenecker KA (2003) Do ungulates accelerate or decelerate nitrogen cycling? For Ecol Manag 181:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solla A, García L, Pérez A, Cordero A, Cubera E, Moreno G (2009) Evaluating potassium phosphonate injections for the control of Quercus ilex decline in SW Spain: implications of low soil contamination by Phytophthora cinnamomi and low soil water content on the effectiveness of treatments. Phytoparasitica 37:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sparks DL (1996) Methods of soil analysis Part 3: Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas FM, Büttner G (1998) Nutrient relations in healthy and damaged stands of mature oaks on clayey soils: two case studies in northwestern Germany. For Ecol Manag 108:301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas FM, Hartmann G (1998) Tree rooting patterns and soil water relations of healthy and damaged stands of mature oaks (Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.). Plant Soil 203:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas FM, Blank R, Hartmann G (2002) Abiotic and biotic factors and their interactions as causes of oak decline in Central Europe. For Pathol 32:277–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. UNECE (2010) Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. vTI Institute for World Forestry, Hamburg. http://www.icp-forests.org/pdf/FINAL_Crown.pdf
  58. Watson GW, Kelsey P (2006) The impact of soil compaction on soil aeration and fine root density of Quercus palustris. Urban For Urban Green 4:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weste G, Marks GC (1987) The biology of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Australasian forests. Annu Rev Phytopathol 25:207–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson SD, Tilman D (1991) Interactive effects of fertilization and disturbance on community structure and resource availability in an old-field plant community. Oecologia 88:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zentmyer GA (1980) Phytophthora cinnamomi and the diseases it causes. Am Phytopathol Soc, St Paul, Monogr, 10Google Scholar
  62. Zhao Y, Peth S, Krümmelbein J, Horn R, Wang Z, Steffens M, Hoffmann C, Peng X (2007) Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in inner Mongolia grassland. Ecol Model 205:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamara Corcobado
    • 1
  • Alejandro Solla
    • 1
  • Manuel A. Madeira
    • 2
  • Gerardo Moreno
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Grupo de Investigación Forestal, Ingeniería Forestal y del Medio NaturalUniversidad de ExtremaduraPlasenciaSpain
  2. 2.Instituto Superior de AgronomiaUniversidade Técnica de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations