Processes leading to N2O and NO emissions from two different Chinese soils under different soil moisture contents
- 943 Downloads
Background and Aims
Great attention has been paid to N2O emissions from paddy soils under summer rice-winter wheat double-crop rotation, while less focus was given to the NO emissions. Besides, neither mechanism is completely understood. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating the relative importance of nitrification and denitrification to N2O and NO emissions from the two soils at different soil moisture contents
N2O and NO emissions during one winter wheat season were simultaneously measured in situ in two rice-wheat based field plots at two different locations in Jiangsu Province, China. One soil was neutral in pH with silt loam texture (NSL), the other soil alkaline in pH with a clay texture (AC). A 15 N tracer incubation experiment was conducted in the laboratory to evaluate the relative importance of nitrification and denitrification for N2O and NO emissions at soil moisture contents of 40 % water holding capacity (WHC), 65 % WHC and 90 % WHC.
Higher N2O emission rates in the AC soil than in the NSL soil were found both in the field and in the laboratory experiments; however, the differences in N2O emissions between AC soil and NSL soil were smaller in the field than in the laboratory. In the latter experiment, nitrification was observed to be the more important source of N2O emissions (>70 %) than denitrification, regardless of the soils and moisture treatments, with the only exception of the AC soil at 90 % WHC, at which the contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions were comparable. The ratios of NO/N2O also supported the evidence that the nitrification process was the dominant source of N2O and NO both in situ and in the laboratory. The proportion of nitrified N emitted as N2O (P N2O ) in NSL soil were around 0.02 % in all three moisture treatments, however, P N2O in the AC soil (0.04 % to 0.10 %) tended to decrease with increasing soil moisture content.
Our results suggest that N2O emission rates obtained from laboratory incubation experiments are not suitable for the estimation of the true amount of N2O fluxes on a field scale. Besides, the variations of P N2O with soil property and soil moisture content should be taken into account in model simulations of N2O emission from soils.
KeywordsNitrification Denitrification NO/N2O Soil moisture Soil pH Rice-wheat rotation
This project was financially supported by the Sino-German collaborative project: “Innovative nitrogen management technologies to improve agricultural production and environmental protection in intensive Chinese agriculture”, “Cultivated land conservation and nitrogen fertilizer management technology”. Co-funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MOST grant no. 2007DFA30850) and the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF FKZ: 0330800C), as well as by a DAAD-PPP (project ID 50751522) with the China Scholarship Council (personal approval no. 2011016097).
- Anderson IC, Levine JS (1986) Relative Rates of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide production by nitrifiers, denitrifiers, and nitrate respirers. Appl Environ Microb 51:938–945Google Scholar
- Bouwman AF (1990) Soils and the greenhouse effect. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Bouwman AF, Boumans LJM, Batjes NH (2002) Emissions of N2O and NO from fertilized fields: summary of available measurement data. Global Biogeochem Cycles 16:1058Google Scholar
- Cao YC, Zhong M, Gong H, Lu GX (2013) Determining 15N abundance in ammonium, nitrate and nitrite in soil by measuring nitrous oxide produced. Acta Pedologica Sin 50:113–119 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. (on line) http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf (17 November, 2007)
- Crutzen PJ (1981) Atmospheric chemical processes of the oxides of nitrogen including nitrous oxide. In: Delwiche CC (ed) Denitrification, nitrification and atmospheric N2O. Wiley, Chichester, pp 17–44Google Scholar
- Davidson EA (1991) Fluxes of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from terrestrial ecosystems. In: Rogers JE, Whitman WB (eds) Microbial production and consumption of greenhouse gases: methane. Nitrogen oxide and Halomethans. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 219–235Google Scholar
- Davidson EA, Swank WT, Perry TO (1986) Distinguishing between nitrification and denitrification as sources of gaseous nitrogen production in soil. Appl Environ Microb 52:1280–1286Google Scholar
- Frolking SE, Mosier AR, Ojima DS, Li C, Parton WJ, Potter CS, Priesack E, Stenger R, Haberbosch C, Dörsch P, Flessa H, Smith KA (1998) Comparison of N2O emissions from soils at three temperate agricultural sites: simulations of year-round measurements by four models. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 52:77–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Lu RK (2000) Soil agro–chemical analyses. Agricultural Technical Press of China, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Nägele W, Conrad R (1990) Influence of pH on the release of NO and N2O from fertilized and unfertilized soil. Biol Fert Soils 10:139–144Google Scholar
- Tortoso AC, Hutchinson GL (1990) Contributions of autotrophic and heterotrophic nitrifiers to soil NO and N2O emissions. Appl Environ Microb 56:1799–1805Google Scholar
- USDA (1994) Keys to soil taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 6th edn, pp:306Google Scholar