Plant and Soil

, Volume 367, Issue 1–2, pp 419–436 | Cite as

Addition of a volcanic rockdust to soils has no observable effects on plant yield and nutrient status or on soil microbial activity

  • Atefeh RamezanianEmail author
  • A. Sigrun Dahlin
  • Colin D. Campbell
  • Stephen Hillier
  • Birgitta Mannerstedt-Fogelfors
  • Ingrid Öborn
Regular Article


Background and Aims

Rising costs and pressure on supplies of commercial mineral fertilizers and increasing markets for organically produced foods and feeds have led to a growing interest in soil amendments to supply plant nutrients. Rockdust is a by-product of quarrying and its effectiveness to supply plants with nutrients has been a contested issue and there have been no assessments of its effect on soil biota other than plants. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a commercially-available volcanic rockdust application on crop growth and element concentrations for a wide range of macro and microelements and the response of soil microbial communities to rockdust due to the potential alteration in soil mineralogy.


A three-year controlled outdoor-growing experiment was conducted on three different soil types with two wheat cultivars in the first year following rockdust application and with forage species in the third year.


Our results show that the tested rockdust had no positive or negative effect on plant growth or nutrient composition. In addition, the microbial response to added substrates, a sensitive measure of changes in soil environment, were unaltered by the rockdust.


As the rockdust had no nutrient or toxic effect it can probably be considered as an inert material which at least causes no harm but equally has no demonstrable ecological or agricultural benefit.


Microbial communities Perennial ryegrass Red clover Soil amendment Substrate induced respiration Trace elements 



We thank Prof. Håkan Fogelfors and his research team for setting up this experiment from the beginning and let us continue with it. The laboratory staff in the department of soil and environment at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) and The James Hutton Institute is acknowledged. This research was funded by the Swedish Research Council for the Environment (Formas), with support from the SLU.


  1. Aarnio T, Raty M, Martikainen PJ (2003) Long-term availability of nutients in forest soil derived from fast- and slow-release fertilizers. Plant Soil 252:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baerug R (1991a) Rock powder as a source of nutrients to different crops the effect of potassium in rock powder. Norsk Landbruksforsking 5:175–182Google Scholar
  4. Baerug R (1991b) Rock powder as a source of nutrients to different crops the magnesium effect of rock powder. Norsk Landbruksforsking 5:183–188Google Scholar
  5. Bakken AK, Gautneb H, Sveistrup T, Myhr K (2000) Crushed rocks and mine tailings applied as K fertilizers on grassland. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 56:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barak P, Chen Y, Singer A (1983) Ground basalt and tuff as iron fertilizers for calcareous soils. Plant Soil 73:155–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barral Silva MT, Hermo BS, Garcia-Rodeja E, Freire NV (2005) Reutilization of granite powder as an amendment and fertilizer for acid soils. Chemosphere 61:993–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolland MDA, Baker MJ (2000) Powdered granite is not an effective fertilizer for clover and wheat in sandy soils from Western Australia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 56:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J Roy Stat Soc B 26:211–243Google Scholar
  10. Cale P, Hobbs R (1991) Condition of roadside vegetation in relation to nutrient status. Saunders, D. A. And R. J. HobbsGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron DG, Idoine NE, Brown TJ, Patton MAG, McGinn C, Mankelow JM (2010) Directory of mines and quarries 2010, 9th Edn, British geological surveyGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell NS (2009) The use of rockdust and composted materials as soil fertility amendments. Dissertation, University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM, Davidson MS, Potts JM (2003) A rapid microtiter plate method to measure carbon dioxide evolved from carbon substrate amendments so as to determine the physiological profiles of soil microbial communities by using whole soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3593–3599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carson JK, Rooney D, Gleeson DB, Clipson N (2007) Altering the mineral composition of soil causes a shift in microbial community structure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:414–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carson JK, Campbell L, Rooney D, Clipson N, Gleeson DB (2009) Minerals in soil select distinct bacterial communities in their microhabitats. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67:381–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Certini G, Campbell CD, Edwards AC (2004) Rock fragments in soil support a different microbial community from the fine earth. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1119–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapman SJ, Campbell CD, Artz RRE (2007) Assessing CLPPs using MicroReSp (TM) - A comparison with biolog and multi-SIR. J Soils Sediments 7:406–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chaudhary M, Singh BR, Krogstad T, Heim M (2011) Release of copper, zinc, and manganese from rock powder with organic materials applied to soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:2682–2697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coroneos C, Hinsinger P, Gilkes RJ (1996) Granite powder as a source of potassium for plants: a glasshouse bioassay comparing two pasture species. Fertil Res 45:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlin AS, Edwards AC, Lindström BEM, Ramezanian A, Shand CA, Walker RL, Watson CA, Öborn I (2012) Revisiting herbage sample collection and preparation procedures to minimise risks of trace element contamination. Europ J Agronomy 43:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Degens BP, Schipper LA, Sparling GP, Duncan LC (2001) Is the microbial community in a soil with reduced catabolic diversity less resistant to stress or disturbance? Soil Biol Biochem 33:1143–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleeson DB, Kennedy NM, Clipson N, Melville K, Gadd GM, McDermott FP (2006) Characterization of bacterial community structure on a weathered pegmatitic granite. Microb Ecol 51:526–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. He ZL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ (2005) Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J Trace Elem Med Biol 19:125–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hillier S (1999) Use of an air brush to spray dry samples for X-ray powder diffraction. Clay Minerals 34:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinsinger P, Bolland MDA, Gilkes RJ (1996) Silicate rock powder: effect on selected chemical properties of a range of soils from Western Australia and on plant growth as assessed in a glasshouse experiment. Fertil Res 45:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones DL, Chesworth S, Khalid M, Iqbal Z (2009) Assessing the addition of mineral processing waste to green waste-derived compost: an agronomic, environmental and economic appraisal. Bioresour Technol 100:770–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kabata-Pendias A (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants. 3rd. ed: CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  28. Kungl. Lantbruksstyrelsen (1950). Kungl. Lantbruksstyrelsens kungörelse Nr 7, med (4) bestämmelser för undersökning av gödsel- och jordförbättringsmedel vid statens lantbrukskemiska kontrollanstalt och med statsmedel understödda lokala lantbrukskemiska kontrollstationer, 4:59–60, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  29. Ljung G (1987) Mekanisk analys - beskrivning av en rationell metod för jordartsbestämning. (Mechanical analysis - a description of a rational method for determination of soil type). Report 87:2 (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  30. Manning DAC (2010) Mineral sources of potassium for plant nutrition. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mullerova J, Vitkova M, Vitek O (2011) The impacts of road and walking trails upon adjacent vegetation: effects of road building materials on species composition in a nutrient poor environment. Sci Total Environ 409:3839–3849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Hara GW (2001) Nutritional constraints on root nodule bacteria affecting symbiotic nitrogen fixation: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 41:417–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Hara GW, Boonkerd N, Dilworth MJ (1988) Mineral constraints to nitrogen-fixation. Plant Soil 108:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Omotoso O, McCarty DK, Hillier S, Kleeberg R (2006) Some successful approaches to quantitative mineral analysis as revealed by the 3rd Reynolds Cup contest. Clays Clay Miner 54:748–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ritz K, Black HIJ, Campbell CD, Harris JA, Wood C (2009) Selecting biological indicators for monitoring soils: a framework for balancing scientific and technical opinion to assist policy development. Ecol Indic 9:1212–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogers JR, Bennett PC (2004) Mineral stimulation of subsurface microorganisms: release of limiting nutrients from silicates. Chem Geol 203:91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanz Scovino JI, Rowell DL (1988) The use of feldspars as potassium fertilizers in the savannah of Colombia. Fertil Res 17:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stamford NP, Santos CER, Santos PR, Santos KS, Montenegro A (2005) Effects of rock phosphate, sulphur with and without Acidithiobacillus and organic by-products on mimosa (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia) grown in a Brazilian tableland soil. Tropical Grasslands 39:54–61Google Scholar
  39. Stevens RE, Carron MK (1948) Simple field test for distinguishing minerals by abrasion pH. Am Miner 33:31–49Google Scholar
  40. Streck T, Richter J (1997) Heavy metal displacement in a sandy soil at the field scale.1. Measurements and parameterization of sorption. J Environ Qual 26:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swedish Standards Institute (1997) Soil analysis. Determination of trace elements in soil. Extraction with nitric acid. SS 028311, Swedish Standards Institute, Stockholm (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  42. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uroz S, Calvaruso C, Turpault MP, Frey-Klett P (2009) Mineral weathering by bacteria: ecology, actors and mechanisms. Trends Microbiol 17:378–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Straaten P (2006) Farming with rocks and minerals: challenges and opportunities. An Acad Bras Cienc 78:731–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wångstrand H, Eriksson J, Öborn I (2007) Cadmium concentration in winter wheat as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Eur J Agron 26:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weerasuriya TJ, Pushpakumara S, Cooray PI (1993) Acidulated pegmatitic mica - A promising new multi-nutrient mineral fertilizer. Fertil Res 34:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitehead DC (2000) Nutrient elements in grassland, soil-plant-animal relationships. CABI PublishingGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson MJ (2004) Weathering of the primary rock-forming minerals: processes, products and rates. Clay Minerals 39:233–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zak JC, Willig MR, Moorhead DL, Wildman HG (1994) Functional diversity of microbial communities - A quantitative approach. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1101–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atefeh Ramezanian
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • A. Sigrun Dahlin
    • 2
  • Colin D. Campbell
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stephen Hillier
    • 3
  • Birgitta Mannerstedt-Fogelfors
    • 1
    • 4
  • Ingrid Öborn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop Production EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Soil and EnvironmentSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.The James Hutton InstituteAberdeenUK
  4. 4.KnivstaSweden

Personalised recommendations