Plant and Soil

, Volume 361, Issue 1–2, pp 43–55 | Cite as

Value of soil zinc balances in predicting fertilizer zinc requirement for cotton-wheat cropping system in irrigated Aridisols

Regular Article



The cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system practised in >3 million ha of irrigated Aridisols in Pakistan is pivotal to its national economy and food security. Thus, the prevalent stagnation in its productivity is a matter of serious concern. Widespread deficiency of zinc (Zn) in these low organic matter alluvial calcareous soils is amongst the suspected constraints. Therefore, studying the impact of improved nutrient management strategies and crop residue recycling on crop productivity and soil Zn balances was thought imperative.


A 5-year permanent layout field experiment was conducted on two predominant soil series of the cotton-wheat belt [i.e., Awagat (coarse loamy mixed, hyperthermic Fluventic Camborthid) and Shahpur (fine silty mixed, hyperthermic Fluventic Camborthid)] to compare the impact of (1) Farmers’ fertilizer use (FFU); (2) Recommended fertilizer use (RFU); and (3) Integrated nutrient management (INM) on crop productivity and apparent soil Zn balances. The nutrient management strategies were compared with and without cotton-wheat residue recycling, in flat-bed sown and raised-bed sown cotton systems.


Under the FFU treatment, Zn deficiency occurred both in wheat and cotton. Overall lowest mean yields (Mg ha-1), obtained with FFU, were: seed cotton—Awagat, 2.19; Shahpur, 2.45; wheat grain—Awagat, 3.03; Shahpur, 3.94. Yield increases with RFU were: cotton, 24 % in Awagat and 18 % in Shahpur soil; wheat, 37 % in Awagat and 24 % in Shahpur soil (P ≤ 0.05). With INM, crop yields were slightly higher than with RFU. Also, cotton yields were ~10 % greater on raised beds than on flat beds. Crop residue also increased yield of both crops, up to 10 %. Zinc uptake patterns of both crops were closely related to their yields. Fertilizer Zn use efficiency by the cotton-wheat system, in both soils, was quite low, i.e., 1.78–2.36 % of the annually applied 5 kg Zn ha-1. Thus, ~98 % of the applied Zn was retained (fixed) in the soils. Though Zn input from organic sources (i.e., crop residue and farm yard manure) was inadequate to meet crop requirements, Zn use efficiency from organic sources was much greater, i.e., 13–24 %. As Zn uptakes by the cropping system were quite low (i.e., 62–123 g Zn ha-1 by cotton; 74–170 g Zn ha-1 by wheat) compared with Zn inputs (i.e., 1.12–1.79 kg Zn ha-1 year-1), all nutrient management treatments, including FFU, resulted in positive apparent Zn balances in both soils.


Thus, unlike nutrient balances for macronutrients, apparent Zn balances have little significance in predicting fertilizer Zn need of the cropping system. Despite positive soil Zn balances, even without using fertilizer Zn, prevalence of Zn deficiency in cotton and wheat crops may be attributed to high Zn fixation in calcareous soils rather than low total Zn content in the soils. In this scenario, soil testing and plant analysis remain the reliable approaches for diagnosing Zn deficiency problem.


Apparent soil Zn balances Cotton-wheat cropping system Crop residue Fertilizer Zn use efficiency Irrigated Aridisols Nutrient management Zinc deficiency Zinc uptake 


  1. Ahmed N, Abid M, Rashid A (2010) Zinc fertilization impact on irrigated cotton grown in an Aridisol: growth, productivity, fiber quality and oil quality. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1647–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed N, Abid M, Rashid A, Ahmad F, Ali MA (2011) Impact of residual and cumulative zinc on cotton-wheat productivity in an irrigated Aridisol. Abstract In: 3rd International Zinc Symposium "Improving Crop Production and Human Health", 10–14 October 2011, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Alloway BJ (2008) Zinc in soils and crop production. International Zinc Association, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell RW, Dell B (2008) Micronutrients for sustainable food, feed, fibre and bioenergy production. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, p 175Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya R, Prakash V, Kundu S, Srivastva AK, Gupta HS (2004) Effect of long-term manuring on soil organic carbon, bulk density and water retention characteristics under soybean-wheat cropping sequence in north-western Himalayas. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 52:238–242Google Scholar
  6. Bielders CL, Michels K, Bationo A (2002) On-farm evaluation of ridging and residue managements options in Sahelian millet-cowpea intercrop. 1. Soil quality changes. Soil Use Manag 18:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan RF (2005) Zinc application and its availability to plants. PhD dissertation, Murdoch University, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  8. Government of Pakistan (2010) Agricultural statistics of Pakistan 2009–10. Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham RD, Welch RM (1996) Breeding for staple food crops with high micronutrient density. Working papers on agricultural strategies for micronutrient, No. 3. International Food Policy Research Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hotz C, Brown KH (2004) Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control. Food Nutr Bull 25:91–204Google Scholar
  11. Hussain F, Rashid A (1979) The fate of soil-applied zinc and the effect of selected soil properties on zinc availability in alkaline calcareous soils. Pakistan J Sci Indus Res 23:64–69Google Scholar
  12. Jones JB Jr, Wolf B, Mills HA (1991) Plant analysis handbook. Macro–Micro Publishing, Inc, Athens, p 213Google Scholar
  13. Kabeerathumma S, Mohankumar CR, Nair GM, Nair PG (1993) Effect of continuous cropping of cassava with organics and inorganics on the secondary and micronutrient elements status of an Ultisol. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 41:710–713Google Scholar
  14. Kurual A, Tripathi RP (1990) Effect of continuous use of anuresand fertilizers on physical properties of soil under paddy-wheat-cowpea cropping system. Crop Res 3:7–12Google Scholar
  15. Mahmood-ul-Hassan M, Akhtar MS, Nabi G (2008) Boron and zinc transport through intact columns of calcareous soils. Pedosphere 18:524–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahmood-ul-Hassan M, Rafique E, Rashid A (2012) Physical and hydraulic properties of Aridisols as affected by nutrient and crop-residue management in a cotton-wheat system. Acta Scientiarum-Agronomy (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Plank CO (1979) Plant analysis handbook for Georgia. Univ. of Georgia Coop. Ext. Bull. 739Google Scholar
  18. Prasad B, Sinha SK (2000) Long-term effects of fertilizer and organic manures on crop yields, nutrient balance, and soil properties in rice-wheat cropping system in Bihar. In: Abrol IP (ed) Rice-Wheat Consortium Paper Series 6, New Delhi, India, pp 105–119Google Scholar
  19. Rafique E, Rashid A, Bhatti AU, Rasool G, Bughio N (2002) Boron deficiency in cotton grown in calcareous soils of Pakistan. I. Distribution of boron availability and comparison of soil testing methods. In: Goldbach HE, Rerkasem B, Wimmer MA et al (eds) Boron in plant and animal nutrition. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rafique E, Rashid A, Ryan J, Bhatti AU (2006) Zinc deficiency in rainfed wheat in Pakistan: magnitude, spatial variability, management, and plant analysis diagnostic norms. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis 37:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rafique E, Mahmood-ul-Hassan M, Rashid A, Chaudhary MF (2012) Nutrient balances as affected by integrated nutrient and crop residue management in cotton-wheat system in Aridisols. I. Nitrogen. J Plant Nutr 35:591–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rashid A (2005) Establishment and management of micronutrient deficiencies in Pakistan: a review. Soil Environ 24:1–22Google Scholar
  23. Rashid A, Ahmed N (1994) Soil testing in Pakistan: country report. In: Proc FADINAP Regional Workshop on Cooperation in Soil Testing for Asia and the Pacific, 16–18 Aug 1993, Bangkok, Thailand. United Nations, New York, p 39–53Google Scholar
  24. Rashid A, Ryan J (2008) Micronutrient constraints to crop production in the Near East: potential significance and management strategies. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Micronutrient deficiencies in global crop production. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 149–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reuter DJ, Edwards DG, Wilhelm NS (1997) Temperate and sub-tropical crops. In: Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (eds) Plant analysis - an interpretation manual, 2nd edn. CSIRO, Collingwood, pp 81–284Google Scholar
  26. Saleem TM (1994) Efficient use of plant nutrients. In: Proceedings national congress of soil science on “Efficient use of plant nutrients”. Soil Science Society of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp 2–21Google Scholar
  27. Soltanpour PN (1985) Use of ammonium bicarbonate-DTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16:323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tiwari VN, Lehri LK, Tiwari KN, Singh H (1998) Effect of the incorporation of groundnut plant residue on wheat-yield, nutrient uptake and soil productivity. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 46:43–47Google Scholar
  29. Wright RJ, Stuczynski TI (1996) Atomic absorption and flame emission spectrometry. In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 3: chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 65–90Google Scholar
  30. Xie R, MacKenzie AF (1986) Urea and manure effects on soil nitrogen and corn dry matter yield. Soil Sci Soc of Am J 50:1504–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yadvinder-Singh, Bijay-Singh, Timsina J (2005) Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Adv Agron 85:269–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ejaz Rafique
    • 1
  • Abdul Rashid
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Mahmood-ul-Hassan
    • 1
  1. 1.Land Resources Research InstituteNational Agricultural Research CenterIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Pakistan Academy of SciencesIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations