Plant and Soil

, Volume 369, Issue 1–2, pp 297–316 | Cite as

Transgenic Bt rice has adverse impacts on CH4 flux and rhizospheric methanogenic archaeal and methanotrophic bacterial communities

Regular Article


Background and Aims

The effect of transgenic insect-resistant crops on soil microorganisms has become an issue of public concern. The goal of this study was to firstly realize the variation of in situ methane (CH4) emission flux and methanogenic and methanotrophic communities due to planting transgenic Bt rice (Bt) cultivar.


CH4 emitted from paddy soil was collected by static closed chamber technique. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and real-time PCR methods were employed to analyze methanogenic archaeal and methanotrophic bacterial community structure and abundance.


Results showed that planting Bt rice cultivar effectively reduced in situ CH4 emission flux and methanogenic archaeal and methanotrophic bacterial community abundance and diversity. Data analysis showed that in situ CH4 emission flux increased significantly with the increase of methanogenic archaeal abundance (R2 = 0.839, p < 0.001) and diversity index H′ (R2 = 0.729, p < 0.05), whereas was not obviously related to methanotrophic bacterial community.


Our results suggested that the lower in situ CH4 emission flux from Bt soil may result from lower methanogenic archaeal community abundance and diversity, lower methanogenic activity and higher methanotrophic activity. Moreover, our results inferred that specific functional microorganisms may be a more sensitive indicator than the total archaeal, bacterial or fungal population to assess the effects of transgenic insect-resistant plants on soil microorganisms.


Ecological risk Transgenic Bt rice Paddy ecosystem Methane emission flux Functional microbial community dynamics Plant-soil interaction 



Transgenic Bt rice


Non-transgenic parental rice control


Seedling stage


Tillering stage


Mid-season aeration stage


Filling stage


Maturing stage


Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis


Operational taxonomic unit


Principal component analysis

Supplementary material

11104_2012_1522_MOESM1_ESM.doc (219 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 219 kb)


  1. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Scheidler KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 59:143–169Google Scholar
  2. Aulakh MS, Wassmann R, Bueno C, Rennenberg H (2001) Impact of root exudates of different cultivars and plant development stages of rice (Oryza sativa L.) on methane production in a paddy soil. Plant Soil 230:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellissimi E, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, Van Maris AJA (2009) Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res 9:358–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bousquet P, Ciais P, Miller JB, Dlugokencky EJ, Hauglustaine DA, Prigent C, Van der Werf GR, Peylin P, Brunke EG, Carouge C, Langenfelds RL, Lathiėre J, Papa F, Ramonet M, Schmidt M, Steele LP, Tyler SC, White J (2006) Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Nature 443:439–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai ZC, Tsuruta H, Gao M, Wei CF (2003) Options for mitigating methane emission from a permanently flooded rice field. Glob Change Biol 9:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castaldini M, Turrini A, Sbrana C, Benedetti A, Marchionni M, Mocali S, Fabiani A, Landi S, Santomassimo F, Pietrangeli B, Nuti MP, Miclaus N, Giovannetti M (2005) Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on Beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6719–6729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrad R (2007) Microbial ecology of methanogens and methanotrophs. Advan Agron 96:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conrad R, Rothfuss F (1991) Methane oxidation in the soil surface layer of a flooded ride field and the effect of ammonium. Biol Fert Soils 12:28–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conrad R, Erkel C, Liesack W (2006) Rice Cluster I methanogens, an important group of Archaea producting greenhouse gas in soil. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:262–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costello AM, Lidstrom ME (1999) Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5066–5074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Crecchio C, Stotzky G (2001) Biodegradation and insecticidal activity of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki bound on complexes of montmorillonite-humic acids-AI hudroxypolymers. Soil Biol Biochem 33:573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtis IS, Nam HG, Yun JY, Seo KH (2002) Expression of an antisense GIGANTEA (GI) gene fragment in transgenic radish causes delayed bolting and flowering. Transgenic Res 11:249–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das S, Adhya TK (2012) Dynamics of methanogenesis and methanotrophy in tropical paddy soils as influenced by elevated CO2 and temperature interaction. Soil Biol Biochem 47:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devare MH, Jones CM, Thies JE (2004) Effect of Cry3Bb transgenic corn and tefluthrin on the soil microbial community. J Environ Qual 33:837–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devare M, Londoňo-R LM, Thies JE (2007) Neither transgenic Bt maize (MON863) nor tefluthrin insecticide adversely affect soil microbial activity or biomass: a 3-year field analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2038–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ding WX, Cai ZC, Tsurata H, Li XP (2003) Key factors affecting spatial variation of methane emissions from freshwater marshes. Chemosphere 51:167–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang H, Dong B, Yan H, Tang FF, Wang BC, Yu YL (2012) Effect of vegetation of transgenic Bt rice lines and their straw amendment on soil enzymes, respiration, functional diversity and community structure of soil microorganisms under field conditions. J Environ Sci 24:1259–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAOSTAT (2006) FAOSTAT Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
  20. Freitag TE, Toet S, Ineson P, Prosser JI (2010) Links between methane flux and transcriptional activities of methanogens and methane oxidizers in a blanket peat bog. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:157–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert B, Frenzel P (1998) Rice roots and CH4 oxidation: the activity of bacteria, their distribution and the microenvironment. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1903–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffiths BS, Caul S, Thompson J, Birch ANE, Scrimgeour C, Cortet J, Foggo A, Hackett CA, Krogh PH (2005) A comparison of soil microbial community structure, protozoa and nematodes in field plots of conventional and genetically modified maize expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. Plant Soil 275:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffiths BS, Caul S, Thompson J, Birch ANE, Scrimgeour C, Andersen MN, Cortet J, Messean A, Sausse C, Lacroix B, Krogh PH (2006) Soil microbial and faunal community responses to Bt maize and insecticide in two soils. J Environ Qual 35:734–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo YQ, Liu JX, Lu Y, Zhu WY, Denman SE, McSweeney CS (2008) Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen micro-organisms. Lett Appl Microbiol 47:421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirota M, Tang Y, Hu Q, Hirata S, Kato T, Mo W, Cao G, Mariko S (2004) Methane emissions from different vegetation zones in a Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau wetland. Soil Biol Biochem 36:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmes AJ, Costello AM, Lidstrom ME, Murrell JC (1995) Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase ammonia monooxygebase may be evolutionarily related. FEMS Microbiol Lett 132:203–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu HY, Liu XX, Zhao ZW, Sun JG, Zhang QW, Liu XZ, Yu Y (2009) Effects of repeated cultivation of transgenic Bt cotton on functional bacterial populations in rhizosphere soil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hussain Q, Liu YZ, Zhang AF, Pan GX, Li LQ, Zhang XH, Song XY, Cui LQ, Jin ZJ (2011) Variation of bacterial and fungal community structures in the rhizosphere of hybrid and standard rice cultivars and linkage to CO2 flux. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:116–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Icoz I, Stotzky G (2008) Cry3Bb1 protein from Bacillus thuringiensis in root exudates and biomass of transgenic corn does not persist in soil. Transgenic Res 17:609–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Icoz I, Saxena D, Andow D, Zwahlen C, Stotzky G (2008) Microbial populations and enzyme activities in soil in situ under transgenic corn expressing cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. J Environ Qual 37:647–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I. II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. Korch C, Drabkin H (1999) Improved DNA Sequencing Accuracy and Detection of Heterozygous Alleles Using Manganese Citrate and Different Fluorescent Dye Terminators. Genome Res 9:588–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Krause S, Lüke C, Frenzel P (2009) Spatial heterogeneity of methanotrophs: a geostatistical analysis of pmoA -based T-RFLP patterns in a paddy soil. Environ Microbiol Reports 1:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li CL, Zhang JD, Hou ZQ (1993) Techniques for high yield cultivations of several main crops. China Scientific and Technological Publishing House, Beijing (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Li XG, Liu B, Heia S, Liu DD, Han ZM, Zhou KX, Cui JJ, Luo JY, Zheng YP (2009) The effect of root exudates from two transgenic insect-resistant cotton lines on the growth of Fusarium oxysporum. Transgenic Res 18:757–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li XG, Liu B, Cui JJ, Liu DD, Ding S, Gilna B, Luo JY, Fang ZX, Cao W, Han ZM (2011) NO evidence of persistent effects of continuously planted transgenic insect-resistant cotton on soil microorganisms. Plant Soil 339:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu W, Lu HH, Wu WX, Wei QK, Chen YX, Thies JE (2008) Transgenic Bt rice does not affect enzyme activities and microbial composition in the rhizosphere during crop development. Soil Biol Biochem 40:475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lu RK (1999) Soil Agro-Chemical Analyses. Agricultural Technical Press of China, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Lu YH, Conrad R (2005) In situ stable isotope probing of methanogenic archaea in the rice rhizosphere. Science 309:1088–1089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lu YH, Lueders T, Friedrich MW, Conrad R (2005) Detecting active methanogenic populations on rice roots using stable isotope probing. Environ Microbiol 7:326–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu HH, Wu WX, Chen YX, Zhang XJ, Devare M, Thies JE (2010) Decomposition of Bt transgenic rice residues and response of soil microbial community in rapeseed-rice cropping system. Plant Soil 336:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lüke C, Bodrossy L, Lupotto E, Frenzel P (2011) Methanotrophic bacteria associated to rice roots: the cultivar effect assessed by T-RFLP and microarray analysis. Environ Microbiol Reports 3:518–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luton PE, Wayne JM, Sharp RJ, Riley PW (2002) The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiol 148:3521–3530Google Scholar
  44. McDonald IR, Murrell JC (1997) The particulate methane monooxygenase gene pmoA and its use as a functional gene probe for methanotrophs. FEMS Microbiol Lett 156:205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDonald IR, Bodrossy L, Chen Y, Murrell JC (2008) Molecular ecology techniques for the study of aerobic methanotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1305–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Minoda T, Kimura M, Wada E (1996) Photosynthates as dominant source of CH4 and CO2 in soil water and CH4 emitted to the atmosphere from paddy fields. J Geophys Res 101:21091–21097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muyzer G, De Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nunoura T, Oida H, Miyazaki J, Miyashita A, Imachi H, Takai K (2008) Quantification of mcrA by fluorescent PCR in methanogenic and methanotrophic microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:240–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ritchie DA, Edwards C, McDonald IR, Murrell JC (1997) Detection of methanogens and methanotrophs in natural environments. Glob Change Biol 3:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shen RF, Cai H, Gong WH (2006) Transgenic Bt cotton has no apparent effect on enzymatic activities or functional diversity of microbial communities in rhizosphere soil. Plant Soil 285:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. State Statistical Bureau (2009) China Statistical yearbook 2009.
  52. Stelly DM, Altman DW, Kohel R, Rangan TS, Commiskey E (1989) Cytogenetic abnormalities of cotton somaclones from callus cultures. Genome 32:762–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stotzky G (2000) Persistent and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and of bacterial DNA bound on clays and humic acids. J Environ Qual 29:691–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tesfaye M, Temple SJ, Allan DL, Vance CP, Samac DA (2001) Over-expression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhance organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiol 127:1836–1844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tesfaye M, Dufault NS, Dornbusch MR, Allan DL, Vance CP, Samac DA (2003) Influence of enhanced malate dehydrogenase expression by safalfa on diversity of rhizobacteria and soil nutrient availability. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1103–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tu J, Datta K, Oliva N, Zhang GA, Xu CG, Khush GS, Zhang QF, Datta SK (2003) Site-independent integrated transgenes in the elite restorer rice line Minghui 63 allow removal of a selectable marker from the gene of interest by self-segregation. Plant Biotechnol J 1:155–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vineela C, Wani SP, Srinivasarao C, Padmaja B, Vittal KPR (2008) Microbial properties of soils as affected by cropping and nutrient management practices in several long-term manorial experiments in the semi-arid tropics of India. Appl Soil Ecol 40:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang ZP, Delaune RD, Patrick WH, Masscheleyn PH (1993) Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 57:382–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang H, Ye Q, Wang W, Wu L, Wu W (2006) Cry1Ab protein from Bt transgenic rice does not residue in rhizosphere soil. Environ Pollut 143:449–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wassmann R, Aulakh MS (2000) The role of rice plants in regulating mechanisms of methane emission. Biol Fert Soils 31:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watanabe A, Takeda T, Kimura M (1999) Evaluation of origins of CH4 carbon emitted from rice paddies. J Geophys Res 104:23623–23629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Watanabe T, Kimura M, Asakawa S (2006) Community structure of methanogenic archaea in paddy field soil under double cropping (rice-wheat). Soil Biol Biochem 38:1264–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weisskopf L, Le Baton RC, Kohler F, Page V, Jossi M, Gobat JM, Martinoia E, Aragno M (2008) Spatio-temporal dynamics of bacterial communities associated with two plant species differing in organic acid serection: A one-year microcosm study on lupin and wheat. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1772–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu WX, Ye QF, Min H, Duan XJ, Jin WM (2004) Bt-transgenic rice straw affects the culturable microbiota and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in a flooded paddy soil. Soil Biol Biochem 36:289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yan X, Akiyama H, Yagi K, Akimoto H (2009) Global estimations of the inventory and mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change guidelines. Global Biogeochem Cycle 23. doi:10.1029/2008GB003299
  66. Yue J, Shi Y, Liang W, Wu J, Wang CR, Huang GH (2005) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice field and related microorganism in black soil, northeastern China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 73:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang Y, Shewry PR, Jones H, Barcelo P, Lazzeri PA, Halford NG (2001) Expression of antisense SnRK1 protein kinase sequence causes abnormal pollen development and male sterility in transgenic barley. Plant J 28:431–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang YH, Ding WX, Cai ZC, Valerie P, Han FX (2010) Response of methane emission to invasion of Spartina alterniflora and exogenous N deposition in the coastal salt marsh. Atmos Environ 44:4588–4594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zheng SJ, Yang JL, He YF, Yu XH, Zhang L, You JF, Shen RF, Matsumoto H (2005) Immobilization of aluminum with phosphorus in roots is associated with high aluminum resistance in buckwheat. Plant Physiol 138:297–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life ScienceNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Geography ScienceNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Biosafety, Ministry of Environmental Protection of ChinaNanjing Institute of Environmental SciencesNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations